Abstract
Glaesser J (2021) Exploring the issue of asymmetry in analysing educational poverty using Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA). Methodological Innovations. DOI: 10.1177/20597991211040062.
In the above-referenced article, in-citations and respective references have been corrected in below sentences:
On page 2, right column, section ‘Educational versus material wealth or poverty’ line 17, correct sentence is: These differences notwithstanding, the authors mentioned earlier have shown that educational poverty can be an analytically fruitful concept and that it differs in important ways from related concepts such as inequality (see also Glaesser, 2021).
Page 10, section ‘Notes’, point 3, correct sentence is: Though they may lose their relative value over time if the labour market’s demands change in line with rising levels of qualification in the population as a whole. I do not have space here to discuss in more detail the relative nature of both material and educational poverty; see Glaesser (2021) and, for example, Townsend (1979).
Glaesser J (2021) Relative educational poverty: Conceptual and empirical issues. Quality & Quantity, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-021-01226-3