Abstract
Objective:
Worsening rates of infant and maternal mortality in the United States serve as an urgent call for multi-modal intervention. Infant Well Child Visits (WCVs) provide an opportunity for prevention, however not all infants receive the recommended schedule of visits, with infants of low-income and Black families missing a higher portion of WCVs. Due to diverse experiences and needs of under-resourced communities throughout the United States, caregiver voice is essential when designing improvement efforts.
Methods:
Purposeful sampling and interviewing of 10 caregivers in Cincinnati, OH was performed by community peer researchers. Interview transcripts were evaluated by the research team, with identification of several important themes.
Results:
Nine out of 10 caregivers self-identified as Black. All young children of the interviewed caregivers had Medicaid as their insurance provider. All interviews highlighted rich perspectives on caregiver hopes for their child, family, and selves. Establishing trust through empathy, shared decision making, and the nurturing of interpersonal patient-practitioner relationships is crucial for fostering a positive healthcare experience. Levels of mistrust was perceptibly high across several interviews, with lack of racial concordance between medical provider and family exacerbating the issue for some caregivers. Caregivers voiced a tendency to rely on family and community members for when to seek out health care for their children, and additionally cited racism and perceptions of being rushed or judged as barriers to seeking further care.
Conclusion:
This study emphasizes the importance of being community-informed when considering interventions. Prior research on the topic of missed WCV’s often focused on material resource availability and limitations. While that was commented on by caregivers in this study as well, equal—if not more—attention was directed toward interpersonal relationship formation, the presence or absence of trust between practitioner and caregiver, and the importance of social-emotional support for caregivers. We highlight several opportunities for systemic improvements as well as future directions for research.
Keywords
Introduction
Across the globe and in the US, efforts to improve population health are focusing increasingly on maternal and infant health and well-being as essential targets.1,2 As with other key health indicators, the US is performing poorly in comparison to similar nations, with rates of infant and maternal mortality higher than in any other high-income country. 3 The numbers themselves are disturbing, with 5.4 infant deaths per 1000 live births (compared to 0.7 deaths/1000 live births in Australia and New Zealand) and 32.9 maternal deaths per 100 000 live births (compared to an average of 12/100 000 live births in other high income countries).4 -7 When disaggregated, the data further reveals stark and unjust inequities that highlight women and infants of Black and American Indian backgrounds, as well as those with lower socioeconomic status, are burdened disproportionately.8,9
Improving maternal-infant outcomes and eliminating existing inequities are urgent and essential aims. Causes for adverse and inequitable maternal-infant health outcomes are multifactorial, thus a multi-pronged intervention approach is necessary. The primary pediatric clinic represents 1 potentially powerful place of intervention, with well childcare visits (WCVs) as a broadly recognized place to positively influence newborn health within the healthcare system, particularly as it relates to primary disease prevention (intervention before a health effect occurs).10 -12 To that end, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) recommends 8 preventive health care visits within the first year of life alone. 13 Many families, however, do not complete all recommended visits within their child’s first year, with Black families and families of low-income households disproportionately not completing all visits.14 -16 Possible reasons include structural disinvestment and resource limitations within racially marginalized and low income communities, medical mistrust rooted in negative past experiences including perceived racism (individually and societally), and health-related concerns such as fear of infectious exposure to COVID-19 during the height of the pandemic.17 -20 All proposed reasons have the effect of negatively impacting the relationship between patient family and provider. A relationship which, when rich, has been proven to increase patient activation in preventive practices.21 -23
We sought to learn about the hopes, needs, and experiences of parents and caregivers who either currently are or recently have cared for a newborn in order to identify opportunities for relationship building with pediatric primary care practices. A multidisciplinary family-community-academic team, co-led by researchers from Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center (CCHMC) and Design Impact (DI—a 501(c)(3) social innovation consulting firm), created the Newborn Project to learn together about the hopes and challenges of families with newborns. More specifically, we aimed to learn from families about their aspirations for themselves and their newborn children, as well as learn about how they envision their primary care practice supporting them. We plan to have the findings of this work inform future strategies to improve the WCV experience, and inspire subsequent improvement work to be co-led by family and community partners with the goal of reducing missed WCVs in our patient population.
Methods
This study was co-created by a multidisciplinary CCHMC research team, community-based research partners from DI, and 3 community peer researchers who are also mothers. The collaborative research team together developed the interview guides, set sampling criteria, conducted the interviews, and analyzed the data. The interview guide was co-created by the multidisciplinary research team, which included academic partners, community organization partners, and peer researchers, through a series of iterations across several sessions. Each interview was led by one of the peer researchers, with a community-based partner from DI supporting them. The peer researchers were additionally responsible for recruitment, targeting caregivers of children between the ages of 2 weeks to 2 years old. Recruitment methods included flyers as well as live recruitment at community-based groups connected with the target population. Timing of interviews was arranged based on the needs of the interviewees. All participants lived within the city of Cincinnati, OH, and were either uninsured or had Medicaid public health insurance. The peer researchers conducted a combination of individual and group interviews, with a total of 10 caregivers. This study was submitted through the CCHMC IRB and determined to be exempt.
Interviews were conducted via video-call, using a semi-structured interview guide (see Supplemental Appendix). They were recorded and then transcribed using an automated service and reviewed by a clinical research coordinator for accuracy. All names and identifiable information were removed from transcripts to ensure anonymity, and caregivers were assigned a number/letter sequence for referencing purposes. Transcripts were reviewed by 4 researchers at CCHMC and coded using content analysis techniques. A fifth impartial researcher also affiliated with CCHMC then reviewed all codes and, using thematic analysis methods, extracted themes and subthemes with representative quotes (see Table 1). The 4 researchers who performed initial coding were asked to review themes to ensure accuracy and objectivity.
Caregiver Hopes for Their Child and Family.
Results
Participants ranged in age from 22-55 years. Of the 10 caregivers, 9 self-identified as Black, with 1 self-identifying as white. When evaluating caregiver type, single mothers, mothers in 2-parent households, 2 grandmothers, and 1 father were interviewed. When all interviews were reviewed in summation, most of the conversation took a strengths-based lens and focus. Although several caregivers remarked on negative past experiences both in- and outside of the medical system, they continually expressed hope for themselves, their children, and a future medical home that they might partner with. Each of these themes are discussed separately in the following section, with representative quotes. Quote tables for each section can be found in the Supplemental Appendix.
Caregiver Hopes for Their Child and Family
Individual interpretations and responses to what caregivers hope for their child and family were diverse, spanning from hopes about health (to be healthy, to be strong, to meet their milestones) to hopes for happiness (including freedom to be themselves and explore their world, self-actualization, to be safe, and to be without struggle). A salient point mentioned by a few, but not the majority, of caregivers included the hope for security without naivety, “experiencing enough trauma that they know how to maneuver in bad situations. Especially being a Black woman in society.” (FG, CG3).
When speaking about the family unit, the most discussed wish was for connectedness. The second most common desire was financial security—particularly as it related to preparedness for unknown future events. In speaking of connectedness, their words reference the hope that open communication would always exist amongst their family, with the inherent respect of individual differences (of choices, opinions, lifestyles) that that comes with.
“Just being tapped into what’s going on in each other’s life, tapped into each other’s feelings. Having an open honest communicative relationship, being kind of on the same wavelength with what’s going on. And you know, just being in tune with what each other, each other’s needs, wants, desires, my hopes for my family might not be the same hope that my child has 10 years from now for herself, or might not be the same hopes that my partner has tomorrow.” (FG, CG3).
When speaking about hopes and wishes for their child and family, a desire to pay learnings forward to future generations could be heard, “Well, I always say I want to be a better caregiver for my grandkids than I was as a parent, because I knew I was absolutely not the best parent.” (0915_3T).
Caregiver Hopes for Themselves
Caregivers were also asked about their hopes and aspirations for themselves. Commonly addressed topics included concrete needs (eg, social-emotional support, financial aid and security, and disaster preparedness) as well as abstract goals related to self-improvement, fulfilling their purpose, and being happy or at peace. Although commentary on concrete goals often included financial stability or security, only 1 caregiver specifically mentioned employment as a desire. This was surprising because the interviews were held during the early part of the COVID-19 pandemic, which significantly impacted both the job market as well as resources available to families in need.
Participants also frequently touched on hopes for themselves specifically in their role as a caregiver, showing how they value this role. Their discourse included hopes of being a good role model, a good caregiver, and teaching those in their care the realities of the world, even when it’s not positive. “My hope was to give them the truth about life [. . .] as far as I knew it, you know, like, it’s enough with the fairy tales, and everything, give them real meaning behind things.” (0818_2M) (Table 2).
Caregiver Hopes for Themselves.
Factors Influencing Caregivers to Seek Medical Care
One of the goals of this community research was to ascertain community members’ (specifically caregivers’) impressions of medical care for their young children, including factors influencing families to present to care. Caregivers noted that they trusted and listened to advice of other family members (including caregiving partners) on taking care of their children, including recommendations for when to see a medical provider. Additional motivators to seek care for their child were if a caregiver had a specific concern about the child, obtaining vaccinations, as well as ensuring their child was growing appropriately and meeting developmental milestones. When the conversation turned toward barriers in care, historical racism and its impact on present-day medical practice was discussed by half of the people interviewed. Trust, or the lack thereof, was frequently highlighted as reason for (in the setting of high levels of trust) or against (in the setting of distrust) seeking care,
“I feel safer for her sake, when it is a doctor of color. Because we’re dying in the care of these doctors, black women are dying, their babies are dying. And it could be prevented. And so I have trust issues when I see a white face. [. . .]I don’t know you and I don’t think that you care.” (0917_1R).
Racial concordance and its positive impact on perceptions of healthcare provider trustworthiness was a common topic for many caregivers. Separately, representation as it relates to positive role modeling was highlighted as crucial, with 1 caregiver noting that increased representation was needed. Additionally, within the context of conversations on the need for racial concordance and representation, multiple comments were made by caregivers that people from African American communities do not routinely see the doctor, “But most of the African American community don’t go to the doctors. They don’t.” (0915_3T) (Table 3).
Factors Influencing Caregivers to Seek Medical Care.
What Caregivers Desire in a Medical Home
As conversation turned to medical homes, a distinct trend was observed in which primary care practices and their providers were discussed as separate entities. Regarding primary care offices, common characteristics expressed by caregivers as desirable included flexibility, supports available within the clinic, to be treated equally, as well as the importance of establishing and maintaining trust. There was significant variation when discussing the desire for flexibility, with some caregivers hoping for scheduling flexibility in terms of appointment availability, having continuity with providers, as well as being able to schedule multiple family members together. Others desired flexibility in terms of telehealth and home visitation programs. An equal amount of variation amongst caregivers was noted when talking about ancillary supports for families in clinic. Most commonly, caregivers spoke of in-office screening services (ie, child development and parental postpartum screening) and the provision of anticipatory guidance. Other supports discussed included financial assistance (including public nutrition benefits programs, gas cards, and taxi credits), childcare for non-patient children during visits, and having a non-physician support person in waiting rooms who could be an advocate for parents experiencing struggle. This last suggestion was in the context of caregiver reluctance to disclose social and material needs for their child that they are having difficulty meeting, with 1 caregiver specifically giving the example of fearing child protective services being called.
“They’re so scared that 241-KIDS [Child Protective Services] is gonna step in, we need to figure out how we can have someone to be able to talk. And for these people to be able to trust them with telling their pediatrician if they need help. [. . .] I think they need an advocate like someone that they feel that they can feel comfortable to tell.” (0915_2R).
In alignment with previously discussed commentary on racism and distrust, caregivers are additionally seeking a medical practice that proves trustworthiness through shared decision making with caregivers, avoiding paternalistic medical approaches, and treating all children equally regardless of background or demographic, “And then I had to do a check with friends, other mama friends. And most of them my white peers are like, no. Like, there was no pediatrician ever, ever suggested that [fluoride varnish] to my, to my baby.” (0917_1R) (Table 4).
What Caregivers Desire in a Medical Home.
What Caregivers Desire in Medical Providers
There was rich discussion about what caregivers are looking for in their physician. Across all topics, this had the most congruency between those interviewed. Participants desired an interpersonal relationship with their provider the most, where personal investment and familiarity could be tangibly felt, “She remember his name, wow!” (0818_1G); “They can get the doctors to see that these people is not just a chart. This chart in this paper is just that’s not me. I’m a human being I’m a living breathing human being.” (0915_3T). Similarly, having medical providers who demonstrate empathy, compassion, and warmth was frequently discussed and sought after. However, interpersonal skills weren’t the only traits caregivers desired. A provider who is knowledgeable, up to date on current medical recommendations, and prepared for each visit was mentioned by multiple caregivers. Further discussion revealed multiple caregivers had past experiences where their medical provider was rushing, resulting in a negative impact, “And they’re just you know, like you said everything is so rushed. You know a lot. ‘I’m so busy’. Yeah, whatever. I’m not trying to hear it. I’m busy too.” (0909_1B). One final common theme was the desire to be listened to without perceived judgment, most notably in the context of caregivers discussing home research or hesitancies around suggested treatments (ie, vaccines).
“And my pediatrician [. . .] is always kind of here to listen, even when I, I truly feel like I’m buggin. But, you know, she never makes me feel like what I’m saying isn’t valid,” (FG, CG1); “when someone shows with some information from doing a lot of research, that they don’t, that they’re not dismissive.” (0917_1R).
Less common, but no less important, hopes for a primary provider include finding one who has a clear passion for their job, as well as somebody who is transparent and direct in their communication (Table 5).
What Caregivers Desire in Medical Providers.
Discussion
By eliciting the views of caregivers in our community, as well as elevating their voices as vital to any improvement effort, we hope to build on existent literature regarding maternal and infant health. Specifically, the caregivers in this study reveal rich hopes and desires for their infants, their families, and themselves while highlighting opportunities for strengthening and enriching the primary care relationship between families and practices. This study is not the first to identify mistrust as a leading barrier between racially marginalized patient families and the medical field. However, caregivers in our study offered suggestions to combat such mistrust through empathy, fostering familiarity and interpersonal relationships between provider and patient, as well as reducing instances of perceived judgment when caregivers bring up questions or concerns. The caregivers interviewed were primarily from under-resourced communities, and this impact could be seen across all parts of the interview—from hoping or needing financial security for themselves and their families, to desiring concrete support services from the medical practice they attend. The types of concrete supports desired were variable by interview, highlighting again the need for medical settings to be familiar with the resource barriers of their patients and families specifically, as well as the needs of the surrounding communities more broadly.
The attention to maternal and infant health outcomes in the US continues to grow in academic, clinical, and community spaces, as well as the intersections of these spaces. This study highlights that caregiver voices provide a unique perspective in needs assessments, and improvement efforts. Caregivers tell a story that other data cannot adequately represent. Our findings closely correlate with a recent 2022 Commonwealth report which gave voice to pregnant person’s desires regarding their prenatal care. 24 Although both studies are small in sample size, the congruency between various interviewees is important, particularly when considering policy change and impact. Potential changes to current care provisions and health policy cannot occur in isolation from patient community needs. Families and clinicians ultimately have the same goal for the children in their care: healthy and thriving babies, and by extension their families. Figuring out how to align expectations and cultural differences, while validating both caregiver and provider expertise, is crucial to facilitating a trusting patient-physician relationship that fosters healthy outcomes. Solutions will require a multidimensional approach, including potential collaboration with insurance groups to change reimbursement infrastructure to allow more time spent with each patient, building representation within community-embedded clinics, partnering with community organizations working to address social determinants of health, and providing additional training to health care providers on cultural attentiveness and empathic response. It cannot be understated that any proposed solution must include community feedback and partnership.
While illuminating, this study does have several limitations. First, our sample size was 10 caregivers within the Cincinnati, OH community. This sample size limits the ability to make aggregate statements regarding the desires and needs of entire communities within a city of this size, even if limiting the scope to certain neighborhoods which are structurally and economically disadvantaged. The generalizability to other communities across the United States is equally limited. These limitations reinforce that centering community voices in improvement efforts should be iterative and individualized to the community in question. Second, interviews were conducted during the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic, which stressed communities inequitably and added additional layers of socioeconomic as well as psychological hardship to people. Ongoing community conversations to identify evolving community needs and priorities as we adjust to the impact of COVID-19 are needed.
Conclusion
Our study centers community voices in primary care—family partnerships, demonstrates rich results with under-utilized research methods via inclusion of community researchers, and highlights problems and potential avenues for solution within the field of maternal and infant health care. We will use the results herein to drive improvement efforts within the Cincinnati Children’s Newborn Collaborative and across clinics affiliated with our work.
Supplemental Material
sj-pdf-1-jpc-10.1177_21501319241253524 – Supplemental material for “When You Look at This Chart, That Is Not My Whole Life”: Caregiver Perspectives to Inform Improved Primary Care Practice and Outcomes
Supplemental material, sj-pdf-1-jpc-10.1177_21501319241253524 for “When You Look at This Chart, That Is Not My Whole Life”: Caregiver Perspectives to Inform Improved Primary Care Practice and Outcomes by Monique Quinn, Allison Parsons, Chidiogo Anyigbo, Alexandra M. S. Corley, Lauren Lipps, Jamaica Gilliam, Julietta O. Ladipo, Caitlin Jee Hae Behle, Desiré Bennett and Carley Riley in Journal of Primary Care & Community Health
Footnotes
Author Contributions
Monique Quinn: validation, formal analysis, writing—original draft, visualization; Allison Parsons: conceptualization, methodology, validation, formal analysis, resources, writing—review & editing, project administration; Chidiogo Anyigbo: conceptualization, formal analysis, writing—review & editing; Alexandra Corley: conceptualization, formal analysis, writing—review & editing; Lauren Lipps: formal analysis, writing—review & editing; Jamaica Gilliam: investigation, validation; Julietta Ladipo: investigation, validation; Caitlin Jee Hae Behle: conceptualization, resources, project administration; Desiré Bennett: conceptualization, resources, project administration; Carley Riley: conceptualization, methodology, validation, resources, writing—review & editing, project administration, supervision
Declaration of Conflicting Interests
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Funding
The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Drs. Corley and Anyigbo’s time for this project were both supported in part by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health, under Award Number KL2TR001426. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH.
Supplemental Material
Supplemental material for this article is available online.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
