Older adults living with complex care needs are often hospitalized due to poor community support. Recommendations for improving patient and family experiences include having a patient navigator to support patients and caregivers in hospital and community settings. This study aimed to report on older adults’ and caregivers’ experiences of receiving services from a hospital-to-home patient navigation program.
Methods
A qualitative descriptive study was conducted. Telephone interviews were conducted with 14 older adults with complex care needs or their family caregivers in Toronto, Ontario from 2020 to 2021. Data were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis.
Results
Four themes were identified: (1) Initial Hesitancy; (2) Meeting Evolving Needs; (3) Unexpected Benefits of Patient Navigation; and (4) The Value of Patient Navigation in Sustaining Aging-in-Place. Participants viewed all their interactions with the navigator as positive, and perceived navigators improved their quality of care.
Discussion
These study findings suggest that patient navigators may be well-positioned to address gaps in services around psychosocial support and care coordination while also encouraging self-management in older adults with complex care needs.
KokoreliasKMShiers-HanleyJERiosJ, et al.Factors influencing the implementation of patient navigation programs for adults with complex needs: a scoping review of the literature. Health Serv Insights2021; 14: 11786329211033267.
2.
FunkLMDansereauLNovekS. Carers as system navigators: exploring sources, processes and outcomes of structural burden. Gerontologist2019; 59: 426–435.
3.
AlexanderKOliverSBennettSG, et al. “Falling between the cracks”: experiences of black dementia caregivers navigating US health systems. J Am Geriatr Soc2022; 70: 592–600.
4.
McGiltonKSVellaniSYeungL, et al.Identifying and understanding the health and social care needs of older adults with multiple chronic conditions and their caregivers: a scoping review. BMC Geriatr2018; 18: 1–33.
5.
BaxterSJohnsonMChambersD, et al.The effects of integrated care: a systematic review of UK and international evidence. BMC Health Serv Res2018; 18: 1–13.
6.
JonesABronskillSESeowH, et al.Associations between continuity of primary and specialty physician care and use of hospital-based care among community-dwelling older adults with complex care needs. PloS one2020; 15: e0234205.
7.
GröneOGarcia-BarberoM. Integrated care: a position paper of the WHO European office for integrated health care services. Int J Integr Care2001; 1: e21.
8.
SchultzEMMcDonaldKM. What is care coordination?International Journal of Care Coordination2014; 17: 5–24.
9.
Gilmore-BykovskyiALRobertsTJKingBJ, et al.Transitions from hospitals to skilled nursing facilities for persons with dementia: a challenging convergence of patient and system-level needs. Gerontologist2017; 57: 867–879.
10.
CebulRDRebitzerJBTaylorLJ, et al.Organizational fragmentation and care quality in the US healthcare system. Journal of Economic Perspectives2008; 22: 93–113.
11.
MartensMDanhieuxKVan BelleS, et al.Integration or fragmentation of health care? Examining policies and politics in a Belgian case study. International Journal of Health Policy and Management–2022; 11: 1668–1681.
12.
LiebzeitDRutkowskiRArbajeAI, et al.A scoping review of interventions for older adults transitioning from hospital to home. J Am Geriatr Soc2021; 69: 2950–2962.
13.
TolesMLeemanJMcKayMH, et al.Adapting the connect-home transitional care intervention for the unique needs of people with dementia and their caregivers: a feasibility study. Geriatr Nurs2022; 48: 193–198.
14.
LaugalandKAaseKBarachP. Interventions to improve patient safety in transitional care–a review of the evidence. Work (Reading, Mass)2012; 41: 2915–2924.
15.
GoldsteinJNHicksLSKolmP, et al.Is the care transitions measure associated with readmission risk? Analysis from a single academic center. J Gen Intern Med2016; 31: 732–738.
16.
Schick-MakaroffKKarimi-DehkordiMCuthbertsonL, et al.Using patient-and family-reported outcome and experience measures across transitions of care for frail older adults living at home: a meta-narrative synthesis. Gerontologist2021; 61: e23–e38.
17.
FacchinettiGD’AngeloDPireddaM, et al.Continuity of care interventions for preventing hospital readmission of older people with chronic diseases: a meta-analysis. Int J Nurs Stud2020; 101: 103396.
18.
ParkMLeeMJeongH, et al.Patient-and family-centered care interventions for improving the quality of health care: a review of systematic reviews. Int J Nurs Stud2018; 87: 69–83.
19.
Roland KBMillikenELRohan, et al.Use of community health workers and patient navigators to improve cancer outcomes among patients served by federally qualified health centers: a systematic literature review. Health Equity2017; 1(1): 61–76.
20.
BrowneTDarnellJEstes SavageT, et al.Social workers as patient navigators: a review of the literature. Soc Work Res2015; 39: 158–166.
21.
BuddeHWilliamsGAWinkelmannJ, et al.The role of patient navigators in ambulatory care: overview of systematic reviews. BMC Health Serv Res2021; 21: 1–12.
22.
McBrienKAIversNBarniehL, et al.Patient navigators for people with chronic disease: a systematic review. PLoS One2018; 13: e0191980.
23.
KellyKDoucetSLukeA. Exploring the roles, functions, and background of patient navigators and case managers: a scoping review. Int J Nurs Stud2019; 98: 27–47.
24.
WellsKJCampbellKKumarA, et al.Effects of patient navigation on satisfaction with cancer care: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Support Care Cancer2018; 26: 1369–1382.
25.
PaskettEDHarropJPWellsKJ. Patient navigation: an update on the state of the science. CA Cancer J Clin2011; 61: 237–249.
26.
RanaghanCBoyleKMeehanM, et al.Effectiveness of a patient navigator on patient satisfaction in adult patients in an ambulatory care setting: a systematic review. JBI Evidence Synthesis2016; 14: 172–218.
27.
BernardoBMZhangXBeverly HeryCM, et al.The efficacy and cost-effectiveness of patient navigation programs across the cancer continuum: a systematic review. Cancer2019; 125: 2747–2761.
28.
BriggsAMValentijnPPThiyagarajanJA, et al.Elements of integrated care approaches for older people: a review of reviews. BMJ open2018; 8: e021194.
29.
ReidMCEcclestonCPillemerK. Management of chronic pain in older adults. Br Med J2015; (feb13 2): h532.
30.
WidemanM. Geriatric care management: role, need, and benefits. Home Healthc Now2012; 30: 553–559.
31.
CounsellSRCallahanCMClarkDO, et al.Geriatric care management for low-income seniors: a randomized controlled trial. Jama2007; 298: 2623–2633.
32.
KokoreliasKMDasGuptaTHitzigSL. Designing the ideal patient navigation program for older adults with complex needs: a qualitative exploration of the preferences of key informants. J Appl Gerontol2021; 41(4): 1002–1010.
33.
KokoreliasKMGouldSDasGuptaT, et al.Assessing readiness to implement patient navigator programs in Toronto, Canada. J Eval Clin Pract2021; 28(4): 550–557.
34.
HudsonAPSpoonerAJBoothN, et al.Qualitative insights of patients and carers under the care of nurse navigators. Collegian (Royal College of Nursing, Australia) 2019; 26 (1): 110–117.
35.
Perez-BustosAHOrozco-UrdanetaMErazoR, et al.A patient navigation initiative to improve access to breast cancer care in cali, Colombia. Cancer Rep2021: e1564.
36.
LukeALuckKEDoucetS. Experiences of caregivers as clients of a patient navigation program for children and youth with complex care needs: A qualitative descriptive study. Int J Integr Care2020; 20(4): 1–10.
37.
SandelowskiM. What’s in a name? Qualitative description revisited. Res Nurs Health2010; 33: 77–84.
38.
NeergaardMAOlesenFAndersenRS, et al.Qualitative description–the poor cousin of health research?BMC Med Res Methodol2009; 9: 1–5.
39.
BraunVClarkeV. To saturate or not to saturate? Questioning data saturation as a useful concept for thematic analysis and sample-size rationales. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health2021; 13: 201–216.
40.
BraunVClarkeV. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol2006; 3: 77–101.
41.
LincolnYSGubaEG. But is it rigorous? Trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation. New Directions for Program Evaluation1986; 1986: 73–84.
42.
WellsKJBattagliaTADudleyDJ, et al.Patient navigation: state of the art or is it science?Cancer2008; 113: 1999–2010.
43.
GrayCSTangTArmasA, et al.Building a digital bridge to support patient-centered care transitions from hospital to home for older adults with complex care needs: protocol for a co-design, implementation, and evaluation study. JMIR Res Protoc2020; 9: e20220.
44.
ArzénK-ECervinAEkerJ, et al.An introduction to control and scheduling co-design. In: Proceedings of the 39th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (Cat No 00CH37187) 2000, pp.4865–4870. IEEE.
45.
DonettoSTsianakasVRobertG. Using experience-based co-design (EBCD) to improve the quality of healthcare: mapping where we are now and establishing future directions. London: King’s College London, 2014, p.5–7.
46.
CarterNValaitisRKLamA, et al.Navigation delivery models and roles of navigators in primary care: a scoping literature review. BMC Health Serv Res2018; 18: 96.
47.
MoxleyDP. Practice of case management. Sage, 1989.
48.
RichMWBeckhamVWittenbergC, et al.A multidisciplinary intervention to prevent the readmission of elderly patients with congestive heart failure. N Engl J Med1995; 333: 1190–1195.
49.
FreemanHP. Patient navigation: a community based strategy to reduce cancer disparities. J Urban Health2006; 83: 139–141.
50.
TanCHHWilsonSMcConigleyR. Experiences of cancer patients in a patient navigation program: a qualitative systematic review. JBI Evidence Synthesis2015; 13: 136–168.
51.
Robinson-WhiteSConroyBSlavishKH, et al.Patient navigation in breast cancer: a systematic review. Cancer Nurs2010; 33: 127–140.
52.
KokoreliasKDas GuptaTCassD, et al.Designing the ideal patient navigation program for older adults with complex needs: A qualitative exploration of the preferences of key informants. J Appl Gerontol2022; 41(4): 1002–1010.
KokoreliasKMNaglieGGignacMA, et al.A qualitative exploration of how gender and relationship shape family caregivers’ experiences across the Alzheimer’s disease trajectory. Dementia, London, England. 2021; 20(8): 2851–2866.
55.
BergenNLabontéR. “Everything is perfect, and we have no problems”: detecting and limiting social desirability bias in qualitative research. Qual Health Res2020; 30: 783–792.
56.
ParasuramanA. Assessing and improving service performancefor maximum impact: Insights from a two-decade-long research journey. Performance measurement and metrics 2004.
