AngI. (2005). Can one say no to Chineseness? Pushing the limits of the diasporic paradigm. In On not Speaking Chinese (pp. 37–51). Routledge.
2.
ChowR. (1998). Introduction: On Chineseness as a theoretical problem. Boundary, 25(3), 1–24.
3.
ChowR. (2000). Modern Chinese literary and cultural studies in the age of theory: Reimagining a field. Duke University Press.
4.
FranceschiniI.LoubereN. (2022). Global China as method. Cambridge University Press.
5.
MizoguchiY. (1989). Hôhô to shite no Chûgoku [China as Method]. Tokyo University Press.
6.
MizoguchiY. (2016). China as method. Inter-Asia cultural studies, 17(4), 513–518.
7.
ShihS. M. (2007). Visuality and identity: Sinophone articulations across the Pacific (Vol. 2). Univ of California Press.
8.
ShihS. M. (2011). The concept of the Sinophone. PMLA, 126(3), 709–718.
9.
WongG. (2023, March 19). What does it mean to be ethnically Chinese in Singapore?Singapore Chinese Cultural Center.
10.
XieK. (2019). Conceptualizing “Chineseness” in Southeast Asian communist movements during the interwar period: Indonesia, Malaya, Vietnam, and Thailand in comparative perspectives (in Chinese). Southeast Asia Studies, (6), 130–151.
11.
YangG. (2021). “China as a method” for Chinese political science research. Chinese Political Science Review, 6, 546–574.