Infrastructural capitalism in China: Alibaba,its corporate culture and three infrastructural mechanisms

Abstract

Contrasting existing scholarship in ‘socialism with Chinese characteristics’, this article builds on the theorisation of infrastructural capitalism as an emerging global-capitalist project entangled with both China’s state-socialist ideology and the latest nationalistic revitalisation agenda, serving both political and commercial goals, yet also rendering discontent and resistance in daily business and employment practices. Through participant observation across 13 Alibaba departments or subsidiaries, semi-structured interviews with workers in Alibaba and other Chinese platform companies, and the analysis of corporate documentation and media reports, our ethnographic study highlights the ‘physical and digital (phygital)’ nature of infrastructure, and theorises how discursive, symbolic, and sensorial techniques are adopted to direct and sustain infrastructural capitalism in daily organisational setting through three unique mechanisms: public-private partnerships, corporate prosumption networks (CPN) and imagineered global competition. This article’s key contributions are threefold: to dissect the intertwined discursive, symbolic and affective mechanisms through which the ‘invisible’ infrastructures of capitalism are made ‘visible’ and ‘sensible’; unpack the variegated impacts and inherent dilemmas of infrastructural capitalism; and reimagine the possibility of individual resistance and systemic transgression.

Keywords

Alibaba China corporate culture digital economy E-commerce infrastructural capitalism phygital infrastructure platform economy public-private partnerships sensorial infrastructure

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anand

(2012). Municipal disconnect: on abject water and its urban infrastructures. Ethnography, 13(4), 487–509. https://doi.org/10.1177/1466138111435743

Arvidsson

(2020). Capitalism and the commons. Theory, Culture and Society, 37(2), 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276419868838

Baran

P. A.

Sweezy

P. M.

(1966). Monopoly capital: An essay on the American economic and social order: Monthly Review Press.

Budnitsky

Jia

(2018). Branding Internet sovereignty: Digital media and the Chinese–Russian cyberalliance. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 21(5), 594–613. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549417751151

Cao

(2019). Bullet screens (Danmu): Texting, online streaming, and the spectacle of social inequality on Chinese social networks. Theory, Culture and Society, 38(3), 29–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276419877675

Chakrabarty

(2000). Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial thought and historical difference: Princeton University Press.

Crary

(2013). Late capitalism and the ends of sleep. Verso (24/7).

Cubitt

(2014). Telecommunication networks: Economy, ecology, rule. Theory, Culture and Society, 31(7-8), 185–199. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276413511490

de Seta

(2023). China’s digital infrastructure: Networks, systems, standards. Global Media and China, 8(3), 245–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/20594364231202203

10.

Dirlik

(1989). Postsocialism? Reflections on “socialism with Chinese characteristics”. Bulletin of Concerned Asian Scholars, 21(1), 33–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/14672715.1989.10413190

11.

Ferguson

(2012). We’re all state capitalists now. Foreign Policy, 2012(9).

12.

Foster

J. B.

Clark

(2020). The robbery of nature: Capitalism and the ecological rift: NYU Press.

13.

Fuchs

Mosco

(Eds), (2015). Marx in the age of digital capitalism: Brill.

14.

Hallinan

Gilmore

J. N.

(2021). Infrastructural politics amidst the coils of control. Cultural Studies, 35(4-5), 617–640. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502386.2021.1895259

15.

Hardt

Negri

(2000). Empire. Harvard University Press.

16.

Harvey

(2010). The enigma of capital. Profile Books.

17.

Harvey

(2018). The limits to capital. Verso books.

18.

Hessler

(2021). The rise of made-in-China diplomacy. The New Yorker. Available at. https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2021/03/15/the-rise-of-made-in-china-diplomacy

19.

Hung

H. F.

(2015). The China boom: Why China will not rule the world: Columbia University Press.

20.

Larkin

(2013). The politics and poetics of infrastructure. Annual Review of Anthropology, 42(1), 327–343. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-092412-155522

21.

(Ed.), (2016). The rise of China and the capitalist world order. Routledge.

22.

(2023). Managerial technique and worker subjectivity in dialogue: Understanding overwork in China’s internet industry. Work, Employment and Society, 37(6), 1699–1716. https://doi.org/10.1177/09500170221092585

23.

Tsang

L. T.

Tse

(2023). Pluralising China as Method: Decolonising cultural mediations in the global South. Global Media and China, 8(4), 433–441. https://doi.org/10.1177/20594364231216265

24.

Liang

(2019). Overtime: Research on work stress of Internet companies in China. Beijing, China: Social Sciences Academic Press.

25.

Lin

(2013). China and global capitalism: Reflections on Marxism, history and contemporary politics. Palgrave Mcmillian.

26.

Lombardi

(1999). Computer networks, social networks and the future of Brazil. PhD dissertation. New York University.

27.

Mandel

(1978). Late capitalism. Verso.

28.

Mann

(1984). The autonomous power of the state: Its origins, mechanisms and results. European Journal of Sociology, 25(2), 185–213. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003975600004239

29.

Parks

(2016). “Infrastructures” in Keywords for media studies. Laurie ouellette and jonathan gray. (pp. 106–108). NYU Press.

30.

Pearson

Rithmire

Tsai

K. S.

(2021). Party-state capitalism in China. Current History, 120(827), 207–213. https://doi.org/10.1525/curh.2021.120.827.207

31.

Peck

Zhang

(2013). A variety of capitalism, with Chinese characteristics? Journal of Economic Geography 13(3): 357–396. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbs058

32.

Peters

J. D.

(2015). The marvelous clouds: Toward a philosophy of elemental media: The University of Chicago Press.

33.

Plantin

De Seta

(2019). WeChat as infrastructure: The techno-nationalist shaping of Chinese digital platforms. Chinese Journal of Communication, 12(3), 257–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/17544750.2019.1572633

34.

Plantin

Lagoze

Edwards

P. N.

Sandvig

(2018). Infrastructure studies meet platform studies in the age of Google and Facebook. New Media and Society, 20(1), 293–310. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816661553

35.

Polanyi

(1957). The great transformation: The political and economic origins of our time: Beacon Press.

36.

Pun

Chen

(2023). Confronting global infrastructural capitalism: the triple logic of the “vanguard” and its inevitable spatial and class contradictions in China’s high-speed rail program. Cultural Studies, 37(6), 872–893. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502386.2022.2056219

37.

Rao

(2023). Discourse as infrastructure: How “new infrastructure” policies re-infrastructure China. Global Media and China, 8(3), 254–270. https://doi.org/10.1177/20594364231198605

38.

Rasmussen

M. B.

(2018). Postfascism, or the cultural logic of late capitalism. Third Text, 32(5-6), 682–688. https://doi.org/10.1080/09528822.2018.1549797

39.

Ritzer

(2015). Prosumer capitalism. The Sociological Quarterly, 56(3), 413–445. https://doi.org/10.1111/tsq.12105

40.

Romele

Severo

(2016). The economy of the digital gift: From socialism to sociality online. Theory, Culture and Society, 33(5), 43–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276415619474

41.

Schwarz

(2019). Facebook rules: Structures of governance in digital capitalism and the control of generalized social capital. Theory, Culture and Society, 36(4), 117–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276419826249

42.

Sneath

(2009). Reading the signs by Lenin’s light: Development, divination and metonymic fields in Mongolia. Ethnos, 74(1), 72–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/00141840902751204

43.

Srnicek

(2016). Platform capitalism. John Wiley and Sons.

44.

Steinberg

Zhang

Mukherjee

(2024). Platform capitalisms and platform cultures. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/13678779231223544

45.

Sun

(2017). Utopia, nostalgia, and femininity: Visually promoting the Chinese Dream. Visual Communication, 18(1), 107–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357217740394

46.

Tan

G. K. S.

(2021). Democratizing finance with Robinhood: Financial infrastructure, interface design and platform capitalism. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 53(8), 1862–1878. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518x211042378

47.

Tan

(2021). China’s Lipstick King sold an astonishing $1.7 billion in goods in 12 hours—And that was just in a promotion for the country’s biggest shopping day. Business insider. https://www.businessinsider.com/china-lipstick-king-sold-17-billion-stuff-in-12-hours-2021-10

48.

Tan

Zhao

J. Z.

(2019). The Rise of public–private partnerships in China: An effective financing approach for infrastructure investment? Public Administration Review, 79(4), 514–518. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13046

49.

Tse

(2023). Recoupling corporate culture with new political discourse in China’s platform economy: The case of Alibaba. Work, Employment and Society, 37(6), 1544–1564. https://doi.org/10.1177/09500170221083106

50.

Vallas

Schor

(2020). What do platforms do? Understanding the gig economy. Annual Review of Sociology, 46(1), 273–294. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-121919-054857

51.

Van Dijck

Poell

de Waal

(2018). The platform society: Public values in a connective world: Oxford University Press.

52.

Veen

Barratt

Goods

(2020). Platform-Capital’s ‘app-etite’ for control: A labour process analysis of food-delivery work in Australia. Work, Employment and Society, 34(3), 388–406. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017019836911

53.

Von Schnitzler

(2008). Citizenship prepaid: Water, calculability, and techno-politics in South Africa. Journal of Southern African Studies, 34(4), 899–917. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057070802456821

54.

Wang

C. L.

(Ed.), (2023). The palgrave handbook of interactive marketing. Palgrave Macmillan.

55.

Wang

(2021). Playing live-streaming ‘love games’: Mediated intimacy and desperational labour in digital China. Journal of Gender Studies, 30(5), 621–632. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2021.1929100

56.

Wood

A. J.

Graham

Lehdonvirta

Hjorth

(2019). Good gig, bad gig: Autonomy and algorithmic control in the global gig economy. Work, Employment & Society: A Journal of the British Sociological Association, 33(1), 56–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017018785616

57.

Xiang

Lindquist

(2014). Migration infrastructure. International Migration Review, 48(1_suppl), 122–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/imre.12141

58.

Zhang

Chen

J. Y.

(2022). A regional and historical approach to platform capitalism: The cases of Alibaba and Tencent. Media, Culture & Society, 44(8), 1454–1472. https://doi.org/10.1177/01634437221127796

59.

Zhang

Peck

(2016). Variegated capitalism, Chinese style: Regional models, multi-scalar constructions. Regional Studies, 50(1), 52–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2013.856514

60.

Zhang

(2019). When Platform capitalism meets petty capitalism in China: Alibaba and an integrated approach to Platformization. International Journal of Communication, 14(2020), 114–134.