The article explores the problematic issues that arise between Bollywood films projecting homosexual relationships and the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) filtering their contents. Queer popular cultural representations in India face challenges to get release certification because of their inherently debatable contents including ‘non-normative’ sexual relationships which are largely identified as a potential threat to the existing heteronormative, majoritarian culture. By giving reference to two queer films, Unfreedom and Angry Indian Goddesses, this article explores the politics of censorship in the light of Foucauldian power relations and the discourse of knowledge production. I argue that by proscribing representations of queer sexualities in films, the CBFC has acted on behalf of the state in decelerating the formation and proliferation of a counter cultural movement to balance homophobia discursively and to peddle majoritarian power politics, and thus the notion of heterosexuality as compulsory form of sexual behaviour is popularized and consolidated in Indian society.
BhaskarI (1998) Allegory, nationalism and cultural change in Indian cinema: Sant Tukaram. Literature and Theology12(1): 50–69.
3.
BhattacharyaS (2019) Reading queerness: Same-sex marriages in India. In: ChakrabortyK (ed) The Politics of Belonging in Contemporary India. London: Routledge, pp. 75–86.
4.
BordoS (1999) Feminism, foucault and the politics of the body. In: PriceJShildrickM (eds) Feminist Theory and the Body: A Reader. London: Routledge, pp. 179–202.
5.
BoseB (2008) Modernity, globality, sexuality, and the city: A reading of Indian cinema. The Global South2(1): 35–58. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40339281.
6.
DasguptaRK (2017) Digital Queer Cultures in India: Politics, Intimacies and Belonging. London: Routledge.
7.
DattaS (2000) Globalisation and representations of women in Indian cinema. Social Scientist28(3/4): 71–82.
8.
DeshpandeA (2007) Indian cinema and the bourgeois nation state. Economic and Political Weekly42(50): 95–103. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40277057
9.
DeveauxM (1994) Feminism and empowerment: A critical reading of foucault. Feminist Studies, 20(2): 223–247.
EschholzSBufkinJLongJ (2002) Symbolic reality bites: Women and racial/ethnic minorities in modern film. Sociological Spectrum22(3): 299–334.
12.
FoucaultM (1984) History of Sexuality Vol. 1. Translated by Robert Hurley. New York: Pantheon Books.
13.
GehlawatA (2010) Reframing Bollywood: Theories of Popular Hindi Cinema. New Delhi: Sage Publications India. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446270233.
14.
GhoshS (2010) Fire: A Queer Film Classic. Vancouver: Arsenal Pulp Press.
15.
GhoshST (1992) Celluloid Nationalism: Cultural Politics in Popular Indian Cinema. The Ohio State University.
16.
GloverDKaplanC (2009) Genders. London: Routledge.
17.
GopinathG (1998) On Fire. GLQ4(4): 631–636.
18.
GopinathG (2002) On fire. In: FengPX (ed) Screening Asian Americans. New Jersey: Rutgers University Press, pp. 293–298.
KapurR (2000) Too hot to handle: The cultural politics of ‘Fire’. Feminist Review64(1): 53–64.
22.
KaurRMazzarellaW (2009) Censorship in South Asia: Cultural Regulation from Sedition to Seduction. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
23.
KhanM (2020) No ‘Me’ before the nation: Portrayal of nationalism and religious identities in Bollywood movies created during Modi-era. PhD Thesis, Illinois State University, USA.
MehtaM (2012) Censorship and Sexuality in Bombay Cinema. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
28.
PalBBhattacharjeePTripathiP (2021) Gendered and casteist body: Cast(e)ing and castigating the female body in select Bollywood films. Journal of International Women’s Studies22(10): 57–67.
29.
RajadhyakshaA (2015) The ‘Bollywoodization’of the Indian cinema: Cultural nationalism in a global arena. In: ChenK-HChuaBH (eds) The Inter-Asia Cultural Studies Reader. London: Routledge, pp. 465–482.
30.
SharmaM (2007) Loving Women: Being Lesbian in Unprivileged India. New Delhi: Yoda Press.
