This article reports on the early stages of a project to develop a model of offender rehabilitation that operationalises the concept of desistance. The concept of desistance is influential but operationalising it remains a challenge. The aim of this article is to assess whether personalisation of offender rehabilitation has potential as a mechanism for operationalising the concept of desistance. We identify learning from the design and implementation of personalisation in social care, but challenges include the roll out of personal budgets, developing a local market to support consumer choice and the limited evidence base on the effectiveness of personalisation. We specify a project to pilot personalisation in the English probation sector that tests concepts relating both to the design and commissioning of personalised services, including community capacity building to support the supply of personalised services at the local or even micro level. A project evaluation design is also outlined.
Beresford P (2013) Personalisation. Bristol: Policy Press.
8.
Care Quality Commission (2011) The State of Health Care and Adult Social Care in England 2009/10. London: QCC.
9.
CookeGMuirR (2012) The Relational State: How Recognising the Importance of Human Relationships could Revolutionise the Role of the State. London: IPPR.
10.
CruddasJ (2012) Lecture on The Role of the State in the Good Society, delivered to the Centre for Social Justice, reproduced in the New Statesman, 13December2012.
11.
DalyGWoolhamJ (2010) Do Personal Budgets lead to Personalisation?York: UK Social Policy Association.
12.
De VriesJ (2010) Is New Public Management Really Dead?OECD Journal on Budgeting 2010/1: 87–92.
13.
Department of Health (1989) Caring for People: Community Care in the Next Decade and Beyond, Cm. 849. London: The Stationary Office.
14.
Department of Health (2007) Putting People First: A Shared Vision and Commitment to the Transformation of Adult Social Care. London: Department of Health.
15.
Department of Health (2008) Evaluation of Individual Budgets Pilots Programme. London: Department of Health.
16.
Department of Health (2009) Contracting for personalised outcomes: Learning from emerging practice. London: Department of Health.
17.
Department of Health (2012) Caring for Our Future: Reforming Care and Support. Cm 8378 London: Department of Health.
18.
DickinsonHGlasbyJ (2010) The Personalisation Agenda: Implications for the Third Sector. Birmingham: Third Sector Research Centre.
European Commission (2013) Evidence on Demographic and Social Trends, Social Policies’ Contribution to Inclusion, Employment and the Economy. SWD(2013) 38 final.
21.
FarrallS (2004) Social capital and offender reintegration: Making probation desistance focussed. In: MarunaSImmarigeonR (eds) After Crime and Punishment: Pathways to Offender Reintegration. Cullompton: Willan.
22.
FergusonI (2007) Increasing user choice or privatising risk? The antinomies of personalisation?British Journal of Social Work37(3): 387–403.
23.
FoxA (2012) Personalisation: Lessons from Social Care. London: RSA.
24.
FoxAFoxCMarshC (2013) Could personalisation reduce re-offending? Reflections on potential lessons from British social care reform for the British criminal justice system. Journal of Social Policy42(4): 721–741.
25.
FoxCGrimmR (2015) The role of social innovation in criminal justice reform and the risk posed by proposed reforms in England and Wales. Criminology and Criminal Justice15(1): 63–82.
26.
FoxCMarshC (2016) ‘Personalisation’: Is social innovation possible under Transforming Rehabilitation?The Probation Journal63(2): 169–181.
27.
Health and Social Care Information Centre (2015) Personal Social Services Adult Social Care Survey, England 2014–15. London: HSCIC.
28.
HemerijckA (2012) Changing Welfare States. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
29.
Her Majesty’s Government (2010) The Coalition: Our Programme for Government. London: Cabinet Office.
30.
HillsJ (2011) The changing architecture of the UK welfare state. Oxford Review of Economic Policy27(4): 589–607.
31.
HollowaySNevilleSWattsR (2011) Longitudinal Study of Cash Payments for Adult Social Care in Essex. London: OPM and ECDP.
32.
HoodCPetersG (2004) The middle ageing of New Public management: Into the age of paradox?Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory14(3): 267–282.
33.
HopkinsTRipponS. (2015) Head, hands and heart: asset-based approaches in health care A review of the conceptual evidence and case studies of asset-based approaches in health, care and wellbeing, London: The Health Foundation
34.
In Control (2015) Third National Personal Budget Survey. London: Think Local, Act Personal.
35.
IPSOS MORI (2008) Closing the Gaps, Crime and Public Perceptions. London: IPSOS MORI.
36.
LeadbetterC (2004) Personalisation through Participation: A New Script for Public Services. London: Demos.
37.
LeadbetterC (2008) We Think: Mass Innovation Not Mass Production. London: Profile Books.
38.
LipseyMWCullenFT (2007) The effectiveness of correctional rehabilitation: A review of systematic reviews. Annual Review of Law and Social Science3: 297–320.
39.
LockyerKHeysR (2016) Local Commissioning, Local Solutions: Devolving Offender Management. London: Reform.
40.
LoweTWilsonR (2015) Playing the game of out-comes-based performance management: Is gamesmanship inevitable? Evidence from theory and practice. Social Policy and Administration. Epub ahead of print 27 December 2015. DOI: 10.1111/spol.12205.
41.
MaguireMRaynorP (2006) How the resettlement of prisoners promotes desistance from crime: Or does it?Criminology and Criminal Justice6(1): 19–38.
42.
Manchester Metropolitan University (2012) Evaluation of the effectiveness of a micro-enterprise support project. Manchester: Unpublished early findings.
43.
MarunaS (2001) Making Good. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Books.
44.
MarunaS (2010) The desistance paradigm in correctional practice: From programmes to lives. In: McNeillFRaynorPTrotterC (eds) Offender Supervision: New Directions in Theory, Research and Practice. Cullompton: Willan.
45.
McKnightJ (1995) The Careless Society: Community and its Counterfeits. Chicago: Basic Books.
46.
McNeillF (2006) A desistance paradigm for offender management. Criminology and Criminal Justice6(1): 39–62.
47.
McNeillF (2009) Towards Effective Practice in Offender Supervision. Glasgow: The Scottish Centre for Crime and Justice Research.
48.
McNeillFWeaverB (2010) Changing Lives? Desistance Research and Offender Management. Glasgow: The Scottish Centre for Crime and Justice Research.
49.
McNeillFFarrallSLightowlerCMarunaS (2012) How and Why People Stop Offending: Discovering Desistance. Glasgow: IRISS.
50.
Ministry of Justice (2010) Breaking the Cycle: Effective Punishment, Rehabilitation and Sentencing of Offenders. London: Home Office.
51.
Ministry of Justice (2013) Transforming Rehabilitation: A Revolution in the Way We Manage Offenders. London: Ministry of Justice.
52.
Ministry of Justice (2014) Voluntary Sector at Forefront of New Fight Against Reoffending. Press release. London: Ministry of Justice.
53.
Ministry of Justice (2016) Proven Re-offending Statistics Quarterly Bulletin April 2013 to March 2014, England and Wales. London: Ministry of Justice.
54.
MorelNPalierBPalmeJ (2012) Towards a Social Investment State? Ideas, Policies and Challenges. Bristol: Policy Press.
55.
MorrisDGilchristA (2011) Communities Connected: Inclusion, Participation and Common Purpose. London: RSA.
56.
MulganGTuckerSAliRSandersB (2007) Social Innovation: What it is, Why it Matters and How it can be Accelerated. Oxford: Said Business School.
57.
MumfordMD (2002) Social innovation: Ten cases from Benjamin Franklin. Creativity Research Journal14 (2): 253–266.
58.
MurrayRCaulier-GriceJMulganG (2010) The Open Book of Social Innovation. The Young Foundation and NESTA.
NeedhamC (2011) Personalising Public Services. Understanding the Personalisation Narrative. Bristol: Policy Press.
64.
PearsonCRidleyJHunterS (2014) Self-Directed Support: Personalisation, Choice and Control. Series: Policy and practice in health and social care, 19. Edinburgh: Dunedin Academic Press.
65.
PrabhakarMThomGJohnsonR (2011) Individual Budgets for Families with Disabled Children – Final Evaluation Report. London: Department for Education.
66.
Prime Minister’s Strategy Unit (2007) Building on Progress: Public Services. London: Cabinet Office.
67.
Princess Royal Trust for Carers (2009) Putting People First without Putting Carers Second. London: PRT.
68.
RoseT (2016) The End of Average: How We Succeed in a World that Values Sameness. New York: HarperOne.
69.
RoutstoneAMorganH (2009) Neo-liberal individualism or self directed support: Are we all speaking the same language on modernising adult social care?Social Policy and Society8(3): 333–345.
70.
Shared Lives Plus (2011) Map for Micro-enterprise in Social Care. Liverpool: Shared Lives Plus.
71.
StaffordBKellardK (2007) Reforming the public sector: Personalised activation services in the UK. In: Berkel R and Valkenburg B (eds) Making it Personal: Individualising Activation Services in the EU. Bristol: Policy Press.
72.
Taylor-GoobyP (2004) New Risks, New Welfare: The Transformation of the European Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
WardTMarunaS (2007) Rehabilitation: Beyond the Risk Paradigm. London: Routledge.
77.
WeaverB (2011) Co-producing community justice: The transformative potential of personalisation for penal sanctions. British Journal of Social Work41(6): 1038–1057.
78.
WeaverB (2012) The relational context of desistance: Some implications and opportunities for Social Policy. Social Policy and Administration46(4): 395–412.
79.
WeaverB (2016) Co-producing Desistance from Crime: The Role of Social Cooperative Structures of Employment. The Howard League for Penal Reform, ECAN Bulletin 28, February2016.
80.
WeaverBMcNeillF (2014) Lifelines: Desistance, Social Relations, and Reciprocity. Criminal Justice and Behavior42(1): 95–107.
81.
WeissC (1997) Theory-based evaluation: Past, present, and future. New Directions for Evaluation76: 41–55.
