It is still debated whether a transradial approach or a transfemoral approach is better for coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention. This article will provide a focused review on different aspects of the two approaches.
BrueckM.BandorskiD.KramerW.WieczorekM.HoltgenR.TillmannsH. (2009). A randomized comparison of transradial versus transfemoral approach for coronary angiography and angioplasty. Journal of the American College of Cardiovascular Interventions, 2, 1047-1054.
2.
CampeauL. (1989). Percutaneous radial artery approach for coronary angiography. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Diagnosis, 16, 3-7.
3.
CaputoR. P.SimonsA.GiambartolomeiA.GrantW.FedeleK.AbrahamS.EsenteP. (2000). Transradial cardiac catheterization in elderly patients. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, 51, 287-290.
4.
DehghaniP.MohammadA.BajajR.HongT.SuenC. M.SharieffW.CheemaA. N. (2009). Mechanism and predictors of failed transradial approach for percutaneous coronary interventions. Journal of the American College of Cardiovascular Interventions, 2, 1057-1064.
5.
KiemeneijF.LaarmanG. J. (1993). Percutaneous transradial artery approach for coronary artery stent implantation. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Diagnosis, 30, 173-178.
6.
KiemeneijF.LaarmanG. J.OdekerkenD.SlagboomT.van der WiekenR. (1997). A randomized comparison of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty by the radial, brachial and femoral approaches: The ACCESS study. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 29, 1269-1275.
7.
KoutouzisM.MatejkaG.OlivecronaG.GripL.AlbertssonP. (2010). Radial vs. femoral approach for primary percutaneous coronary intervention in octogenarians. Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine, 11, 79-83.
8.
LouvardY.LefevreT.AllainA.MoriceM. C. (2001). Coronary angiography through the radial or the femoral approach: The CARAFE study. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, 52, 181-187.
9.
LouvardY.LefevreT.MoriceM. C. (1997). Radial approach: What about the learning curve?Catheterization and Cardiovascular Diagnosis, 42, 467-469.
10.
RaoS. V.OuF. S.WangT. Y.RoeM. T.BrindisR.RumsfeldJ. S.PetersonE. D. (2008). Trends in the prevalence and outcomes of radial and femoral approaches to percutaneous coronary intervention: A report from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry. Journal of the American College of Cardiovascular Interventions, 1, 379-386.
