Corrigendum

Abstract

Nicholas T Davis (2018) Perceptions of elites and (asymmetric) sorting. Research & Politics 5(2): 1–8. DOI: 10.1177/2053168018777099

The author regrets to inform that an error was noticed in the third heading of Table 2 and also the significant p values were missing in the legend of Table 2. In this article, the third heading of Table 2 should have been labelled as "Out-group dissimilarity 1996" and the significant values are *p<0.05, **p<0.01. The corrected table is provided below:

Table 2.

Cross-lagged panel models of sorting and out-group dissimilarity.

	Sorting 1996		Sorting 1996		Out-group dissimilarity 1996
Sorting 1992	0.42**	(0.06)	0.39**	(0.06)	0.10**	(0.03)
Pid3	—–	—–	0.32**	(0.09)	—–	—–
Out-group dissimilarity 1992	0.01	(0.01)	0.12**	(0.02)	0.34**	(0.07)
Sorting 1992 x 3 category PID	—–	—–	–0.01	(0.10)	—–	—–
In-group similarity 1992	0.00	(0.01)	–0.01	(0.01)	–0.01	(0.00)
Knowledge	0.14*	(0.07)	0.13**	(0.06)	0.07	(0.06)
White	0.01	(0.05)	0.05	(0.05)	0.03	(0.02)
Black	0.00	(0.04)	0.00	(0.03)	0.03	(0.02)
Female	–0.03	(0.03)	–0.01	(0.03)	0.01	(0.02)
Education	0.02	(0.01)	0.02	(0.01)	0.01	(0.00)
Constant	0.08	(0.07)	0.04	(0.08)	0.22**	(0.06)
N	435		435		419
R 2	0.29		0.29		0.30

Notes: Values rescaled to range from 0 to 1. Standard errors in parentheses. *p<0.05, **p<0.01.

Source: 1992-1996 ANES Panel Study.