Addiction researchers have unique ethical and legal considerations in designing studies that protect participants who use substances. Ethical principles (including autonomy, nonmaleficence, beneficence, veracity, fidelity, and justice) along with federal and state regulations provide guidance to researchers conducting addictions outcome research. When designing substance use research, particular attention needs to be given to informed consent, compensation, confidentiality, and collection and protection of data. Furthermore, researchers must avoid coercion, provide alternative treatment options, protect vulnerable clients, and select representative participants for addictions research. The ultimate goal of addictions outcome research is to benefit the research participants and society as a whole.
American Counseling Association. (2005). ACA Code of Ethics. Alexandria, VA: Author.
2.
AndersonE.DuBoisJ. (2007). The need for evidence-based research ethics: A review of the substance abuse literature. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 86, 95–105. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2006.06.011.
3.
BarnettJ. E.JohnsonW. B. (2010). Ethics desk reference for counselors. Alexandria, VA: American Counseling Association.
4.
BerghmansR.de JongJ.TibbenA.de WertG. (2009). On the biomedicalization of alcoholism. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 30, 311–321. doi: 10.1007/s11017-009-9103-7.
5.
BriggsC. A. (2008). Gender and addictions. In CappuzziD.StaufferM. D. (Eds.), Foundation of addiction counseling (pp. 331–347). Boston, MA: Pearson.
6.
BrodyJ.WaldronH. (2000). Ethical issues in research on the treatment of adolescent substance abuse disorders. Addictive Behaviors, 25, 217–228. doi: 10.1016/S0306-4603(99)00041-6.
7.
CampbellT. C.DaoodC.CatlinL.AbelsonA. (2005). Integration of research and practice in substance use disorder treatment: Findings from focus groups of clinicians, researchers, educators, administrators, and policy makers. Journal of Addictions & Offender Counseling, 26, 4–14.
8.
Code of Federal Regulations, Title 42. (1995). Confidentiality of alcohol and drug abuse patient records. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
9.
Code of Federal Regulations, Title 45, Part 46. (1994). Protection of human subjects. (OPRR Reports). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
10.
CurranG.SteckerT.HanX.BoothB. (2009). Individual and program predictors of attrition from VA substance use treatment. The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research, 36, 25–34. doi: 10.1007/s11414-007-9093-z.
11.
DuValG.SalmonC. (2004). Ethics of drug treatment research with court-supervised subjects. Journal of Drug Issues, 34, 991–1006. Retrieved from PsycINFO database.
12.
FisherC. B. (2003). Adolescent and parent perspectives on ethical issues in youth drug use and suicide survey research. Ethics & Behavior, 13, 303–332.
13.
GarcíaV. (2009). Binational substance abuse research and internal review boards: Human subject risks and suggestions for protections. Human Organization, 68, 350–357. Retrieved from PsycINFO database.
14.
GeppertC.BogenschutzM. (2009). Pharmacological research on addictions: A framework for ethical and policy considerations. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 41, 49–60. Retrieved from PsycINFO database.
15.
HallW.CarterL.MorleyK. (2004). Neuroscience research on the addictions: A prospectus for future ethical and policy analysis. Addictive Behaviors, 29, 1481–1495. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2004.06.001.
16.
JuhnkeG. A.BordeauW. C.EvanoffJ. C. (2005). Journal of Addictions and Offender Counseling submission patterns, topic areas, and authors: 1999-2004. Journal of Addictions and Offender Counseling, 26, 52–58.
17.
JuhnkeG. A.HagedornW. B. (2006). Counseling addicted families: An integrated assessment and treatment model. New York, NY: Routledge.
18.
KitchenerK. S. (2000). Foundations of ethical practice, research, and teaching psychology. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
19.
LafaveL.DesportesL.McBrideC. (2009). Treatment outcomes and perceived benefits: A qualitative and quantitative assessment of a women’s substance abuse treatment program. Women & Therapy, 32, 51–68. doi: 10.1080/02703140802384743.
20.
LaneJ.SchurC. (2010). Balancing access to health data and privacy: A review of the issues and approaches for the future. Health Services Research, 45, 1456–1467. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2010.01141.x.
21.
MannR. E.RootmanD. B.ShuggiR.AdlafE. (2006). Assessing consequences of alcohol and drug abuse in a drinking driving population. Drugs: Education, Prevention & Policy, 13, 313–326. doi: 10.1080/09687630600624634.
22.
MatthewsC. R.LorahP. (2005). An examination of addiction treatment completion by gender and ethnicity. Journal of Addictions & Offender Counseling, 25, 114–125.
23.
McCradyB.BuxD. (1999). Ethical issues in informed consent with substance abusers. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 186–193. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.67.2.186.
24.
MertensJ. R.LuY. W.ParthasarathyS.MooreC.WeisnerC. M. (2003). Medical and psychiatric conditions of alcohol and drug treatment patients in an HMO: Comparison with matched controls. Archives of Internal Medicine, 163, 2511–2517.
25.
RemleyT. P.Jr.HerlihyB. (2007). Ethical, legal, and professional issues in counseling (updated 2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
26.
RingoldS. (2006). Alcohol abuse and alcoholism. Journal of the American Medical Association, 295, 2100. Retrieved from EBSCOhost.
27.
SchwartzR. C.SmithS. D. (2003). Screening and assessing adolescent substance abuse: A primer for counselors. Journal of Addictions & Offender Counseling, 24, 23–34.
28.
SokolR. J.Delaney-BlackV.NordstromB. (2003). Fetal alcohol spectrum disorder. Journal of the American Medical Association, 290, 2996–2999. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.22.2996.
29.
TolanP.SzapocznikJ.SambranoS. (Eds.), (2007). Preventing youth substance abuse: Science-based programs for children and adolescents. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
