This article is part of the special issue Creative Labor in East Asia. By exploring specific politico-economic and institutional, conditions promoting actually existing precarity in Korean digital game labor, this study aims to examine how the industrial and institutional conditions of precarity affect digital game workers’ subjectivity. Under this theoretical and empirical consideration, the study first delineates how the rapid industrial transition to the mobile game market happens in relation to the Korean government’s deregulation policy on that particular market. It then scrutinizes the ways in which this industrial shift deepens labor precarity, promotes degradation of skills, and ultimately fragments workers in the digital game industry. Based on this structural analysis, it argues that the fragmented industrial structure of the digital game industry in Korea not only actually fosters contrasting labor subjectivities but also promotes fragmented resistances among Korean digital game workers. By critically evaluating both possibilities and limitations of the recent firm-centered union movements created by digital game workers, the study ultimately concludes that finding a way to connect organized unions to unorganized freelance workers is absolutely necessary to actually transform “precarity” into “solidarity.”
BanksM. (2010). Autonomy guaranteed? Cultural work and the “art–commerce relation.”Journal for Cultural Research, 14(3), 251–269.
2.
BrennerN.TheodoreN. (2002). Cities and the geographies of “actually existing neoliberalism.”Antipode, 34(3), 349–379.
3.
BulutE. (2015a). Glamor above, precarity below: Immaterial labor in the video game industry. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 32(3), 193–207.
4.
BulutE. (2015b). Playboring in the tester pit: The convergence of precarity and the degradation of fun in video game testing. Television & New Media, 16(3), 240–258.
5.
ChristophersonS. (2008). Beyond the self-expressive creative worker: An industry perspective on entertainment media. Theory, Culture & Society, 25(7–8), 73–95.
6.
de PeuterG. (2014a). Beyond the model worker: Surveying a creative precariat. Culture Unbound: Journal of Current Cultural Research, 6(1), 263–284.
7.
de PeuterG. (2014b). Confronting precarity in the Warhol economy: Notes from New York City. Journal of Cultural Economy, 7(1), 31–47.
8.
Dyer-WithefordN.de PeuterG. (2009). Games of empire: Global capitalism and video games. University of Minnesota Press.
9.
FuchsC. (2014). Digital Labour and Karl Marx. Routledge.
10.
FungA. (2016). Redefining creative labor: East Asian comparisons. In CurtinM.SansonK. (Eds.), Precarious creativity: Global media, local labor (pp. 200–214). University of California Press.
11.
Game Rating and Administration Committee. (2018). Game rating and administration committee yearbook 2018.
12.
Game Rating Board. (2013). Game rating and administration committee yearbook.
13.
GillR. (2014). Unspeakable inequalities: Post feminism, entrepreneurial subjectivity, and the repudiation of sexism among cultural workers. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 21(4), 509–528.
HjorthL. (2007). The game of being mobile: One media history of gaming and mobile technologies in Asia-Pacific. Convergence, 13(4), 369–381.
18.
JinD. (2011). The digital Korean wave: Local online gaming goes global. Media International Australia, 141(1), 128–136.
19.
JinD. (2016). New Korean wave: Transnational cultural power in the age of social media. University of Illinois Press.
20.
JinD.CheeF. (2008). Age of new media empires: A critical interpretation of the Korean online game industry. Games and Culture, 3(1), 38–58.
21.
JohnsonJ. L.BottorffJ. L.BrowneA. J.GrewalS.HiltonB. A.ClarkeH. (2004). Othering and being othered in the context of health care services. Health Communication, 16(2), 255–271.
22.
KimC. (2014). Labor and the limits of seduction in Korea’s creative economy. Television & New Media, 15(6), 562–576.
23.
KimC. (2019). The political subjectivization of Korean creative workers: Working and living as urban precariat in creative city Seoul. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 25(6), 701–713.
KücklichJ. R. (2009). Virtual worlds and their discontents: Precarious sovereignty, governmentality, and the ideology of play. Games and Culture, 4(4), 340–352.
27.
LeeC. K. (2016). Precarization or empowerment? Reflections on recent labor unrest in China. The Journal of Asian Studies, 75(2), 317–333.
28.
LinJ. (2019). Be creative for the state: Creative workers in Chinese state-owned cultural enterprises. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 22(1), 53–69.
29.
LoreyI. (2015). State of insecurity: Government of the precarious. Verso Books.
30.
MacDonaldI. T. (2018). Rethinking labor unionism in spaces of precarious work. In AtzeniM.NessI. (Eds.), Global perspectives on workers’ and labour organizations (pp. 3–22). Springer.
31.
MayerV. (2011). Below the line: Television producers and production studies in the new economy. Duke University Press.
32.
McRobbieA. (2018). Be creative: Making a living in the new culture industries. John Wiley.
33.
MillerT.GovilN.McMurrinJ.MaxwellR.WangT. (2005). Global Hollywood2. British Film Institute.
34.
MurgiaA. (2014). Representations of precarity in Italy: Collective and individual stories, social imaginaries and subjectivities. Journal of Cultural Economy, 7(1), 48–63.
NeffG.WissingerE.ZukinS. (2005). Entrepreneurial labor among cultural producers: “Cool” jobs in “hot” industries. Social Semiotics, 15(3), 307–334.
37.
NeilsonB.CotéM. (2014). Introduction: Are we all cultural workers now?Journal of Cultural Economy, 7(1), 2–11.
38.
O’DonnellC. (2008). The work/play of the interactive new economy: Video game development in the United States and India [Doctoral dissertation]. Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.
39.
ScharffC. (2016). The psychic life of neoliberalism: Mapping the contours of entrepreneurial subjectivity. Theory, Culture & Society, 33(6), 107–122.
40.
StandingG. (2011). The Precariat: The new dangerous class. Bloomsbury Academic.
41.
UrsellG. (2000). Television production: Issues of exploitation, commodification and subjectivity in UK television labour markets. Media, Culture & Society, 22(6), 805–825.
42.
WrightE. O. (2000). Working-class power, capitalist-class interests, and class compromise. American Journal of Sociology, 105(4), 957–1002.
43.
YoonT. J.CheonH. (2014). Game playing as transnational cultural practice: A case study of Chinese gamers and Korean MMORPGs. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 17(5), 469–483.
