The Kurdistan Democratic Party and Patriotic Union of Kurdistan have dominated the semi-autonomous Kurdistan Region since its establishment in 1992, developing formal institutions reflecting their joint governance of the Kurdistan Region of Iraq (KRI). This article argues that these formal institutions are intrinsically designed to protect the interests of the ruling parties rather than to engender the institutionalization process stipulated by the political settlements reached at various stages. The political settlement framework is employed to examine the evolution of political agreements in the KRI and their impacts on governance structures at different periods. This approach helps elucidate how power dynamics and negotiations have shaped the region's political landscape and administrative systems over time. This article demonstrates that the lack of institutionalization of non-partisan formal institutions in the KRI embedded power-sharing structures that reflect the interests of ruling parties, impeding the democratization process.
AbbasAMA (2023) The governing system in Iraqi Kurdistan: Prospects and challenges of democratic transition. PhD Thesis, Anglia Ruskin University, UK.
2.
AbdullahFHHamaHH (2020) Minority representation and reserved legislative seats in Iraqi Kurdistan. Contemporary Review of the Middle East7(4): 381–402.
3.
AhmedMMA (2012) Iraqi Kurds and nation-building. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
AhramAILustE (2016) The decline and fall of the Arab state. Survival58(2): 7–34.
6.
Al-ZaidiRAMohammadY (2012) Almuearadat Alsyasyt fi ‘Iiqlim Kurdistan - Aleiraq (Alnnshat Walmustaqbali) [The political opposition in the Kurdistan Region - Iraq (The origin and future)].Doha: Arab Centre for Research and Policy Studies. Available at: https://www.dohainstitute.org/ar/ResearchAndStudies//Pages/art175.aspx (accessed 10 January 2025).
7.
Ala’AldeenD (2013) Nishtimansazi an Systami Farman Rawai Xomali le Herimi Kurdistan [Nation building and the system of self-governance in Kurdistan Region]. Istanbul: Aras Publishing.
8.
Ali KhurmaliH (2020) Parte Siyasiyekani Kurdistan le Newan Hellkshan u Dakshanda [The political parties of Kurdistan between the rise and fall].Sulaimani, Iraq: Nawandi Sara.
9.
AlkışMSeverA (2024) Which legitimization for de facto states? The case of the Kurdistan Regional Government of Iraq. Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies27(3): 309–332.
10.
ArifBH (2019) Iran’s struggle for strategic dominance in a post-ISIS Iraq. Asian Affairs50(3): 344–363.
11.
ArifBH (2021) Pro-government militias in Iraq: A threat to human rights and stability. Asian Affairs52(2): 312–326.
12.
ArifBH (2022) KDP-PUK strategic agreement and its consequences for the governing system in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq. Journal of Asian and African Studies59(6): 1867–1891.
13.
ArifBHMokhtarTM (2022) The Kurdish civil war (1994–1998) and its consequences for the governing system in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq. Asian Affairs53(3): 671–689.
14.
AzizS (2014) The Kurdistan regional government elections: A critical evaluation. Insight Turkey16(3): 67–76.
CordesmanAHMausnerADerbyE (2010) Iraq and the United States: Creating a strategic partnership. Washington, DC: Centre for Strategic and International Studies.
Draw Media. (2021b) Perleman le jêr hejmunî ḧkumetdaye…? [Parliament is under the hegemony of the government?]. Available at: https://drawmedia.net/page_detail?smart-id=8540 (accessed 10 April 2024).
23.
FayeqR (2021) Rollî perleman le sîstmî siyasî herêmî Kurdistan [The role of parliament in the political system of Kurdistan region]. Rudaw Research Centre. Available at: https://rudawrc.net/?p=129 (accessed 10 March 2024).
24.
GhanimD (2011) Iraq’s Dysfunctional Democracy. New York, NY: Praeger.
25.
Gorran Movement. (2013) Opozisyon direejkirdnewey mawey serokayeti u xu helbijardinewey Mesud Barzani ret dekatewe [Opposition rejects the extension of presidential term and his self-nomination]. Available at: https://archive.gorran.net/Detail.aspx?id=1922&LinkID=106 (accessed 10 January 2024).
GunterMM (2014) Unrecognized de facto states in world politics: The Kurds. The Brown Journal of World Affairs20(2): 161–178.
28.
HamaHH (2022) The rise and fall of movement for change in the Kurdistan region of Iraq (2009–2018). Asian Journal of Comparative Politics7(3): 539–558.
29.
HamaHHAbdullahFH (2021) Political parties and the political system in Iraqi Kurdistan. Journal of Asian and African Studies56(4): 754–773.
30.
HamzaK (2022) Rifrandomi serbexoy: Na bo serbeoxy nebu [Independent referendum: It was not for independence]. Diplomatic Magazine. Available at: https://diplomaticmagazine.net/opinion/3431 (accessed 15 January 2024).
31.
JambazT (2009) Parlemanterani xuli dwemi Perlemani Kurdistan Iraq 2005–2009 [The MPs of the second term of the Iraqi Kurdistan Parliament 2005–2009]. Shahab Publisher.
32.
JüdeJ (2017) Contesting borders? The formation of Iraqi Kurdistan’s de facto state. International Affairs93(4): 847–863.
33.
KamravaM (2012) Understanding Comparative Politics: A Framework for Analysis. London: Routledge.
34.
KelsallT (2016) Thinking and Working with Political Settlements. London: Overseas Development Institute.
35.
KelsallTSchulzNFergusonWD, et al. (2002) Political Settlements and Development: Theory, Evidence, Implications. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
36.
KhalilHM (2016) The Obstacles to Political Development in the Kurdistan Region 1992–2014. Bangor: Bangor University Press.
37.
KhanMH (1995) State failure in weak states: A critique of new institutionalist explanations. In: HarrissJHunterJLewisC (eds) The New Institutional Economics and Third World Development. London: Routledge, 71–86.
38.
KhanMH (2010) Political settlements and the governance of growth-enhancing institutions. London: SOAS. Available at: https://eprints.soas.ac.uk/id/eprint/9968 (accessed 15 January 2024).
39.
KhanMH (2018) Political settlements and the analysis of institutions. African Affairs117(469): 636–655.
KNN. (2017) Fraksiyonî Gorran beşdarî danîşitinî emirroy Perleman nakat [Goran Fraction will not participate in today’s parliament session]. Available at: https://www.knnc.net/Details4.aspx?jimare=106361 (accessed 20 January 2024).
42.
Kurdistan National Assembly. (1992) Briyari rageyandni fidraly [The decision of declaration of federalism]. Kurdistan Parliament. Available at: https://www.parliament.krd/business/resolutions/ (accessed 15 February 2024).
MustafaN (2012) Gorran lerewa dest padeket: Jiakrdnewey hizba siyasekan u hkumet [The change starts from here: the separation of political parties and government]. Gorran Movement. Available at: https://archive.gorran.net/ArticleDetail.aspx?id=100&LinkID=147 (accessed 10 June 2024).
58.
MustafaSD (2021) Iraqi Kurdistan independence referendum: Political parties, opportunity and timing. British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies48(5): 890–907.
59.
NaderAHanauerLAllenB, et al. (2016) Regional Implications of an Independent Kurdistan. New York, NY: RAND Corporation.
60.
NataliD (2010) The Kurdish Quasi-State: Development and dependency in post-gulf war Iraq. New York, NY: Syracuse University Press.
61.
NorthDCWallisJJWebbSB, et al. (2007) Limited access orders in the developing world: A new approach to the problems of development. Washington, DC: World Bank Publications. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 4359.
62.
O’DriscollDBaserB (2019) Independence referendums and nationalist rhetoric: The Kurdistan Region of Iraq. Third World Quarterly40(11): 2016–2034.
63.
PalaniK (2022) Kurdistan’s De Facto Statehood: A New Explanatory Framework. London: Routledge.
64.
ParkBJongerdenJOwtramF, et al. (2017) On the independence referendum in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq and disputed territories in 2017. Kurdish Studies5(2): 199–214.
65.
ParksTColeW (2010) Political Settlements: Implications for International Development Policy and Practice. San Francisco, CA: The Asia Foundation.
SalamD (2024) The interrelationship between sovereignty, state building, and good governance: The case of the Kurdistan region. Democratization32(3): 638–658.
72.
SalihDAHamaHH (2023) The Kurdish civil war and peace negotiations, 1994–1998. Journal of Asian and African Studies58(3): 298–321.
73.
SalihTMA (2019) Taqwim “ada” Barlaman Kurdistan - Aleiraq (2005–2013) [An evaluation of the performance of the Kurdistan Parliament-Iraq (2005–2013)]. PhD Thesis, University of Sulaimani, Iraq.
74.
StansfieldGRV (2003) Iraqi Kurdistan: Political Development and Emergent Democracy. London: Routledge.
75.
StansfieldG (2017) The evolution of the political system of the Kurdistan region of Iraq. In: GürbeyGHofmannSSeyderI (eds) Between State and Non-state. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan, 61–76.
76.
TalabaniJ (2008) Rekkhstni pawandi newan hkumati harem u parta syasiyakan, ba taybati PUK [Organizing the relationship between the Kurdistan government and political parties, in particular, the PUK]. Kurdistani Nwe.
77.
UK Department for International Development. (2010) Building peaceful states and societies: A DFID practice paper. London: DFID.
van WilgenburgWFumertonM (2015) Kurdistan’s political armies: The challenge of unifying the peshmerga forces. Carnegie Middle East Center16: 2003–2005.
80.
VollerY (2012) From rebellion to de facto statehood: International and transnational sources of the transformation of the Kurdish national liberation movement in Iraq into the Kurdistan Regional Government. PhD Thesis, London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE), UK.
81.
WaisyKS (2015) The roots of the Iraqi Kurdish internal rivalries, conflicts and peace process 1964–2000. American International Journal of Research in Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences10(3): 220–232.
