In previous studies of migration, return migration is usually considered a behavior determined by negative self-selection. This study pools data from three waves of the China College Student Survey (2010, 2013, and 2015) to explore the return migration behavior of Chinese college graduates and its impact on their labor market performance. The results show that graduate return migrants have advantages in terms of family background, although they do not perform as well in terms of human capital. Relative to graduate nonreturn migrants, return migrants have a greater chance of securing positions in governmental organizations, and this advantage is reinforced by family political capital. In addition, income analysis shows that return migrants seem to have an advantage over nonreturn migrants when the effects of migrant selectivity are considered. This study systematically discusses the monetary and occupational returns to return migration of highly educated individuals in a non-Western context, and has important implications for our understanding of the relationship between migration and social inequality.
BianYJ (1994) Guanxi and the allocation of urban jobs in China. The China Quarterly140: 971–999.
2.
BorjasGJ (1987) Self-selection and the income of immigrants. American Economic Review77(4): 531–553.
3.
BurnsJPWangXQ (2010) Civil service reform in China: Impacts on civil servants’ behavior. The China Quarterly201: 58–78.
4.
ChanKWBuckinghamW (2008) Is China abolishing the hukou system?The China Quarterly195: 582–606.
5.
ChanWK (2015) Higher education and graduate employment in China: Challenges for sustainable development. Higher Education Policy28(1): 35–53.
6.
ChengZMGuoFHugoG, et al. (2013) Employment and wage discrimination in the Chinese cities: A comparative study of migrants and locals. Habitat International39: 246–255.
7.
China General Administration of Quality Supervision (2009) The National Standard of Classification and Code of Disciplines of the People's Republic of China (GB/T13745-2009). Beijing: Standards Press of China.
8.
CrescenziRHolmanNOrruE (2017) Why do they return? Beyond the economic drivers of graduate return migration. The Annals of Regional Science59(3): 603–627.
9.
DaVanzoJ (1976) Differences between return and nonreturn migration: An econometric analysis. The International Migration Review10(1): 13–27.
10.
De HaasHFokkemaTFihriMF (2015) Return migration as failure or success?Journal of International Migration and Integration16(2): 415–429.
11.
Di CintioMGrassiE (2013) Internal migration and wages of Italian college graduates. Papers in Regional Science92(1): 119–140.
12.
DuHM (2018) Rich dad, poor dad: The impact of family background on educated young people’s migration from peripheral China. Journal of Youth Studies21(1): 90–11.
13.
GuoQSunWK (2014) Economic returns to English proficiency for college graduates in mainland China. China Economic Review30: 290–300.
14.
HaoYHaoXLiY, et al. (2020) How does air quality affect the willingness of graduates to stay? Evidence from Beijing city, China. Journal of Cleaner Production259.
15.
HuYShiXZ (2020) The impact of China’s one-child policy on intergenerational and gender relations. Contemporary Social Science15(3): 360–377.
16.
HuangXB (2008) Guanxi networks and job searches in China’s emerging labor market: A qualitative investigation. Work, Employment and Society22(3): 467–484.
17.
JewellSFaggianA (2014) Interregional migration “wage premia”: The case of creative and science and technology graduates in the UK. In: KourtitKNijkampPStimsonR (eds) Applied Regional Growth and Innovation Models. Heidelberg: SpringerBerlin, 197–214.
18.
KazakisPFaggianA (2017) Mobility, education and labor market outcomes for US graduates: Is selectivity important?The Annals of Regional Science59(3): 731–758.
19.
LiHBMengLSShiXZ, et al. (2012) Does having a cadre parent pay? Evidence from the first job offers of Chinese college graduates. Journal of Development Economics99(2): 513–552.
20.
LiTZhangJY (2010) What determines employment opportunity for college graduates in China after higher education reform?China Economic Review21(1): 38–50.
21.
LinNBianYJ (1991) Getting ahead in urban China. American Journal of Sociology97(3): 657–688.
22.
LiuD (2016) Parental involvement and college graduate employment in China. Journal of Education and Work29(1): 98–113.
23.
McGregorPThankiRMcKeeP (2002) Home and away: Graduate experience from a regional perspective. Applied Economics34(2): 219–223.
24.
McLaughlinJS (2017) Does Communist Party membership pay? Estimating the economic returns to party membership in the labor market in China. Journal of Comparative Economics45(4): 963–983.
25.
RidgewayGKovalchikSAGriffinBA, et al. (2015) Propensity score analysis with survey weighted data. Journal of Causal Inference3(2): 237–249.
26.
RobertsJNodenPWestA, et al. (2016) Living with the parents: The purpose of young graduates' return to the parental home in England. Journal of Youth Studies19(3): 319–337.
27.
RoksaJ (2005) Double disadvantage or blessing in disguise? Understanding the relationship between college major and work organization. Sociology of Education78(3): 207–232.
28.
RuttenMVerstappenS (2014) Middling migration: Contradictory mobility experiences of Indian youth in London. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 40(8): 1217–1235.
29.
SageJEvandrouMFalkinghamJ (2013) Onwards or homewards? Complex graduate migration pathways, well-being, and the “parental safety net”. Population, Space and Place19(6): 738–755.
30.
ShumwayJMHallG (1996) Self-selection, earnings and Chicano migration: Differences between return and onward migrants. International Migration Review30(4): 979–994.
31.
SjaastadLA (1962) The costs and returns of human migration. Journal of Political Economy70(5), Part 2: 80–93.
32.
WalderAGHuSH (2009) Revolution, reform, and status inheritance: Urban China, 1949–1996. American Journal of Sociology114(5): 1395–1427.
33.
WangHLiWDengY (2017) Precarity among highly educated migrants: College graduates in Beijing, China. Urban Geography38(10): 1497–1516.
34.
WangWWFanCC (2006) Success or failure: selectivity and reasons of return migration in Sichuan and Anhui, China. Environment and Planning A38(5): 939–958.
35.
WuXGSongX (2013) Ethnicity, Migration, and Social Stratification in China: Evidence from Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region. Population Studies Center, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, report no. 13–810.
36.
WuXGTreimanDJ (2004) The household registration system and social stratification in China: 1955–1996. Demography41(2): 363–384.
37.
WuZ (2010) Self-selection and earnings of migrants: Evidence from rural China. Asia Economic Journal24(1): 23–44.
38.
XiaoYBianYJ (2018) The influence of hukou and college education in China’s labor market. Urban Studies55(7): 1504–1524.
39.
YangWHChenL (2016) Political capital and intergenerational mobility: Evidence from elite college admissions in China. Chinese Journal of Sociology2(2): 194–213.
40.
YeungWJJ (2013) Higher education expansion and social stratification in China. Chinese Sociological Review45(4): 54–80.
41.
ZhangZNWuXG (2017) Occupational segregation and earnings inequality: Rural migrants and local workers in urban China. Social Science Research61(1): 57–74.
42.
ZhaoMY (2023) Moving to “Bei–Shang–Guang”? Internal migration, local hukou barriers and labour market outcomes among college graduates in China. Population, Space and Place: e2651.
43.
ZhouJHuiECMPengH (2022) Chasing opportunity: Inequality of opportunity and educational self-selection of interprovincial migrants in China. The Annals of Regional Science 69: 281–309.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
