Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

French

Background:

Chronic kidney disease is more prevalent among First Nations people than in non-First Nations people. Emerging research suggests that First Nations people are subject to greater disease burden than non-First Nations people.

Objective:

We aimed to identify the severity of chronic kidney disease and quantify the geographical challenges of obtaining kidney care by Saskatchewan’s First Nations people.

Design:

This study is a retrospective analysis of the provincial electronic medical record clinical database from January 2012 to December 2013.

Setting:

The setting involved patients followed by the Saskatchewan provincial chronic kidney care program, run out of two clinics, one in Regina, SK, and one in Saskatoon, SK.

Patients:

The patients included 2478 individuals (379 First Nations and 2099 non-First Nations) who were older than 18 years old, resident in Saskatchewan, and followed by the provincial chronic kidney care program. First Nations individuals were identified by their Indigenous and Northern Affairs Canada (INAC) Number.

Measurements:

The demographics, prevalence, cause of end-stage renal disease, severity of chronic kidney disease, use of home-based therapies, and distance traveled for care among patients are reported.

Methods:

Data were extracted from the clinical database used for direct patient care (the provincial electronic medical record database for the chronic kidney care program), which is prospectively managed by the health care staff. Actual distance traveled by road for each patient was estimated by a Geographic Information System Analyst in the First Nations and Inuit Health Branch of Health Canada.

Results:

Compared with non-First Nations, First Nations demonstrate a higher proportion of end-stage renal disease (First Nations = 33.0% vs non-First Nations = 21.4%, P < .001), earlier onset of chronic kidney disease (M_FN = 56.4 years, SD = 15.1; M_NFN = 70.6 years, SD = 14.7, P < .001), and higher rates of end-stage renal disease secondary to type 2 diabetes (First Nations = 66.1% vs non-First Nations = 39.0%, P < .001). First Nations people are also more likely to be on dialysis (First Nations = 69.7% vs non-First Nations = 40.2%, P < .001), use home-based therapies less frequently (First Nations = 16.2% vs non-First Nations = 25.7%; P = 003), and must travel farther for treatment (P < .001), with First Nations being more likely than non-First Nations to have to travel greater than 200 km.

Limitations:

Patients who are followed by their primary care provider or solely through their nephrologist’s office for their chronic kidney disease would not be included in this study. Patients who self-identify as Aboriginal or Indigenous without an INAC number would not be captured in the First Nations cohort.

Conclusions:

In Saskatchewan, First Nations’ burden of chronic kidney disease reveals higher severity, utilization of fewer home-based therapies, and longer travel distances than their non-First Nations counterparts. More research is required to identify innovative solutions within First Nations partnering communities.

Keywords

First Nation chronic kidney disease dialysis modality travel burden quality of life

What was known before

First Nation people have higher incidence and prevalence of chronic kidney disease than non-First Nation people. In other provinces, this is also reflected in higher burden of disease indicated by higher rates of severe disease. In addition, recent gross estimates of travel burden suggest that First Nation people travel longer distances for care.

What this adds

This is the first study in Saskatchewan to highlight that the First Nations people of Saskatchewan are burdened with higher severity of chronic kidney disease than non-First Nation people. Furthermore, using geomatically derived estimates of actual distance via highway, this study supports that First Nations people are also burdened with traveling longer distances for kidney care.

Introduction

Chronic kidney disease (CKD), and its related comorbidities, is more prevalent among First Nations than non-First Nations people, and at diagnosis, First Nations people present with more advanced disease.^1-3 Among CKD patients who progress to end-stage renal disease, treatment choices impacting quality of life can contribute to disease burden. Patients with end-stage renal disease choose a renal replacement therapy, ie, dialysis or transplantation, or, alternatively, choose a palliative care approach. Dialysis therapies include peritoneal dialysis or hemodialysis and may be delivered in a skilled nursing facility at an urban center (“in-center”), in an affiliated rural center (satellite), or, if qualified, within the patient’s home. Patients utilizing home peritoneal dialysis are more satisfied with treatment and minimize their transportation and treatment time.^4-7 First Nations people appear less likely to initiate home peritoneal dialysis,⁸ but the reasons for this are unclear. Chronic kidney disease burden may also be reflected in First Nations’ access to care; however, a formal analysis of the burden of travel due to CKD has not yet been completed in Saskatchewan. Previous literature suggests that First Nations travel farther than non-First Nations to access care from primary care providers,¹ yet kidney health services are concentrated in urban areas, with 75% of hemodialysis patients receiving in-center hemodialysis in Regina or Saskatoon.⁹ Understanding the burden of CKD in First Nations people is important to delivering quality, culturally competent care to First Nations people.

Our current understanding of the burden of CKD in aboriginal and indigenous communities in Canada reveals that severe CKD is nearly 2-fold higher in neighboring prairies provinces of Manitoba and Alberta.^10,11 As expected, the main risk factors for CKD include diabetes and hypertension. International literature reveals similar findings in several Native American populations^12,13 as well as Australian indigenous populations.¹⁴ Interestingly, differences in rates of CKD and comorbid risk factors do occur within regional boundaries of the Northern Territory of Australia.¹⁴ This would suggest that it is important to identify regional differences as potential solutions may need to address these differences. Within Canada, contemporary studies of CKD burden in Saskatchewan have been limited.

Using Saskatchewan’s Chronic Kidney Disease Program and the provincial clinical hemodialysis databases, which are used for direct patient care and have a large number of variables related to processes of care, we proposed to investigate relevant epidemiological data to understand key differences in CKD between First Nations and non-First Nations populations. The aim of this study was to clarify the current landscape of CKD burden in First Nations people using demographic data and exploring access to care via dialysis modality and estimates of travel distances. Our primary research question was whether there was an overall difference between First Nations and non-First Nations people in Saskatchewan with respect to disease burden of CKD. Based on the previous literature¹⁵ and clinical experience, we hypothesized that First Nations people would carry a higher disease burden, as defined by stage of CKD, choice of dialysis modality, and required travel distances for dialysis. Using a clinical database, which is used and maintained by trained practitioners in direct patient care, we would anticipate that our data would more accurately reflect the true disease burden than an administrative billing database which informs the current literature. Furthermore, previous studies have analyzed distances traveled via “as-the-crow flies”¹⁶ whereas our study used geomatical methods to estimate actual ground travel; therefore, our study presents a more realistic picture of travel burden. For the purposes of this study, we were predominantly concerned with the overall differences in disease burden on the First Nations communities, rather than specific contributory factors to the development and progression of CKD.

Methods

Study Design

This observational, cross-sectional design study included all individuals receiving care for CKD in Saskatchewan over a 2-year period. This study received ethics approval through the Federation of Saskatchewan Indians Nations (FSIN; now Federation of Sovereign Indian Nations) and research ethics approval from the Regina Qu’Appelle Health Region (RQHR) and the University of Saskatchewan (including Saskatoon Health Region) via Saskatchewan’s provincial harmonized research ethics review process.

This study was performed in cooperation with FSIN and it is in keeping with the First Nations Principles of Ownership, Control, Access and Possession, OCAP®. (OCAP® is a registered trademark of the First Nations Information Governance Centre, www.FNIGC.ca/OCAP.)

Inclusion criteria were age older than 18 years; receiving kidney care in the province between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2013; having CKD with a valid International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM, 1996); and residence within the province of Saskatchewan. Exclusion criteria were diagnosis of acute kidney injury, incomplete or inaccurate ICD-9-CM, or those codes that did not reliably specify the chronicity of kidney disease. See Appendix A for a flowchart demonstrating application of the inclusion/exclusion criteria, and Appendices B-C and D-E for the included and excluded ICD-9-CM codes, respectively.

ICD (International Classification of Diseases) Codes were used to establish the diagnosis of CKD and then individuals were staged via estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) status and First Nations status.

Data Sources

Collected data included demographic characteristics (age, gender), disease characteristics (stage of CKD, use of dialysis), comorbid disease, and an estimate of distance traveled for treatment. For this study, First Nations people were defined as Registered First Nations with an Indigenous and Northern Affairs Canada (INAC) Number; all others were defined as non-First Nations. Data were collected at the start of the study period on January 01, 2012, and again at the end of the study period on December 31, 2013.

All kidney health care in Saskatchewan is coordinated through the Saskatoon and Regina nephrology programs. Staff at both locations prospectively manage the clinical CKD and hemodialysis databases, which include all patients enrolled in the CKD and renal replacement programs (including in-center hemodialysis, satellite hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis, home hemodialysis, and transplant services). Data were extracted from these databases by kidney program staff and de-identified.

Distance traveled by each client to access services was estimated courtesy of a Geographic Information System analyst in the First Nations and Inuit Health Branch (FNIHB) of Health Canada, Alberta Region. This analyst calculated actual distance traveled by road via the shortest distance possible between a patient’s home residence (based on postal code) and their treatment location.

Statistical Analyses

Inferential statistics (chi-squares, independent-samples t tests, analysis of variance [ANOVA]) were used to determine whether significant differences existed between First Nations and non-First Nations. Unless otherwise stated, the valid percentage is used where missing data are present.

Results

Demographics and CKD Features

There were significant differences in sex distribution and age in First Nations versus non-First Nations (Table 1). Although there were a higher proportion of men with CKD than women in both groups, this difference was more pronounced in the non-First Nations group. Women represented a higher proportion of the CKD population within First Nations than non-First Nations. Among people with CKD, First Nations people are, on average, 14 years younger than non-First Nations.

Table 1.

Demographic Data and Indicators of Disease Burden of CKD in Saskatchewan (N = 2478).

	First Nations(n = 379)	Non-First Nations(n = 2099)	χ² or t (P)
Gender (male), N (%)	205 (54.1)	1256 (59.9)	$χ_{1}^{2}$ = 4.428 (.035)
Mean age, years (SD)	56.4 (15.1)	70.6 (14.7)	t₂₄₇₆ = −17.162 (.001, two-tailed)
Population in Saskatchewan, 2011	103 205^a	905 550^b
CKD secondary to type 2 diabetes, N (%)	250 (66.1)	818 (39.0)	$χ_{1}^{2}$ = 95.375 (.001)
Patients receiving any dialysis modality,^c N (%)	264 (69.7)	844 (40.2)	$χ_{1}^{2}$ = 112.612 (.001)
Patients who received renal transplant, N (%)	6 (1.7)	22 (1.4)	$χ_{1}^{2}$ = 0.212 (.645)
Age at death, years (SD)	61.9 (13.3)	75.6 (11.6)	t₂₀₅₂ = -15.422 (.001)

Note. Percentages may not equal 100% due to rounding; where total N does not equal 2478, this is due to missing data points. CKD = chronic kidney disease.

Statistics Canada.¹⁷

Statistics Canada.¹⁷ Calculated from total population of 1 008 760—First Nation population of 103 205 = 905 550, this value would include those who identify as Metis, Inuit, or with dual aboriginal identities.

Includes conventional hemodialysis, satellite or home hemodialysis, etc.

Type 2 diabetes was the leading cause of CKD in First Nations people, significantly more frequently than for non-First Nations (Table 1). We explored other causes of CKD, such as glomerular disease, but the rate of CKD due to glomerular causes was not statistically significant between First Nations and non-First Nations, potentially due to small sample size.

In this snapshot of relative disease burden, First Nations people presented with more severe cases of CKD (defined as stage 5) overall than did non-First Nations people (Figure 1). A post hoc analysis of the adjusted residuals (AdjR) demonstrates that First Nations are underrepresented in the CKD 1 stage (AdjR = −4.0) and overrepresented in the CKD 5 stage (AdjR = 2.3). A significantly higher proportion of First Nations patients received dialysis of any type.

Figure 1.

Distribution of chronic kidney disease stages among First Nations and non-First Nations patients in Saskatchewan followed by the Saskatchewan chronic kidney disease program (comparing stage 5 First Nations people and non-First Nations people demonstrated significant differences [ $χ_{4}^{2}$ = 26.295, P < .001]).

A 2 (First Nations status) × 5 (chronic kidney disease stage) factorial ANOVA showed a significant main effect for CKD stage, F_4,1020 = 4.407, P = .002 with regard to patient age (Figure 2). Post hoc analyses revealed that there were significant differences (P < .05) between stage 1 and all other stages, as well as between stages 4 and 5. There was also a significant main effect for First Nations status, F_1,1020 = 18.160, P < .001. The interaction between First Nations status and CKD stage was nonsignificant, F_4,1020 = 1.026, P = .393.

Figure 2.

Mean age of First Nations and non-First Nations patients at each stage of chronic kidney disease at end of study.

A higher proportion of First Nations people are on any form of dialysis, but there was no difference in rates of kidney transplantation between First Nations and non-First Nations people (Table 1). The average age of death for First Nations people with CKD is 13.7 years younger than non-First Nations people (independent samples) (Table 1).

Dialysis Modality and Location; Estimates of Travel

There was a significant difference between First Nations and non-First Nations people with respect to in-center dialysis versus dialysis in a satellite center versus in-home dialysis (Figure 3). A greater proportion of First Nations people received dialysis at a satellite location (AdjR = 3.2), but utilized home dialysis significantly less frequently than did non-First Nations people (AdjR = −2.6). Groups did not differ in their use of in-center urban dialysis (AdjR = ±0.9).

Figure 3.

Site of dialysis treatment for First Nations and non-First Nations chronic kidney disease patients.

First Nations and non-First Nations differed in distance traveled for all kidney services (Figure 4). First Nations are less likely than non-First Nations to travel 50 km or fewer for kidney services (AdjR = −6.3). Conversely, First Nations are more likely to travel 200 km or greater for kidney services (AdjR = 8.6). These findings are also reflected in the difference traveled by First Nations and non-First Nations for dialysis only.

Figure 4.

Distance traveled for dialysis alone (top panel) or to any kidney service (bottom panel) including to nephrologist’s office, dialysis site, etc by the First Nations and non-First Nations chronic kidney disease patients (dialysis only: $χ_{3}^{2}$ = 44.058, P < .001; all services: $χ_{3}^{2}$ = 78.195, P < .001).

Interpretation

Main Findings

Our analysis shows that First Nations people have CKD at an earlier age and have more severe stages of CKD than non-First Nations people in Saskatchewan. Chronic kidney disease secondary to type 2 diabetes is more prevalent in First Nations people. First Nations people are more likely to require dialysis, and travel further to receive kidney health services and dialysis. First Nations people die with CKD nearly 14 years younger than non-First Nations people.

Comparison With Other Studies

First Nations people in Saskatchewan face significant geographical challenges, which are reflected in increased distances to participate in their care based on the actual distance traveled. Previous studies¹⁶ have only compared distance “as-the-crow flies,” whereas this study used Geographical Information System data to capture actual distance required for travel based on geographical landscape. An additional strength of this analysis was the use of the provincial kidney database. This database is the bedside electronic patient medical record system, maintained by trained medical professionals, and reflects all patients being cared for within the kidney health program in the province. Since an administrative (Ministry of Health billing database) was not used, the ICD codes, diagnosis, and patient data would be expected to be more reflective of the actual clinical picture than data found within a billing database. This was the first time a nonadministrative database has been analyzed in Saskatchewan for this purpose. Our results are in keeping with analyses completed by Dyck et al^2,3,15 who utilized the administrative database. Their analyses showed that First Nations patients are younger, are more likely to be diagnosed with type 2 diabetes if they are female, and have more severe kidney disease than non-First Nations.

First Nations people also underutilize home dialysis treatment modalities. This is surprising, as First Nations live in more rural areas in the province and it would be expected that use of home modalities would be maximized in those who have the greatest geographical challenges.¹⁶ Our study agreed with Tonelli et al⁸ who found in Alberta that First Nations underutilized home dialysis. The reasons for this, however, are unclear. The underutilization of kidney program resources such as home therapies in the province of Saskatchewan requires a better effort to identify barriers and implement successful service delivery. Recent research has identified that Aboriginal and First Nations patients are at higher risk of infectious complications of peritoneal dialysis^18,19; however, these are preventable complications with adequate support and care. In Ontario and Manitoba, financial concerns and anxiety were the main barriers to utilization of peritoneal dialysis.²⁰ Therefore, more work needs to be done to identify the barriers to providing equitable home services within First Nations communities compared with their non-First Nations counterparts.

It is noteworthy that in this study, the proportion of First Nations people in the severe stages of CKD is higher than in the non-First Nations people. Similarly, in this cohort, a higher proportion of First Nations people were dialysis dependent compared with non-First Nations people, indicating a higher severity of kidney disease. The reasons for this are unknown, but may reflect the need for a better upstream approach and engagement for both the prevention of kidney disease (and type 2 diabetes) and its progression. In the indigenous population of Manitoba,^11,21,22 where higher rates of CKD were also reported, a greater severity of proteinuria was identified, a factor which would predict faster progression to end-stage renal disease. In Alberta, a higher incidence of end-stage renal disease was identified and predicted an increased risk of death.¹⁰ It is notable that our findings are consistent with these neighboring provinces and suggests there may be common challenges and solutions between the Prairie Provinces in Canada where high proportions of First Nations people reside.

Limitations

This was a retrospective study using existing data within a clinical database. One of the limitations of the study is that this database does not capture data from any patients who are not followed by the chronic kidney health program (ie, patients followed solely through a nephrologist’s office or a primary care provider). However, it would be expected that primary care providers and nephrologists would refer patients with more severe kidney failure to be followed in the chronic kidney program. In contrast, all kidney patients on dialysis or who received a kidney transplant are captured in this database.

A strength of this study is that the presence or absence of an INAC number was used to determine First Nations status, eliminating subjectivity and concerns about missing ethnicity data. Previous work in Manitoba²³ suggested that the Indian Registry (which is based on the INAC number, formerly the Department of Indian Affairs and Northern Development [DIAND] number) is the most inclusive identifier for First Nations people in Manitoba, resulting in identification of 20% more First Nations people compared with Manitoba Health identifier. Regardless, patients who self-identify as Indigenous, without an INAC number, were coded in our study as non-First Nations. If those who self-identify as indigenous shared similar health disparities with registered First Nations, one would consider that this would dampen the effect on our results. Previous work by Gao et al in 2007 in Alberta reported on rates of CKD in First Nations communities, identifying First Nations peoples as those registered under the Federal Indian Act; however, it is unclear by which First Nations indicator was used to confirm registration.

An additional limitation is the use of ICD-9-CM codes to determine inclusion and exclusion criteria. We recognize that ICD codes within a billing database may not accurately reflect or may omit specific information; however, in our case, the clinical database is an electronic medical record used for direct patient care and is maintained by trained clinicians. We would anticipate that since our databases are maintained by trained clinicians for the purposes of patient care and management, the data would be more reflective of the actual disease burden (and therefore, more accurate) than in previously studied administrative databases used for billing purposes.

A significant limitation was the volume of missing data points within the data set. In particular, missing data to capture stage of CKD at the beginning and end of the study period resulted in a large number of cases being excluded in some analyses (at times, more than 50% of the sample). It would be beneficial to review the data capture process for the provincial renal database to ensure that each site is collecting and recording data consistently and regularly.

Differences in referral practices may have resulted in delayed identification of patients to the multidisciplinary CKD clinic. Referral practices vary across the province at the discretion of the primary care practitioners and local internal medicine experts. Indeed, this may introduce bias in the study population, which is potentially impacted by rural versus urban expertise, or ability to access primary care. To our knowledge, there was no standardized instrument for referral in Saskatchewan during the time period when this study was conducted.

Conclusions and Implications for Practice and Further Research

First Nations people of Saskatchewan have a high proportion of kidney disease with significant morbidity. However, given the significant limitation of missing data particularly relating to stage of disease at the beginning and end of the study, we acknowledge that more research is needed to determine contributory factors, which in turn can help identify opportunities for improved service delivery among First Nations people. In particular, it would be informative to perform in-depth analysis within the province to identify communities with an excessive burden of disease.

National guidelines recommend screening programs to detect CKD in at-risk populations, including indigenous peoples or those with comorbid conditions such as diabetes and hypertension. Current efforts in Manitoba involve identifying opportunities for triage and screening within First Nations communities.^21,22 Komenda et al identified in the Finished Screening study that remote indigenous populations with less access to primary care demonstrated higher rates of treatable CKD. Replicating this model in Saskatchewan may identify geographic areas of highest need. It follows that additional work to highlight potential impacts of treatment on the progression of CKD would also be helpful. However, a pan-Canadian effort to identify potential variations in epidemiological and demographic contributors to CKD interprovincially and to identify and address barriers to treatment is required to ensure that regional differences are considered and addressed. The barriers to providing kidney health services among First Nations people needs further study and innovative initiatives within First Nations partnering communities such as increased utilization of specialized nurse practitioners, investment in telehealth technologies to reduce travel burden, training of First Nation health practitioners, and development of local programs and expertise. Current research includes development of a screening program for First Nations people within a multidisciplinary environment to identify people at risk of CKD and offering timely referral to specialized nephrology care.^21,22 The challenge is not only to improve delivery of kidney health programs but also the effective implementation of primary prevention initiatives to delay the onset of type 2 diabetes in First Nations people.

Footnotes

Appendix A

Appendix B

Appendix C

Appendix D

Appendix E

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to acknowledge the support of Wilson Sutherland and Kyle Prettyshield from the Federation of Sovereign Indian Nations (FSIN) of First Nations and Inuit Health Branch (FNIHB)–Alberta Region for Geographic Information System (GIS) analysis support and project guidance, and the support of the Saskatchewan Health Authority (formerly the Regina Qu’Appelle Health Region).

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work is generously funded by a grant from the First Nations and Inuit Health Branch (FNIHB)–Saskatchewan Region.

References

End-stage renal disease among Aboriginal peoples in Canada: treatment and outcomes. Canadian Institutes for Health Information. https://secure.cihi.ca/free_products/EndStageRenalDiseaseAiB-ENweb.pdf. Published February, 2013. Accessed May 31, 2016.

Dyck

Osgood

Lin

Gao

Stang

Epidemiology of diabetes mellitus among First Nations and non-First Nations adults. CMAJ. 2010;182(3):249-256.

Dyck

Naqshbandi Hayward

Harris

Prevalence, determinants and co-morbidities of chronic kidney disease among First Nations adults with diabetes: results from the CIRCLE study. BMC Nephrol. 2012;13(1):57.

Barendse

Speight

Bradley

The Renal Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (RTSQ): a measure of satisfaction with treatment for chronic kidney failure. Am J Kidney Dis. 2005;45(3):572-579.

Juergensen

Wuerth

Finkelstein

et al . Hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis: patients’ assessment of their satisfaction with therapy and the impact of the therapy on their lives. Send to Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006;1(6):1191-1196.

Wasserfallen

Moinat

Halabi

et al . Satisfaction of patients on chronic haemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis. Swiss Med Wkly. 2004;136:13-14.

Rubin

Fink

Plantinga

et al . Patient ratings of dialysis care with peritoneal dialysis vs hemodialysis. JAMA. 2004;291(6):697.

Tonelli

Hemmelgarn

Manns

et al . Use and outcomes of peritoneal dialysis among Aboriginal people in Canada. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005;16(2):482-488.

Marko

Whitehead

Clarke

Ugolini

Muhammad

Medical Health Officer Report: Diabetes in Saskatoon Health Region. Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada: Saskatoon Health Region. https://www.saskatoonhealthregion.ca/locations_services/Services/Health-Observatory/Documents/Reports-Publications/SHR_Diabetes_Report_August2011.pdf. Published 2011. Accessed May 31, 2016.

10.

Gao

Manns

Culleton

et al . Prevalence of chronic kidney disease and survival among Aboriginal people. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2007;18(11):2953-2959.

11.

Zacharias

Young

Riediger

Roulette

Bruce

Prevalence, risk factors and awareness of albuminuria on a Canadian First Nation: a community-based screening study. BMC Publ Health. 2012;12(1):290.

12.

Nelson

Saad

Knowler

Bennett

Pettitt

Diabetic kidney disease in Pima Indians. Diabetes Care. 2018;16(supp 1):335-341.

13.

Shah

Scavini

Stidley

et al . Epidemic of diabetic and nondiabetic renal disease among the Zuni Indians: the Zuni Kidney Project. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2003;14(5):1320-1329.

14.

Hoy

Kondalsamy-Chennakesavan

Scheppingen

Sharma

Kidney and related chronic disease profiles and risk factors in three remote Australian Aboriginal communities. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 2005;12(1):64-70.

15.

Jiang

Osgood

Lim

Stang

Dyck

Differential mortality and the excess burden of end-stage renal disease among First Nations people with diabetes mellitus: a competing-risks analysis. CMAJ. 2013;186(2):103-109.

16.

Wang

Maciejewski

Coffman

et al . Impacts of geographic distance on peritoneal dialysis utilization: refining models of treatment selection. Health Serv Res. 2016;52(1):35-55.

17.

Statistics Canada. Saskatchewan (Code 47) (Table). National Household Survey (NHS) Profile. 2011 National Household Survey. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. http://www12.statcan.gc.ca/nhs-enm/2011/dp-pd/prof/index.cfm?Lang=E.StatisticsCanadaCatalogueno.99-004-XWE. Released September 11, 2013. Accessed May 13, 2018.

18.

Hildebrand

Komenda

Miller

et al . Peritonitis and exit site infections in First Nations patients on peritoneal dialysis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010;5(11):1988-1995.

19.

Sood

Komenda

Sood

et al . Adverse outcomes among Aboriginal patients receiving peritoneal dialysis. CMAJ. 2010;182(13):1433-1439.

20.

Mathew

Park

Sachdeva

Sood

Yeates

. Barriers to peritoneal dialysis in Aboriginal patients. Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2018;5:1-9. doi: 10.1177/2054358117747261

21.

Komenda

Lavallee

Ferguson

et al . The prevalence of CKD in rural Canadian Indigenous peoples: results from the First Nations community based screening to improve kidney health and prevent dialysis (FINISHED) screen, triage, and treat program. Am J Kidney Dis. 2016;68(4):582-590.

22.

Lavallee

Chartrand

McLeod

et al . Mass screening for chronic kidney disease in rural and remote Canadian First Nations people: methodology and demographic characteristics. Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2015;2:9.

23.

Jebamani

Burchill

Martens

PJ.

Using data linkage to identify First Nations Manitobans: technical, ethical, and political issues. Can J Public Health. 2005;96(suppl 1):S28-S32.

A Retrospective Study of Chronic Kidney Disease Burden in Saskatchewan’s First Nations People

Abstract

Background:

Objective:

Design:

Setting:

Patients:

Measurements:

Methods:

Results:

Limitations:

Conclusions:

Keywords

What was known before

What this adds

Introduction

Methods

Study Design

Data Sources

Statistical Analyses

Results

Demographics and CKD Features

Dialysis Modality and Location; Estimates of Travel

Interpretation

Main Findings

Comparison With Other Studies

Limitations

Conclusions and Implications for Practice and Further Research

Footnotes

Appendix A

Appendix B

Appendix C

Appendix D

Appendix E

Acknowledgements

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

Funding

References