FarrallS. (2002) Rethinking What Works with Offenders: Probation, Social Context and Desistance from Crime.Cullompton: Willan.
2.
MarunaS.PorterL.CarvalhoI. (2004) ‘The Liverpool Desistance Study and probation practice: Opening the dialogue’, Probation Journal, 51 (3): 221–232.
3.
MarunaS.LeBelT. B.NaplesM.MitchellN. (2009) ‘Looking-glass identity transformation: Pygmalion and Golen in the rehabilitation process’ in VeyseyB. M.ChristianJ.MartinezD. J. (Eds) How Offenders Transform their Lives, Cullompton: Willan: 30–55.
4.
McNeillF. (2004) ‘Supporting desistance in probation practice: A response to Maruna, Porter and Carvalho’, Probation Journal, 51 (3): 241–247.
5.
Ministry of Justice (2012a) Punishment and Reform: Effective Probation Services, London: MoJ, CP7/2012.
6.
Ministry of Justice (2012b) Punishment and Reform: Effective Community Sentences, London: MoJ, CP8/2012.
7.
Ministry of Justice (2012c) Punishment and Reform: Effective Community Sentences. Government Response.London: MoJ, CP(R)20/2012.
8.
NAPO (2012a) Punishment and Reform: Effective Probation Services. A Response from NAPO.London: NAPO. Available on line at: http://www.napo.org.uk.
9.
NAPO (2012b) Punishment and Reform: Effective Community Sentences. A Response from NAPO.London: NAPO. Available on line at: http://www.napo.org.uk.
10.
PorporinoF. J. (2010) ‘Bringing sense and sensitivity to corrections: From programmes to “fix” offenders to services to support desistance’ in BrayfordJ.CoweF.DeeringJ. (Eds) What Else Works: Creative Work with Offenders.Cullompton: Willan: 61–85.