In the past few decades, the rise of China has become the theme of heated debates, the central question of which is whether China will rise peacefully or as a “threat.” Faced with various speculations and predictions about China’s possible future course of action, Chinese political leaders and eminent scholars began engaging in the making and projecting of China’s soft power as well as a series of nation-branding campaigns. In order to study and evaluate the effectiveness of China’s nation-branding campaigns as well as how well the general public receives them, we looked into the perspectives and attitudes of the populace to find out their attitudes toward China’s national image. In this article, we intend to scrutinize the public opinions toward China as reflected by the questions and answers on social media (quora.com in this case), using content analysis. As the findings show, the ranking of effectiveness of the different aspects of China’s nation branding is as follows: (1) history, (2) place, (3) language, (4) political and economic systems, (5) culture, (6) people, (7) infrastructure, and (8) social institution. Based on the results of the study, a model for evaluating the success or effectiveness of nation-branding campaigns was proposed.
AronczykM. (2013). Branding the nation: The global business of national identity. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
2.
BentlyL. (2011). The making of modern trade mark law: The construction of the legal concept of trade mark (1860-1880). In BentlyL.DavisJ.GinsburgJ. C. (Eds.), Trademarks and brands. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3–41.
3.
ChristensenT. J. (1996). Chinese Realpolitik. Foreign Affairs, 75(5), 37–52.
4.
DingS.SaundersR. (2006). Talking up China: An analysis of China’s rising cultural power and global promotion of the Chinese language. East Asia, 23(2), 3–33.
DuffyB. (2018). The perils of perception: Why we’re wrong about nearly everything?London, England: Atlantic Books.
7.
FanY. (2006). Branding the nation: What is being branded?Journal of Vacation Marketing, 12, 5–14.
8.
Frankfort-NachimiasC.NachimiasD. (2008). Research methods in the social sciences (7th ed.). New York, NY: Worth.
9.
GohE. (2013). The struggle for order: Hegemony, hierarchy, and transition in post-cold war East Asia. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
10.
GorfinkelL.JoffeS.Van StadenC.WuY.-S. (2014). CCTV’s global outreach: Examining the audiences of China’s “new voice” on Africa. Media International Australia, 151, 81–88.
11.
HannaS.RowleyJ. (2008). An analysis of terminology use in place branding. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, 4, 61–75.
12.
HansenA.MachinD. (2013). Media and communication research methods. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
13.
HartigF. (2015). Communicating China to the world: Confucius institutes and China’s strategic narrative. Politics, 35, 245–258.
14.
HoltD. B. (2004). How brands become icons: The principles of cultural branding. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School.
15.
JacquesM. (2009). When China rules the World: The rise of the Middle Kingdom and the end of the Western World. New York, NY: Penguin Books.
16.
JohnstonA. I. (1995). Cultural realism: Strategic culture and grand strategy in Chinese history. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
17.
KanevaN. (2011). Nation branding: Towards an agenda for critical research. International Journal of Communication, 5, 117–141.
18.
KatzE.LazarsfeldP. F. (1955). Personal influence. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.
KotlerP.GertnerD. (2002). Country as brand, products, and beyond: A place marketing and brand management perspective. Journal of Brand Management, 9, 249–261.
21.
LeeS. N. (2016). The rise of China and its contest for discursive power. Global Media and China, 1, 102–120.
22.
LippitV. D.BaimanR.KotzD.LarudeeM.LiM.LippitV.OsterreichS. (2011). Introduction: China’s rise in the global economy. Review of Radical Political Economics, 43, 5–8.
23.
MearsheimerJ. (2001). The tragedy of great power politics. New York, NY: Norton.
24.
NathanA. J.ScobellA. (2012). China’s search for security. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
25.
NyeJ. S.Jr. (2004). Soft power: The means to success in world politics. New York, NY: Public Affairs.
26.
PageS. J.HardymanR. (1996). Place marketing and town centre management: A new tool for urban revitalization. Cities, 13, 153–164.
27.
ParadiseJ. (2009). China and international harmony: The role of Confucius institutes in bolstering Beijing’s soft power. Asian Survey, 49, 647–669.
TuchH. N. (1990). Communicating with the world: U.S. public diplomacy overseas. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.
35.
VargaS. (2013). The politics of nation branding: Collective identity and public sphere in the neoliberal state. Philosophy and Social Criticism, 39, 825–845.
WheelerA. (2014). Cultural diplomacy, language planning, and the case of the University of Nairobi Confucius Institute. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 49, 49–63.
38.
WilsonJ. L. (2015). Russia and China respond to soft power: Interpretation and readaptation of a Western construct. Politics, 35, 287–300.
39.
XinX. (2012). How the market is changing China’s news: The case of Xinhua news agency. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
