Interventions with offenders have a normative layer as well as a scientific basis and therefore it is not possible to quarantine ethical questions from discussions of best practice. My aim in this paper is to provide an expanded ethical canvass from which to approach correctional practice with offenders. The cornerstone of this broader ethical perspective will be the concept of human dignity and its protection by human rights norms and theories. I also explore the relationship between responses to crime and offender rehabilitation based on an enriched theory of punishment that is sensitive to offenders' moral equality and their attendant rights.
AndrewsD. A.BontaJ. (2003). The Psychology of Criminal Conduct (3rd ed.). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
2.
BennettC. (2008). The apology ritual: A philosophical theory of punishment.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
3.
BeyleveldD.BrownswordR. (2001). Human dignity in bioethics and law.New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
4.
BooninD. (2008). The problem of punishment.New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
5.
BushS. S.ConnellM. A.DennyR. L. (2006). Ethical practice in forensic psychology: A systematic model for decision making.Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
6.
ChurchillR. P. (2006). Human rights and global diversity.Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
7.
DarwellS. (2006). The second-person standpoint: Morality, respect, and accountability.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8.
DonnellyJ. (2003). Universal human rights in theory and practice2nd ed.London, UK: Cornell University Press.
9.
DriverJ. (2006). Ethics: The fundamentals.Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.
10.
DuffR. A. (2001). Punishment, communication, and community.New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
11.
FreedenM. (1991). Rights.Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
12.
FreemanM. (2002). Human Rights.Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
13.
GewirthA. (1981). Reason and moralityChicago, USA: The University of Chicago Press.
14.
GewirthA. (1996). The community of rights.Chicago, USA: The University of Chicago Press.
15.
GlaserB. (2003). ‘Therapeutic Jurisprudence: An ethical paradigm for therapists in sex offender treatment programs.’Western Criminology Review, 4, 143–154.
16.
GriffinJ. (2008). On human rights.Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
17.
GolashD. (2005). The case against punishment: Retribution, crime prevention, and the law.New York, NY: New York University Press.
18.
HaagA. D. (2006). ‘Ethical dilemmas faced by correctional psychologists’ in Canada. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 33, 93–109.
19.
KleinigJ. (2008). Ethics and criminal justice: An introduction.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
20.
LazarusL. (2004). Contrasting prisoners' rights: A comparative examination of England and Germany.New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
21.
LevensonJ.D'AmoraD. (2005). ‘An ethical paradigm for sex offender treatment: Response to Glaser.’Western Criminology Review, 6, 145–153.
22.
LippkeR. L. (2002). ‘Toward a theory of prisoners' rights.’Ratio Juris, 15, 122–145.
23.
MillerD. (2007). National responsibility and global justice.Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
24.
MillerR. B. (2004). Facing human suffering: Psychology and psychotherapy as moral engagement.Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
25.
MorsinkJ. (2009). Inherent human rights: Philosophical roots of the universal declaration.Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania Press.
26.
NickelJ. W. (2007). Making sense of human rights2nd ed.Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.
27.
NussbaumM. (2006). Frontiers of justice: disability, nationality, species-membership.Cambridge, UK: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
28.
OrendB. (2002). Human rights: Concept and context.Ontario, Canada: Broadview Press.
29.
ShultzinerD. (2007). ‘Human dignity: Functions and meanings.’ In MalpasJ.LickissN., (2007) (Eds.). Perspectives on human dignity: A conversation (pp 73–92). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
30.
SmitD. Z.SnackenS. (2009). Principles of European prison law and policy: Penology and human rights.New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
31.
SulmasyD. P. (2007). ‘Human dignity and human worth.’ In MalpasJ.LickissN., (2007) (Eds.). Perspectives on human dignity: A conversation (pp 9–18). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
32.
United Nations (1948). ‘Universal declaration of human rights.’ In MartinJ. P.RangaswamyR., (1984) (Eds.). Twenty-five human rights documents.NY: Columbia University for the Study of Human Rights.
33.
VessJ. (2009). ‘Fear and loathing in public policy: Ethical issues in laws for sex offenders.’Aggression and Violent Behavior, 14, 264–272.
34.
WardT. (in press). ‘Extending the mind into the world: A new theory of cognitive distortions.’Journal of Sexual Aggression..
35.
WardT.BirgdenA. (2007). ‘Human rights and correctional clinical practice.’Aggression and Violent Behavior, 12, 628–643.
36.
WardT.LanglandsR. (2009). ‘Repairing the rupture: Restorative justice and offender rehabilitation.’Aggression and Violent Behavior, 14, 205–214.
37.
WardT.MarunaS. (2007). Rehabilitation: Beyond the risk paradigm.London: Routledge.
38.
WardTMoretonG. (2008). ‘Moral Repair with Offenders: Ethical Issues Arising From Victimization Experiences.’Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 20, 305–322.
39.
WardT.NeeC. (2009). ‘Surfaces and depths: Evaluating the theoretical assumptions of the cognitive skills programmes’. Psychology, Crime & Law, 15, 165–182.
40.
WardT.SalmonK. (2009). ‘The ethics of punishment: Correctional practice implications.’Aggression and Violent Behavior, 14, 239–247.
