Book Review: Challenging bias in forensic psychological assessment and testing. Theoretical and practical approaches to working with diverse populations
Restricted accessBook reviewFirst published online August, 2023
Book Review: Challenging bias in forensic psychological assessment and testing. Theoretical and practical approaches to working with diverse populations
BannisterDFrancellaF (2019) Inquiring man. The Psychology of Personal Constructs. 2nd ed.Abingdon: Routledge.
2.
BatastiniABKingCMMorganRD, et al. (2016) Telepsychological services with criminal justice and substance abuse clients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Services13(1): 20–30.
3.
BatastiniABPaprzyckiPJonesACT, et al. (2020) Are videoconferenced mental and behavioral health services just as good as in-person? a meta-analysis of a fast-growing practice. Clinical Psychology Review83: 101944. DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2020.101944.
4.
BontaJAndrewsDA (2017) The Psychology of Criminal Conduct. 7th ed.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5.
ChappellATMaggardSRHigginsJL (2013) Exceptions to the rule? exploring the use of overrides in detention risk assessment. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice11(4): 332–348.
6.
CornetLJMVan GelderJ-L (2020) Virtual reality: a use case for criminal justice practice. Psychology, Crime and Law26(7): 631–647.
7.
DaffernMJonesLShineJ (eds) (2010) Offence Paralleling Behaviour: A Case Formulation Approach to Offender Assessment and Intervention. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
8.
FernandezEWoldgabrealYDayA, et al. (2021) Live psychotherapy by video versus in-person: a meta-analysis of efficacy and its relationship to types and targets of treatment. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy28(6): 1535–1549.
9.
GannonTAOlverMEMallionJS, et al. (2019) Does specialized psychological treatment for offending reduce recidivism? a meta-analysis examining staff and program variables as predictors of treatment effectiveness?Clinical Psychology Review73: 101752. DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2019.101752.
10.
GroveLKingCMBomysoadR, et al. (2021) Technology for assessment and treatment of justice-involved youth: a systematic literature review. Law and Human Behavior45(5): 413–426.
11.
KahnemanDTverskyA (1979) Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica47(2): 263–291.
12.
MeehlP (1954) Clinical versus Statistical Prediction: A Theoretical Analysis and a Review of the Evidence. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
13.
OwensRGAshcroftJB (1982) Functional analysis in applied psychology. The British Journal of Clinical Psychology21: 181–189.
14.
RobinsonG (2019) Delivering McJustice? the probation factory at the magistrates’ court. Criminology and Criminal Justice19(5): 605–621.
15.
ShepherdSMSullivanD (2017) Covert and implicit influences on the interpretation of violence risk instruments. Psychiatry, Psychology, and Law: An Interdisciplinary Journal of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law24(2): 292–301.
16.
ViglioneJTaxmanFS (2018) Low risk offenders under probation supervision: risk management and the risk-needs-responsivity framework. Criminal Justice and Behavior45(12): 1809–1831.
17.
ViglioneJ (2019) The risk-need-responsivity model: how do probation officers implement the principles of effective intervention?Criminal Justice and Behavior46(5): 655–673.
