This study investigates the impact of public participation on the journalistic field in Hong Kong and the response of legacy and digital-only newsrooms to this process. Relying on Pierre Bourdieu’s field theory and on Thomas Gieryn’s concept of boundary work, this article examines the strategies used by journalists to patrol and maintain the boundaries of their field. In-depth interviews collected from 24 journalists working for both legacy and digital-only media show that journalists do not fully dismiss the work of public participation. Instead, they do their best to incorporate such practices into their daily work, while aiming to keep their professional standards high. Nevertheless, there are differences between legacy and digital-only journalists when it comes to their use of user-generated content. Legacy journalists tend to avoid using newsworthy content they find online in isolation. They try to use UGC as a starting point, to provide context, and to verify the source of the material. On the other hand, digital-only journalists tend to rush publishing their stories and only add context at a later stage.
AndersonC. W. (2011). Deliberative, agonistic, and algorithmic audiences: Journalism’s vision of its public in an age of audience transparency. International Journal of Communication, 5, 19. doi:1932-8036/20110529
4.
AttonC. (2002). Alternative media. London, England: SAGE.
5.
AttonC. (2003). What is ‘alternative’ journalism?Journalism, 4, 267–272. doi:10.1177/14648849030043001
6.
BorgerM.van HoofA.Costera MeijerI.SandersJ. (2013). Constructing participatory journalism as a scholarly object. Digital Journalism, 1, 117–134. doi:10.1080/21670811.2012.740267
7.
BourdieuP. (1984). Distinction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8.
BourdieuP. (1996). The rules of art: Genesis and structure of the literary field. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
9.
BourdieuP. (1998). On television. New York, NY: The New Press.
10.
BourdieuP. (2005). The political field, the science field, and the journalistic field. In BensonR.NeveuE. (Eds.), Bourdieu and the journalistic field (pp. 29–47). Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
11.
BrunsA. (2005). Gatewatching: Collaborative online news production. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
12.
BrunsA. (2008). Blogs, wikipedia, second life and beyond: From production to produsage. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
13.
BrunsA. (2010). The key characteristics of produsage. In BrunsA. (Ed.), Blogs, Wikipedia, second life, and beyond: From production to produsage (pp. 9–36). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
14.
CarrD. J.BarnidgeM.LeeB. G.TsangS. J. (2014). Cynics and skeptics: Evaluating the credibility of mainstream and citizen journalism. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 91, 452–470. doi:10.1177/1077699014538828
15.
CastellsM. (2010). The rise of the network society: Vol. I: The information age: Economy, society, and culture (2nd ed.). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
16.
ChanJ. M.LeeC.-C. (1991). Power change, co-optation, accommodation: Xinhua and the Press in traditional Hong Kong. China Quarterly, 126, 290–312.
17.
CheungC. (2016). Media power in Hong Kong. Milton Park, Oxon and New York, NY: Routledge.
18.
ChungD. S.NahS. (2014). Negotiating journalistic professionalism: A case study of OhmyNews in a participatory media climate. Journalism Practice, 8, 390–406. doi:10.1080/17512786.2013.813198
19.
DeuzeM.BrunsA.NeubergerC. (2007). Preparing for an age of participatory news. Journalism Practice, 1, 322–338. doi:10.1080/17512780701504864
FrischN.Belair-GagnonV.AgurC. (2017). Media capture with Chinese characteristics: Changing patterns in Hong Kong’s news media system. Journalism: Theory, Practice & Criticism, 19, 1165–1181. doi:10.1177/1464884917724632
22.
GierynT. F. (2001). Cultural boundaries of science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
23.
GlaserB.StraussA. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
24.
GuoS. (2011). Framing distance: Local vs. non-local news in Hong Kong press. Chinese Journal of Communication, 4(1), 21–39. doi:10.1080/17544750.2011.544080
HartleyJ. (2008). Journalism as a human right: The cultural approach to journalism. In LöffelholzM.WeaverD. (Eds.), Global journalism research: Theories, methods, findings, future (pp. 39–51). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
27.
HartleyJ. (2012). Digital futures for cultural and media studies. Chichester: Willey-Blackwell.
JankowskiW. N.WesterF. (1991). The qualitative tradition in social inquiry: Contributions to mass communication research. In JensenK. B.JankovwskiN. W. (Eds.), A handbook of qualitative methodologies for mass communication research (pp. 44–74). London and New York, NY: Routledge.
32.
JenkinsH. (2006). Fans, bloggers, and gamers: Exploring participatory culture. New York: New York University Press.
33.
JenkinsH. (2008). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide (2nd ed.). New York, NY and London: New York University. doi:10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
34.
JenkinsH.DeuzeM. (2008). Editorial: Convergence culture. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 14, 5–12. doi:10.1177/1354856507084415
35.
LasicaJ. D. (2003). Blogs and journalism need each other. Nieman Reports, 57(3), 70–74.
36.
LeeP. S. N.ChuL. L. (1998). Inherent dependence on power: The Hong Kong Press in political transition. Media, Culture & Society, 20, 59–77.
37.
LewisS. C. (2012). The tension between professional control and open participation: Journalism and its boundaries. Information, Communication & Society, 15, 836–866. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2012.674150
38.
MaE. K. W.FungA. Y. H. (2007). Negotiating local and national identifications: Hong Kong Identity Surveys 1996–2006. Asian Journal of Communication, 17, 172–185. doi:10.1080/01292980701306555
39.
McNairB. (2009). Journalism in the 21st century – Evolution, not extinction. Journalism: Theory, Practice & Criticism, 10, 347–349. doi:10.1177/1464884909104756
40.
MilesB. M.HubermanM. A. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
41.
NielsenR. K. (2010). Participation through letters to the editor: Circulation, considerations, and genres in the letters institution. Journalism, 11, 21–35. doi:10.1177/1464884909350641
42.
PetersC.WitschgeT. (2015). From grand narratives of democracy to small expectations of participation. Journalism Practice, 9, 19–34. doi:10.1080/17512786.2014.928455
43.
ReinardyS. (2011). Newspaper journalism in crisis: Burnout on the rise, eroding young journalists’ career commitment. Journalism: Theory, Practice & Criticism, 12, 33–50. doi:10.1177/1464884910385188
44.
Reporters without Borders. (2018). Organized resistance to Beijing’s meddling. Retrieved from https://rsf.org/en/hong-kong
45.
RobinsonS.DeshanoC. (2011). Citizen journalists and their third places. Journalism Studies, 12, 642–657. doi:10.1080/1461670X.2011.557559
RosenJ. (2008). Afterword: The people formerly known as the audience. In CarpentierN.De CleenB. (Eds.), Participation and media production: Critical reflections on content creation (pp. 163–165). Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
48.
RussellA. (2007). Digital communication networks and the journalistic field: The 2005 French Riots. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 24, 285–302. doi:10.1080/07393180701560880
49.
RyfeD. M. (2012). Can journalism survive?: An inside look at American newsrooms. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
50.
SealeC. (1999). Generalizing from qualitative research. In C. Seale (Ed.), The quality of qualitative research (pp. 106–18). London: Sage. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9780857020093.n8
51.
SingerJ. B. (2015). Out of bounds: Professional norms as boundary markers. In CarlsonM.LewisS. C. (Eds.), Boundaries of journalism (pp. 21–36). New York, NY: Routledge.
52.
SingerJ. B. (2016, June9-13). Entrepreneurial journalism studies: Understanding disruption to norms, roles, and economic structures. In ICA Conference, Fukuoka, Japan.
53.
SmallM. L. (2009). ‘How many cases do I need?’: On science and the logic of case selection in field-based research. Ethnography, 10(1), 5–38. doi:10.1177/1466138108099586
54.
SoC. Y. K.ChanJ. M. (2007). Professionalism, politics and market force: Survey studies of Hong Kong journalists 1996–2006. Asian Journal of Communication, 17, 148–158. doi:10.1080/01292980701306506
55.
ThorsenE.AllanS. (2014). Citizen journalism: Global perspectives. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
56.
ThurmanN. (2008). Forums for citizen journalists? Adoption of user generated content initiatives by online news media. New Media & Society, 10, 139–157. doi:10.1177/1461444807085325
57.
UsherN. (2017). Venture-backed news startups and the field of journalism. Digital Journalism, 5, 1116–1133. doi:10.1080/21670811.2016.1272064
58.
WaisbordS. (2013). Reinventing professionalism: Journalism and news in global perspective. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
59.
WallM. (2015). Citizen journalism. Digital Journalism, 3, 797–813. doi:10.1080/21670811.2014.1002513
WardleC.WilliamsA. (2010). Beyond user-generated content: A production study examining the ways in which UGC is used at the BBC. Media, Culture & Society, 32, 781–799. doi:10.1177/0163443710373953
62.
WilliamsA.WardleC.Wahl-JorgensenK. (2011). Have they got news for us?Journalism Practice, 5, 85–99. doi:10.1080/17512781003670031
63.
WongS. H. (2012). Authoritarian co-optation in the age of globalisation: Evidence from Hong Kong. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 42, 182–209. doi:10.1080/00472336.2012.668348
64.
ZelizerB. (1993). Journalists as interpretive communities. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 10, 219–237. doi:10.1080/15295039309366865
65.
ZelizerB. (2004). Taking journalism seriously: News and the academy. London, England: SAGE.
