Nature documentaries often present contradictory images of, on the one hand, a fragile nature that is threatened or already destroyed by humans and, on the other hand, a resilient nature that indifferently survives the human species. Similar ambivalences characterize the public discourse on “nature” in the Anthropocene. From the perspective of cultural and media studies, this essay attempts to disentangle the incoherencies in popular imaginaries of nature by exploring the challenges of narrating and picturing the two opposite qualities of vulnerability and resilience. Tracing the conceptual evolution of documentaries presented by David Attenborough between 1979 and 2020 and their gradual increase in environmentalist rhetoric, I show how different visual motifs undergo a recoding (resilient/fragile) and relate it to paradigm shifts in ecology, earth system science, and environmental protection principles. With an interest in the historical development of multimedia discourses on resilience and vulnerability, I focus on the relationship between visual and verbal representation as well as on the interplay of semantic and aesthetic aspects, while reflecting on whether the observed ambivalences are intentional and how they might influence the perception of the documentaries. This essay is a contribution to Transmedia Ecocriticism and thus situates itself in the Environmental Humanities.
AttenboroughD (1984) The Living Planet. A Portrait of the Earth. London: Guild Publishing.
2.
AttenboroughDHughesJ (2020) A Life on Our Planet. My Mission Statement. London: Penguin Random House UK.
3.
BotkinD (1990) Discordant Harmonies. A New Ecology for the 21st Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4.
BouséD (2000) Wildlife Films. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
5.
ChakrabartyD (2015) The Human Condition in the Anthropocene. Yale University: The Tanner Lectures in Human Values.
6.
ChapmanDACornerAWebsterR, et al. (2016) Climate visuals: A mixed methods investigation of public perceptions of climate images in three countries. Global Environmental Change41: 172–182.
7.
ClelandEE (2011) Biodiversity and ecosystem stability. Nature Education Knowledge3(10): 14.
8.
CommonerB (1971) The Closing Circle. Nature, Man, and Technology. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
9.
CosgroveD (1994) Contested Global Visions: One-world, whole-earth, and the apollo space photographs. Annals of the Association of American Geographers84(2): 270–294.
10.
CosgroveD (2001) Apollo’s Eye: A Cartographic Genealogy of the Earth in the Western Imagination. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
11.
CrononW (1996) The Trouble with Wilderness; or, Getting Back to the Wrong Nature. In: CrononW (ed.) Uncommon Ground. Rethinking the Human Place in Nature. New York: Norton, pp. 69–90.
12.
CrutzenPJStoermerEF (2000) The “Anthropocene”. IGBP Global Change Newsletter41: 17–18.
13.
DingwallRAldridgeM (2006) Television wildlife programming as a source of popular scientific information: A case study of evolution. Public Understanding of Science15(2): 131–152.
14.
DürbeckG (2018) Narrative des Anthropozän – Systematisierung eines interdisziplinären Diskurses. Kulturwissenschaftliche Zeitschrift3(1): 1–20.
15.
DuvallJA (2017) The Environmental Documentary, Cinema Activism in the Twenty-First Century. New York: Bloomsbury.
16.
EllisECGoldewijkKKSiebertS, et al. (2010) Anthropogenic transformation of the biomes, 1700 to 2000. Global Ecology and Biogeography19: 589–606.
17.
EngelhardM (2017) Ice Bear: The Cultural History of an Arctic Icon. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
18.
Fernández-BellonDKaneA (2020) Natural history films raise species awareness—A big data approach. Conservation Letters13(1): e12678–e12679.
19.
FothergillA (2006) Planet Earth: As You’ve Never Seen It Before. Foreword by David Attenborough. Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press.
20.
FothergillAScholeyKPearceF (2019) Our Planet: The Official Companion to the Ground-Breaking Netflix Original With a Special Foreword by David Attenborough. London: Transworld Digital.
21.
GouyonJB (2016) ‘You can’t make a film about mice just by going out into a meadow and looking at mice’: Staging as knowledge production in natural history film-making. In: WillisM (ed.) Staging Science: Scientific Performances on Street, Stage, and Screen. London: Palgrave Pivot, pp.83–103.
22.
GouyonJB (2019) BBC Wildlife Documentaries in the Age of Attenborough. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
23.
GrevsmühlSV (2014) La Terre vue d’en haut: L’invention de l’environnement global. Paris: Seuil.
24.
HarawayDJ (2003) The Companion Species Manifesto: Dogs, People, and Significant Otherness. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press.
25.
HeiseUK (2008) Sense of Place and Sense of Planet: The Environmental Imagination of the Global. New York: Oxford University Press.
26.
HilderbrandL (2020) On nature programming, the Anthropocene, and the humanitarian impulse in documentary. The Cambridge Journal of Postcolonial Literary Inquiry7(2): 210–215.
27.
HornEBergthallerH (2019) The Anthropocene. Key Issues for the Humanities. London/New York: Routledge.
28.
HughesH (2014) Green Documentary. Environmental Documentary in the Twenty-First Century. Bristol: Intellect.
29.
IngensiepHW (2020) Was ist Natur? Philosophische Reflexionen über Naturkonzepte und deren Bausteine in Umweltdokumentarfilmen. In: KaulSLangeS (eds) Politische Ziele und ästhetische Strategien von Umweltdokumentarfilmen. Eine interdisziplinäre Annäherung (Thünen Report 70). Braunschweig: Thünen-Institut, pp.31–35.
30.
IngoldT (1993) Globes and spheres: The topology of environmentalism. In: MiltonK (ed.) Environmentalism: The View From Anthropology. London: Routledge, pp.31–42.
31.
JasanoffS (2001) Image and imagination: The formation of Global Environmental Consciousness. In: MillerCAEdwardsPN (eds) Changing the Atmosphere: Expert Knowledge and Environmental Governance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp.309–337.
32.
JohnsD (2019) History of rewilding: Ideas and practice. In: PettorelliNDurantSMDu ToitJT (eds) Rewilding. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press, pp.12–33.
33.
JonasH (2015) Das Prinzip Verantwortung. Versuch einer Ethik für die technologische Zivilisation. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
34.
JonesJPGThomas-WaltersLRustNA, et al. (2019) Nature documentaries and saving nature: Reflections on the new Netflix series Our Planet. People and Nature1: 420–425.
35.
LatourB (1991) Nous n‘avons jamais été modernes. Essai d’anthropologie symétrique. Paris: La Découverte.
36.
LekanTM (2014) Fractal Eaarth: Visualizing the Global Environment in the Anthropocene. Environmental Humanities5(1): 171–201.
37.
LovelockJ (2009) The Vanishing Face of Gaia: A Final Warning: Enjoy It While You Can. London: Allen Lane.
ManzoK (2010) Imaging vulnerability: The iconography of climate change. Area42(1): 96–107.
40.
MayRM (2001) Stability and Complexity in Model Ecosystems. With a New Introduction by the Author. Princeton, Oxford: Princeton University Press.
41.
McCannKS (2000) The diversity-stability debate. Nature405: 228–233.
42.
McKibbenB (2010) Eaarth: Making a Life on a Tough New Planet. New York: Henry Holt and Company.
43.
MillsB (2015) Towards a theory of documentary representation for animals. Screen56(1): 102–107.
44.
MinsterM (2010) The rhetoric of ascent in an inconvenient truth and everything’s cool. In: Willoquet-MaricondiP (ed.) Framing the World. Explorations in Ecocriticism and Film. Charlottesville: University of Virginia, pp.25–42.
45.
MitmanG (2009) Reel Nature. America’s Romance With Wildlife on Film. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
46.
MolloyC (2013) Nature writes the screenplays: Commercial wildlife films and ecological entertainment. In: RustSMonaniSCubittS (eds) Ecocinema Theory and Practice New York. London: Routledge, pp.169–188.
47.
NardoD (2014) The Blue Marble. How a Photograph Revealed Earth’s Fragile Beauty. North Mankato, MN: Capstone.
48.
NYDF Assessment Partners (2019) Protecting and Restoring Forests: A Story of Large Commitments Yet Limited Progress. New York Declaration on Forests Five-Year Assessment Report. New York, USA. Available at: https://forestdeclaration.org.
49.
PotthastT (2004) Die wahre Natur ist Veränderung. Zur Ikonoklastik des ökologischen Gleichgewichts. In: FischerL (ed.) Projektionsfläche Natur. Zum Zusammenhang von Naturbildern und gesellschaftlichen Verhältnissen. Hamburg: Hamburg University Press, pp.193–221.
50.
RamadeB (2016) From Nature to the Anthropocene: The mutations of environmental photography. In: Ramade B (ed.) The Edge of the Earth: Climate Change in Photography and Video. London: Black Dog Publishing, pp.10–25.
51.
RichardsM (2013a) Greening wildlife documentary. In: LesterLHutchinsB (eds) Environmental Conflict and the Media. New York: Peter Lang, pp.171–186.
52.
RichardsM (2013b) Global nature, global brand: BBC Earth and David Attenborough’s landmark wildlife series. Media International Australia incorporating Culture and Policy146(1): 143–154.
53.
RockströmJSteffenWNooneK, et al. (2009) Planetary boundaries: Exploring the safe operating space for humanity. Ecology and Society14(2): 32.
54.
SchneiderMVogtM (2017) Responsible resilience: Rekonstruktion der Normativität von Resilienz auf Basis einer responsiven Ethik. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society26(1): 174–181.
55.
SerresM (1990) Le Contrat naturel. Paris: Editions F. Bourin.
56.
SerresM (1994) Der Naturvertrag. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
57.
SimberloffD (2014) The “Balance of Nature”—Evolution of a Panchreston. PLoS Biology12(10): e1001963–e1001964.
58.
ThomasJAWilliamsMZalasiewiczJ (2020) The Anthropocene. A Multidisciplinary Approach. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
59.
VardyMSmithM (2017). Resilience. In: Living Lexicon for the Environmental Humanities.pp. 175–179.
60.
Weik von MossnerA (2014) Emotions of consequence? Viewing eco-documentaries from a cognitive perspective. In: Weik von MossnerA. (ed.) Moving Environments. Affect, Emotion, Ecology, and Film. Waterloo, Ontario: Wilfrid Laurier University Press, pp.41–60.
