A state-centric, militaristic, and capitalist-driven model of the liberal world appears incompatible with the measures required for addressing the global environmental threats in the proposed new geological epoch called the Anthropocene. While there have been discussions suggesting or implying the rejection or radical disruption of existing sets of institutional arrangements in global politics, I propose the possibility of locating effective responses to the Anthropocene challenges within the existing order, albeit a reformed or revised one. This paper presents ways of transforming the liberal international order, without abandoning some of its core values and institutions, through a greater emphasis on human security, global disarmament, and alternative economic models. The convergence of the liberal pursuit of peace and the global pursuit of survival is possible in the Anthropocene.
AklinM (2018) How robust is the renewable energy industry to political shocks? Evidence from the 2016 U.S. elections. Business and Politics20(4): 523–552.
2.
Arias-MaldonadoM (2016) The anthropocenic turn: Theorizing sustainability in a postnatural age. Sustainability8(1): 10.
3.
AverreDDaviesL (2015) Russia, humanitarian intervention and the responsibility to protect: The case of Syria. International Affairs91(4): 813–834.
4.
AyoobM (2004) Third world perspectives on humanitarian intervention in an imperfect world. Global Governance10(1): 99–118.
5.
BarryJEckersleyR (2005) W(h)ither the green state? In: BarryJEckersleyR (eds.) The State and the Global Ecological Crisis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp.255–272.
6.
BernsteinSHoffmannM (2018) The politics of decarbonization and the catalytic impact of subnational climate experiments. Policy Sciences51(2): 189–211.
7.
BerryT (1999) The Great Work: Our Way into the Future. New York, NY: Harmony/Bell Tower.
8.
BieberF (2018) Is nationalism on the rise? Assessing global trends. Ethnopolitics17(5): 519–540.
9.
BiermannFAbbottKAndresenS, et al. (2012) Navigating the anthropocene: Improving earth system governance. Science335(604): 1306–1307.
10.
BurkeAFishelAMitchellA, et al. (2016) Planet politics: A manifesto from the end of IR. Millennium: Journal of International Studies44(3): 499–523.
11.
ChandlerD (2017) Securing the anthropocene? International policy experiments in digital hacktivism: A case study of Jakarta. Security Dialogue48(2): 113–130.
12.
ChandlerDCudworthEHobdenS (2018) Anthropocene, capitalocene and liberal cosmopolitan IR: A response to Burke et al.’s ‘planet politics’. Millennium: Journal of International Studies46(2): 190–208.
13.
ClarkN (2014) Geo-politics and the disaster of the Anthropocene. The Sociological Review62(1): 19–37.
14.
ConcaK (2015) An Unfinished Foundation: The United Nations and Global Environmental Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
15.
CookBRRickardsLARutherfordI (2015) Geographies of the Anthropocene. Geographical Research53(3): 231–243.
16.
CooperN (2007) On the crisis of liberal peace. Conflict, Security & Development7(4): 605–616.
17.
CrutzenPJStoermerEF (2000) The Anthropocene. International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme Newsletter41(2000), 17–18.
18.
DalbyS (2009) Peacebuilding and environmental security in the Anthropocene. In: PéclardD (ed.) Environmental Peacebuilding: Managing Natural Resource Conflicts in a Changing World. Bern, Switzerland: Swisspeace.
19.
DalbyS (2013) Peace in the Anthropocene. Peace Review25(4): 561–567.
20.
DayACausJ (2020) Conflict Prevention in an Era of Climate Change: Adapting the UN to Climate-Security Risks. Tokyo, Japan: United Nations University.
21.
DoyleMW (1983) Kant, liberal legacies, and foreign affairs. Philosophy & Public Affairs12(3): 205–235.
22.
DoyleMW (1986) Liberalism and world politics. The American Political Science Review80(4): 1151–1169.
23.
DoyleMWSambanisN (2006) Making War and Building Peace: United Nations Peace Operations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
24.
DryzekJSPickeringJ (2019) The Politics of the Anthropocene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
25.
DunneTMcDonaldM (2013) The politics of liberal internationalism. International Politics50(1): 1–17.
26.
FishelSBurkeAMitchellA, et al. (2018) Defending planet politics. Millennium: Journal of International Studies46(2): 209–219.
27.
FortnaVP (2008) Does Peacekeeping Work?Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
28.
FosterJB (2011) Capitalism and degrowth: an impossibility theorem. Monthly Review62(8): 26–33.
29.
GaltungJ (1967) Theories of Peace: A Synthetic Approach to Peace Thinking. Oslo, Norway: International Peace Research Institute.
30.
GaltungJ (1969) Violence, peace, and peace research. Journal of Peace Research6(3): 167–191.
31.
GlanvilleL (2013) Sovereignty and the Responsibility to Protect. London: Oxford University Press.
32.
GroveJV (2018) The geopolitics of extinction: From the Anthropocene to the Eurocene. In: McCarthyDR (ed.) Technology and World Politics: An Introduction. Oxon and New York, NY: Routledge, pp.204–223.
HawkenPLovinsALovinsLH (1999) Natural Capitalism: The Next Industrial Revolution. London: Earthscan.
35.
HehirA (2013) Humanitarian Intervention: An Introduction, 2nd edition.London: Palgrave Macmillan.
36.
HeoUTanAC (2001) Democracy and economic growth: a causal analysis. Comparative Politics33(4): 463–473.
37.
HeyE (2018) The universal declaration of human rights in ‘the Anthropocene’. American Journal of International Law112: 350–354.
38.
HolstenkampL (2019) What do we know about cooperative sustainable electrification in the global South? A synthesis of the literature and refined social-ecological systems framework. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews109: 307–320.
IkenberryGJ (2018) The end of liberal international order. International Affairs94(1): 7–23.
41.
IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) (2018) Global warming of 1.5°C: An IPCC special report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty. October. Available at: https://www.ipcc.ch/sr15/.
42.
JorgensonAKClarkBKentorJ (2010) Militarization and the environment: A panel study of carbon dioxide emissions and the ecological footprints of nations, 1970-2000. Global Environmental Politics10(1): 7–29.
43.
KapfererB (2004) Introduction: Old permutations, new formations? War, state, and global transgression. In: KapfererB (ed.) State, Sovereignty, War: Civil Violence in Emerging Global Realities. New York, NY: Berghahn Books, pp.1–15.
44.
KarekeziS (2002) Renewables in Africa—Meeting the energy needs of the poor. Energy Policy30(11): 1059–1069.
45.
KeohaneRONyeJS (2001) Power and Interdependence. New York: Longman.
46.
KirchherrJReikeDHekkertM. (2017) Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions. Resources, Conservation and Recycling127: 221–232.
47.
KorhonenJHonkasaloASeppäläJ (2018) Circular economy: The concept and its limitations. Ecological Economics143: 37–46.
48.
KotzéLJ (2014) Human rights and the environment in the Anthropocene. The Anthropocene Review1(3): 252–275.
49.
KrakoffS (2011) Parenting the planet. In: ArnoldDG (ed.) The Ethics of Global Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.145–169.
50.
KrampeFScassaRMitrottaG. (2018). Responses to climate-related security risks: Regional organizations in Asia and Africa. Report, SIPRI. August.
51.
LawrenceMJStembergerHLJZolderdoAJ, et al. (2015) The effects of modern war and military activities on biodiversity and the environment. Environmental Reviews23(4): 443–460.
52.
LayneC (1994) Kant or Cant: The myth of the democratic peace. International Security19(2): 5–49.
53.
LewisSLMaslinMA (2015) Defining the Anthropocene. Nature519(7542): 171–180.
54.
LovelockJEMargulisL (1973) Atmospheric homeostasis by and for the biosphere: the Gaia Hypothesis. Tellus26(1–2): 1–2, 2–10.
55.
MalikALanJ (2016) The role of outsourcing in driving global carbon emissions. Economic Systems Research28(2): 168–182
56.
MalmAHornbogA (2014) The geology of mankind? A critique of the anthropocene narrative. The Anthropocene Review1(1): 62–69.
57.
MansfieldEDSnyderJ (1995) Democratization and the danger of war. International Security20(1): 5–38.
58.
MatthewR (2014) Integrating climate change into peacebuilding. Climatic Change123(1): 83–93.
59.
McDonaldM (2018) Climate change and security: Towards ecological security?International Theory10(2): 153–180.
60.
MillarNMcLaughlinEBörgerT (2019) The circular economy: Swings and roundabouts?Ecological Economics158: 11–19.
61.
MitchellA (2017) Is IR going extinct?European Journal of International Relations23(1): 3–25.
62.
MooreJW (2003) Capitalism as world-ecology. Braudel and Marx on environmental history. Organization Environment16(4): 431–458.
63.
MooreJW (2016) Anthropocene or Capitalocene? Nature, History, and the Crisis of Capitalism. Oakland, CA: PM Press.
64.
MooreJW (2017) Anthropocenes & the capitalocene alternative. Azimuth2017(9): 71–79.
65.
NaessA (1973) The shallow and the deep, long-range ecology movement. A summary. Inquiry16(1–4): 95–100.
NoonanJ (2020) Trump and the liberal international order. International Critical Thought10(2): 182–199.
68.
OgdenLHeynenNOslenderU, et al. (2013) Global assemblages, resilience, and Earth stewardship in the Anthropocene. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment11: 341–347.
69.
O’HaganJ (2013) ‘With the best will in the world. . .’? Humanitarianism, non-state actors and the pursuit of ‘purposes beyond ourselves’. International Politics50(1): 118–137.
70.
ÖzerdemA (2010) The ‘responsibility to protect’ in natural disasters: another excuse for interventionism? Nargis Cyclone, Myanmar. Conflict, Security & Development10(5): 693–713.
71.
ParisR (1997) Peacebuilding and the limits of liberal internationalism. International Security22(2): 54–89.
72.
Prieto-SandovalVJacaCOrmazabalM (2018) Towards a consensus on the circular economy. Journal of Cleaner Production179: 605–615.
73.
RantaVAarikka-StenroosLRitalaP, et al. (2018) Exploring institutional drivers and barriers of the circular economy: A cross-regional comparison of China, the US, and Europe. Resources, Conservation and Recycling135: 70–82.
74.
RaworthK (2017) Why it’s time for doughnut economics. Progressive Review24(3): 216–222.
75.
RichmondOPFranksJ (2009) Liberal Peace Transitions: Between Statebuilding and Peacebuilding. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
76.
SauvéSBernardSSloanP (2016) Environmental sciences, sustainable development and circular economy: Alternative concepts for trans-disciplinary research. Environmental Development17: 48–56.
77.
SaviniF (2019) The economy that runs on waste: Accumulation in the circular city. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning21(6): 675–691.
78.
SchellnhuberHJ (1999) ‘Earth System’ analysis and the second Copernican Revolution. Nature402: C19–C23.
79.
SewellWHJr (2014) The capitalist epoch. Social Science History38(1–2): 1–11.
80.
SimanganD (2019a) International Peacebuilding and Local Involvement: A Liberal Renaissance?Oxon and New York, NY: Routledge.
81.
SimanganD (2019b) Situating the Asia Pacific in the age of the Anthropocene. Australian Journal of International Affairs73(6): 564–584.
82.
SimanganD (2020) Where is the Anthropocene? IR in a new geological epoch. International Affairs96(1): 211–224.
83.
SIPRI (Stockholm International Peace Research Institute) (2020) Global military expenditure sees large annual increase in a decade—says SIPRI—reaching $1917 billion in 2019. SIPRI, 27April.
84.
StahelWR (2006) The Performance Economy, 2nd edition.New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
85.
SteffenWCrutzenPJMcNeillJR (2007) The Anthropocene: Are humans now overwhelming the great forces of nature. Ambio36: 614–621.
86.
SwillingMAnneckeE (2012) Just Transitions: Explorations of Sustainability in an Unfair World. Tokyo, Japan: United Nations University Press.
VincentRJ (1974) Nonintervention and International Order. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
91.
WatersCNZalasiewiczJSummerhayesC, et al. (2016) The Anthropocene is functionally and atratigraphically distinct from the Holocene. Science351(6269): 137–148.
92.
ZalasiewiczJWatersCNWilliamsM, et al. (2015) When did the Anthropocene begin? A mid-twentieth century boundary level is stratigraphically optimal. Quaternary International383: 196–203.
93.
ZinkTGeyerR (2017) Circular economy rebound. Journal of Industrial Ecology21(3): 593–602.
