Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

French

Background:

Nephron progenitor cells derived from the metanephric mesenchyme undergo a complex balance of self-renewal and differentiation throughout kidney development to give rise to the mature nephron. Cell proliferation is an important index of progenitor population dynamics. However, accurate and reproducible in situ quantification of cell proliferation within progenitor populations can be technically difficult to achieve due to the complexity and harsh tissue treatment required of certain protocols.

Objective:

To optimize and compare the performance of the 3 most accurate S phase–specific labeling methods used for in situ detection and quantification of nephron progenitor and ureteric bud cell proliferation in the developing kidney, namely, 5-bromo-2’-deoxyuridine (BrdU), 5-ethynyl-2’-deoxyuridine (EdU), and proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA).

Methods:

Protocols for BrdU, EdU, and PCNA were optimized for fluorescence labeling on paraformaldehyde-fixed, paraffin-embedded mouse kidney tissue sections, with co-labeling of nephron progenitor cells and ureteric bud with Six2 and E-cadherin antibodies, respectively. Image processing and analysis, including quantification of proliferating cells, were carried out using free ImageJ software.

Results:

All 3 methods detect similar ratios of nephron progenitor and ureteric bud proliferating cells. The BrdU staining protocol is the lengthiest and most complex protocol to perform, requires tissue denaturation, and is most subject to interexperimental signal variability. In contrast, bound PCNA and EdU protocols are relatively more straightforward, consistently yield clear results, and far more easily lend themselves to co-staining; however, the bound PCNA protocol requires substantive additional postexperimental analysis to distinguish the punctate nuclear PCNA staining pattern characteristic of proliferating cells.

Conclusions:

All 3 markers exhibit distinct advantages and disadvantages in quantifying cell proliferation in kidney progenitor populations, with EdU and PCNA protocols being favored due to greater technical ease and reproducibility of results associated with these methods.

Keywords

kidney development nephron progenitor cells ureteric bud cell proliferation

What was known before

Several methods exist for quantification of proliferating cells in the embryonic kidney and other tissues. However, measuring proliferation in addition to co-staining progenitor populations in paraffin-embedded kidney tissues can be technically difficult to perform reproducibly well.

What this adds

In this study, we review the pros and cons of existing methods for quantitation of cell proliferation, and provide detailed, optimized protocols for 3 commonly employed methods of measuring cell proliferation with co-staining for nephron progenitors and ureteric bud cells.

Introduction

The mammalian kidney is a complex organ composed of more than 20 different cell types.¹ Remarkably, most cells found in the adult kidney are derived from only 2 primordial tissues: an initial epithelial structure called the ureteric bud and the surrounding cap of nephron progenitor cells originating from the metanephric mesenchyme.² Nephron progenitor cells undergo a complex balance of self-renewal and differentiation throughout kidney development to give rise to the mature nephron.³ Progenitor cell proliferation is a tightly regulated and crucial process throughout kidney development and represents a major phenotypic constituent of nephrogenesis in vivo.⁴ Defects in nephrogenesis and ureteric branching result in congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract (CAKUT).^5-7 With an incidence of 1:400, CAKUT represent one of the most frequent birth defects in humans and remain the major cause of childhood renal failure.⁸ These pleiotropic malformations comprise a multitude of renal phenotypes including renal agenesis, hypoplasia, and renal dysplasia, associated with obstructive or reflexive anomalies of the ureter. A hallmark feature of CAKUT is a reduced nephron number.⁹ Total nephron number, termed nephron endowment, can vary greatly even within the normal distribution, ranging from 200 000 to 1.8 million in humans.¹⁰ Low nephron endowment within this normal range, though asymptomatic early in life, is associated with adult-onset hypertension, coronary heart diseases, and renal failure.^11-14 Despite the importance of nephron endowment to human health and disease, much remains to be learned about the molecular mechanisms governing nephrogenesis.

In Situ Detection of Cell Proliferation in the Developing Kidney

Cell proliferation in nephron progenitor and ureteric bud cells during renal development is a foundational component of nephrogenesis. The ability to accurately quantify and assess in situ cellular proliferation in these lineages is crucial to increasing our knowledge of renal organogenesis. Numerous methods exist for identifying proliferating cells in situ and are broadly subdivided into DNA synthesis assays and endogenous proliferation marker assays (Table 1).

Table 1.

Summary of Methods Used for In Situ Identification of Proliferating Cells.

Method	Description	Pros	Cons
DNA synthesis–based assays (detects cells in S phase only)
³H-thymidine¹⁵	Proliferating cells incorporate radioactive-labeled nucleotides in newly synthesized genomic DNA. Detection by autoradiography. Detects all proliferating cells from time of introduction to tissue fixation. Original “gold standard” proliferation assay.	Direct detection of proliferation by DNA synthesis	Radiation safety hazard Technically difficult to quantify labeled cells^a Up to 2 weeks required for autoradiographic development¹⁶ Does not permit co-labeling of proliferating cells¹⁷
BrdU	Thymidine analogue incorporated during DNA synthesis. Detection by interaction with labeled anti-BrdU antibody (or by anti-BrdU antibody coupled with labeled secondary antibody). Detects all proliferating cells from time of introduction to tissue fixation.	Direct detection of proliferation by DNA synthesis No radiation hazards	Detection requires harsh treatment of fixed sections to denature DNA and provide antibody access to BrdU^b Poor diffusion of detection antibody through tissues makes whole mount staining difficult¹⁸ Requires incorporation of BrdU into living cells prior to fixation¹⁹ High background signal and intra-experimental variability
EdU¹⁸	Thymidine analogue incorporated during DNA synthesis and detected by fluorescent signal incorporated during subsequent cycloaddition “click” reaction	Very small detector molecule easily passes into nucleus without harsh treatment Sensitive and quantitative	Comparatively high interexperimental variability Requires incorporation of EdU into living cells prior to fixation¹⁹
Endogenous proliferation marker assays
Ki-67 antibody	Ki-67 is present in nuclei of all nonquiescent cells, during all phases of the cell cycle. Ki67 expression progressively increases from G₁ to S, peaking in M, and declining during anaphase/telophase.²⁰	Due to the absence of Ki67 in quiescent (G₀) cells, Ki67 detection is particularly useful in tumor diagnostics and prognostics and is often used to calculate tumor growth fraction¹⁶	Due to its expression in all nonquiescent cells, Ki67 is not a specific marker of proliferation Ki67 expression is diminished in low nutrition states contributing to high type II error (false negative) in these conditions²¹
PCNA²²	Cofactor for DNA polymerase δ and ε. Expression of PCNA peaks during S phase, but is also present in G₁ and G₂/M.²² Detection by anti-PCNA antibodies.	Can distinguish S phase cells from other phases through identification of bound PCNA punctate staining pattern Does not require DNA denaturation or harsh tissue treatments	Due to its presence in both S and non-S phase cells, increased potential for type I error (false positive) due to potentially incorrect identification of cells²² May also detect DNA repair in addition to proliferation, increasing counts High background signal due to cytosolic staining can occur with formaldehyde fixation¹⁹ May be residual expression in cells that have just left S phase resulting in higher type I error¹⁹
Topoisomerase IIB	An enzyme involved in uncoiling DNA for replication. Detection through anti-topoisomerase IIB antibodies.	Endogenous antigen detection does not require DNA denaturation or harsh tissue treatments	Found to be associated not only with replication,²³ but interact with chromosomes functionally^24,25 and structurally^26,27 in ways that are not fully understood: not a true measure of proliferation
Phosphohistone H3	One of 5 histones that are major components of eukaryotic chromosome, present in highest concentration during M phase.²⁸ Detection through anti-phosphohistone H3 antibodies.	Due to its peak in M phase, this method is particularly useful in tumor diagnostics and is used as an alternative to mitotic figure counting²⁹	Detecting M phase is helpful in tumor diagnostics where there can be an increase in mitotic figures, but in proliferation studies mitotic figures do not accurately represent proliferating cells.
CDKs³⁰	There are several CDKs which are necessary for progression from one cell cycle phase to another: Cdk3 and cyclin C for G₀ phase Cdks 4, 2, and 6 and cyclins D and E for G1 phase Cdk2 and cyclins A and E for S phase Cdk2, 1, and cyclin A for G₂ phase Cdk1 and cyclin B for M phase	Can measure/quantify multiple phases at once Can select based on phase of interest	Unable to distinguish between interphase cells (G₁, G₂, or G₀) when all or a combination are labeled: not a true measure of proliferation Expression is variable during development, and by tissue type³⁰

Note. BrdU = 5-bromo-2’-deoxyuridine; EdU = 5-ethynyl-2’-deoxyuridine; PCNA = proliferating cell nuclear antigen; CDKs = cyclin-dependent-kinases.

Low resolution of signal and high background noise make quantification of labeled cells difficult.¹⁵

Co-staining for cell specific expression in addition to BrdU staining has traditionally been difficult due to the harsh treatment of tissues that destroys epitopes.

DNA growth is an active and continuous process (Figure 1), coordinating the phases of the cell cycle: G₁ (cell growth and organelle duplication), S (DNA synthesis), G₂ (further cell growth and preparation for cell division), and M (mitosis) phases.³¹ Synthesis of new DNA occurs only in the S phase of the cell cycle. For the purpose of this study, we have strictly defined proliferation as the ratio of DNA-synthesizing cells to total cell population (also known as the proliferation index). Accordingly, we have restricted our analysis to S phase DNA synthesis markers 5-bromo-2’-deoxyuridine (BrdU), proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), and 5-ethynyl-2’-deoxyuridine (EdU). Notwithstanding, selection of other markers of the cell cycle may be more appropriate, dependent on specific study goals. For example, the use of phosphohistone H3 which marks M phase may be particularly helpful in tumor diagnostics, where there can be an increase in mitotic figures (Table 1). Late in G₁, a control point allows the cell to commit to DNA synthesis and division, or otherwise exit the cell cycle and enter a quiescent state.³² In addition, there is a G₂ control point which prevents damaged cells from entering mitosis.³³ Alternate measures of cell proliferation that more broadly label cellular metabolic activity (ie, labeling cells in G₁, S, G₂, and M phase) are more likely to overestimate actual numbers of proliferating cells due to these control points.

Figure 1.

The phases of the eukaryotic cell cycle.

BrDU

Historically, the BrDU protocol has been regarded as a gold standard for in situ cell proliferation quantification in embryonic kidneys and in other developing organ systems. This protocol involves incorporation of the thymidine analogue BrDU into newly synthesized DNA (Figure 2), followed by detection of proliferating, BrDU-positive cells using anti-BrdU antibodies. BrDU protocols may be performed using either acid or enzymatic antigen retrieval steps. However, in order to permit access of anti-BrDU antibodies to genomic DNA, tissue sections are typically subjected to multiple denaturing conditions including incubation in acidic solutions at elevated temperatures, as well as treatment with nucleases and proteases. Ideally, co-staining would be performed to permit quantification of lineage-specific cell proliferation in nephron progenitor and ureteric bud cells.

Figure 2.

A comparison of the structures of (A) thymidine, (B) 5-bromo-2’-deoxyuridine (BrdU), and (C) 5-ethynyl-2’-deoxyuridine (EdU).

In practice, however, the harsh experimental conditions traditionally associated with the BrDU protocol have made co-staining technically prohibitive to perform reproducibly well for several reasons. Because BrDU is a nucleotide analogue, the addition of the DNase step is necessary to unwind DNA so that the antibody can access DNA-incorporated BrdU. When working with paraffin-embedded, paraformaldehyde- or formalin-fixed sections, an additional acid antigen retrieval step is also required to consistently obtain robust BrDU staining. Not surprisingly, the multiple antigen retrieval steps required for BrDU unmasking can partially denature or destroy less stable epitopes, impairing efforts to co-stain for additional antigens of interest. Other reported difficulties associated with co-staining include incompatibility of certain antibodies with the BrDU fixation methods or with BrDU buffers, as well as antibody cross-reactivity.³⁴

Consequently, nephron progenitor and ureteric bud cell populations are typically identified by tissue histology following BrDU staining. Alternatively, ureteric bud cells may be identified using Dolichos biflorus agglutinin lectin staining; however, this method can be problematic due to high signal background, and inefficient labeling of ureteric bud tips.³⁵ A common alternative to co-labeling cell lineages in conjunction with BrDU labeling is to calculate the proliferation index, which represents cycling cells as a fraction of total tissue section area.^36-43

EdU

More recently, EdU has been introduced as another thymidine analogue that is incorporated into actively dividing cells (Figure 2). Like BrDU, EdU can be injected intraperitoneally into laboratory animals or can be added to cell culture media.^7,22 In contrast to BrDU, however, EdU is not detected by antibodies, but by an azide-alkyne cycloaddition “click” reaction (Figure 3). Briefly, each EdU molecule contains an alkyne group which, when catalyzed by copper, binds to a fluorophore-conjugated azide.²³ Importantly, the unique click chemistry developed for EdU detection effectively circumvents the necessity of tissue denaturation for antigen retrieval, rendering this protocol far more compatible with tissue co-staining for nephron progenitor and ureteric bud cells.

Figure 3.

Schematic representation of the EdU click reaction.

Bound PCNA

Proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) is a ubiquitous non-histone nuclear protein exhibiting two distinct patterns of nuclear expression depending on cell cycle, distinguishable by immunostaining methods that do not employ alcohol fixation.¹⁹ “Free” PCNA, visualized as diffuse nuclear staining, is expressed in all cells irrespective of cell cycle phase, and functions in DNA repair and RNA transcription.²⁰ In contrast, “bound” PCNA is a component of the DNA replication complex and is visualized by a punctate nuclear expression pattern only in S phase cells, when bound to DNA polymerase δ and DNA polymerase ε²¹ (Figure 4).

Figure 4.

Two distinct nuclear PCNA expression patterns can be distinguished in kidneys at E14.5: The diffuse staining pattern (arrows) and the punctate nuclear staining of cells in S phase (arrowheads).

Here we present protocol methods for in situ detection of cell proliferation in the developing mouse kidney of BrDU, EdU, and bound PCNA. Importantly, all 3 protocols have been optimized to permit co-staining for nephron progenitors and ureteric bud cells, with anti-Six2 and anti-E Cadherin antibodies, respectively. The advantages and disadvantages of each method are discussed and must be evaluated within the specific context of the individual researcher’s work when determining which method to use.

Methods

All animal experiments were carried out in accordance with the policies of the Animal Care Committee at the University of Prince Edward Island and the Canadian Council on Animal Care guidelines. CD1 dams and sires were purchased from Charles River Laboratories.

Timed Embryos

Place one or two 7-week-old CD1 dams into a sire’s cage overnight. Check for vaginal plugs early the next morning and separate the dams back in to their own cages. Record gestational age of the embryos as embryonic day (E)0.5 when vaginal plug is present.

Tissue Labeling, Collection, and Processing

At desired gestational age, inject pregnant mice intraperitoneally with either BrdU labeling reagent (Roche BrdU kit 1, 11296736001) or EdU labeling reagent (C10337, Life Technologies) that has been warmed to room temperature, at a dose of 1 mL per 100 g body weight of 1000× stock solution, equivalent to 30 μg/g body weight for BrdU and 50 μg/g body weight for EdU. Following injection, place pregnant females back in their cage and allow 1 hour for BrdU incorporation or 30 minutes for EdU incorporation.

1a. NOTE—The commercial BrDU protocol suggests a standard concentration of 100 μg BrDU/g body weight, and incubation time ranging from 30 minutes to 24 hours, depending on tissue of interest. For proliferation studies in embryonic murine kidneys, typical incubation times range between 1 and 4 hours depending on stage of renal development.^44-46 The concentration of BrDU (30 μg/g body weight) and incubation time (1 hour) used in the present study were empirically determined for optimal signal to noise ratio. Longer incubation times or greater concentrations were found to result in more background staining.

After allowing the appropriate time for incorporation, euthanize pregnant dams by CO₂ overdose and cervical dislocation, immediately dissecting out the uterine horns containing embryos and transferring them into a 50 mL Falcon tube containing ice-cold tissue culture-grade PBS (without Ca²⁺ and Mg²⁺), stored in ice.

Transfer the uterine horns containing embryos into a 10-cm plate on ice containing fresh ice-cold PBS. Dissect out embryos and transfer them to fresh ice-cold PBS in a new 10-cm plate. Dissect out the kidneys under a dissection microscope. To keep the kidneys as cold as possible during dissection, place a covered 15-cm cell culture plate filled with ice water on top of the microscope stage. A 10-cm cell culture lid placed upside down on top of this makeshift, translucent ice water bath provides a sterile and disposable cold dissection surface for each embryo to be dissected. For smaller embryonic kidney dissections (eg, embryonic day (E)11-5–E14.5 kidneys), use a dissection microscope with a light source transmitted through the base of the stage.

3a. NOTE—The amnion membrane or another portion of tissue from the embryo (head, tail) may be taken at this point for genotyping purposes if needed.

3b. NOTE—It is important to transfer kidneys into 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) as quickly as possible.

3c. NOTE—Disposable needles (27G) and 1-mL syringes are a cost-effective and durable alternative to using fine forceps (which often bend or break at the tips) during dissection. New needles may be used for each dissection when genotyping is required, to help prevent genomic DNA cross-contamination between littermate samples for genotyping.

Immediately transfer kidneys into a clearly labeled histology cassette and submerge in fresh 4% PFA in PBS.

4a. NOTE—For embryonic murine kidneys, up to 6 pairs of kidneys may be processed in a single 6-compartment histology cassette (Leica Microsystems Inc. Cat #38440301). The use of multicompartment cassettes serves as a cost-saving measure during tissue processing and facilitates locating embryonic kidneys which may shrink and turn translucent following tissue processing.

Incubate kidneys in fresh 4% PFA for a minimum of 1 hour at room temperature, or preferably overnight at 4°C.

5a. NOTE—Embryonic kidneys may become brittle following overfixation, leading to tissue fragility during embedding and sectioning. Overfixation may also lead to fixation artifacts, and antigen masking associated with loss of staining signal.

Dehydrate, clear, and infiltrate the tissues with paraffin wax to prepare them for embedding. This step may be performed by hand, but preferably with an automated tissue processor to maximize wax infiltration into tissue.

6a. NOTE—The following schedule was used for processing embryonic kidneys: Fresh 4% PFA or formalin 1 hour, 70% ethanol—1 hour, 70% ethanol—1 hour, 95% ethanol—1 hour, 95% ethanol—1 hour, 95% ethanol—1 hour, 100% ethanol—1 hour, 100% ethanol—1 hour clearing solution (eg, xylenes or Clear Rite) 2 × 1.5 hours, 4 changes of fresh paraffin at 60°C for 0.5 hour each.

Embed kidneys in paraffin wax blocks oriented to make sagittal sections, labeling each sample. Blocks may be stored indefinitely at room temperature until they are ready to be sectioned.

Tissue Sectioning

Trim down the blocks on the microtome until the kidney tissue becomes visible.

1a. NOTE—Early embryonic kidneys may shrink significantly and turn translucent after paraffinization; care must be taken to avoid trimming through valuable tissue.

Place the trimmed wax blocks cut side down in a shallow ice water bath for 30 minutes prior to sectioning. This step increases fluidity of tissue sectioning and substantively enhances overall section quality.

Cut 5-µm sagittal sections, float on warm water bath and capture onto SuperFrost Plus (or equivalent charged) slides.

3a. NOTE—Multiple section ribbons can be captured together on a single slide as a cost-saving measure.

3b. NOTE—For between-group comparisons, deep sagittal tissue sections of similar depth must be selected. Typical midline landmarks should be clearly visible: primary ureteric bifurcations off the main ureter trunk in early embryonic kidney tissue sections; longitudinal rays of collecting ducts should be visible emerging from the renal calyces and/or pelvis in late embryonic kidneys.

Air dry sections at room temperature for 1 hour before storing at room temperature for future staining.

Rehydrating, Antigen Retrieval, and Blocking Sections

Bake slides at 60°C for 30 minutes.

Immerse slides in 3 separate xylenes baths for 5 minutes each.

Rehydrate sections in a series of ethanol dilutions (100%, 90%, 70%, 40%) through to distilled water by immersing sections in each solution for 5 minutes.

Prepare 1X sodium citrate-based antigen unmasking solution (Vector Laboratories, H-3300) in a glass beaker and heat to below boiling (97°C-99°C) in a steamer. Immerse the slides in the hot (below boiling) solution for 20 minutes.

Remove the beaker containing the slides from the steamer and allow it to cool down at room temperature for an additional 20 minutes.

Remove the slides from the unmasking solution, tap off excess liquid, and encircle tissue sections with a PAP pen to minimize the amount of reagent solution required to stain the sections.

Saturate the sections for 45 minutes at room temperature with permeabilization and blocking solution (10% donkey serum, Sigma; 3% bovine serum albumin [BSA], Calbiochem; 0.1% Tween 20, BioRad; in 1X PBS, Calbiochem).

Labeling of Sections

Each of the proliferation markers is co-labeled with Six2, a marker of nephron progenitor cells, and E-cadherin (E-cad), a marker of the epithelialized ureteric bud. All antibodies are incubated on the slides in a humidified incubation chamber. Summary of antibodies used can be found in Table 2.

Table 2.

Summary of Antibodies Used for Immunofluorescence Labeling.

Antibody type	Name	Ig species	Isotype	Working dilution	Vendor	Catalog number
Primary	Six2 Polyclonal Antibody	Rabbit		1:400^a	Proteintech	11562-1-AP
Primary	E-cadherin Monoclonal Antibody	Rat	IgG2a	1:400^a	ThermoFisher Scientific (Invitrogen)	13-1900
Primary	PCNA Monoclonal Antibody	Mouse	IgG2a	1:500	ThermoFisher Scientific (Invitrogen)	13-3900
Secondary	Anti-Rabbit, Alexa Fluor 350	Donkey	IgG	1:100^a	ThermoFisher Scientific (Invitrogen)	A10039
Secondary	Anti-Rat, Alexa Fluor 594	Donkey	IgG	1:200^a	ThermoFisher Scientific (Invitrogen)	A-21209
Secondary	Anti-Mouse, Alexa Fluor 488	Donkey	IgG	1:10	ThermoFisher Scientific (Invitrogen)	R37114

Note. PCNA = proliferating cell nuclear antigen. BrdU = 5-bromo-2’-deoxyuridine; EdU = 5-ethynyl-2’-deoxyuridine.

These working dilutions were adjusted to be twice as concentrated for staining with BrdU (see “Labeling with BrdU” section).

NOTE—Typically, 200 μL of working antibody dilution are used per slide.

Labeling with EdU

EdU Click-IT reaction and labeling must be performed prior to co-staining with antibodies. Prepare the EdU reaction cocktail according to manufacturer’s instructions (C10337, Life Technologies), no more than 15 minutes before use. Apply to slides and incubate for 30 minutes at room temperature.

Wash slides by immersion in 1X PBS + 0.1% Tween 20 once for 5 minutes.

2a. NOTE—Reducing the number of washes from 3 (as per manufacturer’s instructions) to 1 significantly improves signal strength for weaker fluorophores such as Alexa350, without increasing background signal.

Incubate with Six2 and E-cad primary antibodies (both 1:400) in incubation buffer (3% donkey serum, 3% BSA, 0.1% Tween 20 in 1X PBS) overnight at 4°C.

Wash the slides by immersion once for 5 minutes with 0.1% Tween 20 in 1X PBS.

Incubate with anti-rabbit (1:100) and anti-rat (1:200) secondary antibodies at room temperature for 45 minutes.

Wash by immersion with 0.1% Tween 20 in 1X PBS once for 5 minutes.

Mount slides with a cover slip and mounting media.

Labeling with BrdU

NOTE—Slides must be incubated first with BrDU antibodies in BrDU incubation buffer (supplied with kit) followed by a wash prior to incubation with Six2 and E-Cadherin antibodies. The increased number of washes between incubations steps results in loss of signal strength, necessitating the use of higher concentrations of primary and secondary antibodies to generate sufficient co-staining signal intensity (Table 2).

Incubate each slide with 200 µL of distilled water with DNase (1 µL DNase/mL) for 2 minutes in a humidified incubation chamber at room temperature.

1a. NOTE—Incubation with DNase at this step is essential for high quality staining. DNases are highly unstable and can lose activity during routine handling if tubes are dropped or otherwise mishandled. Insufficient DNase digestion is a major cause of BrDU staining inconsistencies. It is therefore crucial to purchase certified quality DNase enzyme and to test each batch of DNase to confirm enzyme activity. Batches must be handled with extreme care and must be stored in small aliquots to prevent loss of activity due to repeated handling.

1b. NOTE—Optimal DNase incubation times must be empirically determined for each embryonic time-point.

Rinse the slides with BrdU wash solution (from kit 1:10 in distilled water) using a pipette.

Incubate with anti-BrdU antibody (1:10) in incubation buffer (from kit) for 45 minutes at room temperature.

Rinse with BrdU wash solution (from kit, 1:10 in distilled water) using a pipette.

Incubate slides with the secondary anti-mouse (1:10) antibody (from kit, diluted in the incubation buffer) for 45 minutes at room temperature.

Rinse the slides with 0.1% Tween 20 in 1X PBS using a pipette.

Incubate with Six2 and E-cad primary antibodies (both 1:200) in incubation buffer (3% donkey serum, 3% BSA, 0.1% Tween 20 in 1X PBS) overnight at 4°C.

Rinse with 0.1% Tween 20 in 1X PBS using a pipette.

Incubate with anti-rabbit (1:50) and anti-rat (1:100) secondary antibodies diluted in 1X PBS with 0.1% Tween 20 at room temperature for 45 minutes.

Rinse slides with 1X PBS using a pipette.

Mount slides with a coverslip and mounting media.

Label with PCNA

Incubate with Six2, E-cad (both 1:400) and PCNA (1:500) primary antibodies in incubation buffer (3% donkey serum, 3% BSA, 0.1% Tween 20 in 1X PBS) overnight at 4°C.

Wash the slides by immersion once for 5 minutes with 0.1% Tween 20 in 1X PBS.

Incubate with anti-rabbit (1:100), anti-rat (1:200), and anti-mouse (1:400) secondary antibodies at room temperature for 45 minutes.

Wash by immersion with 0.1% Tween 20 in 1X PBS once for 5 minutes.

Mount slides with a cover slip and mounting media.

Image Acquisition and Counting

Images are acquired at 40× magnification using a standard fluorescence or confocal microscope. The appropriate filter sets must be used to assure quality data. Here we have used a Zeiss AxioImager.A1 microscope with an AxioCamMRc digital camera, AxioVision Software, and Zeiss filter sets 20, 38, and 49. Digital images are manually counted using the free ImageJ Cell Counter Plugin or a similar image processing program. Importantly, digital cell counts may be reviewed for calibration purposes, to evaluate precision and/or possible counting bias. Automated or semi-automated cell counting programs are also available for purchase, but have additional hardware, software, and setup requirements, making them cost-prohibitive to smaller laboratories.

Image processing

For tissues older than embryonic day (E)13.5, multiple overlapping images can be taken and stitched together using Fiji/ImageJ software⁴⁷ as previously described.⁴⁸

1a. NOTE—E.14.5 kidneys require 15 to 20 images to capture the entire specimen, depending on the objective used.

1b. NOTE—Images should be saved with filenames corresponding to the order of acquisition to facilitate subsequent processing steps.

Use the Mosaic plugin in Fiji/ImageJ to consolidate each group of images into a single high-resolution image.

2a. NOTE—To obtain the clearest images, acquire a separate image for each color channel, then merge together using ImageJ. Pseudo-coloring may be applied to final images to assist deuteranope viewers in visualizing double-labeled sections.

Quantification

Using the Fiji/ImageJ software, lay a grid over the image to facilitate counting (Figure 5).

Use the Cell Counter Plugin in Fiji/ImageJ to manually tag and count stained cells for each color channel.

Figure 5.

A representative kidney section with nephron progenitor cells (NPC) labeled with Six2 (blue), ureteric bud cells (UB) labeled with E-cadherin (purple), and proliferating cells labeled with EdU (green).

Data Analysis

The ratio of cells labeled by the proliferation marker to total number of nephron progenitor cells (marker/NPC) or of ureteric bud cells (marker/UB) was calculated for each section. Mean values were calculated for each kidney and compared between groups by t test. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation.

Results and Discussion

Assessment of nephron progenitor cell proliferation is a critical parameter of kidney development in vivo. Here we have presented co-immunostaining protocols that we have optimized for BrdU, EdU, or PCNA, along with Six2 and E-cadherin to quantitatively assess in situ nephron progenitor cell and ureteric bud cell proliferation in embryonic murine kidney sections.

To compare the 3 methods in the same tissues, CD1 timed pregnant dams were injected with both BrdU and EdU at E14.5. Kidneys were collected from 5 embryos, processed, and sectioned. A minimum of 9 serial sagittal sections were taken near the midline of each kidney, where the first ureteric bifurcation could be seen, and 3 consecutive sections were stained for each method as described above. Digital images were captured, and the number of stained cells was quantified for each color channel. A nephron progenitor cell proliferation index was calculated as the ratio of Six2-positive, proliferation marker-positive cells to total number of Six2-positive cells. A ureteric bud cell proliferation index was likewise calculated as the ratio of E-cadherin-positive, proliferation marker-positive cells to total number of E-cadherin-positive cells.

The protocols outlined in the Methods section have each been optimized to yield unambiguous nuclear staining of cells for BrDU, EdU, or bound PCNA together with Six2 and E-cadherin co-staining of nephron progenitor and ureteric bud cells, respectively. Notwithstanding, each protocol has distinct advantages and disadvantages. BrdU staining has long been considered a gold standard marker for measuring cell proliferation, with an immense body of evidence supporting its use as such. This protocol in conjunction with Six2 and E-cadherin co-staining is the lengthiest and most technically challenging of the three to perform. Its most notable challenge relates to localized staining inconsistencies, namely, staining of some tissue sections and absence of staining of other tissue sections on the same slide. Staining inconsistencies are resolvable by increasing DNase concentrations (at the expense of tissue morphology), suggesting that the absence of staining may be due at least in part to localized failures in DNase-dependent antigen exposure in these tissue sections. In contrast, while there is a smaller body of literature supporting the use of bound PCNA or EdU as markers of cell proliferation, neither of these protocols suffer from the same staining inconsistencies as BrDU staining, and both are far simpler technically to perform. However, the added necessity of distinguishing the punctate PCNA staining pattern of S phase cells from non-S phase cells (Figure 6A) in the bound PCNA protocol substantially increases the amount time needed to quantitate cell proliferation using the bound PCNA method. (Figure 6A). In this context, the EdU protocol, though by virtue of being the most recent of the three to be introduced and thus having the smallest body of literature to lend itself—is both the most straightforward and rapid to perform. Another important caveat to recall is that of the 3 methods, the bound PCNA protocol alone can be performed retrospectively on fixed tissue as it does not require injection into the live animal.

Figure 6.

(A) Cell lineage-specific proliferation is detected in the developing kidney using BrDU, EdU, or bound PCNA proliferation markers together with Six2 and E-cadherin co-staining. Bar is 25 µm (B, C) Proliferation ratios observed for (B) nephron progenitor cells and (C) ureteric bud cells using each of the 3 methods. Data are presented as mean ± SD (N = 5 kidneys per group).

Similar indices of cell proliferation are detected using BrdU and EdU; however, data precision is higher with the BrdU protocol, as evidenced by lower relative standard deviation in this method compared with EdU (Figure 6B vs C). Interestingly, PCNA staining yields a significantly lower nephron progenitor cell proliferation index compared with BrdU. Whereas BrdU and EdU mark a larger population of cells including those in both S phase and G₂ phase, bound PCNA labels only S phase cells at the time of fixation, which may explain in part the lower proliferation index associated with this method.

In summary, we present this methods article to the nephrology community in the hopes of providing a useful and cost-effective resource to quantitatively assess in situ cell proliferation of multiple cell lineages during kidney development in vivo. Each of the 3 methods optimized and described above present distinct advantages and disadvantages, which must be considered within the specific scientific context of a given experiment (Table 3).

Table 3.

Comparative Summary of BrdU, EdU, and PCNA Staining for Use in Quantifying Progenitor Cell Proliferation in Embryonic Kidneys.

	BrdU	EdU	Bound PCNA
Experimental Setup	Must be injected into the animal prior to harvesting tissue; experiments must be planned out prospectively.	Must be injected into the animal prior to harvesting tissue; experiments must be planned out prospectively.	Can be performed retrospectively on banked tissue samples.
Quality of Signal	Major issue is differences in staining consistency between tissue sections even on the same slide.	Consistently clear signals. Brightest signal intensity of 3 methods.	Consistently clear signals.
Ease of Protocol	Time-consuming and complex protocol requiring DNase-dependent tissue denaturation and numerous incubations for BrdU labeling.	Rapid and does not require DNase-dependent tissue denaturation.	Shortest protocol of the 3 methods. Labeling can be performed in parallel with antibody co-staining.
Ease of Counting Cells	Labeled cells are easily identified.	Labeled cells are easily identified.	Additional time and skill is required to distinguish S phase (punctate) bound PCNA-positive cells from non-S phase free PCNA-positive cells. Ubiquitous free PCNA signal may interfere with Six2 and E-cadherin co-staining.

Note. BrdU = 5-bromo-2’-deoxyuridine; EdU = 5-ethynyl-2’-deoxyuridine; PCNA = proliferating cell nuclear antigen.

Footnotes

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge funding from CIHR and the Kidney Foundation of Canada as well as support from the KRESCENT Program and Time to Write initiative to S.H. through the University of Prince Edward Island.

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

The study protocol was approved by the research ethics board and Animal Care Committee at the University of Prince Edward Island.

Consent for Publication

Consent for publication has been provided by all authors.

Availability of Data and Materials

The data analyzed during this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This study was supported by grants from Kidney Foundation of Canada, CIHR (Grant numbers 615368, 615314).

ORCID iD

Sunny Hartwig

References

Al-Awqati

Oliver

. Stem cells in the kidney. Kidney Int. 2002;61:387-395.

Takasato

Little

. The origin of the mammalian kidney: implications for recreating the kidney in vitro. Development. 2015;142(11):1937-1947.

Kopan

Chen

Little

. Nephron progenitor cells: shifting the balance of self-renewal and differentiation. Curr Top Dev Biol. 2014;107:293-331.

Carroll

Das

. Defining the signals that constitute the nephron progenitor niche. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013;24(6):873-876.

Capone

Morello

Taroni

Montini

. Genetics of congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract: the current state of play. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18(4):16. doi:10.3390/ijms18040796.

Rodriguez

. Congenital anomalies of the kidney and the urinary tract (CAKUT). Fetal Pediatr Pathol. 2014;33:293-320.

Nicolaou

Renkema

Bongers Giles

Knoers

. Genetic, environmental, and epigenetic factors involved in CAKUT. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2015;11(12):720-731.

Pope

IV Brock

III Adams

Stephens

Ichikawa

. How they begin and how they end: classic and new theories for the development and deterioration of congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract, CAKUT. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1999;10(9):2018-2028.

Puddu

Fanos

Podda

Zaffanello

. The kidney from prenatal to adult life: perinatal programming and reduction of number of nephrons during development. Am J Nephrol. 2009;30(2):162-170.

10.

Hughson

Farris

III Douglas-Denton

Hoy

Bertram

. Glomerular number and size in autopsy kidneys: the relationship to birth weight. Kidney Int. 2003;63(6):2113-2122.

11.

Mackenzie

Brenner

. Fewer nephrons at birth: a missing link in the etiology of essential hypertension. Am J Kidney Dis. 1995;26(1):91-98.

12.

Brenner

Garcia

Anderson

. Glomeruli and blood pressure. Less of one, more the other? Am J Hypertens. 1988;1:335-347.

13.

Wang

Garrett

. Nephron number, hypertension, and CKD: physiological and genetic insight from humans and animal models. Physiol Genomics. 2017;49(3):180-192.

14.

Gurusinghe

Tambay

Sethna

. Developmental origins and nephron endowment in hypertension. Front Pediatr. 2017;5:151.

15.

Hughes

Bond

Brecher

, et al. Cellular proliferation in the mouse as revealed by autoradiography with tritiated thymidine. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1958;44(5):476-483.

16.

van Diest

Brugal

Baak

. Proliferation markers in tumours: interpretation and clinical value. J Clin Pathol. 1998;51(10):716-724.

17.

Arora

Min

, et al. EdU incorporation is an alternative non-radioactive assay to [(3)H]thymidine uptake for in vitro measurement of mice T-cell proliferations. J Immunol Methods. 2009;350:29-35.

18.

Salic

Mitchison

. A chemical method for fast and sensitive detection of DNA synthesis in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105(7):2415-2420.

19.

Woods

Levison

. The assessment of cellular proliferation by immunohistochemistry: a review of currently available methods and their applications. Histochem J. 1992;24(3):121-131.

20.

Miller

Min

Yang

, et al. Ki67 is a graded rather than a binary marker of proliferation versus quiescence. Cell Rep. 2018;24(5):1105-1112e5.

21.

Brown

Gatter

. Monoclonal antibody Ki-67: its use in histopathology. Histopathology. 1990;17:489-503.

22.

Hall

Levison

Woods

, et al. Proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) immunolocalization in paraffin sections: an index of cell proliferation with evidence of deregulated expression in some neoplasms. J Pathol. 1990;162(4):285-294.

23.

Heck

Earnshaw

. Topoisomerase II: a specific marker for cell proliferation. J Cell Biol. 1986;103(6, pt 2):2569-2581.

24.

Painter

. A replication model for sister-chromatid exchange. Mutat Res. 1980;70:337-341.

25.

Cockerill

Garrard

. Chromosomal loop anchorage of the kappa immunoglobulin gene occurs next to the enhancer in a region containing topoisomerase II sites. Cell. 1986;44(2):273-282.

26.

Earnshaw

Halligan

Cooke

Heck

Liu

. Topoisomerase II is a structural component of mitotic chromosome scaffolds. J Cell Biol. 1985;100(5):1706-1715.

27.

Gasser

Laroche

Falquet

, et al. Metaphase chromosome structure. Involvement of topoisomerase II. J Mol Biol. 1986;188:613-629.

28.

Aune

Stunes

Tingulstad

Salvesen

Syversen

Torp

. The proliferation markers Ki-67/MIB-1, phosphohistone H3, and survivin may contribute in the identification of aggressive ovarian carcinomas. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2011;4(5):444-453.

29.

Tapia

Kutzner

Mentzel

Savic

Baumhoer

Glatz

. Two mitosis-specific antibodies, MPM-2 and phospho-histone H3 (Ser28), allow rapid and precise determination of mitotic activity. Am J Surg Pathol. 2006;30(1):83-89.

30.

Lim

Kaldis

. Cdks, cyclins and CKIs: roles beyond cell cycle regulation. Development. 2013;140(15):3079-3093.

31.

Alison

. Assessing cellular proliferation: what’s worth measuring. Hum Exp Toxicol. 1995;14(12):935-944.

32.

Duronio

Xiong

. Signaling pathways that control cell proliferation. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2013;5:a008904.

33.

Stark

Taylor

. Analyzing the G2/M checkpoint. Methods Mol Biol. 2004;280:51-82.

34.

Wojtowicz

Kee

. BrdU assay for neurogenesis in rodents. Nat Protoc. 2006;1(3):1399-1405.

35.

Michael

Sweeney

Davies

. The lectin Dolichos biflorus agglutinin is a sensitive indicator of branching morphogenetic activity in the developing mouse metanephric collecting duct system. J Anat. 2007;210(1):89-97.

36.

Appel

Kershaw

Smeets

, et al. Recruitment of podocytes from glomerular parietal epithelial cells. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009;20(2):333-343.

37.

Basile

Friedrich

Spahic

, et al. Impaired endothelial proliferation and mesenchymal transition contribute to vascular rarefaction following acute kidney injury. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2011;300(3):F721.

38.

Oliver

Klinakis

Cheema

, et al. Proliferation and migration of label-retaining cells of the kidney papilla. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009;20(11):2315-2327.

39.

Oliver

Maarouf

Cheema

Martens

Al-Awqati

. The renal papilla is a niche for adult kidney stem cells. J Clin Invest. 2004;114(6):795-804.

40.

Smeets

Uhlig

Fuss

, et al. Tracing the origin of glomerular extracapillary lesions from parietal epithelial cells. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009;20(12):2604-2615.

41.

Suzuki

Isobe

Fujii

, et al. Cell proliferative activity in the kidney of young growing rat analyzed using flash and cumulative labeling with bromodeoxyuridine. J Toxicol Sci. 2010;35(5):631-637.

42.

Vogetseder

Picard

Gaspert

, et al. Proliferation capacity of the renal proximal tubule involves the bulk of differentiated epithelial cells. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2008;294:C22-C28.

43.

Welsh-Bacic

Nowik

Kaissling

Wagner

. Proliferation of acid-secretory cells in the kidney during adaptive remodelling of the collecting duct. PLoS One. 2011;6(10):e25240.

44.

Kann

Bae

Lenz

, et al. WT1 targets Gas1 to maintain nephron progenitor cells by modulating FGF signals. Development. 2015;142(7):1254-1266.

45.

Piscione

Rosenblum

. Elevated SMAD1/beta-catenin molecular complexes and renal medullary cystic dysplasia in ALK3 transgenic mice. Development. 2003;130(12):2753-2766.

46.

Cano-Gauci

Song

Yang

, et al. Glypican-3-deficient mice exhibit developmental overgrowth and some of the abnormalities typical of Simpson-Golabi-Behmel syndrome. J Cell Biol. 1999;146(1):255-264.

47.

Schindelin

Arganda-Carreras

Frise

, et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods. 2012;9(7):676-682.

48.

Arsenault

Miao

Jones

, et al. Estimation of total glomerular number using an integrated disector method in embryonic and postnatal kidneys. Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2014;1:12.

Three Optimized Methods for In Situ Quantification of Progenitor Cell Proliferation in Embryonic Kidneys Using BrdU,EdU,and PCNA

Abstract

Background:

Objective:

Methods:

Results:

Conclusions:

Keywords

What was known before

What this adds

Introduction

In Situ Detection of Cell Proliferation in the Developing Kidney

BrDU

EdU

Bound PCNA

Methods

Timed Embryos

Tissue Labeling, Collection, and Processing

Tissue Sectioning

Rehydrating, Antigen Retrieval, and Blocking Sections

Labeling of Sections

Labeling with EdU

Labeling with BrdU

Label with PCNA

Image Acquisition and Counting

Image processing

Quantification

Data Analysis

Results and Discussion

Footnotes

Acknowledgements

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

Consent for Publication

Availability of Data and Materials

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

Funding

ORCID iD

References