Thailand’s new right,social cleansing and the continuing military

Abstract

The article looks at the nature of the state and society in contemporary Thailand using a comparative historical analysis. Thailand is led by an officer corps, faithful only to the monarchy regime, while the land is at the disposal of the absolute sovereign who unquestionably holds control over its terrain, resources and people. It is a mix of Siamese palingenetic ultranationalist sentiment with re-interpretations of a conservative Buddhist ideology which is based on the morality and right of the rulers to rule. To the military leaders, its general officers, the military–monarchy nexus embodies a supreme source of secular morality and power with the right to dominate and where the ends (always) justify the means. Thai society has become irreparably divided by the interests of the ruling elites, defining the exceptions and, it is argued, comparable to historical and contemporary authoritarian regimes elsewhere. The article argues that the country, led by the New Right, articulates disarming elements of semi-fascism under the military, in a compact with the interests of the monarchy.

Keywords

fascisms New Right social cleansing Thailand ultranationalism

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adams

(2017) Thailand: Junta entrenched 3 years after coup: Empty promises to respect rights, restore democracy. Human Rights Watch, 21 May. Available at: https://www.hrw.org/news/2017/05/21/thailand-junta-entrenched-3-years-after-coup (accessed 11 June 2018).

Aekarach

(2018) NLA passes amended Sangha bill. Bangkok Post, 5 July. Available at: https://www.bangkokpost.com/news/general/1498006/nla-passes-amended-sangha-bill (accessed 22 July 2018).

Agamben

(1998) Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Allardyce

(1979) What fascism is not: Thoughts on the deflation of a concept. The American Historical Review 84(2): 367–388.

Arghiros

(2001) Democracy, Development and Decentralization in Provincial Thailand. Richmond: Curzon Press.

Bangkok Post (2018) Seksan blasts divisive politics. 10 March. Available at: https://www.bangkokpost.com/thailand/politics/1425439/seksan-blasts-divisive-politics (accessed 10 November 2018).

Benjamin

(1969) Theses on the philosophy of history. Illuminations. Trans. Zohn

. New York: Schocken Books.

Bhikkhu

Buddhadasa

(1988) Kalama Sutta, help us! In: Key to Natural Truth. Bangkok: The Dhamma Study & Practice Group.

Castoriadis

(1997) Democracy as procedure and democracy as regime. Constellations 4(1): 1–18.

10.

Chai-Anan

(1987) Democracy in Thailand: A case of a stable semi-democratic regime. World Affairs 150(1): 31–41.

11.

Chambers

Napisa

(2016) The resilience of monarchised military in Thailand. Journal of Contemporary Asia 46(3): 425–444.

12.

Connors

(2007) Democracy and National Identity in Thailand. 2nd edn. Copenhagen: NIAS.

13.

Crispin

(2016) The staying power of Thailand’s military: The ruling junta is likely to remain in power for the foreseeable future. The Diplomat, 10 February. Available at: https://thediplomat.com/2016/02/the-staying-power-of-thailands-military/ (accessed 10 June 2018).

14.

Debord

(1994) The Society of the Spectacle. Trans. Nicholson-Smith

. New York: Zone Books.

15.

Draper

(2014) Steady rise of fascism here is terrifying. Bangkok Post, 28 April. Available at: https://www.bangkokpost.com/opinion/opinion/406983/steady-rise-of-fascism-here-is-terrifying (accessed 17 July 2018).

16.

Draper

(2016a) School experiments in militarised fascism: Thai kindergartners in military uniforms and the third wave. Prachatai, 31 May. Available at: https://prachatai.com/english/node/6212 (accessed 23 July 2018).

17.

Draper

(2016b) Systematic military indoctrination of Thai kindergarteners advances police state. The Nation, 29 December. Available at: https://www.nationthailand.com/opinion/30303112 (accessed 23 July 2018).

18.

Dressel

(2018) Thailand’s traditional trinity and the rule of law: Can they coexist? Asian Studies Review 42(2): 268–285.

19.

Eastman

(1972) Fascists in Kuomintang China: The Blue Shirts. China Quarterly 49: 1–31.

20.

Eatwell

(2006) Explaining fascism and ethnic cleansing: The three dimensions of charisma and the four dark sides of nationalism. Political Studies Review 4(3): 263–278.

21.

Eco

(1995) Ur-Fascism. The New York Review of Books. Available at: https://www.pegc.us/archive/Articles/eco_ur-fascism.pdf (accessed 20 July 2018).

22.

Ellis-Petersen

(2018) Thailand’s junta renews corruption crackdown on Buddhist monks. The Guardian, 26 June. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/jun/26/thailands-junta-renews-corruption-crackdown-on-buddhist-monks (accessed 29 July 2018).

23.

Fifield

(2015) Hardliner tries to reform Thailand’s Buddhist monks behaving badly. The Guardian, 15 May. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/may/15/thailand-buddhist-monks-bad-behaviour-crackdown (accessed 23 July 2018).

24.

Gadamer

H-G

(1986) The Idea of the Good in Platonic-Aristotelian Philosophy. Trans. Smith

. New Haven: Yale University Press.

25.

Ganjanakhundee

(2019) Army chief’s comments a threat to democracy: Scholars. The Nation, 3 April. Available at: http://www.nationmultimedia.com/detail/politics/30367023 (accessed 14 November 2019).

26.

Girling

(1984) Thailand in Gramscian perspective. Pacific Affairs 57(3): 385–403.

27.

Golomb

Wistrich

(eds) (2003) Nietzsche, Godfather of Fascism? On the Uses and Abuses of a Philosophy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

28.

Griffin

(1991) The Nature of Fascism. London: Pinter Publishers.

29.

Griffin

(2007) The ‘holy storm’: ‘Clerical fascism’ through the lens of modernism. Totalitarian Movements and Political Religions 8(2): 213–227.

30.

Hamacher

(2001) “Now”: Walter Benjamin on historical time. In: Friese

(ed.) The Moment: Time and Rupture in Modern Thought. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, pp. 161–196.

31.

Head

(2017) The mystery of the missing brass plaque. BBC, 20 April. Available at: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-39650310 (accessed 25 October 2018).

32.

Henshall

(1992) The Myth of Absolutism: Change & Continuity in Early Modern European Monarchy. Harlow: Longman.

33.

Hewison

Kitirianglarp

(2010) ‘Thai-style democracy’: The royalist struggle for Thailand’s politics. In: Ivarsson

Isager

(eds) Saying the Unsayable: Monarchy and Democracy in Thailand. Copenhagen: Nordic Institute of Asian Studies Press, pp. 179–202.

34.

Hook

(2005) Monumental space and the uncanny. Geoforum 36(6): 688–704.

35.

Human Rights Watch (2017) Laos/Thailand: Investigate abduction of exiled Red Shirt activist. 1 August. Available at: https://www.hrw.org/news/2017/08/01/laos/thailand-investigate-abduction-exiled-Red-Shirt-activist (accessed 12 August 2019).

36.

Human Rights Watch (2019a) Thailand: Critics feared ‘disappeared’. 9 May. Available at: https://www.hrw.org/news/2019/05/09/thailand-critics-feared-disappeared (accessed 1 August 2019).

37.

Human Rights Watch (2019b) Thailand: Structural flaws subvert election. 19 March. Available at: https://www.hrw.org/news/2019/03/19/thailand-structural-flaws-subvert-election (accessed 11 April 2020).

38.

Huntington

(1957) The Soldier and the State: The Theory and Politics of Civil–Military Relations. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

39.

Hutchcroft

(2014) Linking capital and countryside: Patronage and clientelism in Japan, Thailand, and the Philippines. In: Abente

Diamond

(eds) Clientelism, Social Policy, and the Quality of Democracy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 174–203.

40.

Jory

(2015) Republicanism in Thai history. In: Peleggi

(ed.) A Sarong for Clio: Essays on the Intellectual and Cultural History of Thailand. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, pp. 97–117.

41.

Kahane

(1984) Hypothesis on patronage and social change. Ethnology 23(1): 13–24.

42.

Keyes

(1989) Buddhist politics and their revolutionary origins in Thailand. International Political Science Review 10(2): 121–142.

43.

Khaosod English (2019) Prayuth not quitting for botching oath. 10 August. Available at: http://www.khaosodenglish.com/politics/2019/08/10/prayuth-not-quitting-for-botching-oath/ (accessed 30 August 2019).

44.

Khemthong Tonsakulrungruang (2018) Purging the Thai sangha. New Mandala, 28 May. Available at: http://www.newmandala.org/ncpos-purge-thai-sangha/ (accessed 25 July 2018).

45.

Kitschelt

Wilkinson

(eds) (2007) Patrons, Clients, and Policies: Patterns of Democratic Accountability and Political Competition. New York: Cambridge University Press.

46.

Kongpob

Areerat

(2017) Killing the spectre of democracy: 1932 Revolution Plaque removal. Prachatai, 21 April. Available at: https://prachatai.com/english/node/7090 (accessed 25 July 2018).

47.

Kornkritch

Somjittranukit

(2016) Thailand’s witch-hunting culture explained by sociologist. Prachatai, 25 October. Available at: https://prachatai.com/english/node/6670 (accessed 5 August 2019).

48.

Lefebvre

(2001) Comments on a new state form. Trans. Johnson

Brenner

. Antipode 33(5): 769–782.

49.

Lefebvre

(2009) State, Space, World: Selected Essays. Edited by Brenner

Elden

. Trans Moore

Brenner

Elden

. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

50.

Lefevre

(2017) Removal of Thai revolution plaque raises democracy concerns. Reuters, 17 April. Available at: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-thailand-plaque/removal-of-thai-revolution-plaque-raises-democracy-concerns-idUSKBN17J0HB (accessed 23 July 2018).

51.

Legg

(2005) Contesting and surviving memory: Space, nation, and nostalgia in Les Lieux de Mémoire. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 23(4): 481–504.

52.

Leider

(2008) Forging Buddhist credentials as a tool of legitimacy and ethnic identity: A study of Arakan’s subjection in nineteenth-century Burma. Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient 51: 409–450.

53.

McAuliffe

(2015) Thailand renews post-coup policy of ‘attitude adjustment’ for political opponents. The Lowry Institute. Available at: https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/thailand-renews-post-coup-policy-attitude-adjustment-political-opponents (accessed 10 February 2018).

54.

Mahoney

(2003) Knowledge accumulation in comparative historical research: The case of democracy and authoritarianism. In: Mahoney

Rueschemeyer

(eds) Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 131–174.

55.

Mann

(2004) Fascists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

56.

Mark

(2017) Thailand’s missing plaque: The final failure of the 1932 revolution. The Diplomat, 5 May. Available at: https://thediplomat.com/2017/05/thailands-missing-plaque-the-final-failure-of-the-1932-revolution/ (accessed 23 July 2018).

57.

Mérieau

(2016) Thailand’s deep state, royal power and the constitutional court (1997–2015). Journal of Contemporary Asia 46(3): 445–466.

58.

Moore

(1966) Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy. New York: Penguin Books.

59.

Mydans

(2019) Prem Tinsulanonda, former Thai premier and adviser to king, dies at 98. New York Times, 26 May. Available at: nytimes.com/2019/05/26/obituaries/prem-tinsulanonda-death.html (accessed 24 November 2019).

60.

Nattaka

Chaisinthop

(2017) Domestic volunteer tourism in Thailand. South East Asia Research 25(3): 234–250.

61.

Neher

(1988) Thailand in 1987: Semi-successful semi-democracy. Asian Survey 28(2): 192–201.

62.

Nietzsche

(2002) Beyond Good and Evil: Prelude to a Philosophy of the Future. Edited and trans. by Norman

. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

63.

Nora

(1989) Between memory and history: Les lieux de mémoire. Representations 26: 7–24.

64.

Panarat

Thepgumpanat

Panu

Wongcha-um

(2017) Thailand’s Buddhist monks order reforms ahead of royal transition. Reuters, 19 October. Available at: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-thailand-buddhism/thailands-buddhist-monks-order-reforms-ahead-of-royal-transition-idUSKBN1CO07G (accessed 24 July 2018).

65.

Panu

Wongcha-um

Panarat

Thepgumpanat

Tostevin

(2019) Hard right: Political divide deepens in Thailand. Reuters, 5 September. Available at: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-thailand-politics-right-analysis/hard-right-political-divide-deepens-in-thailand-idUSKCN1VQ0JS (accessed 2 April 2020).

66.

Pattamon

Poonsiri

(2016) Thailand’s ‘witch hunt’ case: When mourning legitimizes violence. WBS Bulletin (Willy Brandt School Blog). Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/319059931_Thailand’s_’Witch_Hunt’_case_when_mourning_legitimizes_violence (accessed 10 June 2018).

67.

Pavin

Chachavalpongpun

(2010) “Unity” as a discourse in Thailand’s polarized politics. In: Singh

(ed.) Southeast Asian Affairs 2010. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, pp. 332–342.

68.

Pavin

Chachavalpongpun

(2020) Introduction: A timeless Thailand. In: Chachavalpongpun

Pavin

(ed.) Routledge Handbook of Contemporary Thailand. Abingdon and New York: Routledge, pp. 3–15.

69.

Paxton

(1998) The five stages of fascism. The Journal of Modern History 70(1): 1–23.

70.

Payne

(1973) Spanish fascism in comparative perspective. Iberian Studies: Journal of the Iberian Social Studies Association 2(4): 3–12.

71.

Payne

(1996) A History of Fascism 1914–1945. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

72.

Pithaya Pookaman

(2019) Thailand’s emerging ‘New Right’ political movement seeks to suppress the country’s democracy. South China Morning Post, 21 May. Available at: https://www.scmp.com/week-asia/opinion/article/3011079/thailands-emerging-new-right-political-movement-seeks-suppress (accessed 2 April 2020).

73.

Poowin

Bunyavejchewin

(2010) Constructing the ‘red’ otherness: The role and implications of Thainess on polarised politics. ASEAS – Austrian Journal of South-East Asian Studies 3(2): 241–248.

74.

Political Prisoners Thailand (2014) Lese majeste fascism. Available at: https://thaipoliticalprisoners.wordpress.com/2014/04/21/lese-majeste-fascism/ (accessed 20 June 2018).

75.

Prachatai (2018a) Those with ‘insulting attitude’ towards Thai monarchy can’t be judges: Ultra-royalist. Available at: https://prachatai.com/english/node/6530 (accessed 23 July 2018).

76.

Prachatai (2018b) Ultra-royalist calls for lèse-majesté purge in Paris. Available at: https://prachatai.com/english/node/6658 (accessed 27 July 2018).

77.

Prachatai (2019a) ‘Support good people to rule this country,’ says King of Thailand on eve of election. 24 March. Available at: https://prachatai.com/english/node/7990 (accessed 9 April 2020).

78.

Prachatai (2019b) UN calls for disclosure of information about disappeared dissidents. 11 May. Available at: https://prachatai.com/english/node/8042 (accessed 30 June 2019).

79.

Prajak

Kongkirati

(2006) Counter-movements in democratic transition: Thai right-wing movements after the 1973 popular uprising. Asian Review 19: 1–34.

80.

Prajak

Kongkirati

Kanchoochat

Veerayooth

(2018) The Prayuth regime: Embedded military and hierarchical capitalism in Thailand. TRaNS: Trans-Regional and -National Studies of Southeast Asia 6(2): 279–305.

81.

Pravit

Rojanaphruk

(2018a) Can we talk about Thai-style ‘democracy?’. Khaosod English, 20 January. Available at: http://www.khaosodenglish.com/opinion/2018/01/20/can-talk-thai-style-democracy/ (accessed 24 July 2018).

82.

Pravit

Rojanaphruk

(2018b) Monument marking defeat of royalist rebels removed in dead of night. Khaosod English, 28 December. Available at: https://www.khaosodenglish.com/politics/2018/12/28/monument-marking-defeat-of-royalist-rebels-removed-in-dead-of-night/ (accessed 20 January 2020).

83.

Pravit

Rojanaphruk

(2018c) New ‘monk act’ allows king to appoint sangha members. Khaosod English, 5 July. Available at: http://www.khaosodenglish.com/politics/2018/07/05/new-monk-act-allows-king-to-appoint-sangha-members/ (accessed 30 July 2018).

84.

Priorelli

(2019) “The founders of a European era”? The Fascist and Falangist plans for Italy and Spain in the new Nazi order. Modern Italy 24(3): 317–330.

85.

Puangthong

R Pawakapan

(2017) The Central Role of Thailand’s Internal Security Operations Command in the Post-counter-insurgency Period. Trends in South East Asia No. 17. Singapore: ISEAS.

86.

Puey

Ungphakorn

(1977) Violence and the military coup in Thailand. Bulletin of Concerned Asian Scholars 9(3): 4–12.

87.

Reuter

(2013) Words can kill: Class hatred and the Spanish Civil War. Forbes, 8 November. Available at: https://www.forbes.com/sites/timreuter/2013/11/08/words-can-kill-class-hatred-and-the-spanish-civil-war/#65a632252591 (accessed 30 July 2018).

88.

Reynolds

(2004) Phibun Songkhram and Thai nationalism in the Fascist era. European Journal of East Asian Studies 3(1): 99–134.

89.

Reynolds

(2010) The social bases of autocratic rule in Thailand. e-international relations. Available at: https://www.e-ir.info/2010/06/11/the-social-bases-of-autocratic-rule-in-thailand/ (accessed 26 May 2019).

90.

Rodrigo

(2012) Fascism and violence in Spain: A comparative update. International Journal of Iberian Studies 25(3): 183–199.

91.

Sommerville

(2016) Hobbes and absolutism. In: Martinich

Hoekstra

(eds) Oxford Handbook on Hobbes. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 378–396.

92.

South China Morning Post (2015) Attitude adjustment: The methods used by Thai junta to silence its critics. 18 September. Available at: https://www.scmp.com/news/asia/southeast-asia/article/1859533/attitude-adjustment-methods-used-thai-junta-silence-its (accessed 20 July 2018).

93.

Stott

(1991) Mu’ang and pa: Elite views of nature in a changing Thailand. In: Chitakasem

Turton

(eds) Thai Constructions of Knowledge. London: SOAS, pp. 142–154.

94.

Subrahmanyan

(2020) The unruly past: History and historiography of the 1932 Thai Revolution. Journal of Contemporary Asia 50(1): 74–98.

95.

Taylor

(2008) Buddhism and Post-Modern Imaginings in Thailand: The Religiosity of Urban Space. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing.

96.

Taylor

(2011) ‘Fascism’ and the Thai state. Prachatai, 30 April. Available at: https://prachatai.com/english/node/2460 (accessed 2 April 2020).

97.

Taylor

(2012a) Is there an in-between? The ‘city-nation’, imagining rule, lines and protests from the periphery in Thailand. Spaces and Flows: An International Journal of Urban & ExtraUrban Studies 1(2): 141–150.

98.

Taylor

(2012b) Remembrance and tragedy: Understanding Thailand’s “Red Shirt” social movement. SOJOURN: Journal of Social Issues in Southeast Asia 27(1): 120–152.

99.

Taylor

(2015) Football and blindfolds: Thai junta’s ‘attitude adjustments’. Available at: https://news.yahoo.com/football-blindfolds-thai-juntas-attitude-adjustments-053812445.html (accessed 25 July 2018).

100.

Taylor

(2016a) Thailand’s black hole: A Deleuzian take. New Mandala, 25 October. Available at: http://www.newmandala.org/thailands-black-hole/ (accessed 13 July 2018).

101.

Taylor

(2016b) Thailand’s military regime continues to tighten its grip. Asian Currents (Asian Studies Association of Australia). Available at: http://asaa.asn.au/thailands-military-regime-continues-tighten-grip/ (accessed 2 July 2018).

102.

Taylor

(2017) The perplexing case of Wat Dhammakaya. New Mandala, 6 March. Available at: http://www.newmandala.org/perplexing-case-wat-dhammakaya/ (accessed 21 July 2018).

103.

Taylor

(2018) What’s behind the “purging” of the Thai sangha? New Mandala, 8 June. Available at: http://www.newmandala.org/whats-behind-purging-thai-sangha/ (accessed 26 July 2018).

104.

Thai Alliance for Human Rights (2019) References on 5 assassinations and plight of Thai refugees in Laos (for international reporters). 18 February. Available at: http://tahr-global.org/?p=32840 (accessed 14 May 2019).

105.

Thongchai

Winichakul

(2002) Remembering/silencing the traumatic past: The ambivalent memories of the October 1976 massacre in Bangkok. In: Tanabe

Keyes

(eds) Cultural Crisis and Social Memory: Modernity and Identity in Thailand and Laos. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 243–286.

106.

Thongchai

Winichakul

(2014) The monarchy and anti-monarchy: Two elephants in the room of Thai politics and the state of denial. In: Chachavalpongpun

Pavin

(ed.) “Good Coup” Gone Bad: Thailand’s Political Development Since Thaksin’s Downfall. Singapore: ISEAS, pp. 79–109.

107.

Thongchai

Winichakul

(2020) Fear of democracy in Thailand. J-Stage 66(2): 52–55.

108.

Tuohy

(2013) Thai educators grapple with Nazi imagery. Aljazeera, 15 August. Available at: https://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/features/2013/08/20138916509337563.html (accessed 23 July 2018).

109.

United Nations (2019) Mandates of the Working Group on Enforced or Involuntary Disappearances (REFERENCE: UA THA 3/2019). Available at: https://spcommreports.ohchr.org/TMResultsBase/DownLoadPublicCommunicationFile?gId=24391&fbclid=IwAR32kCxOe_Qxo68ZSgJmXmT5AAv3z4_ofZJ2GN2t-OGoOaIj84S7X-KWkOU (accessed 20 March 2019).

110.

Walton

(2016) Buddhist Politics and Political Thought in Myanmar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

111.

Wassana

Nanuam

(2019) Jit Arsa project builds nation of volunteers. Bangkok Post, 28 July. Available at: https://www.bangkokpost.com/thailand/general/1720035/jit-arsa-project-builds-nation-of-volunteers (accessed 18 April 2020).

112.

Watcharabon

Buddharaksa

(2014) The old is dying and the new cannot be born: Organic crisis, social forces, and the Thai state, 1997–2010. PhD thesis, University of York, UK.

113.

Zackari

(2016) Violence on the periphery of the Thai state and nationhood. In: Koch

(ed.) State Terror, State Violence Global Perspectives. Wiesbaden: Springer VS, pp. 71–92.

Thailand’s new right,social cleansing and the continuing military–monarchy entente

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References