Onwuegbuzie, Leech, and Collins outlined the role that 5 qualitative data analysis techniques can play in the literature review process. Thus, the purpose of this article is to provide a framework for counselor researchers and practitioners for using another qualitative data analysis technique to analyze and interpret literature review sources—a process that we call a Discourse Analysis-Based Research Synthesis (DARS). Using a real review of the literature and with the use of visual aids, we illustrate how to conduct a DARS using a qualitative data analysis software program to address ethical standards when investigating evidence-based practices in counseling research.
BakerS. B. (2012). A new view of evidence-based practice. CounselingToday, 55, 42–43.
7.
BooteD. N.BeileP. (2005). Scholars before researchers: On the centrality of the dissertation literature review in research preparation. Educational Researcher, 34, 3–15. doi:10.3102/0013189X034006003
8.
CombsJ. P.BustamanteR. M.OnwuegbuzieA. J. (2010). A mixed methods approach to conducting literature reviews for stress and coping researchers: An interactive literature review process framework. In GatesG. S.GmelchW. H.WolvertonM. (Series Eds.) CollinsK. M. T.OnwuegbuzieA. J.JiaoQ. G. (Eds.), Toward a broader understanding of stress and coping: Mixed methods approaches (pp. 213–241). The Research on Stress and Coping in Education Series (Vol. 5). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
9.
CooperH. M. (1985, March). The literature review: Knowledge synthesis activities in education and psychology. Invited address at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
10.
ElmoreP. (2010). Reporting standards for research publication. Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation, 1, 19–28. doi:10.1177/2150137810386108
11.
FinkA. (2009). Conducting research literature reviews: From the Internet to paper. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12.
FrelsR. K. (2010). The experiences and perceptions of selected mentors: An exploratory study of the dyadic relationship in school-based mentoring(Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Sam Houston State University, Huntsville, TX.
13.
FrelsR. K.OnwuegbuzieA. J. (2010). The use of an interactive literature review process as a guide for conducting and writing literature reviews. Graduate Research Journal, 3, 1–25. Retrieved fromhttp://www.grjsite.com/
14.
GarrardJ. (2009). Health sciences literature review made easy: The matrix method. Sudbury, MA: Jones & Bartlett.
15.
GeeJ. P. (2005). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method. New York, NY: Routledge.
16.
GeeJ. P. (2010). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
17.
HartC. (2005). Doing a literature review: Releasing the socialscience research imagination. London, England: Sage.
18.
KaplanD. M.GladdingS. T. (2011). A vision for the future of counseling: The 20/20 principles for unifying and strengthening the profession. Journal of Counseling & Development, 89, 367–372. doi:10.1002/j.1556-6678.2011.tb00101.x
19.
KingK. A.VidourekR.DavisB.McClellanW. (2002). Increasing self-esteem and school connectedness through a multidimensional mentoring program. Journal of School Health, 72, 294–299. doi:10.1111/j.1746-1561.2002.tb01336.x
20.
MachiL. A.McEvoyB. T. (2009). The literature review: Six steps to success. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
21.
MilesM.HubermanA. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
OnwuegbuzieA. J.CollinsK. M. T.LeechN. L.DellingerA. B.JiaoQ. G. (2010). A meta-framework for conducting mixed research syntheses for stress and coping researchers and beyond. In GatesG. S.GmelchW. H.WolvertonM. (Series Eds.) & CollinsK. M. T.OnwuegbuzieA. J.JiaoQ. G. (Eds.), Toward a broader understanding of stress and coping: Mixed methods approaches (pp. 169–211). The research on stress and coping in education series (Vol. 5). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
25.
OnwuegbuzieA. J.FrelsR. K. (2012). The review of literature evaluative steps: A step-by-step guide for conducting rigourous literature reviews for undergraduates and beyond. In C. Wagner, B. Kawulich, & M. Garner (Eds.). Practical Social Research. Maidenhead, England: McGraw- Hill.
26.
OnwuegbuzieA. J.DanielL. G. (2005). Editorial: Evidence-based guidelines for publishing articles in research in the schools and beyond. Research in the Schools, 12, 1–11.
27.
OnwuegbuzieA. J.FrelsR. K. (in press). Seven steps to a comprehensive literature review: A multimodal and cultural approach. London, England: Sage.
28.
OnwuegbuzieA. J.LeechN. L. (2005). A typology of errors and myths perpetuated in educational research textbooks. Current Issues in Education, 8. Retrieved fromhttp://cie.ed.asu/volume8/number7
29.
OnwuegbuzieA. J.LeechN. L.CollinsK. M. T. (2011). Innovative qualitative data collection techniques for conducting literature reviews. In WilliamsM.VogtW. P. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of innovation in social research methods (pp. 182–204). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
30.
OnwuegbuzieA. J.LeechN. L.CollinsK. M. T. (2012). Qualitative analysis techniques for the review of the literature. The Qualitative Report, 17, 1–28. Retrieved fromhttp://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR17/onwuegbuzie.pdf
31.
PhillipsN.HardyC. (2002). Discourse analysis: Investigating processes of social construction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
