Left in limbo – Experiences and needs among postmenopausal women newly diagnosed with osteoporosis without preceding osteoporotic fractures: A qualitative study

Abstract

Introduction

Despite the fact that the first osteoporotic fracture is preventable, osteoporosis is still a major health challenge. The disease is highly prevalent among postmenopausal women. However little is known about how to meet and support women, when they are diagnosed with osteoporosis without preceding fractures. Therefore this study aims at gaining a deeper understanding of how women experience being diagnosed. Furthermore to describe and identify their needs, which should be met in future healthcare services.

Methods

We conducted a phenomenological qualitative study. We included 17 women aged 52–65 and collected data through semi-structured interviews. We analysed data following Giorgi's methodology.

Findings

Needs among the women were classified into three main themes: (1) needs of targeted and tailored information about osteoporosis, (2) needs of being prepared for GP visit to participate in treatment decision-making and (3) needs of being able to take care of bone health.

Conclusion and implications

In general the women experienced as been left ‘in limbo’, and they requested targeted and tailored information about osteoporosis. In particular, they want information about dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan results and treatment options in advance of the GP visit. This will help them in being prepared and able to participate in treatment decisions. They ask for support in self-management of the disease with less focus on disease and risk of fracture. Instead, they demand more attention on the benefits of detecting early stage osteoporosis. The study highlights the call for new approaches to postmenopausal women newly diagnosed with osteoporosis without preceding fractures.

Keywords

Experiences needs osteoporosis postmenopause qualitative study

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abrahamsen

van Staa

Ariely

et al.

Excess mortality following hip fracture: a systematic epidemiological review. Osteoporos Int 2009; 20: 1633–1650.

Kanis

McCloskey

Johansson

et al.

European guidance for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int 2013; 24: 23–57.

Lindsay

Pack

. Longitudinal progression of fracture prevalence through a population of postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 2005; 16: 306–312.

Weston

Norris

Clark

. The invisible disease: making sense of an osteoporosis diagnosis in older age. Qual Health Res 2011; 21: 1692–1704.

Kanis

Johnell

De Laet

et al.

A meta-analysis of previous fracture and subsequent fracture risk. Bone 2004; 35: 375–382.

Vestergaard

Rejnmark

Mosekilde

. Osteoporosis is markedly underdiagnosed: a nationwide study from Denmark. Osteoporos Int 2005; 16: 134–141.

Hvas

Reventlow

Jensen

et al.

Awareness of risk of osteoporosis may cause uncertainty and worry in menopausal women. Scand J Public Health 2005; 33: 203–207.

Hvas

Reventlow

Malterud

. Women's needs and wants when seeing the GP in relation to menopausal issues. Scand J Primary Health Care 2004; 22: 118–121.

Reventlow

. Perceived risk of osteoporosis: restricted physical activities? Qualitative interview study with women in their sixties. Scand J Primary Health Care 2007; 25: 160–165.

10.

Hansen

Konradsen

Abrahamsen

et al.

Women's experiences of their osteoporosis diagnosis at the time of diagnosis and 6 months later: a phenomenological hermeneutic study. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being 2014; 9: 22438.

11.

Reventlow

Bang

. Brittle bones: ageing or threat of disease exploring women's cultural models of osteoporosis. Scand J Public Health 2006; 34: 320–326.

12.

Reventlow

Hvas

Malterud

. Making the invisible body visible. Bone scans, osteoporosis and women's bodily experiences. Soc Sci Med (1982) 2006; 62: 2720–2731.

13.

Reventlow

. The risk of osteoporosis experienced by patients. Bone 2010; 47: S16.

14.

Nielsen

Huniche

Brixen

et al.

Handling knowledge on osteoporosis – a qualitative study. Scand J Caring Sci 2013; 27: 516–524.

15.

Barker

Toye

Lowe

. A qualitative systematic review of patients' experience of osteoporosis using meta-ethnography. Arch Osteoporos 2016; 11: 33.

16.

Hansen

Abrahamsen

Konradsen

et al.

Women's lived experiences of learning to live with osteoporosis: a longitudinal qualitative study. BMC Womens Health 2017; 17: 17.

17.

Kvale

Brinkmann

. Interviews – learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 2009.

18.

Giorgi

. The theory, practice, and evaluation of the phenomenological method as a qualitative research procedure. J Phenomenol Psychol 1997; 28: 235–260.

19.

Giorgi

. The descriptive phenomenological method in psychology: a modified Husserlian approach, Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press, 2009.

20.

Bombak

Hanson

. Qualitative Insights from the osteoporosis research: a narrative review of the literature. J Osteoporos 2016. Accessed at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/7915041.

21.

Salter

Howe

McDaid

et al.

Risk, significance and biomedicalisation of a new population: older women's experience of osteoporosis screening. Soc Sci Med (1982) 2011; 73: 808–815.

22.

Besser

Anderson

Weinman

. How do osteoporosis patients perceive their illness and treatment? Implications for clinical practice. Arch Osteoporos 2012; 7: 115–124.

23.

Hansen

Pedersen

Konradsen

et al.

Anti-osteoporotic therapy in Denmark – predictors and demographics of poor refill compliance and poor persistence. Osteoporos Int 2013; 24: 2079–2097.

24.

Salter

McDaid

Bhattacharya

et al.

Abandoned acid? Understanding adherence to bisphosphonate medications for the prevention of osteoporosis among older women: a qualitative longitudinal study. PloS One 2014; 9: e83552.

25.

Sale

Gignac

Hawker

et al.

Non-pharmacological strategies used by patients at high risk for future fracture to manage fracture risk–a qualitative study. Osteoporos Int 2014; 25: 281–288.

26.

Richards

Coulter

Wicks

. Time to deliver patient centred care. BMJ 2015; 350: h530.

27.

Eaton

Roberts

Turner

. Delivering person centred care in long term conditions. BMJ 2015; 350: h181.

28.

Gold

Silverman

. Osteoporosis self-management: choices for better bone health. South Med J 2004; 97: 551–554.

29.

Newman

Steed

Mulligan

. Self-management interventions for chronic illness. Lancet 2004; 364: 1523–1537.

30.

Gallant

. The influence of social support on chronic illness self-management: a review and directions for research. Health Educ Behav 2003; 30: 170–195.

31.

Frosch

. The patient is the most important member of the team. BMJ 2015; 350: g7767.

32.

Coulter

Locock

Ziebland

et al.

Collecting data on patient experience is not enough: they must be used to improve care. BMJ 2014; 348: g2225.

33.

Hibbard

Greene

. What the evidence shows about patient activation: better health outcomes and care experiences; fewer data on costs. Health Aff 2013; 32: 207–214.

34.

Malterud

Siersma

Guassora

. Sample size in qualitative interview studies: guided by information power. Qual Health Res 2016; 26: 1753–1760.