This article examines India's evolving stance on digital sovereignty within the broader context of international public policy and global digital governance. Although much of the current literature has concentrated on the United States, the European Union, and China as leading models, India is progressively establishing itself as an alternative player. The article utilizes a qualitative interpretive policy analysis to evaluate India's domestic initiatives, such as Aadhaar, the Unified Payments Interface, and the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, while also considering its participation in global forums like the G20, the World Trade Organization, and the United Nations Internet Governance Forum. It posits that India is positioning itself as a norm entrepreneur, promoting a model of digital sovereignty that integrates inclusivity, innovation, and strategic autonomy, which aligns with the developmental goals of the Global South. Concurrently, the article underscores the contradictions that complicate this ambition, including conflicts between democratic principles and surveillance practices, openness and protectionism, as well as dependence on foreign technology. By placing India within these dynamics, the study enriches academic discussions on digital sovereignty by recontextualizing India not merely as a passive recipient of global norms but as a potential architect of a more pluralistic and inclusive digital landscape.
AaronsonSA (2019) Data is Different: Why the World Needs a New Approach to Governing Cross-Border Data Flows. Centre for International Governance Innovation.
2.
Access Now (2022) Internet Shutdowns in India: The World’s Largest Democracy Turned off the Internet Again. Access Now.
3.
AgambenG (2005) State of Exception. Chicago, IL, USA: University of Chicago Press.
4.
AllenFLiaoGY (2025) Data governance, regulatory fragmentation, and global digital trade. Journal of International Economic Law28(1): 1–24.
5.
BendrathRMuellerM (2011) The end of the internet? The changing global governance of cyberspace. Information,Communication & Society14(8): 1149–1167.
6.
BhatiaR (2021) Aadhaar and the politics of biometric identification in India. South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies44(2): 345–362.
7.
BodinJ (1992 [1576]) On Sovereignty. Edited and translated by JH Franklin. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
8.
BradfordA (2020) The Brussels Effect: How the European Union Rules the World. Oxford University Press.
9.
BradshawSDeNardisL (2019) The transnational governance of online speech. International Journal of Communication13: 195–214.
10.
CastellsM (2001) The Internet Galaxy: Reflections on the Internet, Business, and Society. Oxford University Press.
11.
CERT-In (2020) National Cyber Security Strategy (Draft). Indian Computer Emergency Response Team, Government of India.
12.
CERT-In (2022) Directions Relating to Information Security Practices, Procedures, Prevention, Response and Reporting of Cyber Incidents. Government of India.
13.
ChaisseJ (2023) The black pit: Power and pitfalls of digital FDI and cross-border data flows. World Trade Review22(1): 73–89.
14.
ChaisseJ (2024) World investment & trade: Shaping the narrative for a sustainable future. Journal of World Investment & Trade25: 1–17.
15.
ChanderA (2020) The Electronic Silk Road: How the Web Binds the World Together in Commerce. New Haven, CT, USA: Yale University Press.
16.
Competition Commission of India (2022) Market Study on E-Commerce in India. Government of India.
17.
CouldryNMejiasUA (2019) The Costs of Connection: How Data Is Colonizing Human Life and Appropriating It for Capitalism. Stanford, CA, USA: Stanford University Press.
18.
CreemersR (2017) Cyber China: Updating propaganda, public opinion work and social management for the twenty-first century. Journal of Contemporary China26(103): 85–100.
19.
DeibertR (2015) Authoritarianism goes global: Cyberspace under siege. Journal of Democracy26(3): 64–78.
20.
DeNardisL (2014) The Global War for Internet Governance. Yale University Press.
21.
European Union (2016) Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council (General Data Protection Regulation). Official Journal of the European Union, L 119, 1–88.
22.
FinnemoreMSikkinkK (1998) International norm dynamics and political change. International Organization52(4): 887–917.
23.
FloridiL (2020) The fight for digital sovereignty: What it is, and why it matters. Philosophy & Technology33(3): 369–378.
24.
FoucaultM (1991 [1975]) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Translated by A Sheridan. London, UK: Penguin Books.
GilardiF (2012) Transnational diffusion: Norms, ideas, and policies. In: CarlsnaesWRisseTSimmonsBA (eds) Handbook of International Relations. Sage, 453–477.
27.
Government of India (2015) Digital India Programme: Vision and Objectives. New Delhi, India: Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology, Government of India. Available at: https://www.digitalindia.gov.in/about-us/?utm (accessed 11 February 2025).
28.
Government of India (2020) Blocking of Mobile Applications Under Section 69A of the Information Technology Act. Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology.
29.
Government of India (2023) The Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023. Ministry of Law and Justice. Available at: https://www.digitalindia.gov.in/journey/2023/?utm (accessed 18 February 2025).
30.
GurumurthyABharthurD (2018) Data sovereignty: From digital colonialism to digital self-determination. Development61(1–92): 91–97.
31.
HeldDMcGrewA (2002) Governing Globalization: Power, Authority and Global Governance. Polity Press.
32.
HintzADencikLWahl-JorgensenK (2019) Digital Citizenship in a Datafied Society. Polity Press.
33.
HobbesT (1996 [ 1651]) Leviathan. Edited by R Tuck. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
34.
Internet Freedom Foundation (2020) Surveillance and the Right to Privacy in India. IFF.
35.
KakaNMadgavkarAManyikaJ, et al. (2019) Digital India: Technology to Transform a Connected Nation. McKinsey Global Institute.
36.
KheraR (2019) Aadhaar: Surveillance and exclusion. Economic and Political Weekly54(50): 38–41.
KuczerawyA (2019) The GDPR and the regulation of online speech. Journal of Intellectual Property,Information Technology and Electronic Commerce Law10(1): 1–16.
39.
MaGWuH (2025) Cross-border data flow supervision in China’s free trade zones: Security and compliance rules. Asia Pacific Law Review33(2): 231–262.
40.
MehrotraK (2021) Atmanirbhar Bharat and Digital Self-Reliance. Observer Research Foundation.
41.
ModiN (2018) Data Empowerment and Protection Architecture (DEPA): Speech at NITI Aayog. Government of India.
42.
MuellerM (2017) Will the Internet Fragment? Sovereignty, Globalization, and Cyberspace. Polity Press.
43.
Nasscom (2017) The Future of India’s Digital Economy. National Association of Software and Service Companies.
44.
NationsUnited (2023) Global Digital Compact: Concept Note. UN Secretary-General’s Office.
YakovlevaS (2020) Personal data transfers in international trade and EU law: A tale of two ‘necessities’. Journal of World Investment & Trade21(6): 881–919.
64.
ZhaiX (2024) Digital trade disputes and regulatory uncertainty. Journal of World Trade58(1): 89–112.
