BirgdenA (2004) Therapeutic jurisprudence and responsivity: Finding the will and the way in offender rehabilitation. Psychology, Crime & Law10(3): 283–295.
2.
Ginsburg-KempanyKKaiserKA (2017) Incorporating procedural justice and legitimacy into the RNR model to improve risk-need assessment. In TaxmanF (ed) Handbook on Risk and Need Assessment. Theory and Practice. New York and Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 269–291.
3.
Herzog-EvansM (2016) Law as an extrinsic responsivity factor: What’s just is what works!European Journal of Probation8(3): 146–169.
4.
Herzog-EvansM (2018) RNR, evidence diversity and integrative theory. In: UgwudikePRaynorPAnnisonJ (eds) International Research on Supporting Rehabilitation and Desistance. Bristol: Policy Press, pp. 99–126.
5.
KaiserKAHoltfreterK (2015) An integrated theory of specialized court programs: Using procedural justice and therapeutic jurisprudence to promote offender compliance and rehabilitation. Criminal Justice and Behavior43(1): 5–62.
6.
LevasseurG (1983) Aperçu sur la judiciarisation de l’exécution des sanctions répressives. Revue Pénitentiaire et de Droit Pénal4(4): 327–339.
7.
MaguireNBeyensKBooneMLaurinaviciusAPerssonA (2015) Using vignette methodology to research the process of breach comparatively. European Journal of Probation7(3): 241–259.