AlsoufiBBennettsJVermaSCaldaroneCA. New developments in the treatment of hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Pediatrics. 2007;119(1):109‐117. doi:10.1542/peds.2006-1592
2.
PohCLd'UdekemY. Life after surviving Fontan surgery: a meta-analysis of the incidence and predictors of late death. Heart Lung Circ. 2018;27(5):552‐559. doi:10.1016/j.hlc.2017.11.007
3.
PundiKNJohnsonJNDearaniJ, et al.40-year follow-up after the Fontan operation long-term outcomes of 1,052 patients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;66(15):1700‐1710.
4.
ZentnerDCelermajerDSGentlesT, et al.Management of people with a Fontan circulation: a cardiac society of Australia and New Zealand position statement. Heart Lung Circ. 2020;29(1):5‐39.
5.
KhairyPFernandesSMMayerJE, et al.Long-term survival, modes of death, and predictors of mortality in patients with Fontan surgery. Circulation. 2008;117(1):85‐92.
6.
D’UdekemYIyengarAJGalatiJC, et al.Redefining expectations of long-term survival after the Fontan procedure twenty-five years of follow-up from the entire population of Australia and New Zealand. Circulation. 2014;130(11):S32‐S38.
7.
RychikJ. The relentless effects of the Fontan paradox. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Pediatr Card Surg Annu. 2016;19(1):37‐43.
8.
KuttySJacobsMLThompsonWRDanfordDA. Fontan circulation of the next generation: why it's necessary, what it might look like. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020;9(1):e013691.
9.
TrustyPMSlesnickTCWeiZA, et al.Fontan surgical planning: previous accomplishments, current challenges, and future directions. J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2018;11(2):133‐144.
10.
RodefeldMDMarsdenAFigliolaRJonasTNearyMGiridharanGA. Cavopulmonary assist: long-term reversal of the Fontan paradox. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019;158(6):1627‐1636.
11.
SundareswaranKSde ZélicourtDSharmaS, et al.Correction of pulmonary arteriovenous malformation using image-based surgical planning. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009;2(8):1024‐1030.
12.
AlsoufiBRosenblumJTraversC, et al.Outcomes of single ventricle patients undergoing the Kawashima procedure: can we do better?World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg. 2019;10(1):20‐27.
13.
PekkanKWhitedBKanterK, et al.Patient-specific surgical planning and hemodynamic computational fluid dynamics optimization through free-form haptic anatomy editing tool (SURGEM). Med Biol Eng Comput. 2008;46(11):1139‐1152.
14.
de ZélicourtDAMarsdenAFogelMAYoganathanAP. Imaging and patient-specific simulations for the Fontan surgery: current methodologies and clinical applications. Prog Pediatr Cardiol. 2010;30(1-2):31‐44.
15.
DeGroffCBirnbaumBShandasROrlandoWHertzbergJ. Computational simulations of the total cavo-pulmonary connection: insights in optimizing numerical solutions. Med Eng Phys. 2005;27(2):135‐146.
16.
LiuXAslanSKimB, et al. Computational Fontan analysis: preserving accuracy while expediting workflow. World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg. 2022;13(3):293‐301.
17.
ShacharGBFuhrmanBPWangYLucasRVLockJE. Rest and exercise hemodynamics after the Fontan procedure. Circulation. 1982;65(6):1043‐1048.
18.
HjortdalVEEmmertsenKStenbøgE, et al.Effects of exercise and respiration on blood flow in total cavopulmonary connection: a real-time magnetic resonance flow study. Circulation. 2003;108(10):1227‐1231.
