THIS ARTICLE EXPLORES some instances of students offering eccentric interpretations of literary texts under the apparent influence of elements of their Christian assumptions and identities. It suggests that rather than viewing such incidents in terms of either error or self-expression, it might be more fruitful to regard them as representing a kind of interpretive interlanguage (a concept current in applied linguistics) that draws imperfectly upon more developed models of Christian interpretation. Four such models are identified and related to students' interpretive practices.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndersonC. (1989). The description of an embarrassment: When students write about religion. ADE Bulletin, 94, 12.
2.
BakhtinM. M. (1993). Toward a philosophy of the act (LiapunovV., Trans.). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
3.
BrunsG. L. (1992). Hermeneutics ancient and modern. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press
4.
CorderS. P. (1967). The significance of learners' errors. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 5, 161–170.
5.
DoughtyC. J.LongM. H. (2003). The handbook of second language acquisition. Oxford: Blackwell.
6.
EichendorffJ. V., (1975). Sämtliche Gedichte. München: Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag.
7.
GriffithsP. J. (2002). Reading as a spiritual practice. In JonesL. G.PaulsellS. (Eds.), The scope of our art: The vocation of the theological teacher (pp. 32–47). Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.
8.
HuelinS. (2005). Toward a theological ontology of textual meaning. Christian Scholar's Review, 34(2), 217–233.
9.
JacobsA. (2001a). Bakhtin and the hermeneutics of love. In FelchS. M.ContinoP. J. (Eds.), Bakhtin and religion: A feeling for faith (pp. 25–45). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
10.
JacobsA. (2001b). A theology of reading: The hermeneutics of love. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
11.
JandlE. (1981). die bearbeitung der mütze. Darmstadt: Luchterhand.
12.
JandlE. (1997). Poetische Werke 8: Der gelbe hund/selbstporträt des schachspielers als trinkende uhr. München: Luchterhand.
13.
JonesL. G. (2002). Formed and transformed by scripture: Character, community, and authority in biblical interpretation. In BrownW. P. (Ed.), Character and scripture: Moral formation, community and biblical tradition (pp. 18–33). Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.
PannenbergW. (1984). Christian spirituality and sacramental community. London: Darton, Longman and Todd.
16.
PikeM. A. (2002). Aesthetic distance and the spiritual journey: Educating for spiritually and morally significant experiences across the art and literature curriculum. International Journal of Children's Spirituality, 7(1), 9–21.
17.
PikeM. A. (2005). Reading and responding to biblical texts: Aesthetic distance and the spiritual journey. In OtaC.ErrickerC. (Eds.), Spiritual education: Literary, empirical and pedagogical approaches (pp. 189–201). Brighton: Sussex Academic Press.
18.
RandL. (2001). Enacting faith: Evangelical discourse and the discipline of composition studies. College Composition and Communication, 52(3), 349–367.
19.
RosenblattL. M. (1978). The Reader, the text, the poem: The transactional theory of the literary work. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
20.
RosenblattL. M. (1980). “What facts does this poem teach you?”Language Arts, 57(4), 386–394.
21.
Schmidt-DenglerW. (2001). Der wahre Vogel: Sechs Studien zum Gedenken an Ernst Jandl. Wien: Edition Praesens.
22.
SchwehnM. (1993). Exiles from Eden: Religion and the academic vocation in America. New York: Oxford University Press.
23.
SelinkerL. (1972). Interlanguage. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 10, 209–231.
24.
SloaneA. (2004). On being a Christian in the academy: Nicholas Wolterstorff and the practice of Christian scholarship. Carlisle: Paternoster Press.
25.
SmartJ. M. (2005). “Frankenstein or Jesus Christ?” When the voice of faith creates a monster for the composition teacher. In Vander LeiE.KyburzB. L. (Eds.), Negotiating religious faith in the composition classroom (pp. 11–23). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
26.
SmithD. I. (2004). The poet, the child and the blackbird: Aesthetic reading and spiritual development. International Journal of Children's Spirituality, 9(2), 143–154.
27.
SpinaF. A. (1989). Revelation, reformation, re-creation: Canon and the theological foundation of the Christian university. Christian Scholar's Review, 18(4), 315–332.
28.
TaylorC. (1989). Sources of the self: The making of the modern identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
29.
ThistletonA. C. (1992). New horizons in hermeneutics: The theory and practice of transforming Bible reading. London: HarperCollins.
30.
WestphalM. (1998). Suspicion and faith: The religious uses of modern atheism. New York: Fordham University Press.
31.
WolterstorffN. (1984). Reason within the bounds of religion (2nd ed.). Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.
32.
WolterstorffN. (1997a). The importance of hermeneutics for a Christian worldview. In LundinR. (Ed.), Disciplining hermeneutics: Interpretation in Christian perspective (pp. 25–47). Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.
33.
WolterstorffN. (1997b). Suffering, power, and privileged cognitive access: The revenge of the particular. In HoekemaD. A.FongB. (Eds.), Christianity and culture in the crossfire (pp. 79–94). Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.
34.
WolterstorffN. (1999). Can scholarship and Christian conviction mix? A new look at the integration of knowledge. Journal of Education and Christian Belief, 3(1), 33–49.
35.
ZizioulasJ. D. (1986). The early Christian community. In McGinnB.MeyendorffJ. (Eds.), Christian spirituality: Origins to the twelfth century (Vol. 16, pp. 23–43). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
