The main aim of this article is to present and analyse literature and research focused upon public perceptions of probation and portrayals of probation in print, on-line and broadcast news media in England and Wales. A brief account is provided of historical developments in probation in those countries over the past 50 years. Public perceptions of crime, community sentencing, the wider criminal justice system and, in particular probation, are critically explored. Analysis is presented of attempts to publicise probation work. The varied impact of news media upon the public in England and Wales about crime, community sentencing, the criminal justice system and probation is analysed. Past and present responses to news media by probation are also critically evaluated. Suggestions are made for further research, for improvements in communication between probation organisations, the public and news media, drawing upon existing research and examples from social work and other countries.
CollettS (2024) A panoramic approach to probation: can undercover journalism keep us safe?Probation Journal: 1–13. DOI: 10.1177/0264550524301346journals.sagepub.com/home/prb.
9.
CollinsS. (2025) Then and now: revisitng policy, tasks, theories, skills, and experiences of probation work in the 1970s. Probation Journal60(2): 128–139.
10.
CollinsJFauserB (2005) Balancing the strengths of systematic and narrative reviews. Human Reproduction Update11(2): 103–104.
11.
CuthbertsonS (2013) Analysis of Complete “You Be the Judge” Website Experiences. London: Ministry of Justice.
12.
DuffyMWakeRBurrowsT, et al. (2008) Closing the Gaps: Crime and Public Perceptions. London: IPSOS Mori.
13.
FeilzerM (2007) Criminologists making news? Providing factual information on crime and criminal justice through a weekly newspaper column. Crime, Media, Culture3(3): 285–304.
14.
FeilzerM (2009) The importance of telling a good story: an experiment in public criminology. The Howard Journal48(5): 472–484.
15.
FitzgibbonW (2011) Probation and Social Work on Trial: Violent Offenders and Child Abusers. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
16.
HammersleyM (2001) On “systematic” reviews of research literature: a “narrative” response to Evans and Busfield. British Educational Research Journal27(5): 543–554.
17.
HapperCMcGuinessPMcNeillF, et al. (2019) Punishment, legitimacy and taste: the role and limits of mainstream and social media in constructing attitudes towards community sanctions. Crime, Media, Culture15(2): 301–321.
18.
HayesD (2013) Reading between the lines: English newspaper representations of community punishment. European Journal of Probation5(3): 24–40.
19.
HeddermanCMurphyC (2015) Bad news for probation? Analysing the newspaper coverage of transforming rehabilitation. Probation Journal62(3): 217–233.
20.
HMPPS (2021) The Target Operational Model for Probation Services in England and Wales. London: HM Prison and Probation Service.
21.
Home Office (2011) British Crime Survey: Technical Report Volume 1, London: Home Office.
HoughMParkA (2002) How malleable are attitudes to crime and punishment? Findings from a deliberative poll. In: RobertsJHoughM (eds) Changing Attitudes to Punishment. Cullompton: Willan, 163–183.
24.
HoughMRobertsJ (2017) Public opinion, crime and criminal justice. In: LieblingAMarunaSMcAraL (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Criminology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 239–259.
25.
HoughMRobertsJJacobsonJ (2009) Public attitudes to the principles of sentencing: research Report. London: London Sentencing Advisory Panel.
26.
House of Commons Justice Committee (2023) Public Opinion and Understanding of Sentencing: Tenth Report of the Session 2022-23. London: UK Parliament.
27.
JanssonK (2015) Public Confidence in the Criminal Justice System - Findings from the Crime Survey for England and Wales (2013-2014): Analytical Summary. London: Ministry of Justice Analytical Services.
28.
JewkesY (2008) Offending media: the social construction of offenders, victims and the Probation Service. In: GreenSLancasterEFeaseyS (eds) Addressing Offending Behaviour: Context, Practice and Values. Cullompton: Willan, 59–74.
29.
JohnsonP (2006) Regrets Not Enough If Probation Service Cannot Cope, Daily Telegraph, 21March.
30.
LeedhamM (2022) Social workers failed to heed warnings: a text-based study of how a profession is portrayed in the UK. British Journal of Social Work52: 1010–1028.
31.
MarunaS (2007) The probation story: one hundred years of probation in the media. Vista: Perspectives on Probation11(2): 113–119.
32.
MarunaSKingA (2004) Public opinion and community penalties. In: BottomsARexSRobinsonG (eds) Alternatives to Prison: Options for an Insecure Society. Cullompton: Willan, 83–112.
33.
MarunaSKingA (2008) Selling the public on probation: beyond the Bib. Probation Journal55(4): 337–351.
34.
MawbyRWorrallA (2013) Doing Probation Work: Identity in a Criminal Justice Occupation. London: Routledge.
35.
McCullochTMcNeillF (2007) Consumer society, commodification and offender management. Criminology and Criminal Justice7(3): 223–242.
36.
McCullochTWebbS (2020) What the public thinks about social services: report from Scotland. British Journal of Social Work50(4): 1146–1166.
37.
McGreevyG (2013) Probation and the role of public relations. Irish Probation Journal10: 90–103.
38.
McNeillF (2009) Probation, rehabilitation and reparation: second annual Martin Tansey Memorial Lecture. Irish Probation Journal6: 5–22.
39.
Ministry of Justice (2013) Transforming Rehabilitation: A Strategy for Reform. London: Ministry of Justice.
40.
Ministry of Justice (2018) Strengthening Probation: Building Confidence. London: Ministry of Justice.
41.
MorganR (2003) Thinking about the demand for probation services. Probation Journal50(1): 7–19.
42.
National Probation Service (2002) Perceptions of the National Probation Service. London: Mori.
43.
PalmatierRHoustonMHollandJ (2018) Review articles: purpose, process and structure. Journal of Academic Marketing Science46: 1–5.
44.
PhillipsJ (2014) Probation in the news: transforming rehabilitation. Journal of Community Justice12(1): 27–48.
45.
Probation Institute (2020) Code of Ethics. London: Probation Institute.
46.
RobertsJ (2002) Public opinion and the nature of community penalties. In: RobertsJHoughM (eds) Changing Attitudes to Punishment, Public Opinion, Crime and Justice. Cullompton: Willan, 32–62.
47.
RobertsJHoughM (2005) Understanding Public Attitudes to Criminal Justice. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
48.
RobertsJBildJPina- SanchezJ, et al. (2022) Public Knowledge of Sentencing Practices and Trends. London: Sentencing Academy.
49.
RobinsonGAnnisonJBurkeL, et al. (2023) Whose confidence? Regional leaders’ perspectives on building confidence in a reconfigured Probation Service. Criminology and Criminal Justice. DOI: 10.1177/17488958231218571.
50.
Sentencing Council (2019) Public Knowledge and Confidence in the Criminal Justice System and Sentencing; A Report for the Sentencing Council. London: Sentencing Council.
51.
Sentencing Council (2022) Public Confidence in Sentencing in the Criminal Justice System. London: Sentencing Council.
52.
SingerLCooperS (2009) Improving public confidence in the criminal justice system: an evaluation of a communication activity. The Howard Journal48(5): 485–500.
53.
SjostromSOhmanA (2018) What if an investigative journalist calls? Media relationships in social work. British Journal of Social Work48(7): 2077–2095.
54.
SteadMMacFadyenLHastingsG (2002) What Do the Public Really Feel about Non-custodial Penalties. Stirling: University of Stirling. Esme Fairbairn Foundation.
55.
TeagueM (2002) Public perceptions of probation. Criminal Justice Matters49: 34–35.
56.
TidmarshM (2023) A pedagogy of ‘public criminology’ as a counter to marginality? Lessons for community sanctions and measures from the Pedagogy of the Oppressed. Probation Journal70(2): 179–198.
57.
WilsonPEllisR (2013) Communicating Sentencing and Exploring New Ways to Explain Adult Sentences. London: Ministry of Justice Analytical Services.
