This article aims to explain why Japan has been at the periphery of the international humanitarian system, at least for the past two decades. Based on a review of the main features of the country’s historical involvement in humanitarian crisis response, I suggest two main reasons: 1) the difficulty for Japan to adapt to the kind of institutions created after the end of the Cold War, mainly by Western actors, and 2) Japan’s preference for an integral approach to crisis management, using multiple international cooperation means, which falls outside of the present humanitarian diplomacy paradigm. As this paradigm comes into question, Japan can influence the emerging humanitarian system, particularly through the promotion of crisis management ownership and long-term commitment backed by multiple financial means.
AndersenRde SilvaPL (2018) The Routledge Companion to Media and Humanitarian Action. Abingdon: Routledge.
3.
BarnettM (2011) Empire of Humanity: A History of Humanitarianism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
4.
BarnettMWalkerP (2015) Regime change for humanitarian aid. Foreign Affairs94(4): 130–143.
5.
BinderASteetsJMeierC (2010) Humanitarian assistance: Truly universal? A Mapping Study of Non-Western Donors. GPPi Research Paper No. 12. Berlin: Global Public Policy Institute.
6.
Caballero-AnthonyMCookADBChenC (2021) Re-imagining the global humanitarian system: Emerging dynamics in the Asia-Pacific. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction56: 102098.
ChinkinCKaldorM (2017) International Law and New Wars. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9.
Commission on Human Security (2003) Human Security Now. New York: Commission on Human Security.
10.
Development Initiatives (2005) Global Humanitarian Assistance Update 2004–05. Evercreech: Development Initiatives.
11.
Development Initiatives (2018) Global Humanitarian Assistance Report 2018. Bristol: Development Initiatives.
12.
Development Initiatives (2019) Global Humanitarian Assistance Report 2019. Bristol: Development Initiatives.
13.
EgelandJ (2013) Humanitarian diplomacy. In: CooperAFHeineJThakurR (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Modern Diplomacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 352–368.
14.
GómezOA (2018) Sovereignty as responsibility in East Asia’s response to crisis. Humanitarian Alternatives9: 78–89.
15.
GómezOA (2019a) Human security after the Great East Japan Earthquake: Rethinking the role of external assistance. In: HernandezCGKimEMMineY, et al. (eds) Human Security and Cross-Border Cooperation in East Asia. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 65–86.
16.
GómezOA (2019b) What is at stake in localizing human security norms in the ASEAN+3? A Comparative analysis of 11 qualitative regional review surveys. In: MineYGómezOAMutoA (eds) Human Security Norms in East Asia. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 273–294.
17.
GómezOA (2021) Localisation or deglobalisation? East Asia and the dismantling of liberal humanitarianism. Third World Quarterly42(6): 1347–1364.
18.
GómezOAKawaguchiC (2016) The continuum of humanitarian crises management: Multiple approaches and the challenge of convergence. JICA-RI Working Paper. Tokyo: JICA Research Institute, 45.
HirataK (2002) Civil Society in Japan: The Growing Role of NGOs in Tokyo’s Aid Development Policy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
25.
HondaT (2017) JICA no heiwakochikushien no shiteki tenkai (1999–2015): Nihonryu heiwakochiku apurochi no keisei [Historical development of JICA’s peacebuilding (1999–2015): A formation of Japanese way of peacebuilding]. Kokusai seiji [International Politics]2017(186): 97–112.
26.
HongY-S (2015) Cold War Germany, the Third World, and the Global Humanitarian Regime. New York: Cambridge University Press.
27.
HoshinoT (2017) Japan’s Policies on Conflict Prevention and International Peace Cooperation Activities. Japan and the World, Japan Digital Library. JIIA, 17.
28.
IkenberryGJ (2018) The end of liberal international order?International Affairs94(1): 7–23.
29.
International Federation of Red Cross (n.d.) Yokohama strategy and plan of action for a safer world. Guidelines for natural disaster prevention, preparedness and mitigation. World Conference on Natural Disaster Reduction Yokohama, Japan, 23–27 May 1994. Available at: https://www.ifrc.org/Docs/idrl/I248EN.pdf(accessed 25 June 2021).
KamidohzonoSGGómezOAMineY (2016) Embracing human security: New directions of Japan’s ODA for the 21st century. In: KatoHPageJShimomuraY (eds) Japan’s Development Assistance: Foreign Aid and the Post-2015 Agenda. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 205–221.
34.
KatoH (2016) Japan’s ODA 1954–2014: Changes and continuities in a central instrument in Japan’s foreign policy. In: KatoHPageJShimomuraY (eds) Japan’s Development Assistance: Foreign Aid and the Post-2015 Agenda. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 1–18.
35.
KawaguchiC (2018) Comparative analysis of donor approaches to the continuum under a fragile peace: The case of South Sudan. In: HanataniAGómezOAKawaguchiC (eds) Crisis Management Beyond the Humanitarian-Development Nexus. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 75–100.
36.
KellettJCaravaniA (2013) Financing Disaster Risk Reduction: A 20 Year Story of International Aid. London: GFDRR and ODI, 60.
37.
KurodaK (2003) Japan-based non-governmental organizations in pursuit of human security. Japan Forum15(2): 227–250.
38.
LechatMF (1990) The International Decade for Natural Disaster Reduction: Background and objectives. Disasters14(1): 1–6.
39.
LoescherG (2001) The UNHCR and World Politics: A Perilous Path. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
40.
MacraeJCollinsonSBuchanan-SmithM, et al. (2002) Uncertain power: The changing role of official donors in humanitarian action. HPG Report. London: ODI, 91.
41.
MearsheimerJJ (2019) Bound to fail: The rise and fall of the liberal international order. International Security43(4): 7–50.
Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan (2015) Cabinet decision on the Development Cooperation Charter. Available at: https://www.mofa.go.jp/files/000067701.pdf(accessed 25 June 2021).
MiyashitaH (2019) Refugees, refuge applicants and others [Nanmin, Nanminshinseisha nado]. In: TakasuY (ed.) SDGs and Japan: Human Security Indicators to Leave No One Behind. Tokyo Akashi Shoten, pp. 223–225.
47.
NishikawaY (2005) Japan’s Changing Role in Humanitarian Crises. Abingdon: Routledge.
48.
OCHA (n.d.) Financial tracking service: Humanitarian aid contributions. Available at: https://fts.unocha.org/ (accessed 25 June 2021).
49.
O’HaganJ (2016) Australia and the promise and the perils of humanitarian diplomacy. Australian Journal of International Affairs70(6): 657–669.
50.
OECD (1996) Development Co-operation Review Series: Japan 1996. Paris: OECD, 76.
51.
OECD (2010) Development Assistance Committee Peer Review of Japan. DAC Peer Reviews. Paris: OECD, 126.
52.
OECD (2014) OECD Development Co-operation Peer Reviews: Japan 2014. DAC Peer Reviews. Paris: OECD Publishing, 111.
53.
OECD (2020) OECD Development Co-operation Peer Reviews: Japan 2020. DAC Peer Reviews. Paris: OECD Publishing, 133.
OhashiM (2016) NGOs and Japan’s ODA: Critical views and advocacy. In: KatoHPageJShimomuraY (eds) Japan’s Development Assistance: Foreign Aid and the Post-2015 Agenda. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 327–343.
57.
OsaY (2012) Seeking Japanese conceptions of humanitarianism. In: Cultures of Humanitarianism: Perspectives from the Asia-Pacific project. Canberra: Australian National University. Available at: https://www.nottingham.ac.uk/iaps/documents/project/osa.pdf (accessed 25 June 2021).
58.
PaulmannJ (2016) The dilemmas of humanitarian aid: Historical perspectives. In: PaulmannJ (ed.) Dilemmas of Humanitarian Aid in the Twentieth Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–31.
59.
PaulmannJ (2019) Humanitarianism and media: Introduction to an entangled history. In: PaulmannJ (ed.) Humanitarianism and Media. Oxford: Berghahn Books, pp. 1–38.
RégnierP (2011) The emerging concept of humanitarian diplomacy: Identification of a community of practice and prospects for international recognition. International Review of the Red Cross93(884): 1211–1237.
62.
SalvaticiS (2019) A History of Humanitarianism, 1755–1989: In the Name of Others. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
63.
SezginZDijkzeulD (2015) The New Humanitarians in International Practice: Emerging Actors and Contested Principles. Abingdon: Routledge.
64.
StreetenP (1982) First Things First: Meeting Basic Human Needs in the Developing Countries. Washington DC: World Bank.
65.
TakedaY (2013) Shisensaigai to Nihon no Kokusaikinkyuenjo [Natural disasters and Japan’s emergency assistance]. In: OshibaR (ed.) Nihon no Gaiko [Japan's Diplomacy]. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten, pp. 147–171.
66.
TanSS (2011) Providers not protectors: Institutionalizing responsible sovereignty in Southeast Asia. Asian Security7(3): 201–217.
67.
UN General Assembly (1991) Strengthening of the Coordination of Emergency Humanitarian Assistance of the United Nations. New York: United Nations.
68.
WeissTG (1998) Humanitarian shell games: Whither UN reform?Security Dialogue29(1): 9–23.
