The level of work engagement is an important aspect of organizational culture. In this empirical study the relation between engagement and experienced professionalism of probation officers is investigated. Starting from ideal-typical theories on professionalism, a psychometric instrument for measuring experienced professionalism was developed and administered to a sample of Dutch probation officers. Two reliable scales could be constructed that account for 64% of the variance in work engagement. Of these, professional ethos (humanistic values) is the most important predictor of work engagement in probation. Professional facilitation (support from the surroundings), however, also contributes to engagement.
AbbotA. (1988). The systems of professions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
2.
ArnoldL. (2002). Assessing professional behavior: Yesterday, today and tomorrow. Academic medicine77 (6), 502–515.
3.
BakerK. (2005). Assessment in youth justice: Professional discretion and the use of asset. Youth Justice5, 106–122.
4.
BakkerA. B.BalP. M. (2010). Weekly work engagement and performance: A study among starting teachers. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology83, 189–206.
5.
BakkerA. B.AlbrechtS. L.LeiterM. P. (2011). Key questions regarding work engagement. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology20 (1), 4–28.
6.
BakkerA. B.AlbrechtS. L.LeiterM. P. (2011). Response to commentaries. Work engagement: Further reflections on the state of play. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology20 (1), 74–88.
7.
BakkerA. B. (2010). Engagement and “job crafting”: Engaged employees create their own great place to work. In AlbrechtS. L. (Ed.). Handbook of employee engagement: Perspectives, issues, research and practice (pp. 229–244). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
8.
BakkerA. B. (2009). Building engagement in the work place. In BurkeR. J.CooperC. L. (Eds.), The peak performing organization (pp. 50–72). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
9.
BartolK. M. (1979). Professionalism as a predictor of organizational commitment, role stress, and turnover: A multidimensional approach. Academy of Management Journal22 (4), pp. 815–821.
10.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11.
DaleM. P.TrlinA. (2010). Leadership and probation officer practice in New Zealand. The Journal of Community and Criminal Justice57 (2), 121–138.
12.
FarrowK. (2004). Still committed after all these years?: Morale in modern day probation service. Probation Journal51 (3), 206–220.
13.
FreidsonE. (1983). The theory of professions. The state of the art. In DingwallR.LewisP. (Eds.), The sociology of professions (pp. 19–36). London: McMillan.
14.
FreidsonE. (1994). Professionalism reborn. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Polity.
15.
FreidsonE. (2001). Professionalism: The third logic. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Polity.
16.
GregoryM. G. (2009). My probation career. Probation Journal58 (1), 37–51.
17.
HalbeslebenJ. R. B.WheelerA. R. (2008). The relative role of engagement and embeddedness in predicting job performance and turnover intention. Work and Stress, 22, 242–256.
18.
HallR. (1968). Professionalism and bureaucratization. American Sociological Review33, 92–104.
19.
LeachT (2003). “Oh my country, how I leave my country”: Some reflections on a changing probation service. Probation Journal50 (1), 20–29.
20.
MayT.BuckM. (1998) ‘Power, Professionalism and Organisational Transformation’Sociological Research Online, Vol. 3, no. 2, http://www.socresonline.org.uk/3/2/5.html.
21.
NoordegraafM. (2007): “From ‘pure’ to ‘hybrid’ professionalism: Present-day professionalism in ambiguous public domains.”Administration & Society, 39 (6), 761–785.
RobinsonG. (2003). Implementing OASys: Lessons from research into LSI-R and ACE. Probation Journal50 (1), 30–40.
24.
SnizekW. (1972). Hall's professionalism scale: An empirical assessment. American Sociological Review37, 109–114.
25.
SchaufeliW. B.BakkerA. B.SalanovaM.The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire. Educational and Psychological Measurement66 (4), 701–716.
26.
SchaufeliW. B.SalanovaM. (2011). Work engagement: On how to better catch a slippery concept. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology20 (1), 39–46.
27.
Tschannen-MoranM. (2009). Fostering teacher professionalism in schools: The role of leadership orientation and trust. Educational Administration Quarterly45 (2), 217–247.
