This paper is part of a special edition on Judicial Rehabilitation, a topic that derived from Maruna's work on rehabilitation and rehabilitation rituals. It addresses the possibility of such rituals in the Netherlands. It describes which data concerning criminal convictions can be stored, how long they may be preserved and which persons and organisations can get access to the criminal records. It also pays attention to the jobs and position for which a conduct certificate is needed and the conditions under which it can be issued. Conclusion of this analysis is that the stricter regulations concerning criminal records, the increase of jobs a conduct certificate is needed for and the stricter conditions under which it is issued, hinder the serious efforts that are made in prison and probation to reduce recidivism.
BeckerH.S., (1963). Outsiders. Studies in the sociology of deviance, The Free Press, New York.
2.
BontaJ. (2002) āRecidivepreventie bij delinquenten: Een overzicht van de huidige kennis en een visie op de toekomstā, JustitiĆ«le Verkenningen28, 20ā36.
3.
BooneMiranda (2005a) āCommunity Justice in a safety culture: Probation service and community justice in the Netherlandsā In Jane Winstone and Francis Pakes, Community Justice, Issues for probation and criminal justice, Willan Publishing Devon: 283ā301.
4.
BooneMiranda (2005b) āZacht als boter, hard als steen. Het juridisch gehalte van het recht op maatschappelijke opvangā, Proces, 84: 232ā239.
5.
BooneMiranda (2007), āSelective rehabilitationā, in MirandaBooneMoeringsMartin, Dutch Prisons, BJu Legal Publishers, The Hague: 231ā249.
6.
BrokHelen (1999), Gevangen in het verleden, Wetenschapswinkel Rechten, Utrecht Herzog-Evans, M. (20011a) āEditorialāEuropean Journal of Probation3 (1): 1ā3.
7.
Herzog-EvansM (2011b) āJudicial rehabilitation in France: Helping with the desisting process and acknowledging achieved desistanceāEuropean Journal of Probation3 (1): 4ā19.
van KralingenRobert (1997), āDe nieuwe wet op de justitiĆ«le documentatie: Grote veranderingen?ā, Proces76: 87ā89.
10.
Lemert (1951). Social Pathology, McGraw-Hill, New York.
11.
MaguireM.GrubinD.LoselF.RaynorP. (2010). āWhat Works' and the Correctional Services Accreditation Panel: Taking stock from an inside perspectiveā. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 10: 37ā58.
12.
MarunaShadd (2001) Making Good. How ex-convicts reform and rebuild their lives, American Psychological Association', Washington D.C.
13.
MarunaShadd (2011) āReentry as a Rite of Passageā. Punishment & Society13, 1ā27.
14.
MorgensternC. (2011) āJudicial rehabilitation in Germany ā The use of criminal records and the removal of recorded convictionsāEuropean Journal of Probation3 (1): 20ā35.
15.
MulderG.E. (1955). Van bewijs van goed zedelijk gedrag naar verklaring omtrent het gedrag, Excelsior Den Haag.
16.
PakesF (2004). The Politics of Discontent: The Emergence of a New Criminal Justice Discourse in the Netherlands, Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 43: 284ā298.
17.
PerryD (2002) āBewijsgerelateerde praktijk en bewijsgerelateerd beleid, modernisering van de reclassering in Engeland en in Walesā, JustitiĆ«le Verkenningen28, 36ā48.
Singer-DekkerH. (1980). Justitiƫle Documentatie en Antecedentenonderzoek, W.E.J. Tjeenk Willink, Zwolle.
20.
Singer-DekkerH. (1991). Justitiƫle Documentatie en de verklaring omtrent gedrag, W.E.J. Tjeenk Willink, Zwolle.
21.
TannenbaumF. (1938). Crime and the Community. Colombia University Press, New York.
22.
UggenChristopherJeffManzaBehrensAngelaāLess than the average citizen: Stigma, transition and the civic reintegration of convicted felonsā In: MarunaSImmarigeonR. (eds): After Crime and Punishment: Pathways to Offender Reintegration: Willan, Collumpton, p. 258ā290.
23.
WardTonyMarunaShadd (2007). Rehabilitation, Routledge, New York.
24.
WartnaB.S.J.TollenaarsN.EssersA.A.M. (2005). Door na de gevangenis, Een cijfermatig overzicht van strafrechtelijke recidive onder ex-gedetineerden, Boom Juridische Uitgevers, Den Haag.
25.
Van der LindenB (2004), āTerugdringen Recidiveā, Proces83: 94ā102.
26.
Van SwaaningenR (2004) āVeiligheid in Nederland en Europa, een sociologische beschouwing aan de hand van David Garlandā, JustitiĆ«le Verkenningen, 3: 9ā24.
