While inter-personal conflicts have attracted much attention from scholars and practitioners over the last two decades, our understanding of inter-organizational conflicts remains limited. This paper critically assesses current literature on inter-organizational conflicts. We first discuss the specific features of conflicts at the inter-organizational level. Second, we provide an overview of both qualitative and quantitative research conducted in the field. Third, we make suggestions for future research on inter-organizational conflicts. We specifically suggest opportunities to develop theoretical bridges with other streams of literature and to build multi-level models of conflict management. We then discuss important empirical issues associated with doing research on conflicts between organizations and provide recommendations to overcome these challenges.
AdairWBrettJLempereurAOkumuraTShikhirevPTinsleyCLytleA (2004). Culture and negotiation strategy. Negotiation Journal20: 87–111.
2.
AlterC (1990) An exploratory study of conflict and coordination in interorganizational service delivery systems. Academy of Management Journal, 33: 478–502.
3.
ArinoADe La TorreJ (1998) Learning from failure: Towards an evolutionary model of collaborative ventures. Organization Science, 9: 306–325.
4.
AssaelH (1969) Constructive role of interorganizational conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 14: 573–582.
5.
BarneyJ (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17: 99–120.
6.
BercovitzJETylerBB (2014) Who I am and how I contract: The effect of contractors' roles on the evolution of contract structure in university-industry research agreements. Organization Science, 25: 1840–1859.
7.
BornsteinGKuglerTZiegelmeyerA (2004) Individual and group decisions in the centipede game: Are groups more ‘rational’ players?Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40: 599–605.
8.
BorysBJemisonDB (1989) Hybrid arrangements as strategic alliances: Theoretical issues in organizational combinations. Academy of Management Review, 14: 234–249.
9.
BrettJMShapiroDLLytleAL (1998). Breaking the bonds of reciprocity in negotiations. Academy of Management Journal, 41: 410–424.
10.
BrownJRDevCSLeeDJ (2000) Managing marketing channel opportunism: The efficacy of alternative governance mechanisms. Journal of Marketing, 64: 51–65.
11.
BurkhardtHSeibtJImaguireG (Eds.), (2014) Handbook of Mereology, Munich, Germany: Philosophia.
12.
CannonJPPerreaultWD (1999) Buyer-Seller relationships in business markets. Journal of Marketing Research, 36: 439–460.
13.
CaoZLumineauF (2015) Complements or substitutes? A qualitative and meta-analytic review of the relationship between contractual and relational governance. Journal of Operations Management, 33-34: 15–42.
14.
ChristoffersenJ (2013) A review of antecedents of international strategic alliance performance: Synthesized evidence and new directions for core constructs. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15: 66–85.
15.
ConlonDESullivanDP (1999) Examining the actions of organizations in conflict: Evidence from the Delaware court of chancery. Academy of Management Journal, 42: 319–329.
16.
CrosonRAnandJAgarwalR (2007) Using experiments in corporate strategy research. European Management Review, 4: 173–181.
17.
CurrallS CJudgeTA (1995) Measuring trust between organizational boundary role persons. Organizational behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 64: 151–170.
18.
DansereauFYammarinoFJ (2000)Within and between analysis: The variant paradigm as an underlying approach to theory building and testing. In: KleinKJKozlowskiSWJ (eds), Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions .San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass, pp. 425–466.
19.
DansereauFYammarinoFJ (Eds.), (2005) Multi-level issues in strategy and methods (Vol. 4). Oxford, UK: Elsevier/JAI.
20.
DantRPSchulPL (1992) Conflict resolution processes in contractual channels of distribution. Journal of Marketing, 56: 38–54.
21.
DasTKRahmanN (2002) Opportunism dynamics in strategic alliances. In: ContractorFJLorangeP (eds) Cooperative Strategies and Alliances. Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science, pp. 89–118.
22.
DasTKTengBS (2000) Instabilities of strategic alliances: An internal tensions perspective. Organization Science, 11: 77–101.
23.
DavisLENorthDC (1971) Institutional Change and American Economic Growth. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
24.
DeedsDLHillCW (1999) An examination of opportunistic action within research alliances: Evidence from the biotechnology industry. Journal of Business Venturing, 14: 141–163.
25.
DemirbagMMirzaH (2000) Factors affecting international joint venture success: An empirical analysis of foreign–local partner relationships and performance in joint ventures in Turkey. International Business Review, 9: 1–35.
26.
DeutschM (1973) The resolution of conflict: Constructive and destructive processes. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
27.
DirksKTLewickiRJZaheerA (2009) Repairing relationships within and between organizations: Building a conceptual foundation. Academy of Management Review, 34: 68–84.
28.
DwyerFRSchurrPHOhS (1987) Developing buyer-seller relationships. Journal of Marketing, 51: 11–27.
29.
EckerdSHillJABoyerKKDonohueKWardPT (2013). The relative impact of attribute, severity, and timing of psychological contract breach on behavioural and attitudinal outcomes. Journal of Operations Management, 31: 567–578.
30.
Egels-ZandénNHyllmanP (2011) Differences in organizing between unions and NGOs: Conflict and cooperation among Swedish unions and NGOs. Journal of Business Ethics, 101: 249–261.
31.
FeldmanMSMarchJG (1981) Information in organizations as signal and symbol. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26: 171–186.
32.
FrazierGLRodyRC (1991) The use of influence strategies in interfirm relationships in industrial product channels. Journal of Marketing, 55: 53–69.
33.
GanesanS (1993) Negotiation strategies and the nature of channel relationships. Journal of Marketing Research, 30: 183–203.
34.
GanesanSBrownSPMariadossBJHoH (2010) Buffering and amplifying effects of relationship commitment in business-to-business relationships. Journal of Marketing Research, 47: 361–373.
35.
GaskiJF (1984) The theory of power and conflict in channels of distribution. Journal of Marketing, 48: 9–29.
36.
GillespieNDietzG (2009) Trust repair after an organization-level failure. Academy of Management Review, 34: 127–145.
37.
GoldenBR (1992) The past is the past – or is it? The use of retrospective accounts as indicators of past strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 35: 848–860.
38.
GrayJHandleyS (2011) Managing quality in outsourced production: Construct development and measurement validation. Quality Management Journal, 18: 26–45.
HabibGM (1987) Measures of manifest conflict in international joint ventures. Academy of Management Journal, 30: 808–816.
41.
HandleySMAngstCM (2014) The impact of culture on the relationship between governance and opportunism in outsourcing relationships. Strategic Management Journal.
42.
HandleySMBentonWCJr (2012) The influence of exchange hazards and power on opportunism in outsourcing relationships. Journal of Operations Management, 30: 55–68.
43.
HardyCPhillipsN (1998) Strategies of engagement: Lessons from the critical examination of collaboration and conflict in an interorganizational domain. Organization Science, 9: 217–230.
44.
HarmonDJKimPHMayerKJ (2014) Breaking the letter vs. spirit of the law: How the interpretation of contract violations affects trust and the management of relationships. Strategic Management Journal.
45.
HarveyJB (1974) The Abilene paradox: The management of agreement. Organizational Dynamics, 3: 63–80.
46.
HeidlRASteensmaHKPhelpsC (2014) Divisive faultlines and the unplanned dissolutions of multipartner alliances. Organization Science, 25: 1351–1371.
47.
HibbardJDKumarNStern LW (2001) Examining the impact of destructive acts in marketing channel relationships. Journal of Marketing Research, 38: 45–61.
48.
HouseRRousseauDMThomas-Hunt M (1995) The meso paradigm- A framework for the integration of micro and macro organizational- behaviour. Research in Organizational Behavior: An Annual Series of Analytical Essays and Critical Reviews, 17: 71–114.
Janowicz-PanjaitanMKrishnanR (2009) Measures for dealing with competence and integrity violations of interorganizational trust at the corporate and operating levels of organizational hierarchy. Journal of Management Studies, 46: 245–268.
51.
JickTD (1979) Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24: 602–611.
52.
JohnsonSMcMillanJWoodruffC (2002) Courts and relational contracts. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 18: 221–277.
53.
KimPHDirksKTCooperCDFerrinDL (2006) When more blame is better than less: The implications of internal vs. external attributions for the repair of trust after a competence-vs. integrity-based trust violation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 99: 49–65.
54.
KimPHFerrinDLCooperCD.DirksKT (2004) Removing the shadow of suspicion: The effects of apology versus denial for repairing competence-versus integrity-based trust violations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89: 104–118.
55.
KimSKHibbardJDSwainSD (2011) Commitment in marketing channels: Mitigator or aggravator of the effects of destructive acts?Journal of Retailing, 87: 521–539.
56.
KimY (2001) A comparative study of the ‘Abilene Paradox’ and ‘Groupthink’. Public Administration Quarterly, 25: 168–189.
57.
KleinKJKozlowskiSWJ (2000) From micro to meso: Critical steps in conceptualizing and conducting multilevel research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(4): 211–236.
58.
KocherMGSutterM (2005) The decision maker matters: Individual versus group behavior in experimental beauty contest games. The Economic Journal, 115: 200–223.
59.
KozaKLDantRP (2007) Effects of relationship climate, control mechanism, and communications on conflict resolution behavior and performance outcomes. Journal of Retailing, 83: 279–296.
60.
KumarKVan DisselHG (1996) Sustainable collaboration: managing conflict and cooperation in interorganizational systems. MIS Quarterly, 20: 279–300.
61.
LumineauF (2015) How contracts influence trust and distrust. Journal of Management.
62.
LumineauFFréchetMPuthodD (2011) An organizational learning perspective on contract design. Strategic Organization, 9: 8–32.
63.
LumineauFHendersonJ (2012) The influence of relational experience and contractual governance on the negotiation strategy in buyer-supplier disputes. Journal of Operations Management, 30: 382–395.
64.
LumineauFMalhotraD (2011) Shadow of the contract: How contract structure shapes inter-firm dispute resolution. Strategic Management Journal, 32: 532–555.
65.
LumineauFOxleyJ (2012) Let’s work it out (or we’ll see you in court): Litigation and private dispute resolution in vertical exchange relationships. Organization Science, 23: 820–834.
66.
LumineauFQuélinB (2012) An empirical investigation of interorganizational opportunism and contracting mechanisms. Strategic Organization, 10: 55–84.
67.
LuoY (2006) Opportunism in inter-firm exchanges in emerging markets. Management and Organization Review, 2: 121–147.
68.
McGinnKL (2006) Relationships and negotiations in context. In ThompsonL (ed) Frontiers of Social Psychology: Negotiation Theory and Research. New York: Psychological Press, pp. 129–144.
69.
MalhotraDLumineauF (2011) Trust and collaboration in the aftermath of conflict: The effects of contract structure. Academy of Management Journal, 54: 981–998.
70.
MarchJSimonH (1958) Organizations. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
71.
MasseyGRDawesL (2007) The antecedents and consequences of functional and dysfunctional conflict between marketing managers and sales managers. Industrial Marketing Management, 36: 1118–1129.
72.
MillerCCardinalLGlickW (1997) Retrospective reports in organizational research: A reexamination of recent evidence. Academy of Management Journal, 40: 189–204.
73.
MohrJSpekmanR (1994) Characteristics of partnership success: Partnership attributes, communication behavior, and conflict resolution techniques. Strategic Management Journal, 15: 135–152.
74.
MolnarJJRogersDL (1979) A comparative model of interorganizational conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24: 405–425.
75.
NakayachiKWatabeM (2005) Restoring trustworthiness after adverse events: The signaling effects of voluntary ‘Hostage Posting’ on trust. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 97: 1–17.
76.
ParkSHUngsonGR (2001). Interfirm rivalry and managerial complexity: A conceptual framework of alliance failure. Organization Science, 12: 37–53.
77.
ParkheA (1993) Strategic alliance structuring: A game theoretic and transaction cost examination of interfirm cooperation. Academy of Management Journal, 36: 794–829.
78.
ParmigianiARivera-SantosM (2011) Clearing a path through the forest: A meta-review of interorganizational relationships. Journal of Management, 37: 1108–1136.
79.
PerroneVZaheerAMcEvilyB (2003) Free to be trusted? Organizational constraints on trust in boundary spanners. Organization Science, 14: 422–439.
80.
PeterafMA (1993) The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal, 14: 179–191.
81.
PillutlaMMMurnighanJK (1996) Unfairness, anger, and spite: Emotional rejections of ultimatum offers. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 68: 208–224.
PrudenHO (1969) Interorganizational conflict, linkage, and exchange: A study of industrial salesmen. Academy of Management Journal, 12: 339–350.
84.
ReederGDBrewerMB (1979) A schematic model of dispositional attribution in interpersonal perception. Psychological Review, 86: 61–79.
85.
RenHGrayB (2009) Repairing relationship conflict: How violation types and culture influence the effectiveness of restoration rituals. Academy of Management Review, 34: 105–126.
86.
ReusTHRottigD (2009) Meta-analyses of international joint venture performance determinants. Management International Review, 49: 607–640.
87.
RichmanBD (2004) Firms, courts, and reputation mechanisms: Toward a positive theory of private ordering. Columbia Law Review, 104: 2328–2367.
88.
RingPSvan de VenAH (1994) Developmental processes of cooperative interorganizational relationships. Academy of Management Review, 19: 90–118.
89.
RobinsonSL (1996) Trust and breach of the psychological contract. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41: 574–599.
90.
RocheWKTeaguePColvinAJ (Eds.), (2014) The Oxford Handbook of Conflict Management in Organizations. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
91.
RockenbachBSadriehAMathauschekB (2007) Teams take the better risks. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 63: 412–422.
92.
RoseGMShohamA (2004) Interorganizational task and emotional conflict with international channels of distribution. Journal of Business Research, 57: 942–950.
93.
RousseauDM (1985) Issues of level in organizational research: Multi-level and cross-level perspectives. Research in Organizational Behavior, 7: 1–37.
94.
RousseauDM (2004) Now let’s make multi-level research on trust doable. In: YammarinoFJDansereauF (eds), Multi-level issues in organizational behavior and processes (Vol. 3). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing, pp. 159 – 166.
95.
RousseauDMHouseRJ (1994) Meso organizational behavior: Avoiding three fundamental biases. In: CooperCLRousseauDM (eds), Trends in Organizational Behavior. Chichester: Wiley, pp. 13–30.
96.
SamahaSAPalmatierRWDantRP (2011) Poisoning relationships: Perceived unfairness in channels of distribution. Journal of Marketing, 75: 99–117.
97.
SchilkeOCookKS (2013) A cross-level process theory of trust development in interorganizational relationships. Strategic Organization, 11: 281–303.
SchreinerMKalePCorstenD (2009) What really is alliance management capability and how does it impact alliance outcomes and success?Strategic Management Journal, 30: 1395–1419.
100.
SchweitzerMEHersheyJCBradlowET (2006) Promises and lies: Restoring violated trust. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 101: 1–19.
101.
SebringRH (1977) The five-million dollar misunderstanding: A perspective on state government-university interorganizational conflicts. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22: 505–523.
102.
ShapiroDL (1991) The effects of explanations on negative reactions to deceit. Administrative Science Quarterly,36: 614–630.
103.
ShapiroDLButtnerEHBarryB (1994) Explanations: What factors enhance their perceived adequacy?Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 58: 346–368.
104.
SitkinSBRothNL (1993) Explaining the limited effectiveness of legalistic ‘remedies’ for trust/distrust. Organization Science, 4: 367–392.
105.
SpinelliSBirleyS (1996) Toward a theory of conflict in the franchise system. Journal of Business Venturing, 11: 329–342.
106.
SteensmaHKLylesMA. (2000) Explaining IJV survival in a transitional economy through social exchange and knowledge-based perspectives. Strategic Management Journal, 21: 831–851.
107.
SternLWGormanR (1969) Conflict in distribution channels: An exploration. In: SternLW (ed) Distribution Channels: Behavioral Dimensions. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin, pp. 156–175.
108.
SternLWSternthalBCraigCS (1975) Strategies for managing interorganizational conflict: A laboratory paradigm. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60: 472–482.
109.
StumpRLHeideJB (1996) Controlling supplier opportunism in industrial relations. Journal of Marketing Research, 33: 431–441.
110.
SutterM (2007) Are teams prone to myopic loss aversion? An experimental study on individual versus team investment behavior. Economics Letters, 97: 128–132.
111.
TangpongCHungKTRoYK (2010) The interaction effect of relational norms and agent cooperativeness on opportunism in buyer–supplier relationships. Journal of Operations Management, 28: 398–414.
112.
ThomasKW (1992) Conflict and conflict management: Reflections and update. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13: 265–274.
113.
TjosvoldDChiaLC (1989) Conflict between managers and workers – The role of cooperation and competition. Journal of Social Psychology, 129: 235–247.
114.
TolbertPSZuckerLG (1996) The institutionalization of institutional theory. In: CleggSRHardyCNordWR (eds), Handbook of Organization Studies. London, UK: Sage, pp. 175–190.
115.
TomlinsonECMayerRC (2009) The role of causal attribution dimensions in trust repair. Academy of Management Review, 34: 85–104.
116.
TomlinsonECDineenBRLewickiRJ (2004) The road to reconciliation: Antecedents of victim willingness to reconcile following a broken promise. Journal of Management, 30: 165–187.
117.
WallJACallisterRR (1995). Conflict and its management. Journal of Management, 21: 515–558.
118.
WathneKHHeideJB (2000). Opportunism in interfirm relationships: Forms, outcomes, and solutions. Journal of Marketing, 64: 36–51.
119.
WilliamsonOE (1985) The economic institutions of capitalism. NY: The Free Press.
120.
Zaheer A McEvilyBPerroneV (1998) Does trust matter? Exploring the effects of interorganizational and interpersonal trust on performance. Organization Science, 9: 141–159.
121.
ZhouKZPoppoL (2010) Exchange hazards, relational reliability, and contracts in China: The contingent role of legal enforceability. Journal of International Business Studies, 41, 861–881.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
