In meeting the changing demands of authenticity and visibility in social media, performances of identity and connections are discussed to entail new sociotechnical labours and digital literacies. Research has looked into the construction and presentation of celebrity identities, in light of these developments, but has paid little attention on the celebrities’ experiences and perspectives, which is also due to the lack of willingness of industry insiders in this culturally sensitive business to be interviewed and genuinely talk about its problems. Twelve in-depth interviews with celebrities and entertainment industry practitioners were conducted between 2014 and 2015. Particularly, this article draws on the cases of two established celebrities in Hong Kong and China, and assesses how and why they were unable to actively construct and perform their preferred media identities, highlighting the blurring boundaries among traditional celebrities, micro-celebrities and ordinary people for their construction of online identities through social media, and also elucidating the opportunities and challenges posed by today’s evolving media environment. We argue that social media only superficially open up a site of counter-narratives for celebrities to resist the identities imposed on them by the mainstream media and online audiences. The interviewed celebrities’ contradictory experiences in their self-presentations in social media offer alternative angles to understanding the incoherent and unstable celebrity identity production processes, the blurring boundaries between celebrities and ordinary people through such processes as well as the celebrities’ capacity to reclaim control in asserting their ‘true’ selves.
BennettL. (2013). If we stick together we can do anything: Lady Gaga fandom, philanthropy and activism through social media. Celebrity Studies, 5, 138–152.
4.
boydd. (2008). Taken out of context: American teen sociality in networked publics (Doctoral dissertation). University of California, Berkeley.
5.
DavissonA. L. (2013). Lady Gaga and the remaking of celebrity culture. Jefferson, NC: McFarland.
6.
DeCordovaR. (2007). The emergence of the star system in America. In RedmondS.HolmesS. (Eds.), Stardom and celebrity: A reader (pp. 132–140). London, England: SAGE.
7.
DuffyB. E.HundE. (2015). “Having it all” on social media: Entrepreneurial femininity and self-branding among fashion bloggers. Social Media + Society, 1.
8.
DunnR. G. (1998). Identity crises: A social critique of postmodernity. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
9.
EdwardsL.JeffreysE. (Eds.). (2010). Celebrity in China. Pokfulam: Hong Kong University Press.
10.
EllcessorE. (2018). “One tweet to make so much noise”: Connected celebrity activism in the case of Marlee Matlin. New Media & Society, 20, 255–271.
11.
FerrisK.HarrisS. R. (2011). Stargazing: Celebrity, fame, and social interaction. New York, NY: Routledge.
12.
GalN.ShifmanL.KampfZ. (2016). “It gets better”: Internet memes and the construction of collective identity. New Media & Society, 18, 1698–1714.
13.
GergenK. J. (1996). Technology and the self: From the essential to the sublime. In GordinD.LindlofT. (Eds.), Constructing the self in a mediated world (pp.127–140). London, England: SAGE.
14.
HallS. (1990). Cultural identity and diaspora. In RutherfordJ. (Ed.), Identity: Community, culture, difference (pp. 222–237). London, England: Lawrence & Wishart.
15.
HearnA. (2008). “Meat, mask burden”: Probing the contours of the branded “self.”Journal of Consumer Culture, 8, 197–217.
16.
HortonD.WohlR. R. (2010). Mass communication and para-social interaction: Observations on intimacy at a distance. In RojekC. (Ed.), Celebrity: Critical concepts in sociology (vol. 2, pp.35–55). London, England: Routledge.
17.
JohanssonS. (2006). “Sometimes you wanna hate celebrities”: Tabloid readers and celebrity coverage. In HolmesS.RedmondS. (Eds.), Framing celebrity: New directions in celebrity culture (pp. 341–358). London, England: Routledge.
18.
KapoorI. (2013). Celebrity humanitarianism: The ideology of global charity. New York, NY: Routledge.
19.
LaclauE. (1994). The making of political identities. New York, NY: Verso.
20.
LambertA. (2016). Intimacy and social capital on Facebook: Beyond the psychological perspective. New Media & Society, 18, 2559–2575.
21.
LangerJ. (2006). Television’s “personality system.” In MarshallP. D. (Ed.), The celebrity culture reader (pp. 181–195). New York, NY: Routledge.
22.
LeungV.ChengK.TseT. (2017). Celebrity culture and the entertainment industry in Asia: Use of celebrity and its influence on society, culture and communication. Bristol, UK: Intellect.
23.
LeungV.ChengK.TseT. (2018). Insiders’ views: The current practice of using celebrities in marketing communications in Greater China. Intercultural Communications Studies, 27, 96–113.
24.
LiE. C. Y. (2017). Desiring queer, negotiating normal: Denise Ho (HOCC) fandom before and after the coming-out. In LavinM.YangL.ZhaoJ. J. (Eds.), Boys’ Love, cosplay, and androgynous idols: Queer fan cultures in Mainland China, HK, and Taiwan (pp. 131–156). Pokfulam: Hong Kong University Press.
25.
LindA. (2013). Heteronormativity and sexuality. In WaylenG.CelisK.KantolaJ.WeldonL. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of gender and politics (pp. 189–213). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
26.
MarshallP. D. (1997). Celebrity and power: Fame in contemporary culture. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
27.
MarshallP. D. (2010). The promotion and presentation of the self: Celebrity as marker of presentational media. Celebrity Studies, 1, 25–48.
28.
MarwickA. E.boydd. (2010). I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse and the imagined audience. New Media & Society, 13, 114–133.
29.
MarwickA. E.boydd. (2011). To see and be seen: Celebrity practice on Twitter. Convergence, 17, 139–158.
30.
MarwickA. E.boydd. (2014). Networked privacy: How teenagers negotiate context in social media. New Media & Society, 16, 1051–1067.
31.
MillerV. (2011). Understanding digital culture. London, England: SAGE.
32.
MilnerM.Jr. (2005). Celebrity culture as a status system. Hedgehog Review, 7, 66–77.
33.
PosterM. (1995). The second media age. New York, NY: Polity Press.
34.
RheingoldH. (1993). The virtual community: Homesteading on the electronic frontier. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
35.
RobinsonL. (2007). The cyberself: The self-ing project goes online, symbolic interaction in the digital age. New Media & Society, 9, 93–110.
TurkleS. (1995). Life on the screen: Identity in the age of the Internet. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
43.
TurnerG. (2010). The mass production of celebrity: “Celetoids,” reality TV and the “demotic turn.” In RojekC. (Ed.), Celebrity: Critical concepts in sociology (vol. 3, pp. 216–227). London, England: Routledge.
44.
VandeboschH.Van CleemputK. (2009). Cyberbullying among youngsters: Profiles of bullies and victims. New Media & Society, 11, 1349–1371.
45.
Van KriekenR. (2012). Celebrity as a social form: Status, charisma and power. In Van KriekenR. (Ed.), Celebrity society (pp. 62–80). London, England: Routledge.
46.
VroomanS. S. (2002). The art of invective: Performing identity in cyberspace. New Media & Society, 4, 51–70.
47.
WardP. (2011). Gods behaving badly: Media, religion, and celebrity culture. Waco, TX: Baylor University Press.
48.
WeberM. (2006). The sociology of charismatic authority: The nature of charismatic authority and its routinization. In MarshallP. D. (Ed.), The celebrity culture reader (pp. 55–71). New York, NY: Routledge.
49.
YueX. D. (2007). My favorite idol: Your die-hard fans—The study of adolescent idol worship. Kowloon: City University of Hong Kong Press.
