Abstract
Healthcare systems worldwide face growing pressure to reduce environmental impact while maintaining high-quality, cost-effective care. Radiology, a particularly resource-intensive discipline, contributes significantly to healthcare-related emissions and operational inefficiencies. At the same time, digital technologies—such as artificial intelligence (AI), structured reporting, and smart scheduling—offer powerful tools to address both ecological and economic challenges. For example, AI-driven protocol optimization has been shown to cut energy consumption by up to 56% and examination time by 55%, directly aligning sustainability with operational efficiency. Using radiology as a representative case, this article examines how these innovations can reduce environmental waste, imaging overuse, and workflow inefficiencies, offering a scalable blueprint for healthcare-wide transformation. This commentary draws on a targeted review of recent literature, supplemented by practical insights from clinical radiology practice.
Keywords
Introduction
Climate change is the most significant health threat of the 21st century, with direct effects such as rising temperatures, extreme weather, and declining air quality. 1 Healthcare paradoxically adds to this burden, producing 5%–8.5% of global greenhouse gas emissions. 2 Radiology is a disproportionate contributor, especially through energy-intensive magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT). 3
Sustainability has become a strategic priority, exposing both the scale of avoidable waste and the potential for transformation. Recent studies highlight multiple levers: optimizing imaging appropriateness to prevent unnecessary examinations, 4 adopting energy-efficient protocols, 5 and leveraging AI to streamline workflows and decision-making. 6 Debate continues, however, over the net environmental effect of digital solutions, particularly artificial intelligence (AI), given its high computational demands. 7
Evidence shows that integrating sustainability into radiology is both an environmental and economic imperative. If applied deliberately, digital innovations can reduce emissions, improve quality, and enhance efficiency.8,9
This article positions radiology as a model for broader healthcare transformation by aligning ecological and financial goals. We argue that sustainability and efficiency reinforce each other through targeted digital innovation and clearer communication. The central challenge is overutilization, which inflates costs, undermines value, and amplifies environmental impact.
Overutilization as a key factor
Medical imaging is indispensable, yet a large share of studies is unnecessary. A survey of radiologists and emergency physicians found that defensive medicine and malpractice concerns are major drivers, particularly for CT. 4 Communication gaps further contribute: unclear referrals, vague clinical indications, and absent structured reporting lead to misinterpretations and redundant exams. 4 Many referrers order precautionary scans in the absence of solid evidence. 5
This behavior increases costs, exposes patients to radiation and incidental findings, and generates further unwarranted interventions. Patients themselves may request scans for reassurance, reinforcing the cycle when providers fail to offer clear guidance.
From a behavioral economics view, demand is shaped by incentives. Physicians adopt “just in case” ordering to minimize legal risk; fee-for-service rewards volume, while value-based models discourage low-value imaging but may create pressures to limit care. Patients, insulated by insurance, request advanced tests despite low diagnostic yield.
Internationally, drivers differ: in high-income systems with abundant capacity, supply-induced demand and defensive practice dominate; in resource-limited settings, outdated protocols and weak referral pathways are common. In both contexts, poor patient–clinician communication increases misdiagnoses and unnecessary follow-ups; ineffective communication has been linked directly to adverse safety outcomes. 6
The burden is immense: billions in global costs. 3 Environmentally, MRI and CT are heavy emitters, with a single scanner consuming as much energy as several households annually. 7 Tackling overutilization therefore reduces costs, improves safety, and lessens radiology's carbon footprint.
With these drivers in mind, we turn to the technologies that can curb overuse and make imaging more efficient and sustainable.
Sustainable radiology: Harnessing technology for smarter imaging
Technological innovations offer concrete strategies to align radiology with sustainability and efficiency. Structured reporting standardizes terminology and templates, improving clarity, completeness, and interdisciplinary communication. Studies consistently show higher completeness scores, fewer errors, and reduced follow-up imaging when structured reports are used.8–12 Yet careful implementation is needed to avoid overreliance and skill erosion, while transparency and validation remain essential to prevent bias and preserve equity. 13
Structured content also enables patient-facing innovation. Reports can be transformed into plain-language or multilingual summaries; NLP and explainable AI tools support dialogue-oriented explanations and enhance trust, reducing disparities for patients with limited health literacy.14–16
Energy efficiency represents another key lever. AI-assisted protocols shorten scans and reduce energy use, particularly in MRI. Low-field systems and intelligent shutdown protocols help minimize idle waste.17,18 However, these gains must be weighed against AI's own energy consumption, which can equal emissions from multiple vehicles, and against equity concerns tied to high implementation costs. 19
Patient-centered communication and scheduling further improve outcomes. Accessible reports with plain language and visuals increase comprehension and adherence, reduce anxiety, and decrease unnecessary consultations.20,21 AI-driven scheduling lowers no-show rates and optimizes utilization by predicting demand, filling idle slots, and prioritizing urgent cases.22,23 Machine learning triage tools also enhance imaging appropriateness in emergency settings. 24 Safeguards are vital to avoid bias from historical data and ensure equitable access.
Together, these approaches show that structured reporting, energy-aware imaging, and AI-enabled communication and scheduling can make radiology more sustainable while improving care quality and efficiency.
These tools promise value, but their impact depends on proven economic viability and supportive policy frameworks.
Economic and policy perspectives on digital innovations in radiology
Beyond ecological benefits, adoption depends on clear economic viability. Peer-reviewed cost–benefit analyses show that integrating AI models into accredited workflows can generate striking returns. One evaluation of AI for large vessel occlusion detection in a stroke-accredited hospital reported a 451% ROI over five years, rising to 791% when radiologist time savings were included. These results were derived from hospital-level data on outcomes, resources, and efficiency across a five-year horizon. 25
Reducing unnecessary imaging adds further savings. Structured and guided reporting improve clarity and completeness, curbing redundant exams.4,10 Defensive medicine is a major driver: according to a 2014 survey-based white paper of 196 U.S. hospital leaders, estimated waste from unnecessary imaging totaled $7.47–11.95 billion annually, with more than 90% citing defensive medicine as the prime factor. The estimate applied respondent-reported “unnecessary” percentages to an assumed $100 billion annual imaging spend. 26 Improved communication strengthens efficiency: in a prospective single-center study, dialogue between radiologists and clinicians revised diagnoses in 50% of patients and changed treatment in 60%, directly reducing follow-up imaging. 7
Operational improvements also translate into ecological gain. AI-assisted protocol optimization and deep-learning reconstruction cut idle energy use and shortened exam times. In one study, energy consumption was reduced by up to 56%, and imaging time decreased by up to 55%. Idle-mode power management saved an additional 30% in costs. 8
Policy frameworks ultimately determine scaling. Because most healthcare emissions are indirect, reimbursement, accreditation, and sustainability mandates are essential to drive adoption. 9 Yet digital maturity varies widely. International assessments (WHO, OECD) highlight connectivity, maintenance, and governance gaps as key barriers to equitable implementation.27,28
The following conclusion distills these findings into concrete actions radiology can take to unite sustainability with quality at scale.
Conclusion
The urgency for climate action in healthcare—and radiology in particular—has never been greater. A recent position paper from leading radiology societies (ACR, DRG, ESR, RSNA, etc.) stresses that climate change, biodiversity loss, and pollution pose a global health threat that disproportionately affects vulnerable populations. It calls for urgent, measurable changes in how care is delivered. 29
Radiology can lead this transformation by reducing overutilization, implementing energy-efficient protocols, and adopting digital innovations that streamline care while conserving resources. Evidence shows these steps improve quality, cut costs, and lower emissions.
Key actions include:
Research & metrics: life-cycle assessments, best-practice playbooks, standardized indicators. Policy & incentives: reimbursement and accreditation levers to drive sustainable imaging. Industry: prioritize energy-efficient design and circularity. Education: build climate literacy among radiologists and referrers. Digital tools: validated AI for protocol optimization, appropriateness, and throughput. Patient-centered communication: structured reports and plain-language outputs to prevent repeat imaging and delays. International collaboration and transparent monitoring to track measurable progress.
With aligned incentives and committed action, radiology can serve as a model for healthcare systems worldwide—delivering excellence in care while reducing the ecological footprint.
Footnotes
Authors’ contributions
Igor Toker, Sven Jansen, Julius Knoche, and Daniel Lorenz contributed equally to the conception and writing of the article. All authors participated in drafting the article, reviewing the content for accuracy and clarity, and approving the final version for submission.
Funding
The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Declaration of conflicting interests
The author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: The authors Dr Igor Toker, Dr Sven Jansen, and Dr Daniel Lorenz of this article are employed by Neo Q Quality in Imaging GmbH, a company that develops software solutions for radiologists. Julius Knoche is also working for the consulting agency honeycut & peers. As such, there may be a potential conflict of interest. However, we would like to emphasize that the content of this article is based on our extensive experience and is intended to provide an objective perspective. Our goal is to contribute to the ongoing dialogue in the field and support the enhancement of patient care and sustainability in healthcare.
