The meanings of being “underclass” in China are increasingly ambivalent when various disadvantaged social groups also get access to digital platforms which become more and more influential in not just facilitating people’s economic and cultural practices online but also mediating, distorting, and reshaping these processes. Using critical techno-cultural discourse analysis about how the underclass represent poverty and themselves by creating short videos and performing live-commerce on Kuaishou, this study finds that digital entrepreneurialism becomes an interlocking governmentality to discipline the underclass’ online participation. Afforded by the platform and operationalized by multiple networked actors, entrepreneurialism incorporates the underclass in the digitally mediated productive relationship and at the same time disciplines their online representation and exploits the involved entities through both platform labor and monetary investments to cultivate an underclass entrepreneurial subject. Although claiming to include and empower the diversified Chinese underclass, digital platforms actually reproduce the underclassness by mobilizing the calculated conformity among the underclass to experience the intertwining online and offline inequalities through digital entrepreneurship. Nonetheless, nuances of minor narratives still exist in the digitally mediated self-representation.
AhlstromD.DingZ. (2014). Entrepreneurship in China: An overview. International Small Business Journal, 32(6), 610–618. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242613517913.
2.
ArriagadaA.BishopS. (2021). Between Commerciality and Authenticity: The Imaginary of Social Media Influencers in the Platform Economy. Communication, Culture and Critique, 14(4), 568–586. https://doi.org/10.1093/ccc/tcab050.
3.
BaumanZ. (2004). Work, consumerism and the new poor. Open University Press.
BrockA. (2020). Distributed blackness: African American cybercultures. NYU Press.
6.
CarlssonB.BraunerhjelmP.McKelveyM.OlofssonC.PerssonL.YlinenpääH. (2013). The evolving domain of entrepreneurship research. Small business economics, 41(4), 913-930. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-013-9503-y.
7.
ChenJ. Y.SunP. (2020). Temporal arbitrage, fragmented rush, and opportunistic behaviors: The labor politics of time in the platform economy. New Media & Society, 22(9), 1561–1579. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820913567.
CraigD.LinJ.CunninghamS. (2021). Wanghong as social media entertainment in China. Palgrave macmillan.
10.
De KloetJ.PoellT.GuohuaZ.Yiu FaiC. (2019). The platformization of Chinese society: Infrastructure, governance, and practice. Chinese Journal of Communication, 12(3), 249–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/17544750.2019.1644008.
11.
DeleuzeG.GuattariF. (1986). Kafka: Toward a Minor Literature. D. Polan, Trans.). University of Minnesota Press.
12.
DuanJ.YinJ.XuY.WuD. (2020). Should I stay or should I go? Job demands’ push and entrepreneurial resources’ pull in Chinese migrant workers’ return-home entrepreneurial intention. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 32(5-6), 429–448. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2019.1640455.
13.
DuffyB. E.PinchA.SannonS.SaweyM. (2021). The nested precarities of creative labor on social media. Social Media+ Society, 7(2). http://doi.org/10.1177/20563051211021368.
14.
FengJ. (2010). Xinhua fuyin chanye de shengmingshi [The life history of Xinhua copy industry]. China Market 13.
15.
HelmondA.van der VlistF. N. (2019). Social media and platform historiography: Challenges and opportunities. TMG – Journal for Media History, 22(1), 6–34. https://doi.org/10.18146/tmg.434.
16.
HouJ. (2020). Contesting the vulgar hanmai performance from Kuaishou: Online vigilantism toward Chinese underclass youths on social media platforms. In TrottierD.GabdulhakovR.HuangQ. (Eds), Introducing vigilant audiences (pp. 49–76). Open book publisher. https://doi.org/10.11647/obp.0200.03.
17.
HouJ. (2021). A platform for underclass youth: Hanmai rap videos, social class, and surveillance on Chinese social media. First Monday, 26(9). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v26i9.10587.
18.
IraniL. (2019). Chasing innovation: Making entrepreneurial citizens in modern India. Princeton University Press.
19.
LatourB. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford University Press.
20.
LeongC.PanS. L.PanS. L.NewellS.CuiL. (2016). The emergence of self-organizing e-commerce ecosystems in remote villages of China: A tale of digital empowerment for rural development. MIS Quarterly, 40(2), 475–484. https://doi.org/10.25300/misq/2016/40.2.11.
21.
LiQ. (2021). 21shiji yilai zhongguo shehui fencing jiegou bianqian de tezheng yu qushi [The features and trends of Chinese social stratification from 21st century]. Hebei Journal, 5.
22.
LightB.BurgessJ.DuguayS. (2018). The walkthrough method: An approach to the study of apps. New Media & Society, 20(3), 881–900. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816675438.
23.
LinJ.de KloetJ. (2019). Platformization of the unlikely creative class: Kuaishou and Chinese digital cultural production. Social Media+ Society, 5(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119883430.
24.
LindtnerS. M. (2020). Prototype nation: China and the contested promise of innovation. Princeton University Press.
25.
LiM.TanC. K. K.YangY. (2020). Shehui Ren: Cultural production and rural youths’ use of the Kuaishou video-sharing app in Eastern China. Information, Communication & Society, 23(10), 1499-1514. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2019.1585469.
26.
LiuC. W. (2020). Return migration, online entrepreneurship and gender performance in the Chinese ‘Taobao families. Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 61(3), 478–493. https://doi.org/10.1111/apv.12280.
27.
MeiY.MaoD.LuY.ChuW. (2020). Effects and mechanisms of rural E‐commerce clusters on households’ entrepreneurship behavior in China. Growth and Change, 51(4), 1588–1610. https://doi.org/10.1111/grow.12424.
28.
MurphyR. (2000). Return migration, entrepreneurship and local state corporatism in rural China: the experience of two counties in south Jiangxi. Journal of Contemporary China, 9(24), 231–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/713675936.
29.
NambisanS. (2017). Digital entrepreneurship: Toward a digital technology perspective of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 41(6), 1029-1055. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12254.
30.
NicollB. (2019). Minor Platforms in Videogame History. Amsterdam University Press.
31.
OregliaE. (2013). From farm to farmville: Circulation, adoption, and use of ICT between urban and rural China [Doctoral dissertation. UC Berkeley. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/68s0x1r3.
32.
PeverelliP. J.SongJ. (2012). Chinese entrepreneurship: A social capital approach. Springer.
33.
PinkS.HorstH.PostillJ.HjorthL.LewisT.TacchiJ. (2015). Digital ethnography: Principles and practice. SAGE.
34.
PoutziourisP.WangY.ChanS. (2002). Chinese entrepreneurship: The development of small family firms in China. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 9(4), 383–399. https://doi.org/10.1108/14626000210450568.
35.
QiuJ. L. (2009). Working-class network society: Communication technology and the information have-less in urban China. MIT press.
36.
RosenblatA.StarkL. (2016). Algorithmic labor and information asymmetries: A case study of Uber’s drivers. International Journal of Communication, 10, 3758-3784.
37.
ScottJ. C. (2008). Weapons of the weak: Everyday forms of peasant resistance. Yale university Press.
38.
SiS.YuX.WuA.ChenS.ChenS.SuY. (2015). Entrepreneurship and poverty reduction: A case study of Yiwu, China. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 32(1), 119–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-014-9395-7.
SolingerD. J. (2012). The new urban underclass and its consciousness: Is it a class? Journal of Contemporary China, 21(78), 1011–1028. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2012.701037.
41.
SunW. (2014). Subaltern China: Rural migrants, media, and cultural practices. Rowman & Littlefield.
42.
SunP. (2019). Your order, their labor: An exploration of algorithms and laboring on food delivery platforms in China. Chinese Journal of Communication, 12(3), 308–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/17544750.2019.1583676.
43.
TangW.ZhuJ. (2020). Informality and rural industry: Rethinking the impacts of E-Commerce on rural development in China. Journal of Rural Studies, 75, 20–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.02.010.
44.
TanC. K.WangJ.WangzhuS.XuJ.ZhuC. (2020). The real digital housewives of China’s Kuaishou video-sharing and live-streaming app. Media, Culture & Society, 42(7-8), 1243–1259. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443719899802.
WodakR.MeyerM. (2015). Methods of critical discourse studies. SAGE.
47.
WoodcockJ.JohnsonM. R. (2019). The affective labor and performance of live streaming on Twitch. tv. Television & New Media, 20(8), 813–823. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476419851077.
48.
WuJ.SiS.YanH. (2020). Reducing poverty through the shared economy: Creating inclusive entrepreneurship around institutional voids in China. Asian Business & Management. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41291-020-00113-3.
49.
XiangB. (2018). Kuayue bianjie de shequ: Beijing zhejiangcun de shenghuoshi [Transcending Boundaries: Zhejiangcun, the Story of a Migrant Village in Beijing]. SDX Publishing.
50.
YangP.TangL. (2018). Positive Energy”: Hegemonic intervention and online media discourse in China's xi jinping era. China: An International Journal, 16(1), 1–22.
YuH. (2019). The enterprising self: Disability and digital entrepreneurship in China. In AthiqueA.BaulchE. (Eds), Digital transactions in Asia: Economic, informational, and social exchanges (pp. 192–208). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429425110-11.
ZhangL. (2017). Entrepreneurial labor: Digital work and subjectivities in China’s new economy [doctoral dissertation. University of Southern California. https://www.proquest.com/docview/2401772867.
55.
ZhangL. (2020). When platform capitalism meets petty capitalism in China: Alibaba and an integrated approach to platformization. International Journal of Communication, 14, 114–134.
56.
ZhanX.LiuZ.OuE.MaQ.PanW. (2020). The Study of Tourism Poverty Alleviation Effect under the Perspective of New Media: Taking the Internet Celebrity Attractions of Tik Tok Libo as an Example. 2020 international conference on computer information and big data applications (CIBDA) (pp. 352–357). IEEE.
