This study examines the strategies of political impression management adopted by the Weibo account Liyuan Fan Club from a source credibility perspective, investigating the capacity of each strategy in encouraging online political participation through measuring consumer’s online brand-related activities (i.e. consuming, contributing, and creating). In addition to traditional dimensions of source credibility (i.e. expertise and attractiveness), a new dimension, namely “closeness,” is added in based on previous studies in political branding and celebrity studies. A content analysis of 790 posts is conducted, in which the study finds that emphasis on Peng’s attractiveness and closeness have positive effects on participatory behaviors on social media, while emphasis on Peng’s expertise show no effect. Further analysis indicates that individual contributions of attractiveness and closeness on three levels of participatory behaviors are different, among which attractiveness is more effective in activating low-level participation, while closeness has more positive effect in encouraging high-level participation.
ApplbaumR. F.AnatolK. W. (1972). The factor structure of source credibility as a function of the speaking situation. Speech Monographs, 39, 219–222.
2.
AtkinsonD. R.BradyS.CasasJ. M. (1981). Sexual preference similarity, attitude similarity, and perceived counseling credibility and attractiveness. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 28, 504–509.
3.
AuneR. K.KikuchiT. (1993). Effects of language intensity similarity on perceptions of credibility relational attributions, and persuasion. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 12, 224–238.
4.
BakerM. J.ChurchillG. A.Jr (1977). The impact of physically attractive models on advertising evaluations. Journal of Marketing research, 14, 538–555.
5.
BeechH. (2013, April18). The 2013 Time 100: Time presents its annual list of the 100 most influential people in the world, from artists and leaders to pioneers, titans and icons. Time. Retrieved from http://time100.time.com/2013/04/18/time-100/slide/peng-liyuan/
6.
BerelsonB. R.LazarsfeldP. F.McPheeW. N. (1954). Voting: A study of opinion formation in a presidential campaign. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
7.
BerloD. K.LemertJ. B.MertzR. J. (1969). Dimensions for evaluating the acceptability of message sources. Public Opinion Quarterly, 33, 563–576.
8.
BlumlerJ. G.KavanaghD. (1999). The third age of political communication: Influences and features. Political Communication, 16, 209–230.
9.
CaballeroM. J.PrideW. M. (1984). Selected effects of salesperson sex and attractiveness in direct mail advertisements. The Journal of Marketing, 48, 94–100.
10.
CarpiniM. X. D.CookF. L.JacobsL. R. (2004). Public deliberation, discursive participation, and citizen engagement: A review of the empirical literature. Annual Review of Political Science, 7, 315–344.
11.
CaugheyJ. L. (1978). Artificial social relations in modern America. America Quarterly, 30, 70–89.
12.
ChinB.HillsM. (2008). Restricted confessions? Blogging, subcultural celebrity and the management of producer–fan proximity. Social Semiotics, 18, 253–272.
13.
ConwayB. E. (1991). Transition from “supercapacitor” to “battery” behavior in electrochemical energy storage. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 138, 1539–1548.
14.
CornerJ. (2003). Mediated persona and political culture. In CornerJ.PelsD. (Eds.), Media and the restyling of politics: Consumerism, celebrity and cynicism (pp. 67–85). London, England: SAGE.
15.
CrisciR.KassinoveH. (1973). Effect of perceived expertise, strength of advice, and environmental setting on parental compliance. The Journal of Social Psychology, 89(2), 245–250.
16.
DeSarboW. S.HarshmanR. A. (1985). Celebrity-brand congruence analysis. Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 8, 17–52.
17.
DuffettM. (2014). Celebrity: The return of the repressed in fan studies? In DuitsL.ZwaanK.ReijndersS. (Eds.), The Ashgate research companion to fan cultures (pp. 163–180). Farnham, UK: Ashgate.
18.
DunnS. G. S.NisbettG. S. (2014). Parasocial interactions online: Candidate intimacy in Webpages and Facebook. The Journal of Social Media in Society, 3, 26–41.
19.
EndersbyJ. W.TowleM. J. (1996). Tailgate partisanship: Political and social expression through bumper stickers. The Social Science Journal, 33, 307–319.
20.
ErdoganB. Z.BakerM. J.TaggS. (2001). Selecting celebrity endorsers: The practitioner’s perspective. Journal of Advertising Research, 41(3), 39–48.
21.
EricssonL.HåkanssonE. (2005). Athletes as celebrity endorsers: Case studies from Sweden (Master’s Thesis). Lulea University of Technology, Lulea, Sweden.
22.
FlanaginA. J.MetzgerM. J. (2003). The perceived credibility of personal Web page information as influenced by the sex of the source. Computers in Human Behavior, 19, 683–701.
23.
FriedmanH. H.FriedmanL. (1978). Does the celebrity endorser’s image spill over the product?Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 6, 291–299.
24.
GeorgeD.MalleryP. (2010), SPSS for Windows Step by Step: A Simple Study Guide and Reference. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
25.
GibsonR.CantijochM. (2013). Conceptualizing and measuring participation in the age of the internet: Is online political engagement really different to offline?The Journal of Politics, 75, 701–716.
26.
GoldsmithR. E.LaffertyB. A.NewellS. J. (2000). The impact of corporate credibility and celebrity credibility on consumer reaction to advertisements and brands. Journal of Advertising, 29(3), 43–54.
27.
HomerP. M.KahleL. R. (1990). Source expertise, time of source identification, and involvement in persuasion: An elaborative processing perspective. Journal of Advertising, 19, 30–39.
28.
HovlandC. I.JanisI. L.KelleyH. H. (1953). Communication and persuasion; psychological studies of opinion change. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
29.
HovlandC. I.WeissW. (1951). The influence of source credibility on communication effectiveness. Public Opinion Quarterly, 15, 635–650.
JosephW. B. (1982). The credibility of physically attractive communicators: A review. Journal of Advertising, 11(3), 15–24.
33.
KelleyS.MirerT. W. (1974). The simple act of voting. American Political Science Review, 68, 572–591.
34.
KelmanH. C. (1961). Processes of opinion change. Public Opinion Quarterly, 25, 57–78.
35.
MarshallP. D. (1997). Celebrity and power: Fame in contemporary culture. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
36.
MatthewsD.ChaneyC.OpiriJ. A. (2015). The Michelle Obama influence: An exploration of the first lady’s fashion, style, and impact on women. Fashion and Textiles, 2, 1–12.
37.
McAllisterI. (2007). The personalization of politics. In DaltonR. J.KlingemannH-D. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political behavior (pp. 571–588). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
38.
McCroskeyJ. C. (1966). Scales for the measurement of ethos. Speech Monographs, 33, 65–72.
39.
McGinniesE.WardC. D. (1980). Better liked than right: Trustworthiness and expertise as factors in credibility. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 6, 467–472.
40.
McGuireW. J. (1968). Personality and attitude change: An information-processing theory. In Green-WaldA. G.BrockT. C.OstromT. M. (Eds.), Psychological foundations of attitudes (pp. 171–196). New York, NY: Academic Press.
41.
McGuireW. J. (1985). Attitudes and attitude change. In LindzeyG.AronsonE. (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (3rd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 233–346). New York, NY: Random House.
MillsJ.HarveyJ. (1972). Opinion change as a function of when information about the communicator is received and whether he is attractive or expert. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 21, 52–55.
44.
MorrowP. C.McElroyJ. C.StamperB. G.WilsonM. A. (1990). The effects of physical attractiveness and other demographic characteristics on promotion decisions. Journal of Management, 16, 723–736.
45.
MulveyL. (1989). Visual and other pleasures. London, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
46.
MuntingaD. G.MoormanM.SmitE. G. (2011). Introducing COBRAs: Exploring motivations for brand-related social media use. International Journal of Advertising, 30, 13–46.
47.
OhanianR. (1990). Construction and validation of a scale to measure celebrity endorsers’ perceived expertise, trustworthiness, and attractiveness. Journal of Advertising, 19(3), 39–52.
48.
PatraS.DattaS. K. (2012). Celebrity selection & role of celebrities in creating brand awareness and brand preference—A literature review. Journal of Marketing Communications, 8, 48–57.
49.
PettyR. E.CacioppoJ. T. (1980). Effects of issue involvement on attitudes in an advertising context. In GornG. G.GoldbergM. E. (Eds.), Proceedings of the division 23 program (pp. 75–79). Montreal, Québec, Canada: American Psychological Association.
50.
PettyR. E.CacioppoJ. T.SchumannD. (1983). Central and peripheral routes to advertising effectiveness: The moderating role of involvement. Journal of Consumer Research, 10, 135–146.
51.
PhuaJ. (2014). The effects of similarity, parasocial identification, and source credibility in obesity public service announcements on diet and exercise self-efficacy. Journal of Health Psychology, 21, 699–708.
52.
PostmanN. (1985). Amusing ourselves to death: Public discourse in the age of show business. New York, NY: Viking Books.
53.
RobertsonS. P.VatrapuR. K.MedinaR. (2010). Off the wall political discourse: Facebook use in the 2008 U.S. presidential election. Information Polity, 15(12), 11–31.
54.
RojasH.Puig-i-AbrilE. (2009). Mobilizers mobilized: Information, expression, mobilization and participation in the digital age. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14, 902–927.
55.
RosenbergS. W.KahnS.TranT. (1991). Creating a political image: Shaping appearance and manipulating the vote. Political Behavior, 13, 345–367.
56.
SchickelR. (1985). Coherent lives. In SchickelR. (Ed.), Intimate strangers: The culture of celebrity (pp. 255–285). New York, NY: Doubleday Books.
57.
SchlozmanK. L.VerbaS.BradyH. E. (2012). The unheavenly chorus: Unequal political voice and the broken promise of American democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
58.
SerazioM. (2015). Branding politics: Emotion, authenticity, and the marketing culture of American political communication. Journal of Consumer Culture, 17, 255–241.
59.
SpenceP. R.LachlanK. A.WestermanD.SpatesS. A. (2013). Where the gates matter less: Ethnicity and perceived source credibility in social media health messages. Howard Journal of Communications, 24, 1–16.
60.
StewartL. M. (2010). Effect of consumers’ perceptions of political figures on source credibility and attitude toward apparel (Doctoral dissertation). Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA.
61.
StreetJ. (2003). The celebrity politician: Political style and popular culture. In CornerJ.PelsD. (Eds.), Media and the restyling of politics: Consumerism, celebrity and cynicism (pp. 85–99). London, England: SAGE.
62.
TedeschiJ. T.SchlenkerB. R.BonomaT. V. (1973). Conflict, power, and games. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
63.
TillB. D.BuslerM. (2000). The match-up hypothesis: Physical attractiveness, expertise, and the role of fit on brand attitude, purchase intent and brand beliefs. Journal of Advertising, 29(3), 1–13.
64.
van ZoonenL. (2006). The personal, the political and the popular: A woman’s guide to celebrity politics. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 9, 287–301.
65.
WhittlerT. E.DiMeoJ. (1991). Viewers’ reactions to racial cues in advertising stimuli. Journal of Advertising Research, 31, 37–46.
