Abstract
Objective
To explore the current clinical attitudes of members of the British Menopause Society to the management of premature ovarian insufficiency.
Design
An electronic cross-sectional questionnaire survey.
Setting
Members of the British Menopause Society.
Population
All members of the British Menopause Society with a valid email address.
Method
Completion of an electronic survey.
Main outcome measures
Investigations and treatment options and preferences for the management of women with premature ovarian insufficiency.
Results
A total of 130 questionnaires were returned and analysed. The majority of responses were from Hospital Consultants (n = 55/130; 42.3%). A total of 53/124 (42.7%) clinicians routinely performed a bone density scan. A total of 73/130 (56.2%) clinicians would prescribe hormone replacement therapy in preference to combined ethinyl estradiol and progesterone (COC; 27/130, 20.8%). A total of 44/108 (40.7%) routinely prescribed oral estradiol in preference to transdermal administration (62/108, 57.4%). A total of 26/128 (20.3%) prescribed oral micronised progesterone, 31/128 (24.2%) oral progestogens, while 42/128 (32.8%) preferred the intra-uterine system. Fertility concerns remain an important aspect of care, with 33.9% (n = 39/115) of clinicians indicating that more than 50% of their patients had a concern regarding their fertility.
Conclusion
The majority of clinicians indicated a preference for hormone replacement therapy instead of the COC as their choice of hormone replacement in women with premature ovarian insufficiency. However, there was a significant variation in practices. This information can be useful in counselling women and in guiding clinical practitioners. The results highlight the need for further research to determine the optimal regimens for the management of women with premature ovarian insufficiency.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.