Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The article addresses the question how far European initiatives on Community Sanctions and Measures as well as the attitude towards them and their implementation by the Member States reflect “the punitive turn” or rather show a tendency to “resist punitiveness” in European penal policies. After presenting the Council of Europe's European Rules on Community Sanctions and Measures (ER CSM) of 1992 its provision regarding the co-operation and consent of the offender is considered in more detail. The change of penal climate in the Member States and its reflection by the update of the ER CSM in 2000 is described then, using the example of sanctions of indeterminate duration and Electronic Monitoring. Finally, the European Union's Framework Decision on the supervision of probation measures and alternative sanctions (adopted 2008) and possible obstacles with regard to its implementation are introduced briefly.

Keywords

Co-operation Consent Harmonization Human rights Minimum standards Penal policy

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Boone

Moerings

(2007) Growing Prison Rates. In: Boone

Moerings

(eds.): Dutch Prisons. Den Haag, pp. 40–76.

Cavadino

Dignan

(1997) The Penal System. An Introduction. Second Edition. London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi.

Cavadino

Dignan

(2007) The Penal System. An Introduction. Fourth Edition. London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi.

Dünkel

Lappi-Sepälä

Morgenstern

van Zyl Smit

(eds.) (forthcoming) Kriminalität, politische Systeme und Bestrafungstendenzen in Europa. Mönchengladbach.

Fletcher

Lööf

Gilmore

(2008) EU Criminal Law and Justice. Cheltenham.

Home Office (2000) National standards for the supervision of offenders in the community. London. Home Office, Department of Health, Welsh Office 1992: National standards for the supervision of offenders in the community. London.

Joerden

Szwarc

(eds.) (2007) Europäisierung des Strafrechts in Polen und Deutschland — Rechtsstaatliche Grundlagen. Berlin.

Kruusement

(2009) Electronic monitoring in Estonia. Paper presented at the 6. CEP-Conference on Electronic Monitoring, 7. 9. May 2009. Available online at www.cepprobation.org (last retrieved 2 September 2009).

Lappi-Seppälä

(2007) Penal Policy in Scandinavia. In: Tonry

(ed.): Vol. 36, Crime and Justice: A Review of Research. Chicago.

10.

Mayer

(2004) Modellprojekt Elektronische Fußfessel. Wissenschaftliche Befunde zur Modellphase des hessischen Projekts. Max-Planck-Institut für ausländisches und internationales Strafrecht, forschung aktuell — Research in brief, Nr. 23. Freiburg.

11.

Morgenstern

(2002) Internationale Mindeststandards für ambulante Strafen und Maßnahmen. Mönchengladbach.

12.

Morgenstern

(2006) Neues zur Führungsaufsicht . Neue Kriminalpolitik 18, pp. 152–154.

13.

National Offender Management Service (2006) The NOMS Offender Management Model. London. Available online http://noms.justice.gov.uk/news-publications-events/publications/strategy/offender-management-model-1.1?view=Binary (last retrieved 16 September 2009).

14.

Nelken

(2009) Comparative Criminal Justice. Beyond Ethnocentrism and Relativism. European Journal of Criminology, pp. 291–307.

15.

Ratzel

(forthcoming) Elektronische Aufsicht. Bericht über die 6. CEP-Konferenz vom 7. bis 9. Mai 2009. Forum Strafvollzug.

16.

Schünemann

(ed.) (2006) A Programme for European Criminal Justice. Köln.

17.

Snacken

(2007) Penal Policy and Practice in Belgium. In: Tonry

(Hrsg.): Crime, Punishment, and Politics in a Comparative Perspective. Chicago, London: The University of Chicago Press, S. 127–215.

18.

Tonry

(2007) Penal Policy, Polical Culture and Constitutional Obsolecence. In: Aromaa

(ed.): Penal Policy, Justice Reform and Social Exclusion — Plenary Presentations held at the Fifth Annual Conference of the European Society of Criminology in Krakow, Poland, 2005. Helsinki, pp. 80–99.

19.

Válková

Hulmáková

(2007) Crime and Criminal Justice Reforms in the “New Central European Countries”, and the example of the Czech Republic. In: Aromaa

20.

Válková

(1998) Some Remarks on Implementation of Community Sanctions and Measures. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research 6, pp. 573–597.

21.

Van Zyl Smit

(1993) Legal Standards and the Limits of Community Sanctions. European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice, pp. 309–331.

22.

van Zyl Smit

Dirk

Snacken

Sonja

(2009) Principles of European Prison Law and Policy: Penology and Human Rights. Oxford University Press. Oxford, New York.

23.

Ward

(1993) Community Sentences: Law and Practice. London.

European Initiatives for Harmonisation and Minimum Standards in the Field of Community Sanctions and Measures

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References