Why does the homeowners' cross-neighborhood organizational coalition in Shanghai differ from that in Guangzhou? A city-level comparative analysis of the governance structures and political opportunities (threats)
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online July, 2016
Why does the homeowners' cross-neighborhood organizational coalition in Shanghai differ from that in Guangzhou? A city-level comparative analysis of the governance structures and political opportunities (threats)
This article presents a comparative study of homeowners' organizational coalitions in Shanghai and Guangzhou. Based on the analyses of the data from documents, first-hand interviews and Internet networks, the homeowners' organizational coalition in Shanghai was found to be weaker than that in Guangzhou. This article proposes an analytical framework that integrates the insights from social movement coalition studies and urban governance studies to explain the differences between the homeowners' cross-neighborhood coalitions in the two cities. Compared with Guangzhou, the property governance system in Shanghai is relatively advanced, and the probability of the homeowners experiencing common threats or severe rights infringements is relatively low; hence, the homeowners in different residential neighborhoods are less likely to collaborate. In addition, the highly developed base level governance structure in Shanghai also has the capacity to pre-empt the radicalization of conflicts and prevent them from becoming city-wide public issues. Finally, the lack of allies within the political system also encourages homeowners' localized collective action at the neighborhood level in Shanghai. Given the responsive nature of contention at the city level in China and the Chinese social management system's dual functions of social control and interest representation, future urban-contention studies should pay attention to the institutional roots of contenders' claims and institutional constraints on collective contention as well as the state's multifaceted roles. On the one hand, the state can, to some extent, pre-empt the emergence of large-scale collective actions through institutional design. On the other hand, the availability of institutional allies plays an important role in facilitating the formation of lateral coalitions.
BanaszakLA (2005) Inside and outside the state: movement insider status, tactics, and public policy achievements. In: MeyerDSJennessVIngramH (eds) Routing the Opposition: Social Movements, Public Policy, and Democracy, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 149–176.
2.
BorlandE (2008) Social movement organizations and coalitions: Comparisons from the women's movement in Buenos Aires, Argentina. In: CoyPG (eds) Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and ChangeVol 28Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp. 83–112.
3.
CaiY (2005) China's moderate middle class: The case of homeowners' resistance. Asian Survey45(5): 777–799.
4.
CaramaniD (2009) Introduction to the Comparative Method with Boolean Algebra, Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.
5.
ChangP (2008) Unintended consequences of repression: alliance formation in South Korea's democracy movement (1970–1979). Social Forces87(2): 651–677.
6.
ChenP (2010) Urban homeowners' legal rights activism in contemporary China: An analytical framework for homeowners' rights protection activities. Sociological Studies1: 34–63.
7.
ChenX (2012) Disorganize: The strategy of homeowners' collective activisms – a survey of the anti-incinerator action in Guangzhou. Journal of Public Management2: 67–75.
8.
Chung Y (2008) Property owning socialism in a new state–society relationship: Housing reform in urban China. PhD Thesis, University of Wisconsin–Madison, USA.
9.
FengS (2006) Protest mobilization under Danwei system in China. Sociological Studies3: 98–134.
10.
GeorgeABennettA (2004) Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11.
GerringJ (2006) Case Study Research: Principles and Practices, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
12.
GuanB (2010) Rights-protecting actions and grassroots democratic participation: The case of homeowners in City B. Chinese Journal of Sociology (Chinese version)30(5): 46–74.
13.
GuiY (2001) On the development of grass-roots democracy in urban areas: a case study of Shanghai City. Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology (Social Science Edition)1: 24–27.
14.
Guangzhou Municipal Land Resources and Housing Administrative Bureau (2009) Guangzhou's Regulation of Homeowners' Congress and the Homeowners' Committee (draft), Article 5. Available at: http://www.laho.gov.cn/xwzx/tzgg/200909/t20090904_163197.htm (accessed 15 October 2012).
15.
GuiY (2007) Neighborhood politics: Urban grassroots power operating strategy and the state–society conglutination. Chinese Journal of Sociology (Chinese version)27(6): 102–126.
16.
GuiYMaWMühlhahnK (2009) Grassroots transformation in contemporary China. Journal of Contemporary Asia39(3): 400–423.
17.
GuoWChenX (2011) Environmental dissent in risk society: A survey of the anti-incinerator action in Guangzhou. Journal of Public Administration1: 95–121.
18.
HayduJ (2012) Frame brokerage in the Pure Food Movement, 1879–1906. Social Movement Studies11(1): 97–112.
19.
HeY (2007) Community organizations and community events: An analytical frame for urban community power structure in post-Danwei times. Journal of Sun Yatsen University (Social Science Edition)4: 66–70.
20.
HoP (2007) Embedded activism and political change in a semiauthoritarian context. China Information21(2): 187–209.
21.
Huang R (2010) Housing activism in Shanghai: Opportunities and constraints. PhD Thesis, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
22.
HuangRGuiY (2009) The internet and homeowners' collective resistance: A qualitative comparative analysis. Sociological Studies5: 29–56.
23.
HuangRYipNM (2012) Internet and activism in urban China: A case study of protests in Xiamen and Panyu. Journal of Comparative Asia Development11(2): 201–223.
24.
HuangRZhangTGuiY (2011) Structure and determinants of on-line diffusion of information: An empirical study of home-owners' forums. Journalism and Communication2: 89–97.
25.
HuangYJiangL (2009) Housing inequality in transitional Beijing. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research33(4): 936–956.
26.
HurstW (2004) Understanding contentious collective action by Chinese laid-off workers: The importance of regional political economy. Studies in Comparative International Development39(2): 94–120.
LiuA (2011) Harm to the rights of labor and choice of action: A comparison between two generations of migrant workers. Journal of Jiangsu Administration Institute1: 66–73.
29.
LiuN (2004) Explanation of grudge, mobilization structure and reasonable choice: An analysis on the possibility of collective actions in urban areas of China. Open Times4: 57–70.
30.
LiuN (2008) Some theoretical thoughts on collective actions in contemporary China: Observation based on experience and cases. Open Times3: 110–123.
31.
LiuN (2009) Collective actions in the transforming society of contemporary China: A review on three collective actions during the past three decades. Academia Bimestris4: 146–152.
32.
LoganJRFangYZhangZ (2010) The winners in China's urban housing reform. Housing Studies25(1): 101–117.
33.
McAdamDBoudetHS (2012) Putting Social Movements in their Place: Explaining Opposition to Energy Projects in the United States, 2000–2005, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
34.
McCammonHJCampbellKE (2002) Allies on the road to victory: Coalition formation between the suffragists and the Woman's Christian Temperance Union. Mobilization: An International Quarterly7(3): 231–251.
35.
McCammonHJVan DykeN (2010) Applying qualitative comparative analysis to empirical studies of social movement coalition formation. In: Van DykeNMcCammonHJ (eds) Strategic Alliances: Coalition Building and Social Movements, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 292–315.
36.
MaoM (2012) Shanghai model of large-scale mediation mechanism of property management. Urban Development9: 34–36.
O'BrienKJLiL (2006) Rightful Resistance in Rural China, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
39.
PerryEJ (1994) Trends in the study of Chinese politics: State–society relations. The China Quarterly139: 704–713.
40.
ReadBL (2003a) Democratizing the neighbourhood? New private housing and home-owner self-organization in urban China. The China Journal49: 31–59.
41.
Read BL (2003b) State, social networks and citizens in China's urban neighborhoods. PhD Dissertation, Department of Government, Harvard University, USA.
42.
ReadBL (2007) Inadvertent political reform via private associations: Assessing homeowners' groups in new neighborhood. In: PerryEJGoldmanM (eds) Grassroots Political Reform in Contemporary China, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 149–173.
43.
ReadBL (2008) Assessing variation in civil society organizations: China's homeowner associations in comparative perspective. Comparative Political Studies41(9): 1240–1265.
44.
RohlingerDA (2006) Friends and foes: Media, politics, and tactics in the abortion war. Social Problems53(4): 537–561.
45.
RuchtD (2004) Movement allies, adversaries, and third parties. In: SnowDASouleSAKriesiH (eds) The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements, Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 197–216.
46.
ShafferMB (2000) Coalition work among environmental groups: Who participates? In: CoyPG (eds) Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and ChangeVol 22Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp. 111–126.
47.
ShemtovR (2003) Social networks and sustained activism in local NIMBY campaigns. Sociological Forum18(2): 215–244.
48.
ShiF (2008) Social capital at work: The dynamics and consequences of grassroots movements in urban China. Critical Asian Studies40(2): 233–262.
49.
ShiFCaiY (2006) Disaggregating the state: Networks and collective resistance in Shanghai. The China Quarterly186(1): 314–332.
50.
SnyderR (2001) Scaling down: The subnational comparative method. Studies in Comparative International Development36(1): 93–110.
51.
StaggenborgS (1986) Coalition work in the pro-choice movement: Organizational and environmental opportunities and obstacles. Social Problems33(5): 374–390.
52.
SunYZhaoD (2007) Multifaceted state and fragmented society: Dynamics of environmental movement in China. In: YangD (eds) Discontented Miracle: Growth, Conflict, and Institutional Adaptations in China, Hackensack, NJ: World Scientific Publishing, pp. 111–160.
53.
TangJuan (2006) A new model of rights-defending by owners of Moon Bay Community. Modern Property Management3: 5–7.
54.
TangJun (2006) Deprivation of living resource and dependence on traditional system: The logic of contemporary Chinese workers' collective action – a case study on annexation of Z factory in Z City of Henan Province. Jiangsu Social Sciences6: 174–183.
55.
TangY (2004) Incomplete social contract: Community governance structure of China's market transition –a case study on OCs in Kangjian neighborhood, Shanghai. Journal of Shanghai Administration Institute2: 68–78.
56.
TombaL (2004) Creating an urban middle class: Social engineering in Beijing. The China Journal51: 1–26.
57.
TongX (2006) Continued socialist cultural tradition: An analysis of collective action of workers at a state-owned enterprise. Sociological Studies1: 59–76.
58.
TongZ (2009) Mobilization structure and development of natural protection movement: To take the Fight-against-Dam campaign in Nujiang as an example. Open Times9: 116–132.
59.
Van DykeN (2003) Crossing movement boundaries: Factors that facilitate coalition protest by American college students, 1930–1990. Social Problems50(2): 226–250.
60.
Van DykeNMcCammonHJ (2010) Strategic Alliances: Coalition Building and Social Movements, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
61.
WalderA (2009) Political sociology and social movements. Annual Review of Sociology35: 393–412.
62.
WangHWuY (2011) Visible and invisible State in grass-roots society: Episodes in a commodity housing enclave. Sociological Studies1: 63–95.
63.
XiaJ (2003) The first signs of the civil society of China: The committee of owners as an example. Journal of Literature, History and Philosophy3: 115–121.
64.
YangG (2009) The Power of the Internet in China: Citizen Activism Online, New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
65.
YingX (2007) Grassroots mobilization and the mechanism of interest expression of the peasants group: A comparative study of four cases. Sociological Studies22(2): 1–23.
66.
YipNMJiangY (2011) Homeowners united: The attempt to create lateral networks of homeowners' associations in urban China. Journal of Contemporary China20(72): 735–750.
67.
YuJ (2004) An explanatory framework of contemporary farmers' rights-defending movement. Sociological Studies2: 49–55.
68.
YuZ (2012) The factors shaping the outcomes of collective actions: A comparative study on three collective action cases. Sociological Studies3: 90–112.
69.
ZengW (2002) Community's self-governance: Conflict and response – a development process of an owners' committee. Urban Problems4: 54–57.
70.
ZhangJ (2010) Four ‘ones' in the bidding market: Review and outlook of Shanghai property management bidding market's development. China Property Management2: 56–57.
71.
ZhangJZhuangW (2008) Informal politics and acting tactics of a grassroot NGO: A case study of the Preparatory Committee of Guangzhou Proprietor Committee's Friendship Association. Sociological Studies2: 133–150.
72.
ZhangL (2005) Beijing house owners' rights protection movement: Reason for breakout and mobilization mechanism. Sociological Studies20(6): 1–39.
73.
ZhaoD (2010) Authoritarian state and contentious politics. In: LeichtKTJenkinsJC (eds) Handbook of Politics: State and Society in Global Perspective, New York, NY: Springer, pp. 459–476.
74.
ZhaoZBreitungW (2010) Community power structure and action strategies in the process of house owner's right protection movement: A comparison of tow residential communities in Guangzhou. Journal of Strategy and Decision-Making5: 74–90.
75.
Zhu J (2002) Between the family and the state: An ethnography of the civil association and community movements in a Shanghai Living Neighborhood. PhD Thesis, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
76.
ZhuangW (2011) Beyond state-conferred-right? A case study on homeowners' resistance in Guangzhou. Chinese Journal of Sociology (Chinese version)31(3): 88–113.
