In order to explore the Chinese traditional media role on social media platforms, this study examined the agenda-setting effects between the networked attribute agendas of Chinese traditional media and various opinion leaders on Weibo in one crisis and non-crisis news, respectively. The results showed that Chinese traditional media failed to lead the discussion on Weibo in both the crisis and non-crisis cases. However, business elites tended to be the most influential opinion leaders in both circumstances. Furthermore, the news agendas of traditional media and the opinion leaders changed in both cases.
AndersonJ. R.BowerG. H. (2014). Human associative memory. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
2.
BorgatiiS. P. (2002). Netdraw Network Visualization. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.
3.
BrunsA.HighfieldT.BurgessJ. (2013). The Arab spring and social media audiences English and Arabic twitter users and their networks. American Behavioral Scientist, 57, 871–898.
4.
CancliniN. G. (2001). Consumers and citizens: Globalization and multicultural conflicts. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
ChoS. E.ShinD. H. (2014). Media discourse in a hyper connected society: A comparison between media frame and Twitter discourse during media strike. Info, 16, 67–79.
9.
ColleoniE.RozzaA.ArvidssonA. (2014). Echo chamber or public sphere? Predicting political orientation and measuring political homophily in Twitter using big data. Journal of Communication, 64, 317–332.
10.
ConwayB. A.KenskiK.WangD. (2015). The rise of Twitter in the political campaign: Searching for intermedia agenda-setting effects in the presidential primary. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 20, 363–380. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12124
DongS. G.ParkL. Y.ChangJ. C. W. (2013). The evolution of Chinese government communication: Towards transparent governance. In SandersK.CanelM. J. (Eds.), Government communication: Cases and challenges (pp. 259–275). Portland, OR: Ringgold, Inc.
DowningJ. D. (2003). Audiences and readers of alternative media: The absent lure of the virtually unknown. Media, Culture & Society, 25, 625–645.
15.
DuboisE.GaffneyD. (2014). The multiple facets of influence identifying political influentials and opinion leaders on Twitter. American Behavioral Scientist, 58, 1260–1277.
16.
EsareyA.QiangX. (2011). Digital communication and political change in China. International Journal of Communication, 5, 298–319.
17.
FuK.ChauM. (2014). Use of microblogs in grassroots movements in China: Exploring the role of online networking in agenda setting. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 11, 309–328.
18.
GroshekJ.GroshekM. C. (2013). Agenda trending: Reciprocity and the predictive capacity of social networking sites in intermedia agenda setting across topics over time. Media and Communication, 1(1), 15–27.
GuoL. (2012). The application of social network analysis in agenda setting research: A methodological exploration. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 56, 616–631.
21.
GuoL.McCombsM. (2011a, May26-30). Network agenda setting: A third level of media effects. Paper presented at the ICA Annual Conference, Boston, MA.
22.
GuoL.McCombsM. (2011b, August10-13). Toward the third level of agenda setting theory: A Network Agenda Setting Model. Paper presented at the AEJMC Annual Conference, St. Louis, MO.
23.
GuoL.ChenY.-N. K.VuH.WangQ.AksamitR.GuzekD.McCombsM. (2015). Coverage of the Iraq War in the United States, Mainland China, Taiwan and Poland: A transnational network agenda-setting study. Journalism Studies, 16, 343–362.
24.
GuoL.VargoC. (2015). The power of message networks: A big-data analysis of the network agenda setting model and issue ownership. Mass Communication and Society, 18, 557–576.
25.
HongJ.CuthbertM. (1991). Media reform in China since 1978: Background factors, problems and future trends. Gazette, 47, 141–158.
26.
HuM.LiuS.WeiF.WuY.StaskoJ.MaK.-L. (2012). Breaking news on twitter. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 2751–2754). New York, NY: ACM.
KaplanS. (1973). Cognitive maps in perception and thought. In DownsR. M.SteaD. (Eds.), Image and Environment: Cognitive Mapping and Spatial Behavior (pp. 63–78). Chicago, IL: Aldine Transaction.
31.
KatzE.LazarsfeldP. F. (1955). Personal influence: The part played by people in the flow of mass communications. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.
32.
KellnerD. M. (2000). Habermas, the public sphere and democracy: A critical intervention. In HahnL. (Ed.), Perspectives on Habermas (pp. 259–287). Peru, IL: Open Court.
33.
KimS. T.LeeY. H. (2006). New functions of Internet mediated agenda-setting: Agenda-rippling and reversed agenda-setting. Korean Journal of Journalism and Communication Studies, 50, 175–205.
34.
KongthonA.HaruechaiyasakC.PailaiJ.KongyoungS. (2012). The role of Twitter during a natural disaster: Case study of 2011 Thai Flood. In 2012 Proceedings of PICMET’12 Technology Management for Emerging Technologies (PICMET), (pp. 2227–2232). New York, NY: IEEE.
35.
KushinM. J. (2010). Tweeting the issues in the age of social media? Intermedia agenda setting between the “New York Times” and Twitter. Dissertation submitted to Washington State University, Pullman, WA.
36.
KwakH.LeeC.ParkH.MoonS. (2010). What is Twitter, a social network or a news media? In Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World Wide Web (pp. 591–600). New York, NY: ACM.
37.
LazarsfeldP. F.BerelsonB.GaudetH. (1944). The people’s choice: How the voter makes up his mind in a presidential campaign. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
38.
LeavittA.BurchardE.FisherD.GilbertS. (2009). The influentials: New approaches for analyzing influence on twitter. Web Ecology Project, 4(2), 1–18.
39.
LeeC. C. (2005). The conception of Chinese journalists. In HugoH. D. (Ed.), Making Journalists: Diverse Models, Global Issues (pp. 107–124). New York: Routledge.
40.
LeeB.LancendorferK. M.LeeK. J. (2005). Agenda-setting and the Internet: The intermedia influence of Internet bulletin boards on newspaper coverage of the 2000 general election in South Korea. Asian Journal of Communication, 15(1), 57–71.
41.
LuoY. (2011). The Internet and politics in China: The agenda-setting influence of online public opinion on media coverage and government policy. Dissertation submitted to the School of Journalism, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, IN.
42.
MerazS. (2009). Is there an elite hold? Traditional media to social media agenda setting influence in blog networks. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14, 682–707.
PanZ.LuY. (2003). Localizing professionalism: Discursive practices in China’s media reforms. In Chin-ChuanL. (Ed.), Chinese media, global contexts (pp. 215–236). Oxon: Routledge.
45.
ParkC. S. (2013). Does Twitter motivate involvement in politics? Tweeting, opinion leadership, and political engagement. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 1641–1648.
46.
ParmeleeJ. H. (2014). The agenda-building function of political tweets. New Media & Society, 16, 434–450.
47.
ParmeleeJ. H.BichardS. L. (2011). Politics and the Twitter revolution: How tweets influence the relationship between political leaders and the public. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
48.
ShirkS. L. (2010). Changing media, changing China. In ShirkS. L. (Ed.), Changing media, changing China (pp.1–37). New York, NY: Oxford University.
49.
SkogerbøE.KrumsvikA. H. (2015). Newspapers, Facebook and Twitter: Intermedia agenda setting in local election campaigns. Journalism Practice, 9, 350–366.
VargoC. J.GuoL.McCombsM.ShawD. L. (2014). Network issue agendas on Twitter during the 2012 U.S. presidential election. Journal of Communication, 64, 296–316.
55.
VuH. T.GuoL.McCombsM. E. (2014). Exploring the world outside and the pictures in our heads: A network agenda-setting study. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 91, 669–686.
56.
WaltherJ. B.CarrC. T.ChoiS. S. W.DeAndreaD. C.KimJ.TongS. T.Van Der HeideB. (2010). Interaction of interpersonal, peer, and media influence sources online. In PapacharissiZ.A networked self: Identity, community, and culture on social network sites pp (17–38). New York, NY: Routledge.
57.
WassermanS.FaustK. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
WuS.HofmanJ. M.MasonW. A.WattsD. J. (2011). Who says what to whom on twitter. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on World Wide Web (pp. 705–714). New York, NY: ACM.
60.
WuX. (2007). Chinese cyber nationalism: Evolution, characteristics and implications. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
61.
YinR. K. (1994). Case Study Research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
62.
YinR. K. (2009). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 4 Suppl.Thousand Oaks, CA.
63.
ZhaoY. (1998). Media, market, and democracy in China: Between the party line and the bottomline. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
64.
ZhuX. F. (2012). The rise of think tanks in China. New York, NY: Routledge.
