AndrewsDAZingerIHogeRD, et al. (1990) Does correctional treatment work? A clinically relevant and psychologically informed meta-analysis. Criminology28(3): 369–404.
2.
BontaJAndrewsDA (2024) The Psychology of Criminal Conduct. 7th edition. New York: Routledge.
3.
CullenFT (2005) The twelve people who saved rehabilitation: how the science of criminology made a difference—the American Society of Criminology 2004 Presidential Address. Criminology43(1): 1–42.
4.
CullenFT (2012) Taking rehabilitation seriously: creativity, science, and the challenge of offender change. Punishment and Society14(1): 94–114.
5.
CullenFTGendreauP (2001) From nothing works to what works: changing professional ideology in the 21st century. The Prison Journal81(3): 313–338.
Kang BalzariniT (2023) The lost scrolls of the correctional bible: before the risk-need, responsivity model. In: MagalettaPTernesMPatryM (eds) The History and Future of Correctional Psychology. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature Switzerland AG, 137–163.
8.
MertonRK (1995) Opportunity structure: the emergence, diffusion, and differentiation of a sociological concept, 1930s–1950s. In: AdlerFLauferWS (eds) The Legacy of Anomie Theory: Advances in Criminological Theory. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction, Vol. 6, 3–78.
9.
PattavinaAFLongJSPetrichDM, et al. (2024) Revisiting the effectiveness of HOPE/swift-certain-fair supervision programs: a meta-analytic review. Criminology and Public Policy23(1): 45–76.
10.
PetrichDMPrattTCJonsonCL, et al. (2021) Custodial sanctions and reoffending: a meta-analytic review. In: TonryM (ed) Crime and Justice: A Review of Research. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, Vol. 50, 353–424.
11.
WormithJS (2011) The legacy of D. A. Andrews in the field of criminal justice: how theory and research can change policy and practice. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health10(2): 78–82.
