Innovation and criminal justice: Editorial introduction to the Special Issue on ‘Innovation’,December 2017

Abstract

This Special Issue of the European Journal of Probation considers examples and influences of innovation within criminal justice and community contexts. It offers some timely and insightful contributions from different countries to broader discussions of innovation in this field, a multi-faceted topic that piques significant interest but has perhaps not yet received the level of sustained critical analytical engagement it warrants. This editorial introduction critically reflects on a series of questions and problematisations of innovation and criminal justice. Questions about the forms and functions (‘what’, ‘where’ and ‘how’) of innovation in criminal justice should not be divorced from questions about its architects and beneficiaries, including their intentions and ideologies (‘who’ and ‘why’). Following this, a brief overview of the Special Issue is provided. There is much more yet to be done, as well as celebrated in this area.

Keywords

Change community justice criminal justice innovation probation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Annison

(2013) Innovation in probation practice: Past, present and future. Probation Journal 60(3): 227–241. DOI: 10.1177/0264550513489761.

Bartels

(2017) Swift, Certain and Fair: Does Project HOPE provide a Therapeutic Paradigm for Managing Offenders? Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Burke

(2013) Innovation and probation. Probation Journal 60(3): 223–226. DOI: 10.1177/0264550513501473.

Cheliotis

(ed.) (2012) The Arts of Imprisonment: Control, Resistance and Empowerment. Surrey: Ashgate Publishing.

Cheliotis

(2014) Decorative justice: Deconstructing the relationship between the arts and imprisonment. International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy 3(1): 16–34. DOI 10.5204/ijcjsd.v3i1.137.

Durnescu

(2013) The future of probation in Europe: Common in the middle and diverse at the edge. Probation Journal 60(3): 316–324. DOI: 10.1177/0264550513493821.

Graham

(2015a) On knowing and being known: Trust and legitimacy in co-producing desistance. 8 May 2015, Co-Producing Desistance research blog. Available at: http://www.coproducingdesistance.org.uk/on-knowing-and-being-known-trust-and-legitimacy-in-co-producing-desistance-by-hannah-graham/ (accessed 11 November 2017).

Graham

(2015b) Reproducing co-production and upscaling innovation: The growth of forums supporting desistance. 22 May 2015, on Co-Producing Desistance research blog. Available at: http://www.coproducingdesistance.org.uk/reproducing-co-production-and-upscaling-innovation-the-growth-of-forums-supporting-desistance-by-hannah-graham/ (accessed 11 November 2017).

Graham

(2016) Rehabilitation Work: Supporting Desistance and Recovery. London: Routledge.

10.

Graham

Field

(2015) Returning citizens: A quiet revolution in prisoner reintegration. Scottish Justice Matters 1(3): 32–33.

11.

Graham

McNeill

(2017) Desistance: Envisioning futures. In: Carlen

França

(eds) Alternative Criminologies. London: Routledge, pp. 433–451.

12.

Graham

White

(2014) Innovative justice – According to whom? In: Lumsden

Winter

(eds) Reflexivity in Criminological Research: Experiences with the Powerful and the Powerless. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 313–325.

13.

Graham

White

(2015) Innovative Justice. London: Routledge.

14.

Graham

White

(2016) The ethics of innovation in criminal justice. In: Jacobs

Jackson

(eds) The Routledge Handbook of Criminal Justice Ethics. London: Routledge.

15.

Maruna

(2001) Making Good: How Ex-Convicts Reform and Rebuild Their Lives Washington: American Psychological Association.

16.

Mawby

Worrall

(2013) Doing Probation Work: Identity in a Criminal Justice Occupation. London: Routledge.

17.

Robinson

Svensson

(2015) Fish out of water? Introduction to the Special Issue on innovative methods for comparative research on offender supervision practice. European Journal of Probation 7(3): 171–178. DOI: 10.1177/2066220315610241.

18.

Senior

(2013) Community engagement: Innovation; past, present and future. Probation Journal 60(3): 242–258. DOI: 10.1177/0264550513493822.

19.

Špero

(2015) Best practice: Probation service engaged in flood damage recovery. Confederation of European Probation (CEP) blog. Available at: http://www.cep-probation.org/best-practice-probation-service-engaged-in-flood-damage-recovery/ (accessed on November 16, 2017)

20.

Špero

(2016) How to promote probation: Special probation activities of Croatia in the last years. In: Confederation of European Probation (CEP) Alternatives to Detention in Central and Eastern European Countries International Conference, 17–18 November 2016, Dubrovnik. Available at: http://www.cep-probation.org/presentations-international-conference-on-alternatives-to-detention-in-central-and-east-european-countries-dubrovnik/ (accessed 16 November 2017).

21.

Vanstone

Priestley

(eds) (2016) Probation and Politics: Academic Reflections from Former Practitioners. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

22.

Weaver

(2011) Coproducing community justice: The transformative potential of personalisation for community sanctions. British Journal of Social Work 41(6): 1038–1057. DOI https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcr011.

23.

White

Graham

(2015) Greening justice: Examining the interfaces of criminal, social and ecological justice. British Journal of Criminology 55(5): 845–865. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azu117.