Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Objective

Individuals who have experienced traumatic events often encounter a variety of changes in their lives and and may suffer from them. To help and alleviate these traumatic stress, we developed an evidence-based mobile application (app) for easy accessibility. This study aimed to test the effects of the mobile app for traumatic stress management using neurofeedback-based meditation and binaural beat music.

Method

Fifty-eight participants were enrolled in a pilot randomized controlled trial (Trial Registration Number: KCT007724) consisting of two groups: (a) experimental group (n = 28) and (b) control group (n = 30). Participants used the mobile app 3 days a week at home for 4 weeks, engaging in neurofeedback-based meditation and binaural beat music. Participants completed self-report measures (SCL-47-R, Psychological Well-Being Post-traumatic Changes questionnaire) and EEG test (emotional stability, anti-stress) at a pretreatment and 1-month follow-up.

Results

Participants in the experimental group demonstrated significant improvements in psychological well-being (F = 16.37, p < 0.001), emotional stability (F = 10.38; p = 0.002), and the anti-stress index (F = 11.37; p = 0.001).

Conclusion

The results of this pilot trial, involving a neurofeedback-based meditation and binaural beat-centered music intervention, provide preliminary support and a readily accessible option for individuals seeking to recover from the effects of traumatic events. Additionally, we have established the groundwork for subsequent research to study the efficacy of a neurofeedback-based meditation program and a binaural beat-centered music intervention for those who have experienced traumatic events.

Keywords

Binaural beat emotion intervention program meditation mental health mobile app neurofeedback

Introduction

Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a psychiatric disorder that can develop in individuals who have experienced or witnessed traumatic events, and it may significantly impact an individual's mental, physical, social, and spiritual well-being.¹ Experiencing traumatic events is a common occurrence worldwide and can have serious negative psychological effects on a large proportion of people, if not the majority.² The lifetime prevalence of PTSD among respondents exposed to trauma is 5.6%, with rates ranging from 0.5% to 14.5% across different countries.³ The prevalence of traumatic stress symptoms may vary across countries; however, it has been confirmed to be higher in developed countries than in less developed regions.⁴ The onset of symptoms commonly occurs immediately following a traumatic event, regardless of socioeconomic status.³

Nevertheless, previous studies have indicated that the average delay in PTSD treatment has ranged from 3 to 30 years.⁵ Additionally, although PTSD causes pain in various ways, many individuals with PTSD do not actively seek or receive treatment until they have experienced symptoms for an extended period.⁶ While experiencing symptoms of PTSD, individuals may face delayed recovery owing to increasing social isolation, which can lead to greater depression and reduced well-being.⁷

Over the previous few decades, there has been ongoing debate regarding effective strategies to support trauma survivors and prevent severe and prolonged PTSD.⁸ General PTSD psychotherapy programs that involve exposure to traumatic memories have limitations due to high dropout rates, attributed to the extended duration and stringent structure of the therapy.⁹ Additionally, existing psychopharmacological treatments do not entirely prevent the progression of the disease but rather alleviate specific symptoms. Moreover, limitations such as excessive side effects, limited efficacy, and low patient compliance can improve complex causes.¹⁰ These therapeutic limitations highlight the rationale for further research on PTSD and the exploration of new treatment approaches.¹¹

Previous researchers have suggested that the first step in the basic stages of trauma recovery involves establishing stabilization.¹² Therefore, the most suitable topic for a self-management intervention for individuals exposed to traumatic events would be a method that enables self-stabilization. Self-regulation helps trauma survivors in their recovery by enabling them to control and manage their emotions and behaviors, engage in adaptive processes, utilize resources effectively, and prevent self-determination violations that can lead to persistent psychopathology such as PTSD.¹³ Therefore, individuals who have experienced traumatic stress require a means of self-regulation and self-monitoring of their condition to progress in their recovery at their own pace.

Furthermore, recent research has indicated that treatment for PTSD can be effective without directly processing traumatic memories. Various methods, including Internet-based cognitive therapy with psychoeducation,¹⁴ mindfulness-based therapies,¹⁵ and behavioral therapy interventions such as psychoeducation, breathing exercises, and relaxation training,¹⁶ have shown promise. Additional techniques, like neurofeedback and music interventions,^17,18 are effective in reducing PTSD-related symptoms. These findings suggest that both trauma exposure-based and nonexposure-based treatments can potentially alleviate PTSD symptoms.¹⁹ Moreover, for those with PTSD to achieve long-term recovery, comprehensive interventions that enhance well-being are necessary, not merely those that focus on symptomatic relief. Such approaches aim to prevent relapse, address residual PTSD symptoms, and foster complete recovery.²⁰ Enhancing the well-being of individuals with PTSD is crucial, as it significantly influences treatment outcomes and overall quality of life.²¹ Researchers also suggested that considering the symptom severity of PTSD and well-being when evaluating treatment response in PTSD individuals is crucial.²² Focusing on well-being enhances treatment effectiveness and plays an important role in improving patients’ psychosocial functioning and quality of life. Furthermore, this approach has the potential to yield benefits by strengthening positive psychological factors in PTSD management.²³ In particular, mindfulness has been studied as a method to enhance the symptoms and psychological well-being of individuals with PTSD, especially when provided alongside various trauma treatments.^24–26

Previous studies have demonstrated that the psychological symptoms of patients with PTSD can be improved, and neurophysiological changes can be induced by meditative interventions that affect EEG activity. As such, the neurophysiological changes associated with meditation have recently attracted scientific attention. Meditation has been demonstrated to regulate emotions by facilitating the integration of experiences through nonjudgmental concentration training, increasing positive emotions, and reducing negative emotions.²⁷

Neurofeedback, utilizing brain wave activity, is a technology that promotes the body's homeostasis. Positive brain wave patterns are generated through individuals’ willingness to improve their cognitive abilities and achieve a state where the body can independently regulate tension, anxiety, and excitement levels. Neurofeedback enhances the ability to regulate brain homeostasis while measuring one's brain waves. This enables individuals to create an optimal brain state through personalized efforts and training without the use of medication.²⁸ Neurofeedback is a noninvasive intervention that can be used continuously, regardless of time and location. It is also simple and effective and has no side effects.

Another therapeutic intervention involving brain waves is the use of binaural beat music, which has recently gained attention. Binaural beat music promotes psychological stability and reportedly alleviates pain, anxiety, and depression.^29,30 This form of acoustic psychotherapy influences brain waves by delivering two different-frequency sounds to the left and right ears as auditory stimuli, which are then transmitted to the brainstem nuclei.³¹ A study applying binaural beats to reduce anxiety and pain in psychiatric patients found that it effectively decreased anxiety levels.³² Another study examining the impact of binaural beats on stress relief confirmed that the group listening to binaural beats exhibited reduced stress responses to acute psychological stressors compared to the control group.³³

The recent proliferation and widespread use of smartphones have spurred research into mental health management using mobile apps, including for the assessment and treatment of mental health issues.^34–36 Through mobile mental health management apps, individuals can access medical information, receive exercise management and diet guidance, monitor biometric data, and manage their health daily at minimal cost and without constraints of time or location.^36,37 However, studies demonstrating the effectiveness of mobile programs for traumatic stress management using brainwave interventions are still lacking, highlighting the need for further research in this area.

Based on this identified gap, our study aimed to facilitate the psychological recovery of individuals experiencing traumatic stress and support their reintegration into daily life by investigating the effects of a traumatic stress management mobile app utilizing neurofeedback-based meditation and binaural beat music. We verified the effectiveness of the developed app and formulated the following hypotheses regarding the statistical comparison of average values between the experimental and control groups:

Hypothesis 1: The experimental group will exhibit a significant decrease in Post-traumatic Diagnostic Scale (PDS) compared to the control group.

Hypothesis 2: The experimental group will demonstrate significantly higher scores on the Psychological Well-Being Post-traumatic Changes Questionnaire (PWB-PTCQ) than the control group.

Hypothesis 3: The experimental group will show a significant decrease in SCL-47-R compared to the control group.

Hypothesis 4: The experimental group will experience a significant increase in emotional stability and anti-stress index compared to the control group.

Methods

Study design

This study was a pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) aimed at evaluating the effectiveness of a mobile traumatic stress management app utilizing neurofeedback and binaural beat music for individuals who have experienced trauma.

Participants

The sample size of the study was calculated as 52 participants using G*power 3.1 program at a significance level of .05, power of .80, and effect size of .80. Participants included adults aged 18–45 years who reported experiencing trauma and stress. This age range was selected because brain wave background frequencies vary by age, and frequencies are consistent among individuals aged 15–45 years, which minimizes variations in measuring research effectiveness. Recruitment was continued based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria until 60 participants were included, taking into account dropout.

Inclusion criteria

Adults aged 18–45 years.

Individuals with moderate or higher severity (≥ 11 points) based on the PDS.

Experienced a traumatic event > 6 months prior to recruitment.

Willing voluntary participation after receiving an explanation of the purpose and process of the clinical trial.

Ability to use mobile phone applications without difficulty.

Exclusion criteria

Severe mental illness, recent or past delusions, or hallucinations.

Serious diseases affecting the central nervous system.

Participation in other clinical studies within the last month.

Participants were determined by the principal investigator to have significant difficulty in performing or understanding the clinical trial.

Randomization, allocation concealment, and blinding

An independent researcher generated a randomization table using a stratified randomization method in Excel. An independent researcher classified the participants into experimental and control groups based on the selection criteria, including age and willingness to participate among the general characteristics of the participants. Through this, we handled the classification to minimize any possible impact on the research outcomes, and the researcher responsible for the classification did not participate in the result analysis. Initially, 78 individuals expressed interest in the study; however, 14 did not meet inclusion criteria, and 4 declined consents after receiving study information. Thirty individuals were assigned to the experimental group, and 30 were assigned to the control group according to the allocation process, and the research was carried out. Twenty-eight individuals in the experimental group and 30 in the control group participated in the study. Two participants in the experimental group were excluded from the study because they were unable to regularly participate in the experimental intervention owing to personal scheduling conflicts (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Consort flow diagram.

Intervention

Experimental group

Participants in the experimental group received training to use the Mind Therapy app (Choi et al., 2023).³⁸ Figure 2 illustrates the Mind Therapy app. The app consists of (1) Information of Mind Therapy (trauma stress management information); (2) EEG/Stress Test; (3) Autonomic Nervous System Therapy (deep breathing/butter fly hug); (4) Brain Therapy (neurofeedback meditation/binaural beat music); and (5) Brain Games. In the figure, it is connected via Bluetooth to a two-channel EEG headset, employing neurofeedback meditation and binaural beat music available on the Google Play Store.³⁸

Figure 2.

The Mind Therapy app using neurofeedback and binaural beat.

The intervention was conducted at home for 3 days or more per week for 4 weeks. Each training session lasted at least 50 min and consisted of neurofeedback-based meditation (30 min) and binaural beat music (20 min). During training, when participants focused on meditation and their alpha waves increased, a bell sounded to indicate heightened focus. The frequency of these bells corresponded to increases in alpha waves, signifying improved meditation focus. Experienced researchers, certified as brain counselors and involved in app development and EEG training, provided instructions on using the EEG device and app. Participants downloaded and utilized the “Mind Therapy” app on their smartphones, with experimental group log data accessible to researchers through Google Sheets, and the experiment was conducted. The log data, containing each participant's phone contact information (excluding personal identifiers), recorded connection dates, usage durations, and brain wave measurement results in a chronological order. This allowed researchers to verify participation and identify any missed sessions. Participants who did not engage in the experiment were reminded via phone calls or text messages to complete their assigned tasks.

The control group

Participants in the control group received a handout on traumatic stress management immediately following the pre-test and were scheduled for the post-test 4 weeks later. The handout contents included information on “healthy brain and brain waves,” “activities for a healthy brain,” and “traumatic stress management.” After completing the post-test, participants were wait-listed for treatment if desired.

Data collection

Data were collected between May 23, 2022, and February 28, 2023, using self-report questionnaires and EEG tests by the pre- and post-tests at Seoul Metropolitan area in Korea. Specific details regarding the measurement items and methods are outlined in the Measurements section.

Measurements

Post-traumatic diagnostic scale

The PDS was utilized to assess post-traumatic stress levels among participants. This scale was developed by Foa et al.³⁹ and standardized in Korean.⁴⁰ The PDS comprises 17 items rated on a 4-point Likert scale (0–3), addressing re-experiencing, avoidance, emotional numbness, and hyperarousal symptoms. Total scores range from 0 to 51 points, with three cutoff sections: (a) mild (under 10), (b) moderate (11 to 20), and (c) severe (over 20, the cutoff point for clinical diagnosis in Korea). Participants in this study were required to have a total score of ≥11 for inclusion criteria. The PDS encompasses all PTSD diagnostic criteria from the DSM-5 and is applicable to both male and female samples. Sample items include “If possible, I try to avoid activities, people, or places that remind me of the event,” “I have nightmares about that incident,” and “I feel distant or disconnected from the people around me.” Cronbach's alpha values for internal consistency have been reported between 0.90 and 0.94 in previous studies,^40,41 and it was found to be 0.84 in this study.

Symptom Checklist-47-R

The Symptom Checklist-47-R (SCL-47-R) was employed to assess participants’ mental health status across various sub-categories, including depression, somatization, phobic anxiety, interpersonal sensitivity, anxiety, paranoia, obsessive–compulsive behavior, hostility, and psychoticism. Originally developed by Derogatis,⁴² the SCL-47-R was translated and adapted into a concise Korean version.^43,44 The SCL-47-R comprises 47 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale, with total scores ranging from 47 to 235 points. Sample items include “I feel nervous and anxious,” “I feel depressed,” and “I keep thinking useless thoughts.” Higher scores on the SCL-47-R indicate poorer mental health status across the assessed domains. The instrument has demonstrated high internal consistency, with Cronbach's α values ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 (Gwon & Park, 2016; Hyun & Cho, 2012).^45,46

PWB-PTCQ

The PWB-PTCQ was utilized to measure participants’ psychological well-being. Developed by Joseph et al.⁴⁷ and translated into Korean,⁴⁸ this tool assesses two factors: (1) changes in outlook on life and interpersonal relationships (e.g. “I am a compassionate and giving person,” “I am grateful to have people in my life who care for me”) and (2) changes in oneself and the world (e.g. “I handle my responsibilities in life well,” “I have a sense of purpose in life”). The questionnaire consists of 16 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale. Total scores range from 16 to 80 points, with higher scores indicating better psychological well-being. The Cronbach's α coefficient for internal consistency ranges from .92 to .94,^48,49 demonstrating the reliability of this instrument in assessing psychological well-being post-trauma.

EEG results: emotional stability and anti-stress index

The effects of the intervention on participants’ emotional stability and anti-stress index were assessed using the Neuroharmony program, which is approved by the Food and Drug Administration and measured by a two-channel EEG check device. Emotional stability was analyzed using the emotional quotient (EQ), which assesses the symmetry of alpha waves between the left and right sides of the brain. A higher EQ indicates more active emotional stability, while a lower EQ suggests darker or more depressed emotional stability. Generally, an EQ of 80 or higher is considered optimal; a range of 60–80 is considered active, 40–60 is considered normal, 20–40 is considered inactive, and ≤ 20 is considered extremely low. The anti-stress index measures stress resistance through the analysis of delta and high beta waves. A higher anti-stress index value indicates better resistance to stress-related conditions. Traumatic stress can hyper-arouse the right frontal lobe (the fear center of the brain) and increase high beta waves. This also affects the left brain, increasing high beta waves in the left brain and breaking the balance between the left and right brain.⁵⁰ Generally, a value of ≥80 is considered optimal, 60–80 is healthy, 40–60 is normal, 20–40 indicates fatigue, and <20 is considered pathological.^51,52

Data analysis

The collected data were analyzed using SPSS version 25. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze participants’ general characteristics. Participant homogeneity was assessed using chi-square tests. Finally, differences between the experimental and control groups were analyzed using ANOVA.

Ethical considerations

This study was conducted with the approval of the Institutional Review Board at a university in Seoul, South Korea (No. 1041078-20230331-HR- 081). Following an explanation of the study's purpose and methodology, participants were provided with a consent form to read and sign. The researchers clarified that participants had the option to withdraw from the study at any time without facing adverse consequences. Additionally, participants were assured that their personal information would be used solely for research purposes and would be discarded upon completion of the study.

Results

Regarding the participant demographics, there were 8 men (13.8%) and 50 women (86.2%) in the study. In terms of age distribution, 25 participants were in their 20s (43.1%), 21 in their 30s (36.2%), and 12 in their 40s (20.7%). Analysis of homogeneity between the experimental and control groups revealed no significant differences in sex, age, education level, or occupation (Table 1).

Table 1.

General characteristics and homogeneity of participants.

Characteristics		Exp. (n = 28)	Comp. (n = 30)	X2(p)
Characteristics		Frequency (%)		X2(p)
Gender	Male	5(17.9)	3(10)	0.752(0.386)
Gender	Female	23(82.1)	27(90)	0.752(0.386)
Age	20s	16(57.1)	9(30)	4.563(0.102)
	30s	7(25)	14(46.7)
	40s	5(17.9)	7(23.3)
Education	High school	6(21.4)	3(10)	.3.215(0.200)
	College	17(60.7)	16(53.3)
	Graduate school	5(17.9)	11(36.7)
Occupation	Employed	16(57.1)	20(66.7)	1.611(0.657)
	Leave of absence	3(10.7)	1(3.3)
	Unemployed	6(21.4)	5(16.7)
	Student	3(10.7)	4(13.3)

N=58.

The study outcomes indicated that Hypothesis 1 was not supported, whereas Hypotheses 2 and 3 were supported, with Hypothesis 4 partially supported (Table 2). The specifics are outlined below:

Hypothesis 1: Analysis of the PDS results revealed that while the average value in the experimental group decreased before and after the intervention, there was no significant difference observed between the experimental and control groups (F = 1.31; p = 0.257).

Hypothesis 2: Examination of PWB-PTCQ of the two groups before and after the traumatic stress management program indicated that the score of the experimental group demonstrated a significantly greater improvement compared to the control group (F = 16.37; p < 0.001).

Hypothesis 3: The differences in mental health status (SCL-47-R) before and after the traumatic stress management program between the experimental and control groups are significant (F = 6.82; p = 0.012).

Hypothesis 4: Analysis of the emotional stability differences between the experimental and control groups before and after the traumatic stress management program showed that the experimental group's scores improved slightly. In contrast, those of the control group deteriorated slightly. This difference was statistically significant (F = 10.38; p = 0.002). Additionally, analysis of the differences in the Rt. anti-stress index scores between the experimental and control groups before and after the traumatic stress management program demonstrated that the scores of the experimental group increased. In contrast, those of the control group decreased, and the difference was statistically significant (F = 11.37; p = 0.001). However, for the Lt. anti-stress index, although the scores of the experimental group improved and those of the control group deteriorated, this difference was not statistically significant (F = 3.92; p = 0.053).

Table 2.

Effects of the program.

Variable		Groups	Pre-test		Post-test		F	p
Variable		Groups	M	SD	M	SD	F	p
Self-report questionnaires	Post-traumatic diagnostic scale	Exp. (n = 28)	22.30	8.73	15.70	10.40	1.31	0.257
	Post-traumatic diagnostic scale	Cont. (n = 30)	22.63	8.79	18.30	10.53	1.31	0.257
	Mental health status	Exp. (n = 28)	104.68	30.10	86.75	28.03	6.82	0.012*
	Mental health status	Cont. (n = 30)	108.77	29.60	104.53	30.91	6.82	0.012*
	Psychological well-being	Exp. (n = 28)	47.79	12.99	54.07	13.24	16.37	0.000***
	Psychological well-being	Cont. (n = 30)	49.63	13.43	45.00	14.58	16.37	0.000***
EEG	Emotional stability	Exp. (n = 28)	76.25	5.54	77.09	3.95	10.38	0.002**
	Emotional stability	Cont. (n = 30)	77.79	3.98	75.12	4.66	10.38	0.002**
	Anti-stress (Rt.)	Exp. (n = 28)	66.58	11.60	71.70	9.72	11.37	0.001**
	Anti-stress (Rt.)	Cont. (n = 30)	69.79	10.74	63.45	14.22	11.37	0.001**
	Anti-stress (Lt.)	Exp. (n = 28)	66.94	13.50	69.41	11.50	3.92	0.053
	Anti-stress (Lt.)	Cont. (n = 30)	69.25	10.39	63.80	14.02	3.92	0.053

N = 58.

*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.

Discussion

This study was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of a developed traumatic stress management program utilizing neurofeedback-based meditation and binaural beat-centered music intervention and to propose an effective research design for future follow-up studies.

In this study, the effects of meditation align with findings from a RCT,⁵³ which demonstrated that participants experienced improvements in stress and well-being following a mobile meditation intervention. Previous research has indicated that meditation can effectively address various mental health challenges, such as PTSD, anxiety, and depression,⁵⁴ and is an activity that increases alpha waves.⁵⁵ The meditation provided in this study focused on improving alpha waves using neurofeedback technology, providing an environment that allows users to become more immersed in meditation activities. Therefore, it can be assumed that the participant's mental health and well-being scale improved as a result of this study. Therefore, providing alpha wave neurofeedback training through meditation, which is an activity that increases alpha wave, is suggested to be an efficient method for people experiencing mental health difficulties. As the number of mobile meditation apps is gradually increasing, studies on their effects and qualitative research on the positive experiences of app users are being reported.⁵⁶ In the future, qualitative studies on the experience of using mobile neurofeedback-based meditation apps are required to ensure their continuous quality and alignment with user needs.

The results of this study confirmed significant differences in other evaluation scales, but this was not the case with the PTSD scale (PDS). When reviewing the duration of neurofeedback intervention for PTSD participants from previous research, the measurement interval at which significant changes in PTSD were observed (a) not at 4 weeks and (b) others were taken at 3-month, 6-month, or 8-week intervals.⁵⁷ Another study demonstrated a significant reduction in PTSD symptoms after 40 intervention sessions conducted twice a week over 4 months, with improvements in emotional regulation observed beforehand.⁵⁸ Furthermore, studies involving the general population, not limited to those with PTSD, have shown sufficient stress reduction effects even within a 4-week research period.⁵⁹ These findings from previous studies partly align with the results of this study. In this study, the emotional control and mental health indicators of the participants were improved, including significant enhancement in the mental health status and well-being scale of the experimental group and brain emotional indicators in the EEG test. Due to the limited intervention period of 4 weeks, we speculate that there was no significant difference in the improvement of direct PTSD symptoms, which follows a complex and varied course. Therefore, to directly address PTSD symptoms, it is deemed necessary to conduct follow-up research by applying various “periods” within the intervention conditions.

In this study, to assess the improvement of PTSD-related symptoms, emotional stability was measured by evaluating the left–right balance of alpha waves in the brain. Previous research has indicated that PTSD may be linked to the imbalance of alpha waves between the left and right hemispheres, leading to emotional instability.^60–62 Following the 4-week intervention, it was observed that the emotional stability of the experimental group increased. It is assumed that our intervention had a significant impact on the balance of alpha waves between the hemispheres, which may have positively influenced the mental health status scale. These findings are consistent with prior research suggesting that emotional symptoms may improve before the symptoms of PTSD.

Similar to the effect of binaural beat music used with mobile neurofeedback meditation in this study, previous studies have reported reductions in acute psychological stress among intervention groups exposed to binaural beats.³³ A research demonstrated that a single application of binaural beats improved the alpha levels of the right hemisphere—more involved in processing negative emotions—compared to the alpha level of the left hemisphere.⁶³ However, one study included a meditation group, a binaural beat group, a meditation and binaural beat group, and a control group. The greatest improvement in sleep, stress, depression, anger, and overall mood was reported for the meditation and binaural beat groups.⁶⁴ These findings are consistent with the results of our study, which utilized mobile neurofeedback-based meditation and binaural beat music to achieve significant improvements in participants’ mental health status, psychological well-being, emotional stability, and anti-stress index. Therefore, this study is valuable as it offers a convenient program for users by making neurofeedback meditation and binaural beat music available via a mobile app.

Finally, the limitation of this study is the inability to fully control all exogenous variables occurring in participants’ daily lives during the 4-week intervention period, which may affect the generalizability of the research results. Future studies should aim to explore these phenomena among diverse populations to address this limitation. This study used the PDS cut point to select participants with a history of trauma, which may result in a lack of specificity in the population. Therefore, caution is needed when interpreting or generalizing the results of this study. In addition, when selecting participants, the brain measurement was considered to be in a normal state, so it could be difficult to determine the extent of change after intervention. The possibility cannot be ruled out because the EEG test results can be affected by external factors such as individual conditions and measurement time, temperature, sound, etc. The handouts provided to the control group may raise issues due to treatment as usual. In future studies, it is necessary to ensure that more stringent treatment is provided to the control group. In this study, binaural beat-centered music intervention and alpha wave-centered neurofeedback meditation intervention were structurally separate in the application; however, they were combined in parallel during the experiment. The potential mutual effects of these interventions cannot be completely ruled out. Therefore, future research should investigate each intervention separately to understand their individual effects in follow-up studies better.

Despite these limitations, this study holds significant importance. It conducted an RCT on a new smartphone app offering binaural beats and meditation treatment for trauma, laying the foundation for future intervention research targeting individuals with PTSD. The exposure therapy of trauma, which has been the mainstay of PTSD treatment to date, has been highly effective; however, it has a high dropout rate, which has its limitations. The mobile neurofeedback-based meditation intervention developed in this study presents a promising alternative to trauma exposure therapy, aligning with the advantages of neurofeedback interventions suggested in previous research.⁵⁰ Furthermore, the mobile neurofeedback-based meditation and binaural beat-centered music intervention program introduced in this study offers user-friendly convenience and can serve as a routine and safe intervention that individuals with PTSD can utilize at their discretion. Discovering cost-effective and time-flexible treatments for PTSD and other mental health disorders is particularly critical given the limitations of existing therapies and the need for continuous care. Our research is meaningful as it contributes to advancing public mental health by providing free development content and conducting the development in consideration of convenience and cost-effectiveness.

Conclusion

The mobile neurofeedback-based meditation and binaural beats-centered music program developed in this study holds promise for effectively managing evidence-based traumatic stress. By prioritizing emotional stability and enhancing individual well-being and mental health status, this program is expected to impact the future recovery of individuals with PTSD positively. It is crucial to undertake ongoing long-term evaluation using systematic research design and long-term effectiveness analysis to assess the program's benefits and outcomes further. This cost-effective and time-efficient treatment intervention can be disseminated widely to individuals, families, and communities experiencing disaster and mental stress in a more accessible way and without side effects. We hope that this program will effectively promote mental health within communities.

Footnotes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank everyone who agreed and offered to take part in this study.

Contributorship

YC: conceptualization, methodology, writing—original draft. DC: data analysis, project administration, writing—review. NL: data curation.

Consent to participate

Participants provided written informed consent prior to participation.

Data availability

The data of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Declaration of conflicting interests

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Ethical approval

This study was conducted with the approval of the Institutional Review Board at a university in Seoul, South Korea (No. 1041078-20230331-HR-081).

Funding

The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT, Republic of Korea (NRF-2020R1A2B5B0100208 and NRF-2023R1A2C2003043).

Guarantor

Y. Choi.

ORCID iD

Yun-Jung Choi

References

National Institute of Mental Health . Transforming the understanding and treatment of mental illnesses [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2023 Nov 15]. Available from: https://www.samhsa.gov/mental-health/post-traumatic-stress-disorder.

Stein

Seedat

Iversen

, et al. Post-traumatic stress disorder: medicine and politics. Lancet 2007; 369: 139–144.

Koenen

Ratanatharathorn

, et al. Post-traumatic stress disorder in the world mental health surveys. Psychol Med 2017; 47: 2260–2274.

Benjet

Bromet

Karam

, et al. The epidemiology of traumatic event exposure worldwide: results from the world mental health survey consortium. Psychol Med 2016; 46: 327–343.

Wang

Angermeyer

Borges

, et al. Delay and failure in treatment seeking after first onset of mental disorders in the world health organization’s world mental health survey initiative. World Psychiatry 2007; 6: 177.

Goldmann

Galea

. Mental health consequences of disasters. Annu Rev Public Health 2014; 35: 169–183.

Grenawalt

Hamner

, et al. Social isolation and well-being in veterans with mental illness. J Ment Health 2023; 32: 407–411.

Watkins

Sprang

Rothbaum

. Treating PTSD: a review of evidence-based psychotherapy interventions. Front Behav Neurosci 2018; 12: 1–9.

van der Kolk

Stone

West

, et al. Yoga as an adjunctive treatment for post-traumatic stress disorder: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Psychiatry 2014; 75(6): e559–e565.

10.

Akhtar

Pilkhwal Sah

. Advances in the pharmacotherapeutic management of post-traumatic stress disorder. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2021; 22: 1919–1930.

11.

Palmisano

Meshberg-Cohen

Petrakis

, et al. A systematic review evaluating PTSD treatment effects on intermediate phenotypes of PTSD. Psychol Trauma 2023; 16: 768–783.

12.

Zaleski

Johnson

Klein

. Grounding Judith Herman’s trauma theory within interpersonal neuroscience and evidence-based practice modalities for trauma treatment. Smith Coll Stud Soc Work 2016; 86: 377–393.

13.

Littleton

Ricca

Allen

, et al. Recovery and adjustment trajectories among Hurricane Florence survivors: analysis utilizing nonlinear dynamic system modeling. J Trauma Stress 2023; 36: 579–592.

14.

Graham

Ehlers

. Development and validation of the bullied cognitions inventory (BCI). Cognit Ther Res 2023; 47: 1033–1045.

15.

Grasser

Javanbakht

. Treatments of post-traumatic stress disorder in civilian populations. Curr Psychiatry Rep 2019; 21: 11.

16.

Çiller

Köskün

Akca

AYE

. Post traumatic stress disorder and behavioral therapy intervention techniques used in treatment. Curr Approaches Psychiatry 2022; 14: 499–509.

17.

Fragedakis

Toriello

. The development and experience of combat-related PTSD: a demand for neurofeedback as an effective form of treatment. J Couns Dev 2014; 92: 481–488.

18.

Pant

Frishkopf

Park

, et al. A neurobiological framework for the therapeutic potential of music and sound interventions for post-traumatic stress symptoms in critical illness survivors. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022; 19: 3113.

19.

Eddinger

Hardt

Williams

. Concurrent treatment for PTSD and prolonged grief disorder: review of outcomes for exposure- and nonexposure-based treatments. Omega (Westport) 2021; 83: 446–469.

20.

Radstaak

Hüning

Bohlmeijer

. Well-being therapy as rehabilitation therapy for post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms: a randomized controlled trial. J Trauma Stress 2020; 33: 813–823.

21.

Radstaak

Hüning

Lamers

, et al. Examining well-being in post-traumatic stress disorder treatment: an explorative study. J Trauma Stress 2022; 35: 914–925.

22.

Bohlmeijer

Westerhof

. A new model for sustainable mental health: integrating well-being into psychological treatment. In: Making an impact on mental health. London: Routledge, 2020, pp.153–188.

23.

Harnett

Kelly

Gullo

. The impact of post-traumatic stress disorder on the psychological distress, positivity, and well-being of Australian police officers. Psychol Trauma 2023; 15: 340–348.

24.

Kummar

Correia

Tan

, et al. An 8-week compassion and mindfulness-based exposure therapy program improves post-traumatic stress symptoms. Clin Psychol Psychother 2023; 31: 1–18.

25.

Saban

Collins

Mathews

, et al. Impact of a mindfulness-based stress reduction program on psychological well-being, cortisol, and inflammation in women veterans. J Gen Intern Med 2022; 37: 751–761.

26.

Omidi

Shabanzadeh

Akbari

, et al. The effects of mindfulness-based stress reduction on emotional regulation and psychological well-being of Iranian veteran’s homemakers with secondary post-traumatic stress disorder. Arch Trauma Res 2017; 6: 82–86.

27.

Tang

Hölzel

Posner

. The neuroscience of mindfulness meditation. Nat Rev Neurosci 2015; 16: 213–225.

28.

Korea institute of psychiatric science. Seoul, Korea: Neuroharmony, 2017.

29.

Aparecido-Kanzler

Cidral-Filho

Prediger

. Effects of binaural beats and isochronic tones on brain wave modulation: literature review. Rev Mex Neurociencia 2021; 22: 238–247.

30.

Munro

Searchfield

. The short-term effects of recorded ocean sound with and without alpha frequency binaural beats on tinnitus perception. Complement Ther Med 2019; 44: 291–295.

31.

Wiwatwongwana

Vichitvejpaisal

Thaikruea

, et al. The effect of music with and without binaural beat audio on operative anxiety in patients undergoing cataract surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Eye 2016; 30: 1407–1414.

32.

Yusim

Grigaitis

. Efficacy of binaural beat meditation technology for treating anxiety symptoms: a pilot study. J Nerv Ment Dis 2020; 208: 155–160.

33.

Kelton

Weaver

Willoughby

, et al. The efficacy of binaural beats as a stress-buffering technique. Altern Ther Health Med 2021; 27: 28–33. Available from: https://www.proquest.com.

34.

Latour

O’Byrne

McCarthy

, et al. Improving mental health in US veterans using mHealth tools: a pilot study. Health Informatics J 2020; 26: 3201–3214.

35.

Gustafson

McTavish

Chih

, et al. Smartphone application to support recovery from alcoholism: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Psychiatry 2014; 71: 566–572.

36.

Park

Lee

Kim

, et al. Development of a smartphone application for promoting bone health in Korean young adult women: a pilot study. Korean J Adult Nurs 2015; 27: 459–471.

37.

Yang

Lee

Yoo

. Development and evaluation of health care providers’ counseling manual in mobile application for lifelong health care among patients with chronic hepatitis B. J Korean Acad Soc Nurs Educ 2014; 42: 258–268.

38.

Choi

. Development of serious games for PFA simulation and trauma stress management programs using neurofeedback. Seoul: Korean Research Foundation; 2023: 1–35

39.

Foa

Cashman

Jaycox

, et al. The validation of a self-report measure of PTSD: the PTSD diagnostic scale (PDS). Psychol Assess 1997; 9: 445–451.

40.

Nam

Kwon

. Psychometric qualities of the Korean version of the posttraumatic diagnostic scale (PDS-K). Korean J Clin Psychol 2010; 29: 147–167.

41.

Ahn

Cho

. Post-traumatic negative beliefs as a mediator in the relationship between self-compassion and psychological symptoms among trauma survivors. Cogn Behav Ther Korea 2016; 16: 365–381.

42.

Derogatis

. SCL-90-R: Administration, scoring and procedures manual. Baltimore, MD: Clinical Psychometric Research, 1977.

43.

Kim

Won

. Instructions for conducting the SCL-90-R assessment. Seoul: Central Aptitude Publishing Department, 1984.

44.

Kim

Lee

. Interpretation guidelines for SCL-90-R. Ment Health Res 1985; 3: 173–217.

45.

Kim

Lee

. A comparative study of basic physical fitness and mental health of elementary school students according to participation in challenging physical activities. J Educ 2014; 34: 103–117.

46.

Hyun

Cho

. Factors influencing problem and pathological gambling in participants of horse race gambling. J Korean Acad Nurs 2012; 42: 589–598.

47.

Joseph

Maltby

Wood

, et al. The psychological well-being—post-traumatic changes questionnaire (PWB-PTCQ): reliability and validity. Psychol Trauma 2012; 4: 420–428.

48.

Jeong

Kim

. The validation of the Korean version of the psychological well-being-post-traumatic changes questionnaire. Korean J Health Psychol 2016; 21: 195–224.

49.

Goo

Chang

. The mediating effect of psychological acceptance on the relationship between emotional clarity and post-traumatic psychological well-being of college students with relationship loss. J Educ Cult 2019; 25: 315–337.

50.

van der Kolk

Hodgdon

Gapen

, et al. A randomized controlled study of neurofeedback for chronic PTSD. PLoS One 2016; 11: e0166752.

51.

Byun

. Effect of prefrontal lobe neurofeedback training for reducing adolescent theta waves. J Korea Acad Ind Coop Soc 2017; 18: 459–465.

52.

Han

Chae

Park

, et al. Patterns analysis of prefrontal brain waves of cancer patients using brain-computer-interface. J KISS Softw Appl 2008; 35: 169–178.

53.

Coelhoso

Patricia

Shirley

, et al. A new mental health mobile app for well-being and stress reduction in working women: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res 2019; 21: e14269.

54.

Al-Refae

Munroe

, et al. A self-compassion and mindfulness-based cognitive Mobile intervention (serene) for depression, anxiety, and stress: promoting adaptive emotional regulation and wisdom. Front Psychol 2021; 12: 648087.

55.

Kora

Rajani

Chinnaiah

, et al. EEG-Based Brain-Electric activity detection during meditation using spectral estimation techniques. In: Jyothi

Mamatha

Zhang

Raju

(eds) Computational and bio engineering. Singapore: Springer, 2021, pp.459–465.

56.

Sifat

Tasnim

Stoebenau

, et al. A qualitative exploration of university student perspectives on mindfulness-based stress reduction exercises via smartphone app in Bangladesh. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-Being 2022; 17: 1–13.

57.

Wickersham

Petrides

Williamson

, et al. Efficacy of mobile application interventions for the treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder: A systematic review. Digit Health 2019; 5: 1–11.

58.

Gapen

van der Kolk

Hamlin

, et al. A pilot study of neurofeedback for chronic PTSD. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback 2016; 41: 251–261.

59.

Min

Park

Kim

, et al. The effectiveness of a neurofeedback-assisted mindfulness training program using a mobile app on stress reduction in employees: randomized controlled trial. JMIR mHealth UHealth 2023; 11: e42851.

60.

López-Castro

Martin

Nickley

, et al. Frontal alpha asymmetry in post-traumatic stress disorder: group differences among individuals with and without PTSD during an inhibitory control task. Clin EEG Neurosci 2023; 54: 472–482.

61.

Gordon

Palmer

Cooper

. EEG Alpha asymmetry in schizophrenia, depression, PTSD, panic disorder, ADHD and conduct disorder. Clin EEG Neurosci 2010; 41: 178–183.

62.

Roohi-Azizi

Azimi

Heysieattalab

, et al. Changes in the brain’s bioelectrical activity in cognition, consciousness, and some mental disorders. Med J Islam Repub Iran 2017; 31: 307–312.

63.

Norhazman

Mohamad

Taib

, et al. Behavior of EEG alpha asymmetry when stress is induced, and binaural beat is applied. Int Symp Comput Appl Ind Electron 2012: 297–301.

64.

Yadav

Cidral-Filho

Iyer

. Using heartfulness meditation and brainwave entrainment to improve teenage mental well-being. Front Psychol 2021; 12: 1–9.

Feasibility of a mobile app for traumatic stress management using neurofeedback-based meditation and binaural beat music: A pilot randomized controlled trial

Abstract

Objective

Method

Results

Conclusion

Keywords

Introduction

Methods

Study design

Participants

Inclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria

Randomization, allocation concealment, and blinding

Intervention

Experimental group

The control group

Data collection

Measurements

Post-traumatic diagnostic scale

Symptom Checklist-47-R

PWB-PTCQ

EEG results: emotional stability and anti-stress index

Data analysis

Ethical considerations

Results

Discussion

Conclusion

Footnotes

Acknowledgements

Contributorship

Consent to participate

Data availability

Declaration of conflicting interests

Ethical approval

Funding

Guarantor

ORCID iD

References