BotmanK. J.PijlsN. H. J.BechJ. W.AarnoudseW.PeelsK.van StratenB.. . . KoolenJ. J. (2004). Percutaneous coronary intervention or bypass surgery in multivessel disease? A tailored approach based on coronary pressure measurement. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, 63, 184-191.
2.
BriguoriC.AnzuiniA.AiroldiF.GimelliG.NishidaT.AdamianM.. . . ColomboA. (2001). Intravascular ultrasound criteria for the assessment of the functional significance of intermediate coronary artery stenoses and comparison with fractional flow reserve. American Journal of Cardiology, 87, 136-141.
3.
ChristouM. A.SiontisG. C.KatritsisD. G.IoannidisP. (2007). Meta-analysis of fractional flow reserve versus quantitative coronary angiography and noninvasive imaging for evaluation of myocardial ischemia. American Journal of Cardiology, 99, 450-456.
4.
De BruyneB.PijlsN. H.BarbatoE.BartunekJ.BechJ. W.WijnsW.HeyndrickxG. R. (2003). Intracoronary and intravenous adenosine 50-triphosphate, adenosine, papaverine, and contrast medium to assess fractional flow reserve in humans. Circulation, 107, 1877-1883.
5.
HamilosM.MullerO.CuissetT.NtalianisA.ChlouverakisG.SarnoG.. . . De BruyneB. (2009). Long-term clinical outcome after fractional flow reserve-guided treatment in patients with angiographically equivocal left main coronary artery stenosis. Circulation, 120, 1505-1512.
6.
HirotaM.IwasakiK.YamamotoK.KusachiS.HinaK.HirohataS.. . .ShiratoriY. (2006). Coronary pressure measurement to identify the lesion requiring percutaneous coronary intervention in equivocal tandem lesions. Coronary Artery Disease, 17, 181-186.
7.
KernM. J.SamadyH. (2010). Current concepts of integrated coronary physiology in the catheterization laboratory. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 55, 173-185.
8.
KooB. K.ParkK. W.KangH. J.ChoY. S.ChungW. Y.YounT. J.. . . KimH. S. (2008). Physiological evaluation of the provisional side-branch intervention strategy for bifurcation lesions using fractional flow reserve. European Heart Journal, 29, 726-732.
9.
LeesarM. A.Abdul-BakiT.AkkusN. I.SharmaA.KannanT.BolliR. (2003). Use of fractional flow reserve versus stress perfusion scintigraphy after unstable angina. Effect on duration of hospitalization, cost, procedural characteristics, and clinical outcome. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 41, 1115-1121.
10.
MagniV.ChieffoA.ColomboA. (2009). Evaluation of intermediate coronary stenosis with intravascular ultrasound and fractional flow reserve: Its use and abuse. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, 73, 441-448.
11.
MintzG. S.PopmaJ. J.PichardA. D.KentK. M.SatlerL. F.ChuangY. C.. . . LeonM. B. (1996). Limitations of angiography in the assessment of plaque distribution in coronary artery disease: A systematic study of target lesion eccentricity in 1446 lesions. Circulation, 93, 924-931.
12.
NamC. W.YoonH. J.ChoY. K.ParkH. S.KimH.HurS. H.. . . KimK. B. (2010). Outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention in intermediate coronary artery disease: Fractional flow reserve-guided versus intravascular ultrasound-guided. JACC. Cardiovascular Interventions, 3, 812-817.
13.
PijlsN. H. J.de BruyneB.PeelsK.Van Der VoortP. H.BonnierH. J.BartunekJ.. . . KoolenJ. J. (1996). Measurement of fractional flow reserve to assess the functional severity of coronary artery stenosis. New England Journal of Medicine, 334, 1703-1708.
14.
PijlsN. H. J.Van GelderB.Van der VoortP.PeelsK.BrackeF. A.BonnierH. J.el GamalM. I. (1995). Fractional flow reserve: a useful index to evaluate the influence of an epicardial coronary stenosis on myocardial blood flow. Circulation, 92, 318-319.
15.
PijlsN. H. J.Van SchaardenburghP.ManoharanG.BoersmaE.BechJ. W.van’t VeerM.. . . de BruyneB. (2007). Percutaneous coronary intervention of functionally non-significant stenoses: 5-year follow-up of the DEFER study. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 49, 2105-2111.
16.
ToninoP. A.De BruyneB.PijlsN. H.SiebertU.IkenoF.van’t VeerM.FearonW. F. (2009). Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. New England Journal of Medicine, 360, 213-224.
17.
TopolE. J.NissenS. E. (1995). Our preoccupation with coronary luminology. The dissociation between clinical and angiographic findings in ischemic heart disease. Circulation, 92, 2333-2342.
