BenderE. M.GebruT.McMillan-MajorA.ShmitchellS. (2021). On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language models be too big? In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (pp. 610–623). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3442188.3445922
2.
BenjaminR. (2019). Race after technology: Abolitionist tools for the new Jim code. Polity.
3.
BlumerH. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Prentice-Hall.
4.
BucherT. (2025). Beyond the hype: Reframing AI through algorithms and culture. Journal of Communication, 75(1), 81–84. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqae048
5.
CampbellS. W.EllisonN. B.RossM. Q. (2025). Extending the self through AI-mediated communication: Functional, ontological, and anthropomorphic extensions. Communication and Change, 1, 3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44382-025-00003-2
6.
CastellsM. (2009). Communication power. Oxford University Press.
7.
ChaffeeS. H.BergerC. R. (1987). Levels of analysis: An introduction. In BergerC. R.ChaffeeS. H. (Eds.), Handbook of communication science (pp. 143–145). Sage.
DourishP. (2017). The stuff of bits: An essay on the materialities of information. MIT Press.
12.
EdwardsC.EdwardsA.SpenceP. R.SheltonA. K. (2014). Is that a bot running the social media feed? Testing the differences in perceptions of communication quality for a human agent and a bot agent on Twitter. Computers in Human Behavior, 33(5), 372–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.08.013
13.
EisensteinE. L. (1979) The printing press as an agent of change: Communications and cultural transformations in early-modern Europe (Vols. 1–2). Cambridge University Press.
14.
Ertem-ErayT.ChengY. (2025). A review of artificial intelligence research in peer-reviewed communication journals. Applied Sciences, 15(3), 1058. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15031058
15.
FølstadA.AraujoT.LawE. L.-C.BrandtzaegP. B.PapadopoulosS.ReisL.BaezM.LabanG.McAllisterP.IschenC.WaldR.CataniaF.Meyer von WolffR.HobertS.LugerE. (2021). Future directions for chatbot research: An interdisciplinary research agenda. Computing, 103(12), 2915–2942. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00607-021-01016-7
GambinoA.FoxJ.RatanR. A. (2020). Building a stronger CASA: Extending the computers are social actors paradigm. Human-Machine Communication, 1, 71–86. https://doi.org/10.30658/hmc.1.5
18.
GuzmanA. L. (Ed.), (2018). Human-machine communication: Rethinking communication, technology, and ourselves. Peter Lang. https://doi.org/10.3726/b14399
19.
GuzmanA. L. (2020). Ontological boundaries between humans and computers and the implications for human-machine communication. Human-Machine Communication, 1, 37–54. https://doi.org/10.30658/hmc.1.3
20.
GuzmanA. L.LewisS. C. (2020). Artificial intelligence and communication: A human–machine communication research agenda. New Media & Society, 22(1), 70–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819858691
21.
HancockJ. T.NaamanM.LevyK. (2020). AI-mediated communication: Definition, research agenda, and ethical considerations. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 25(1), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmz022
22.
IschenC.AraujoT.van NoortG.VoorveldH.SmitE. (2020). “I am here to assist you today”: The role of entity, interactivity and experiential perceptions in chatbot persuasion. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 64(4), 615–639. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2020.1834297
23.
KimY.GambinoA. (2024). Do you feel what I feel? Social presence and parasocial interactions with an AI speaker. Human Communication Research, 50(3), 296–307. https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/hqae008
24.
KuhnT. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press.
25.
LewisS. C.GuzmanA. L.SchmidtT. R. (2019). Automation, journalism, and human–machine communication: Rethinking roles and relationships of humans and machines in news. Digital Journalism, 7(4), 409–427. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2019.1577147
LiuB. (2021). In AI we trust? Effects of agency locus and transparency on uncertainty reduction in human–AI interaction. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 26(6), 384–402. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmab013
28.
LiuB.SundarS. S. (2018). Should machines express sympathy and empathy? Experiments with a health advice chatbot. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 21(10), 625–636. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2018.0110
29.
ManJ. (2002). The gutenberg revolution: How printing changed the course of history. Headline.
30.
McLeodJ. M.ShahD. V.HessD.LeeN.-J. (2010). Communication and education: Creating competence for socialization into public life. In SherrodL. R.FlanaganC. A.Torney-PurtaJ. (Eds.), Handbook of research on civic engagement in youth (pp. 363–391). Wiley.
31.
PetersJ. D. (2008). Communication: History of the idea. In DonsbachW. (Ed.), The international encyclopedia of communication (pp. 689–693). Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405186407.wbiecc075
32.
PlantinJ.-C.de SetaG. (2019). WeChat as infrastructure: The techno-nationalist shaping of Chinese digital platforms. Chinese Journal of Communication, 12(3), 257–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/17544750.2019.1572633
33.
RodgersS. (2021). Themed issue introduction: Promises and perils of artificial intelligence and advertising. Journal of Advertising, 50(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2020.1868233
34.
ShinD.ParkY. J. (2019). Role of fairness, accountability, and transparency in algorithmic decision-making: Trust, acceptance, and satisfaction. Computers in Human Behavior, 98, 277–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.04.019
35.
SkjuveM.FølstadA.FostervoldK. I.BrandtzaegP. B. (2021). My chatbot companion—A study of human-chatbot relationships. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 149, 102601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2021.102601
36.
SundarS. S. (2008). The MAIN model: A heuristic approach to understanding technology effects on credibility. In MetzgerM. J.FlanaginA. J. (Eds.), Digital media, youth, and credibility (pp. 73–100). MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.1162/dmal.9780262562324.073
37.
SundarS. S. (2020). Rise of machine agency: A framework for studying the psychology of human–AI interaction (HAII). Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 25(1), 74–88. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmz026
WoolleyS. C.HowardP. N. (Eds.), (2018). Computational propaganda: Political parties, politicians, and political manipulation on social media. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190931407.001.0001
40.
YakuraH.NishimuraY.PicardR. (2024). Empirical evidence of large language Model’s influence on human spoken communication. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2409.01754