The Operating Culture of Finnish Christian Schools 1

Abstract

The main focus of the article is to describe the educational purpose of Finnish Christian schools within their operating culture. The empirical data was derived from the curricula of the schools, questionnaires and interviews. The curricula were examined for the background of the schools’ operations. The theoretical and conceptual framework of the study was built on the philosophy of Martin Buber. The research findings are integrated with the theoretical framework. The study does not emphasise the Christian values but considers them as presuppositions. The context of the questionnaires was a Christian worldview. The method of the research study was mainly content analysis interpreted according to the hermeneutical tradition emphasising interpretation. and understanding.

It was concluded that educational relationship was regarded as fundamental reflecting the absolute value of each student. Communication skills were viewed as essential in building relationships including taking account of emotions. Pupils learned to understand one another's experiences by discussions and listening to the others. Individual attention and time were the keys to promoting wellbeing and personal encounter. Shared everyday life at schools was emphasised by teachers. The active role of parents was also an essential part of the school culture.

Keywords

Christian school dialogue encounter Finland operating culture

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Betti

(1980). Hermeneutics as the general methodology of the Geisteswissenschaften. In Bleicher

Josef

. Contemporary Hermeneutics. Hermeneutics as method, philosophy and critique. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. 51–94.

Black

L. W.

(2005). Dialogue in Lecture Hall: Teacher — Student Communication and Students’ Perceptions of their Learning. Qualitative Research Reports in Communication. Vol. 6. No 1, October 2005, 31—40.

Buber

(1947). Between Man and Man. Trans Ronald Gregor Smith. London: Kegan Paul.

Buber

(1962/1966). Ich und Du. Text nach Buber, M., Werke. Erster Band. Schriften zur Philosophie. 1962. Köln: Verlagjakob Hegner.

Buber

(1986). Minä ja Sinä. Suomentanut J. Pietilä. Helsinki: Therapeia- säätiö.

Buber

(1993). Minä ja Sinä. Suomentanut

J. Pietilä.

Juva: WSOY.

Cissna

& Anderson

(1998). Theorizing about dialogic moments: The Buber — Rogers position and postmodern themes. Communication Theory, 8, 63–104.

Collins

(1980). Philosophy and “Alternative Humanistic Education”. Buber and Neil in Contrast. Journal of Thought. Vol. 15. Summer 1980. University of Oklahoma. 47–62.

Dilthey

(1976). Selected Writings. Ed. trans. Rickman

H.P.

London: Cambridge University Press.

10.

Gadamer

H-G.

(2004). Hermeneutiikka. Ymmärtäminen tieteissä ja filosofiassa. Valikoinut ja suomentanut Ismo Nikander. Vastapaino: Tampere.

11.

Heino

(1997). Mihin Suomi tänään uskoo. Juva: WSOY

12.

Hirsjärvi

(1985). Johdatus kasvatusfilosofiaan. Helsinki: Kirjayhtymä.

13.

Hirsjärvi

(ed.) (1992). Kasvatustieteen käsitteistö. Helsinki: Otava.

14.

Holm

(2007). Identity Formation Through Classroom Conversations and Collaboration With Spirit Journalof Christian Education, V. 50, (2), September 45–54.

15.

Väkevä

(1999). Musiikin merkitys David J. Elliotin praksiaalisessa musiikkikasvatusfilosofiassa: pragmatistinen tulkinta. Musiikkikasvatus 4 (2—3), 44–45.

16.

Värri

V-M.

(1997). Hyvä kasvatus — kasvatus hyvään. Dialogisen kasvatuksen filosofinen tarkastelu erityisesti vanhemmuuden näkökulmasta. Akateeminen väitöskirja. Tampere: Tampereen yliopisto.