Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Objective

To explore the feasibility for a set of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) eligibility guidelines that follow a similar structure and appearance to the UKMEC guidance for contraception. To enable non-specialists to feel confident in safely prescribing HRT and to aid selection of the most appropriate first line treatment.

Methods

A literature review was undertaken with evidence summarised on the topic of venous thromboembolism (VTE) which is an area frequently considered a barrier to prescribing. Medical eligibility tables which separated HRT by type were then produced for a set of VTE-related topics.

Results

The literature search confirmed the importance of distinguishing between different types and routes of administration when considering the suitability of HRT. Much of the evidence has been based on older synthetic types of HRT and whilst they still have a role in management, these medications carry different risks to the now more accepted use of body identical types. The search also highlighted the nuances involved, increasing the complexity of forming guidelines, with the need for consideration to be given to an individual’s own perception of risks and benefits.

Conclusion

The demand for HRT has risen in recent years and there is a need for this to be managed effectively, particularly for patients in primary care. The production of this type of guidance will enable the non-specialist to feel confident in safe and evidence-based prescribing. The guidelines are also designed to demonstrate to prescribers which complex patients should be referred onto menopause specialists.

Keywords

Venous thromboembolism eligibility criteria UKMEC hormone replacement therapy

Introduction

International medical organisations including the British Menopause Society, International Menopause Society and the Menopause Society have published best practice recommendations for menopause care.^1–5 These provide evidence-based guidance for healthcare practitioners to refer to and are perhaps more accessible to those with a menopause interest. There are currently no guidelines available that provide specific recommendations on the prescription of HRT according to a medical co-morbidity. There are also no easy to access, risk-based stratification tools that can be used as a decision-making aid for prescribing HRT in primary care. A set of HRT eligibility criteria, with similarity to those established for contraceptive methods,⁶ would enable the formation of this type of guidance. Such guidelines could be used from within an app or other digital interface and would help clinicians, particularly those with limited menopause experience, to feel confident in safely prescribing HRT, reducing the need for secondary care menopause related referrals. This review explores this concept using the topic of VTE. The examples produced are for illustration purposes only and a wider scope of topics with prior clinical advisory group review would be required before forming any final recommendations.

Methodology

The topic of VTE was chosen and a literature review undertaken with results from meta-analyses, systematic reviews and randomised trials evaluated. Observational studies were included with particular interest in population-based cohorts or large case-control studies. In addition, consensus papers, position statements and review articles were reviewed, with the reference list of relevant studies checked. Medical eligibility tables which separated HRT by type were then produced for a set of VTE related topics. The allocation of HRT to an eligibility category was judged by the strength of evidence available on that topic.

Eligibility categories

Eligibility categories 1 to 4 have been used to remain unified with the UKMEC guidance on contraception⁶. The difference between eligibility category 2 and 3 delineates what would be considered safe versus unsafe prescribing by a non-specialist. Where plausibility for safe prescribing is considered to exist, for example, from publications containing indirect evidence, a consensus decision between category 2 and 3 could be made by the panel which would be classed as expert opinion. Where a category 3 is assigned, this demonstrates to prescribers which complex patients require further input from a menopause specialist Table 1.

Table 1.

Definition of eligibility categories.

Category 1	No restriction for use of HRT
Category 2	The benefits of use generally outweigh any theoretical or proven risks. Evidence is sufficient to support use but careful follow up may be required
Category 3	Any theoretical or proven risks might outweigh the benefits of use. Evidence is limited or does not confirm safety and the provision of HRT requires expert clinical judgement and/or referral to a specialist
Category 4	HRT should not be used and represents an unacceptable health risk

Key differences to contraception guidance

Although it is intended that this guidance will be aligned with that on contraception, there are key differences:

(1) The indication for hormone treatment in this guidance will be for menopausal symptoms and not for contraception. When withholding treatment for contraception, this confers a potential higher VTE risk for the patient, should pregnancy occur.

(2) When making decisions about risk stratification, the effect of relative risk on underlying absolute risk must be considered. The absolute risk of VTE is age dependent and in general will be higher for menopausal women, compared to younger women seeking contraception.

Discussion

Route of administration

There is good evidence from large observational studies,^7–14 randomised controlled trials^15–19 and meta-analyses^20–22 that transdermal HRT, when given at licensed doses, does not increase the risk of VTE above that in non-users. This remains the case whether the transdermal preparation is estrogen only or a combined type.^12,20 In contrast, for women that use oral HRT, including estrogen alone or combined preparations, risk of VTE is increased 2–4-fold and is greatest in the first year after initiation.^1,23 Exceptions are for tibolone and preparations containing dydrogesterone or micronised progesterone which are discussed separately.

Progestogen choice

Progestogens vary widely in their chemical structures depending on whether they are derived from progesterone or testosterone. Their pharmacokinetics, metabolism and affinity for steroid receptors (androgen, glucocorticoid and mineralocorticoid receptors) differ and they are considered to lack a class effect with each progestogen type conferring a unique biological profile.²⁴ Progestogens that are liencesed for HRT in the United Kingdom include micronised progesterone (MP), dydrogesterone (DYG) (only available combined with oral estradiol), medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA), norethisterone (NET) and levonorgestrel (LNG) (Table 2).

Table 2.

Classification of progestogens licensed for HRT.

Body identical	Micronised progesterone
Retroprogesterone	Dydrogesterone
Progestogens structurally related to progesterone (pregnane and nor pregnane derivatives)	Medroxyprogesterone acetate
Progestogens structurally related to testosterone (estranes, 13-ethyl gonanes and non-ethinylated derivatives)	Levonorgestrel Norethisterone

The choice of progestogen can affect VTE risk. A large nested case-control study demonstrated a higher risk of VTE in women using preparations containing oral estradiol with MPA (OR 1.44 [1.09–1.89]) and oral estradiol with NET (OR 1.68 [1.57–1.80]) compared to oral estradiol with DYG (OR 1.18 [0.98–1.42]).¹² Similarly, a large meta-analysis of seven population-based observational studies found that in users of oral estrogen, there was higher VTE risk in women using MPA (RR 2.77 [RR 2.33–3.30]) than in those using other progestogens.²⁵ This study reported no change in VTE risk in users of transdermal estrogen with MP (RR 0.93 [0.65–1.33]) whereas the norpregnane derivatives, nomegestrol acetate and promegestone, were associated with an increased risk (RR 2.42 [1.84–3.18]) and risk related to other progestogens, which included pregnane derivatives, was intermediate with important heterogeneity.²⁵ In addition, two recent systematic reviews concluded that MP has a neutral effect on VTE.^26,27

There is sparse data on NET or MPA prescribing and any associated VTE risk in post-menopausal women. Large studies have unanimously demonstrated no increased risk of VTE when low doses of progestogens are prescribed in pre-menopausal women for contraceptive purposes, and this includes norethisterone 0.35 mg taken daily.^28–32 However, higher therapeutic doses of progestogens, when prescribed in pre-menopausal women for other reasons, have been shown to increase VTE risk which might suggest a dose dependent effect.^33–38

The dose of NET is important to consider given it partly converts to ethinylestradiol in the liver. Current guidance recommends NET 5 mg is taken for 12 days in sequential HRT regimes and NET 0.5–1 mg is taken daily in continuous HRT regimes.³⁹ It is estimated that 1 mg of orally administered NET metabolises to 4–6 µg ethinylestradiol.⁴⁰ Considering the thromboembolic risk associated with ethinylestradiol, this conversion may be clinically significant in women at increased risk for VTE. Use of ultra-low doses, however, is unlikely to cause harm and safety data is available for doses ≤0.35 mg daily.

Unlike NET, the synthetic progestogen MPA does not convert to ethinylestradiol and MPA may therefore be safer from this point of view, although evidence is limited. There is some observational data that demonstrates no association of VTE with use of pregnane derivatives.^8,41 However, as mentioned above, the large meta-analysis of seven population-based observational studies showed MPA was consistently associated with increased VTE risk in users of oral estrogen (RR 2.77 [2.33–3.30]).²⁵ In addition, in the Women’s Health Initiative (WHI) trial, the Women’s International Study of long Duration Oestrogen after Menopause (WISDOM) trial and the large nested case-control study by Vinogradova et al, the association of estrogen plus MPA was more thrombogenic than unopposed estrogen.^12,18,19 Uncertainty therefore still remains regarding the impact of oral MPA on VTE risk and more research is required.

Evidence from large systematic reviews and meta-analyses has found that LNG intrauterine devices (LNG IUD) do not increase risk of VTE.^29,30,42 Most women included in these studies were pre-menopausal in age, which limits generalisability. However, the relative safety of a 52 mg LNG IUD can be explained by its localised action. After placement, serum levels reach a peak and plateau after the first few weeks, thereafter the systemic concentration decreases.⁴³ It releases about 20 μg of LNG daily, most of which remains concentrated in the endometrial cavity.²⁹

Tibolone and combined preparations containing micronised progesterone or dydrogesterone

The safety of a combined estradiol 1 mg and MP 100 mg oral tablet was studied in the REPLENISH trial, a multicentre 12-month, phase 3, prospective, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.⁴⁴ Results from this study found no significant changes in any coagulation parameters suggesting preliminary safety data for VTE risk is reassuring. However, long-term safety data are absent.

There is a body of evidence that suggests that when combined with oral estrogen, DYG delivered orally, like progesterone, has an overall better risk profile compared to other progestogens with regard to thrombotic risk.^8,45,46 The large nested case-control study undertaken by Vinogradova et al reported that combined oral preparations containing estradiol with DYG were not associated with a statistically significantly increased VTE risk (OR 1.18 [0.98–1.42]).¹² However, further studies looking at various combinations of oral estradiol and DYG are needed.

Tibolone is a synthetic steroid with estrogenic, progestogenic and androgenic properties that has tissue-specific effects. A Cochrane review reported no increased risk of VTE with its use; however, it described the evidence included as being low or very low quality.⁴⁷ Further support has since come from a large UK nested case-control study which similarly found no association of tibolone with VTE (OR 1.02 [0.90–1.15]).¹²

Vaginal estrogen

Vaginal preparations containing licensed doses of either estradiol or estriol do not elevate serum levels above normal post-menopausal ranges with long-term use.⁴⁸ Data from the large observational Women’s Health Initiative study showed no increase in VTE risk with use of any vaginal estrogen preparations at licensed doses.⁴⁹

Risk factors for VTE

A risk factor for VTE can be categorised as major, moderate or minor based on its odds ratio (OR) (Table 2).⁵⁰ In the presence of a minor risk factor, oral estrogen, including estrogen alone or combined preparations, can sometimes be considered, albeit with some caution. The UKMEC guidance for contraception, for example, denotes a BMI ≥30–34 kg/m² as UKMEC 2 for combined hormonal contraceptive use.⁶ Nonetheless, it is generally recommended that in the presence of any VTE risk factor, preparations with the lowest VTE risk should always be used first line where possible.

Where a moderate or major risk factor exists, or where there are multiple risks, oral preparations should be avoided. A similar approach should be taken when considering tibolone or oral preparations containing MP or DYG due to the limited number of studies available on these preparations.

Use of a transdermal HRT, 52 mg LNG IUD or MP can be considered in the presence of a major, moderate or minor risk factor, because these represent options that are unlikely to increase VTE risk further. However, where a woman is considered particularly high risk, the initiation of these HRT types may be best placed with a specialist, where detailed counselling can be conducted. In addition, liaison with haematology might be required.^1,50 Vaginal estrogen is a safe localised treatment that can be initiated, at licensed doses, in users with a major risk factor for VTE. (Table 3)

Table 3.

Risk factors for VTE.^50–55

Major (OR >10)	Moderate (OR 2–9)	Minor (OR <2)
• Major surgery within the last 2 months with general anaesthesia >30 min • Hip or knee replacement in the last 2 months • Major trauma associated with immobilisation • Hip or leg fracture in the last 2 months • Spinal cord injury associated with immobilisation • High risk thrombophilia such as homozygous or combination forms • Antiphospholipid syndrome	• Surgery within the last 2 months with general anaesthesia <30 min • Arthroscopic hip or knee surgery in the last 2 months • Previous VTE episode • Obesity • Active cancer • Significant immobility >3 days • Pregnancy and the first 6 weeks post-partum • Central venous lines • Thrombophilia • One or more significant comorbidities	• Laparoscopic surgery in the last 30 days • Age>60 years • Being overweight • Active smoker • Long distance sedentary travel >4 h • Varicose veins and superficial venous thrombosis • Family history of VTE

Example eligibility tables

Obesity

Increasing body mass index (BMI) has a linear association with the development of VTE.^56–61 In one large prospective study, the OR for VTE in women for BMI 23.7–26.3 kg/m² was 1.45 [CI 1.03–2.05], for BMI 26.4–29.9 kg/m² was 1.81 [CI 1.27–2.56] and for BMI >29.9 was 2.82 [1.96–4.04].⁵⁸ The risk of VTE is therefore more than doubled in obese subjects.

The association between HRT, VTE and BMI was confirmed in a systematic review and meta-analysis.²¹ Being overweight or obese increased the risk of VTE (pooled OR 2.6 [CI 2.1–3.3]) and use of oral estrogen increased this risk further (OR 5.4 [CI 2.9–10.0]).²¹ However, use of transdermal estrogen does not appear to confer additional risk in women in either overweight or obese categories.^21,41,62 Data looking at other HRT preparations, BMI and VTE is limited (Table 4). The UKMEC supports use of the combined contraceptive pill up to age 50 years with BMI ≥30–34 kg/m² and does not restrict use of the 52 mg LNG IUD in any obese category.⁶

Table 4.

Suggested eligibility criteria for safely prescribing HRT in relation to BMI.

	Combined tablets		Tibolone	Combined patches	Oral estradiol with a separate progestogen			Transdermal estradiol with a separate progestogen			Estrogen only		Topical
	Oral (NET or MPA)	Oral (MP or DYG)	Tibolone	Transdermal NET or LNG	LNG IUD 52 mg	MP	NET or MPA	LNG IUD 52 mg	MP	NET or MPA	Oral	Transdermal	Vaginal estrogen
BMI ≥ 25–29 kg/m²	2	2	2	1	2	2	2	1	1	2	2	1	1
BMI ≥ 30–34 kg/m² and aged <50 years	2	2	2	1	2	2	2	1	1	2	2	1	1
BMI ≥ 30–34 kg/m² and aged ≥ 50 years	3	3	3	2	3	3	3	2	2	3	3	2	1
BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2	3	3	3	2	3	3	3	2	2	3	3	2	1

Recent surgery

Although most surgical procedures increase VTE risk, this varies considerably across operation types. Elective procedures with a short duration of general anaesthesia (<30 min) and no associated immobilisation are considered low VTE risk.^6,53,63 This can include some types of minor laparoscopic surgeries.⁵⁰ Elective procedures with a longer duration of general anaesthesia (>30 min) or associated with immobilisation are considered higher VTE risk.^51,64 This will include surgery undertaken on the lower limbs such as hip and knee arthroplasties.⁶³

Where an individual is admitted electively to hospital, they should receive thromboprophylaxis as appropriate and if no additional risk factors for VTE are present, they do not need to discontinue their HRT whether transdermal or oral.¹ However, where additional risk factors for VTE are present, women using oral preparations of estrogen should switch to the transdermal route.¹

Major surgery within the last 2 months represents a time of increased VTE risk and requires extra vigilance given it accounts for close to one third of cases of confirmed PE.⁵¹ After thromboprophylaxis is stopped (Table 5), women require repeat risk assessment and oral estrogen should only be continued where other risk factors for VTE are absent and there has been at least 2 weeks of full mobilisation.⁶

Table 5.

Suggested eligibility criteria for safely prescribing HRT during planned elective surgery.

	Combined tablets		Tibolone	Combined patches	Oral estradiol with a separate progestogen			Transdermal estradiol with a separate progestogen			Estrogen only		Topical
	Oral (NET or MPA)	Oral (MP or DYG)	Tibolone	Transdermal NET or LNG	LNG IUD 52 mg	MP	NET or MPA	LNG IUD 52 mg	MP	NET or MPA	Oral	Transdermal	Vaginal estrogen
Planned elective surgery
Major elective surgery with planned thromboprophylaxis. No other risk factors for VTE	2	2	2	1	2	2	2	1	1	2	2	1	1
Major elective surgery with planned thromboprophylaxis. Other risk factors for VTE present	3	3	3	1	3	3	3	1	1	3	3	1	1
Minor surgery without immobilisation	2	2	2	1	2	2	2	1	1	2	2	1	1
Major surgery <2 months ago. Thromboprophylaxis now stopped
Full mobilisation for ≥2 weeks and no other risk factors for VTE present	2	2	2	1	2	2	2	1	1	2	2	1	1
Full mobilisation for ≤2 weeks and/or other risk factors for VTE present	3	3	3	2	3	3	3	2	2	3	3	2	1

Previous VTE episode

Whether an episode of prior VTE was provoked or unprovoked, it has implications for risk of recurrence.⁵³ If thrombosis was provoked by a transient risk factor, there is a low risk of recurrence. If thrombosis was provoked by a persistent or progressive risk factor, there is a high risk of recurrence. Patients with neither a transient or persistent risk factor are referred to as having an unprovoked VTE and have an intermediate risk of recurrence of VTE.⁵³

Data about risk of VTE recurrence with HRT use remains limited. The only randomised controlled trial was stopped prematurely due to an increased incidence of VTE recurrence in women on oral combined HRT compared to placebo.¹⁶ The Menopause Estrogen and Veins (MEVE) cohort study found no increased risk of VTE recurrence in women using transdermal estrogen (HR 1.0 [CI 0.4–2.4])¹⁴ although recurrence risk was increased in women using oral estrogen (HR 6.4 [HR 1.5–27.3]) (Table 6). Similarly, a systematic review found that transdermal estrogen with MP did not increase risk of recurrent VTE.²⁶

Table 6.

Suggested eligibility criteria for safely prescribing HRT in women with a past history of VTE.

	Combined tablets		Tibolone	Combined patches	Oral estradiol with a separate progestogen			Transdermal estradiol with a separate progestogen			Estrogen only		Topical
	Oral (NET or MPA)	Oral (MP or DYG)	Tibolone	Transdermal NET or LNG	LNG IUD 52 mg	MP	NET or MPA	LNG IUD 52 mg	MP	NET or MPA	Oral	Transdermal	Vaginal estrogen
History of provoked VTE by a transient and resolved factor	3	3	3	2	3	3	3	2	2	3	3	2	1
History of provoked VTE by a persistent factor. On anticoagulation	3	3	3	2	3	3	3	2	2	3	3	2	1
History of unprovoked VTE. On anticoagulation	3	3	3	2	3	3	3	2	2	3	3	2	1
History of an unprovoked VTE or past history of VTE with a persistent risk factor. Not on anticoagulation	4	4^a	4^a	3	4	4	4	3	3	4^a	4	3	1

^aThe authors acknowledge that VTE risk may be less with these HRT types compared to other preparations that have also been allocated a category 4. However, the authors agreed that a category 4 should still be allocated due to a lack of safety data in high risk women.

Family history of VTE

Several studies show that a significant family history of venous thrombosis is an independent risk factor for VTE even in the absence of a known familial thrombophilia.⁶⁵ It is very likely that there are as yet undiscovered genetic factors that account for familial clustering of some thrombotic disorders and a negative thrombophilia screen does not exclude an increased risk of venous thrombosis.⁶⁶ (Table 7)

Table 7.

Suggested eligibility criteria for safely prescribing HRT in women with a family history of VTE.

	Combined tablets		Tibolone	Combined patches	Oral estradiol with a separate progestogen			Transdermal estradiol with a separate progestogen			Estrogen only		Topical
	Oral (NET or MPA)	Oral (MP or DYG)	Tibolone	Transdermal NET or LNG	LNG IUD 52 mg	MP	NET or MPA	LNG IUD 52 mg	MP	NET or MPA	Oral	Transdermal	Vaginal estrogen
Family history of VTE in a first degree relative <45 years	3	3	3	2	3	3	3	2	2	3	3	2	1
Family history of VTE in a first degree relative ≥45 years	2	2	2	1	2	2	2	1	1	2	2	1	1
Family history of an unprovoked VTE in a first degree relative at any age	3	3	3	2	3	3	3	2	2	3	3	2	1
Multiple first-degree relatives affected by VTE	3	3	3	2	3	3	3	2	2	3	3	2	1

Thrombophilia

The most common thrombophilias are heterozygous Factor V Leiden (FVL) and the prothrombin 20210A gene mutation.²³ Studies undertaken to date have mostly included women with these mutations. Data for more rare thrombophilias (including homozygous types, antiphospholipid (APL) syndrome, protein C deficiency, protein S deficiency and antithrombin deficiency) is limited and no trial data are available.

The risk of VTE is significantly increased in women with the FVL or prothrombin 20210A gene mutation using oral HRT preparations.^15,67–71 However, a large systematic review and meta-analysis found that whilst the combination of oral estrogen with either of these gene mutations enhanced the risk of VTE, use of transdermal estrogen did not.²¹ Similarly, a multicentre case-control study found that whilst use of oral estrogen in women with the FVL or G20210 A gene mutation increased risk of VTE 25-fold, transdermal estrogen did not confer any additional risk.⁷⁰

Data regarding thrombophilia and HRT is limited mostly to heterozygous FVL and prothrombin 20210A gene mutations and there should be caution extrapolating this data to other groups. (Table 8)

Table 8.

Suggested eligibility criteria for safely prescribing HRT in women a history of thrombophilia who are not using long-term anticoagulation for secondary VTE prevention. The included 'thrombophilias' are Factor V Leiden, prothrombin gene mutation (both homozygous and heterozygous), protein C deficiency, protein S deficiency, antithrombin deficiency, antiphospholipid syndrome and compound heterozygotes/combined thrombophilias.

	Combined tablets		Tibolone	Combined patches	Oral estradiol with a separate progestogen			Transdermal estradiol with a separate progestogen			Estrogen only		Topical
	Oral (NET or MPA)	Oral (MP or DYG)	Tibolone	Transdermal NET or LNG	LNG IUD 52 mg	MP	NET or MPA	LNG IUD 52 mg	MP	NET or MPA	Oral	Transdermal	Vaginal estrogen
Heterozygous Factor V Leiden or prothrombin 20210A gene mutation	4	3	3	2	4	4	4	2	2	3	4	2	1
Homozygous Factor V Leiden or prothrombin 20210A gene mutation	4	4^a	4^a	3	4	4	4	3	3	4^a	4	3	1
Other thrombophilias^b	4	4^a	4^a	3	4	4	4	3	3	4^a	4	3	1

^bIncludes APL syndrome, protein C, protein S, antithrombin deficiency and compound heterozygotes/combined thrombophilias.

Post-partum

Pregnancy is uncommon in the menopause transition but not impossible and will be relevant to women with premature ovarian insufficiency who may have had fertility treatment. VTE risk is elevated during the post-partum period and this risk is most pronounced in the first 3 weeks after delivery declining to near baseline by 6 weeks.^6,72–76 Other risk factors for VTE often co-exist and may pose additional risk, including immobility, transfusion at delivery, post-caesarean section, obesity, infection or pre-eclampsia.⁶ Being post-partum includes any birth from 24 weeks.⁶

Although not directly relevant to the topic of VTE, the allocation of HRT to an eligibility category should take into consideration any effect on infant health or breast feeding. There is limited data on this; however, in general, no negative impact has been found with initiation of the combined contraceptive pill containing ethinylestradiol from 6 weeks onwards^6,77 and comparable results have been reported in small studies using estradiol patches^78–81 and MP.⁸² Similarly most studies indicate that progestogens are not detrimental to milk production or infant health outcomes⁸³ and this includes data for women using the 52 mg LNG-IUS with insertion either immediately post-partum or after 4 weeks.^6,84–86 (Table 9)

Table 9.

Suggested eligibility criteria for safely prescribing HRT during the post-partum period.

	Combined tablets		Tibolone	Combined patches	Oral estradiol with a separate progestogen			Transdermal estradiol with a separate progestogen			Estrogen only		Topical
	Oral (NET or MPA)	Oral (MP or DYG)	Tibolone	Transdermal NET or LNG	LNG IUD 52 mg	MP	NET or MPA	LNG IUD 52 mg	MP	NET or MPA	Oral	Transdermal	Vaginal estrogen
Post-partum in non-breast-feeding women
0 to <6 weeks	3	3	3	2	3	3	3	2^a	2	3	3	2	1
≥6 weeks	2	2	2	1	2	2	2	1^a	1	2	2	1	1
Post-partum in breast-feeding women
0 to <6 weeks	3	3	3	3	3	3	3	3^a	3	3	3	3	1
≥6 weeks	2	2	2	1	2	2	2	1^a	1	2	2	1	1

^aif insertion either <48^ah or ≥4^aweeks.

Age

Any decision to take HRT in older women should be made after an individualised discussion about the benefits and risks.⁴ This should consider benefits to symptom control, quality of life, cardiovascular health and bone health, versus risks of developing a HRT-related health condition, such as VTE, MI, stroke or breast cancer. More careful considerations are required in older age groups, because the absolute risk of these health conditions, as well as other health conditions, increases with age.^1,50,87,88

Risk of VTE roughly doubles for each decade.⁵⁰ The approximate incidence for VTE in women <40 years is 1 in 10,000 per year, whereas this increases to 5.4 in 10,000 for ages 40–50 years, 6.2–12.2 in 10,000 for ages 50–60 years and 3–4 in 1000 for ages 70–80 years.^89,90 As mentioned earlier, for women using oral HRT, including estrogen alone or combined preparations, risk of VTE is increased 2–4-fold, and is greatest in the first year after initiation.^1,23 (Table 10)

Table 10.

Suggested eligibility criteria for prescribing HRT by age.

	Combined tablets		Tibolone	Combined patches	Oral estradiol with a separate progestogen			Transdermal estradiol with a separate progestogen			Estrogen only		Topical
	Oral (NET or MPA)	Oral (MP or DYG)	Tibolone	Transdermal NET or LNG	LNG IUD 52 mg	MP	NET or MPA	LNG IUD 52 mg	MP	NET or MPA	Oral	Transdermal	Vaginal estrogen
≤49 years	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1
≥50 to ≤59 years	2	2	2	1	2	2	2	1	1	2	2	1	1
≥60 or ≤69 years or ≥10 years since LMP	3	3	3	2	3	3	3	2	2	3	3	2	1
≥70 years	3	3	3	3	3	3	3	3	3	3	3	3	1

Feasibility for development

This proposal demonstrates the potential for a set of eligibility criteria on the topic of VTE. Examples provided are for illustrative purposes only and do not represent any final guidance. The formation of final recommendations would require consensus from a panel of experts working within a clinical advisory group and would include a wider scope of topics such as cardiovascular health, stroke, migraine, previous cancers and drug interactions.

The feasibility of producing this type of guidance has already been demonstrated by the Spanish Menopause Society which used rigorous methodological tools to formulate eligibility criteria in nine clinical areas.⁹¹ The authors described the most critical limitation being the lack of quality studies available for some subject areas and because of this, on occasions, a final recommendation was based on the best available evidence.⁹¹ In some of the cases, this involved expert opinion based on data obtained in healthy women.

Conclusion

The creation of a set of HRT eligibility criteria would provide an easy to access, risk-based stratification tool that could be used as a decision-making aid for prescribing HRT in primary care. It has the potential to revolutionise prescribing by helping clinicians, particularly those with limited menopause experience, to feel confident in making decisions about HRT. It may benefit many women who have been denied HRT inappropriately, avoid prescribing in areas of risk, and help to reduce secondary care menopause related referrals. It could be developed into an app or other user-friendly digital interface and be aligned with current guidance on contraception. Any next steps would involve the formation of a clinical advisory group and formation of an evidence to decision framework. Even a small set of eligibility criteria would be likely to be beneficial to many healthcare professionals.

Footnotes

Declaration of conflicting interests

The author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Mr Tim Hillard BM DM FFSRH FRCOG. Declarations: Speaker and consultancy fees from Astellas and Besins; Prof. Nick Panay BSc MB BS FRCOG MFSRH. Declarations: Speaker and consultancy fees from Abbott, Astellas, Bayer, Besins, Gedeon Richter, Mithra, Mylan, Novo Nordisk, Roche, SeCur, Theramex and Viatris.

Funding

The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

ORCID iD

Abbie Laing

References

Hamoda

Panay

Pedder

, et al. The British Menopause Society & Women's Health Concern 2020 recommendations on hormone replacement therapy in menopausal women. Post Reprod Health 2020; 26: 181–208.

Shifren

Gass

. The North American menopause society recommendations for clinical care of midlife women. Menopause 2014; 21: 1038–1062.

Baber

Panay

Fenton

. 2016 IMS Recommendations on women’s midlife health and menopause hormone therapy. Climacteric 2016; 19: 109–150.

Hamoda

Mukherjee

Morris

, et al. Joint position statement by the British Menopause Society, Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists and Society for Endocrinology on best practice recommendations for the care of women experiencing the menopause. Post Reprod Health 2022; 28: 123–125.

Hamoda

Moger

Morris

, et al. Menopause practice standards. Post Reprod Health 2022; 28: 127–132.

. UK medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use. The Faculty of Sexual and Reproductive Health 2016. https://www.fsrh.org/documents/ukmec-2016/

Canonico

Oger

Plu-Bureau

, et al. Hormone therapy and venous thromboembolism among postmenopausal women: impact of the route of estrogen administration and progestogens: the ESTHER study. Circulation 2007; 115: 840–845.

Canonico

Fournier

Carcaillon

, et al. Postmenopausal hormone therapy and risk of idiopathic venous thromboembolism: results from the E3N cohort study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2010; 30: 340–345.

Renoux

Dell'Aniello

Suissa

. Hormone replacement therapy and the risk of venous thromboembolism: a population-based study. J Thromb Haemostasis 2010; 8: 979–986.

10.

Sweetland

Beral

Balkwill

, et al. Venous thromboembolism risk in relation to use of different types of postmenopausal hormone therapy in a large prospective study. J Thromb Haemostasis 2012; 10: 2277–2286.

11.

Roach

Lijfering

Helmerhorst

, et al. The risk of venous thrombosis in women over 50 years old using oral contraception or postmenopausal hormone therapy. J Thromb Haemostasis 2013; 11: 124–131.

12.

Vinogradova

Coupland

Hippisley-Cox

. Use of hormone replacement therapy and risk of venous thromboembolism: nested case-control studies using the QResearch and CPRD databases. BMJ 2019; k4810: 364.

13.

Scarabin

Oger

Plu-Bureau

. Differential association of oral and transdermal oestrogen-replacement therapy with venous thromboembolism risk. Lancet 2003; 362: 428–432.

14.

Olié

Plu-Bureau

Conard

, et al. Hormone therapy and recurrence of venous thromboembolism among postmenopausal women. Menopause 2011; 18: 488–493.

15.

Cushman

Kuller

Prentice

, et al. Estrogen plus progestin and risk of venous thrombosis. JAMA 2004; 292: 1573–1580.

16.

Høibraaten

Qvigstad

Arnesen

, et al. Increased risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism during hormone replacement therapy. Thromb Haemostasis 2000; 84: 961–967.

17.

Hulley

Grady

Bush

, et al. Heart and Estrogen/progestin Replacement Study (HERS) Research Group. Randomized trial of estrogen plus progestin for secondary prevention of coronary heart disease in postmenopausal women. JAMA 1998; 280: 605–613.

18.

Curb

Prentice

Bray

, et al. Venous thrombosis and conjugated equine estrogen in women without a uterus. Arch Intern Med 2006; 166: 772–780.

19.

Vickers

MacLennan

Lawton

, et al. Main morbidities recorded in the women's international study of long duration oestrogen after menopause (WISDOM): a randomised controlled trial of hormone replacement therapy in postmenopausal women. BMJ 2007; 335: 239.

20.

Rovinski

Ramos

Fighera

, et al. Risk of venous thromboembolism events in postmenopausal women using oral versus non-oral hormone therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Thromb Res 2018; 168: 83–95.

21.

Canonico

Plu-Bureau

Lowe

, et al. Hormone replacement therapy and risk of venous thromboembolism in postmenopausal women: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2008; 336: 1227–1231.

22.

Scarabin

. Hormone therapy and venous thromboembolism among postmenopausal women. Cardiovascular Issues in Endocrinology 2014; 43: 21–32.

23.

Morris

Talaulikar

. Hormone replacement therapy in women with history of thrombosis or a thrombophilia. Post Reprod Health 2023; 29: 33–41.

24.

Stevenson

Rozenberg

Maffei

, et al. Progestogens as a component of menopausal hormone therapy: the right molecule makes the difference. Drugs Context 2020; 9.

25.

Scarabin

. Progestogens and venous thromboembolism in menopausal women: an updated oral versus transdermal estrogen meta-analysis. Climacteric 2018; 21: 341–345.

26.

Kaemmle

Stadler

Janka

, et al. The impact of micronized progesterone on cardiovascular events -a systematic review. Climacteric 2022; 25: 327–336.

27.

Graham

Archer

Simon

, et al. Review of menopausal hormone therapy with estradiol and progesterone versus other estrogens and progestins. Gynecol Endocrinol 2022; 38: 891–910.

28.

Løkkegaard

Svendsen

, et al. Hormonal contraception and risk of venous thromboembolism: national follow-up study. BMJ 2009; 13: 339.

29.

Mantha

Karp

Raghavan

, et al. Assessing the risk of venous thromboembolic events in women taking progestin-only contraception: a meta-analysis. BMJ 2012; 7: 345.

30.

Tepper

Whiteman

Marchbanks

, et al. Progestin-only contraception and thromboembolism: a systematic review. Contraception 2016; 94: 678–700.

31.

Glisic

Shahzad

Tsoli

, et al. Association between progestin-only contraceptive use and cardiometabolic outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. European Journal of Preventive Cardiology 2018; 25: 1042–1052.

32.

Heikinheimo

Toffol

Partonen

, et al. Systemic hormonal contraception and risk of venous thromboembolism. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2022; 101: 846–855.

33.

Poulter

Chang

Farley

, et al. Risk of cardiovascular diseases associated with oral progestagen preparations with therapeutic indications. Lancet 1999; 354: 1610.

34.

Gialeraki

Valsami

Pittaras

, et al. Oral contraceptives and HRT risk of thrombosis. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost 2018; 24: 217–225.

35.

Ruiz

Demirovic

Belkic

. A multinational case-control study of cardiovascular disease and steroid hormone contraceptives Description and validation of methods. J Chin Epidemiol 1995; 48: 1513–1547.

36.

Cockrum

Soo

Ham

, et al. Association of progestogens and venous thromboembolism among women of reproductive age. Obstet Gynecol 2022; 140: 477–487.

37.

Vasilakis

Jick

del Mar Melero-Montes

. Risk of idiopathic venous thromboembolism in users of progestagens alone. Lancet 1999; 6: 1610–1611.

38.

Sundström

Seaman

Kieler

, et al. The risk of venous thromboembolism associated with the use of tranexamic acid and other drugs used to treat menorrhagia: a case–control study using the General Practice Research Database. BJOG An Int J Obstet Gynaecol 2009; 116: 91–97.

39.

Hamoda

BMS Medical Advisory Council . British Menopause Society tools for clinicians: progestogens and endometrial protection. Post Reprod Health 2022; 28: 40–46.

40.

Kuhnz

Heuner

Hümpel

, et al. In vivo conversion of norethisterone and norethisterone acetate to ethinyl etradiol in postmenopausal women. Contraception 1997; 56: 379–385.

41.

Canonico

Oger

Conard

, et al. Obesity and risk of venous thromboembolism among postmenopausal women: differential impact of hormone therapy by route of estrogen administration. The ESTHER Study. J Thromb Haemostasis 2006; 4: 1259–1265.

42.

Keenan

Kerr

Duane

, et al. Systematic review of hormonal contraception and risk of venous thrombosis. Linacre Q 2018; 85: 470–477.

43.

Luukkainen

Lähteenmäki

Toivonen

. Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device. Ann Med 1990; 22: 85–90.

44.

Lobo

Liu

Kaunitz

, et al. Effects of single-capsule 17β-estradiol/progesterone (TX-001HR) on metabolic parameters and cardiovascular outcomes in menopausal women of the REPLENISH trial. Menopause 2018; 25: 1484–1485.

45.

Tremollieres

Brincat

Erel

, et al. EMAS position statement: managing menopausal women with a personal or family history of VTE. Maturitas 2011; 69: 195–198.

46.

Fournier

Berrino

Clavel-Chapelon

. Unequal risks for breast cancer associated with different hormone replacement therapies: results from the E3N cohort study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2008; 107: 103–111.

47.

Formoso

Perrone

Maltoni

, et al. Short-term and long-term effects of tibolone in postmenopausal women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016; 12(10): CD008536.

48.

Faubion

Kingsberg

Clark

, et al. The 2020 genitourinary syndrome of menopause position statement of the North American Menopause Society. Menopause 2020; 27: 976–992.

49.

Crandall

Hovey

Andrews

, et al. Breast cancer, endometrial cancer, and cardiovascular events in participants who used vaginal estrogen in the Women's Health Initiative Observational Study. Menopause 2018; 25: 11.

50.

Anderson

Spencer

. Risk factors for venous thromboembolism. Circulation 2003; 17: I–9.

51.

National Institute of Clinical Excellence NICE Clinical knowledge Summaries . Pulmonary Embolism: background information: risk factors. Last revised September 2023.

52.

National Institute of Clinical Excellence NICE Clinical knowledge summaries . Deep vein thrombosis: background information: risk factors. Last revised June 2023.

53.

Kearon

Ageno

Cannegieter

, et al. Categorization of patients as having provoked or unprovoked venous thromboembolism: guidance from the SSC of ISTH. J Thromb Haemostasis 2016; 14: 1480–1483.

54.

Prins

Lensing

Prandoni

, et al. Risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism according to baseline risk factor profiles. Blood advances 2018; 2: 788–796.

55.

Pastori

Cormaci

Marucci

, et al. A comprehensive review of risk factors for venous thromboembolism: from epidemiology to pathophysiology. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24: 3169.

56.

Kabrhel

Varraso

Goldhaber

, et al. Prospective study of BMI and the risk of pulmonary embolism in women. Obesity 2009; 17: 2040–2046.

57.

Eichinger

Hron

Bialonczyk

, et al. Overweight, obesity, and the risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism. Arch Intern Med 2008; 168: 1678–1683.

58.

Severinsen

Kristensen

Johnsen

, et al. Anthropometry, body fat, and venous thromboembolism: a Danish follow-up study. Circulation 2009; 120: 1850–1857.

59.

Tsai

Cushman

Rosamond

, et al. Cardiovascular risk factors and venous thromboembolism incidence: the longitudinal investigation of thromboembolism etiology. Arch Intern Med 2002; 162: 1182–1189.

60.

Stein

Beemath

Olson

. Obesity as a risk factor in venous thromboembolism. Am J Med 2005; 118: 978–980.

61.

Rosano

Rodriguez Martinez

Spoletini

, et al. Obesity and contraceptive use: impact on cardiovascular risk. ESC Heart Failure 2022; 9: 3761–3767.

62.

Oger

Alhenc-Gelas

Lacut

, et al. Differential effects of oral and transdermal estrogen/progesterone regimens on sensitivity to activated protein C among postmenopausal women: a randomized trial. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2003; 23: 1671–1676.

63.

White

Zhou

Romano

. Incidence of symptomatic venous thromboembolism after different elective or urgent surgical procedures. Thromb Haemostasis 2003; 90: 446–455.

64.

Konstantinides

Meyer

Becattini

, et al. 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism developed in collaboration with the European Respiratory Society (ERS) the Task Force for the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 2020; 41: 543–603.

65.

Zöller

Ohlsson

Sundquist

, et al. Family history of venous thromboembolism is a risk factor for venous thromboembolism in combined oral contraceptive users: a nationwide case-control study. Thromb J 2015; 13: 1–8.

66.

Baglin

Gray

Greaves

, et al. Clinical guidelines for testing for heritable thrombophilia. Br J Haematol 2010; 149: 209–220.

67.

Robertson

Langhorne

, et al. Oral contraceptives, hormone replacement therapy, thrombophilias and risk of venous thromboembolism: a systematic review. Thromb Haemostasis 2005; 94: 17–25.

68.

Herrington

Vittinghoff

Howard

, et al. Factor V Leiden, hormone replacement therapy, and risk of venous thromboembolic events in women with coronary disease. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2002; 22: 1012–1017.

69.

Douketis

Julian

Crowther

, et al. The effect of prothrombotic blood abnormalities on risk of deep vein thrombosis in users of hormone replacement therapy: a prospective case-control study. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost 2011; 17: 106–113.

70.

Straczek

Oger

Yon de Jonage-Canonico

, et al. Prothrombotic mutations, hormone therapy, and venous thromboembolism among postmenopausal women: impact of the route of estrogen administration. Circulation 2005; 112: 3495–3500.

71.

Rosendaal

Vessey

Rumley

, et al. Hormonal replacement therapy, prothrombotic mutations and the risk of venous thrombosis. Br J Haematol 2002; 116: 851–864.

72.

Kamel

Navi

Sriram

, et al. Risk of a thrombotic event after the 6-week postpartum period. N Engl J Med 2014; 370: 1307–1315.

73.

Sultan

Tata

West

, et al. Risk factors for first venous thromboembolism around pregnancy: a population-based cohort study from the United Kingdom. Blood, The Journal of the American Society of Hematology 2013; 121: 3953–3961.

74.

Sultan

West

Tata

, et al. Risk of first venous thromboembolism in and around pregnancy: a population‐based cohort study. Br J Haematol 2012; 156: 366–373.

75.

Tepper

Boulet

Whiteman

, et al. Postpartum venous thromboembolism: incidence and risk factors. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 123: 987–996.

76.

Jackson

Curtis

Gaffield

. Risk of venous thromboembolism during the postpartum period: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 117: 691–703.

77.

Tepper

Phillips

Kapp

, et al. Combined hormonal contraceptive use among breastfeeding women: an updated systematic review. Contraception 2016; 94: 262–274.

78.

Perheentupa

Critchley

Illingworth

, et al. Enhanced sensitivity to steroid-negative feedback during breast-feeding: low-dose estradiol (transdermal estradiol supplementation) suppresses gonadotropins and ovarian activity assessed by inhibin B. J Clin Endocrinol Metabol 2000; 85: 4280–4286.

79.

Ilingworth

Seaton

McKinlay

, et al. Endocrinology: low dose transdermal estradiol suppresses gonadotrophin secretion in breast-feeding women. Hum Reprod 1995; 10: 1671–1677.

80.

Pinheiro

Bogen

Hoxha

, et al. Transdermal estradiol treatment during breastfeeding: maternal and infant serum concentrations. Arch Wom Ment Health 2016; 19: 409–413.

81.

Perheentupa

Ruokonen

Tapanainen

. Transdermal estradiol treatment suppresses serum gonadotropins during lactation without transfer into breast milk. Fertil Steril 2004; 82: 903–907.

82.

Carr

Gaffield

Dragoman

, et al. Safety of the progesterone-releasing vaginal ring (PVR) among lactating women: a systematic review. Contraception 2016; 94: 253–261.

83.

Phillips

Tepper

Kapp

, et al. Progestogen-only contraceptive use among breastfeeding women: a systematic review. Contraception 2016; 94: 226–252.

84.

Shaamash

Sayed

Hussien

, et al. A comparative study of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system Mirena® versus the Copper T380A intrauterine device during lactation: breast-feeding performance, infant growth and infant development. Contraception 2005; 72: 346–351.

85.

Bahamondes

Modesto

, et al. Effect of hormonal contraceptives during breastfeeding on infant's milk ingestion and growth. Fertil Steril 2013; 100: 445–450.

86.

Chen

Reeves

Creinin

, et al. Postplacental or delayed levonorgestrel intrauterine device insertion and breast-feeding duration. Contraception 2011; 84: 499–504.

87.

Marsden J in collaboration with the medical advisory council of the British Menopause Society . Breast cancer: risk factors. Women’s Health Concern fact sheet. https://www.womens-health-concern.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/01-WHC-FACTSHEET-BreastCancer-NOV2022-C.pdf, 2022. Last visited 2023.

88.

Boardman

Hartley

Eisinga

, et al. Hormone therapy for preventing cardiovascular disease in post menopausal women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; 3: CD002229.

89.

Committee on Gynecological Practice . Committee opinion. Postmenopausal estrogen therapy route of administration and risk of venous thromboembolism. The American College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2013, p. 556.

90.

Cushman

. Epidemiology and risk factors for venous thrombosis. Semin Hematol 2007; 44: 62–69.

91.

Mendoza

Ramírez

de la Viuda

, et al. Eligibility criteria for Menopausal Hormone Therapy (MHT): a position statement from a consortium of scientific societies for the use of MHT in women with medical conditions. MHT Eligibility Criteria Group. Maturitas 2022; 166: 65–85.

Exploring the potential for a set of UK hormone replacement therapy eligibility guidelines: A suggested proposal on the topic of venous thromboembolism

Abstract

Objective

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Keywords

Introduction

Methodology

Eligibility categories

Key differences to contraception guidance

Discussion

Route of administration

Progestogen choice

Tibolone and combined preparations containing micronised progesterone or dydrogesterone

Vaginal estrogen

Risk factors for VTE

Example eligibility tables

Obesity

Recent surgery

Previous VTE episode

Family history of VTE

Thrombophilia

Post-partum

Age

Feasibility for development

Conclusion

Footnotes

Declaration of conflicting interests

Funding

ORCID iD

References