Ecological economics recognizes economic activity as a biophysical process mediated by social systems and ultimately subject to the constraints of a finite earth system. The Anthropocene discourse appears as validation of the central concerns of ecological economics yet throws into relief its limits as a normative transdiscipline oriented toward social transformation. We review ecological economics in light of two overarching challenges: first, negotiating between biophysical reality and plural constructed social realities, so as to create legitimate grounds for a sustainability transition; second, accounting for multi-level, multi-scale social and political action, which demands a means for arbitrating among competing normative propositions. We argue that attempts to address these challenges within ecological economics have been inconsistent and relatively scarce, reflecting an unresolved tension regarding modern and postmodern social theory. We demonstrate that a critically modern ecological economics could draw on aligned social movements and build on deliberative theory as a foundation for social and political change fit for navigating the Anthropocene.
Asafu-AdjayeJBlomqvistLBrandSet al. (2015) An ecomodernist manifesto. Available at: www.ecomodernism.org (accessed 5 August 2019).
2.
AyresRvan den BerghJGowdyJ (2001) Strong versus weak sustainability. Environmental Ethics23(2): 155–168.
3.
BaberWFBartlettRV (2005) Deliberative Environmental Politics. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
4.
BaberWFBartlettRV (2015) Consensus and Global Environmental Governance. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
5.
BarbierEB (2010) A Global Green New Deal: Rethinking the Economic Recovery. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6.
BarryJ (2016) Green political economy: Beyond orthodox undifferentiated economic growth as a permanent feature of the economy. In: GabrielsonTHallCMeyerJMet al (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Environmental Political Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
7.
BeckU (1992) Risk Society: Toward a New Modernity. London: SAGE.
8.
BeckUGrandeE (2010) Varieties of second modernity: The cosmopolitan turn in social and political theory and research. The British Journal of Sociology61(3): 409–443.
9.
BiermannFAbbottKAndresenSet al. (2012) Navigating the Anthropocene: Improving earth system governance. Science335(6074): 1306–1307.
10.
BonneuilCFressozJ-B (2015) The Shock of the Anthropocene: The Earth, History and Us. London: Verso Books.
11.
BrownPG (2007) The Commonwealth of Life: Economics for a Flourishing Earth. Montreal, QC, Canada: Black Rose Books.
12.
BrownPGEricksonJD (2016) How higher education imperils the future: An urgent call for action. Balance2: 42–48.
13.
CallinicosA (2007) Social Theory: A Historical Introduction. Cambridge: Polity Press.
14.
CarolusJFHanleyNOlsenSBet al. (2018) A bottom-up approach to environmental cost-benefit analysis. Ecological Economics152: 282–295.
15.
CashDWAdgerWNBerkesFet al. (2006) Scale and cross-scale dynamics: Governance and information in a multilevel world. Ecology and Society11(2): 8.
16.
ChristensenPP (1989) Historical roots for ecological economics: Biophysical versus allocative approaches. Ecological Economics1(1): 17–36.
17.
CostanzaR (1992) Ecological Economics: The Science and Management of Sustainability. New York: Columbia University Press.
18.
CoxCR (2015) Faulty presuppositions and false dichotomies: The problematic nature of “the Anthropocene.”Telos172: 59–81.
19.
CrutzenPJ (2002) Geology of mankind. Nature415: 23.
20.
DalyH (1974) The economics of the steady state. American Economic Review64(2): 15–21.
21.
DalyHCobbJB (1989) For the Common Good: Redirecting the Economy Toward Community, the Environment, and a Sustainable Future. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
22.
DalyHE (1980) Economics, Ecology, Ethics: Essays toward a Steady-State Economy. San Francisco, CA: W.H. Freeman.
23.
DalyHE (1992) Allocation, distribution, and scale: Towards an economics that is efficient, just, and sustainable. Ecological Economics6(3): 185–193.
24.
DalyHEFarleyJ (2010) Ecological Economics: Principles and Applications. 2nd edition.Washington, DC: Island Press.
25.
DeriuM (2012) Democracies with a future: Degrowth and the democratic tradition. Futures44(6): 553–561.
26.
DirzoRYoungHSGalettiMet al. (2014) Defaunation in the Anthropocene. Science345(6195): 401–406.
27.
DryzekJS (2002) Deliberative Democracy and Beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
28.
EasterlinRA (2001) Income and happiness: Towards a unified theory. The Economic Journal111(473): 465–484.
29.
EllisE (2011) The planet of no return: Human resilience on an artificial Earth. Breakthrough Journal2: 39–44.
30.
EscobarA (2004) Beyond the third world: Imperial globality, global coloniality, and anti-globalization social movements. Third World Quarterly25(1): 207–230.
31.
EscobarA (2005) Economics and the space of modernity: Tales of market, production and labour. Cultural Studies19(2): 139–175.
32.
FarleyJ (2012) Ecosystem services: The economics debate. Ecosystem Services1(1): 40–49.
33.
FourcadeMOllionEAlganY (2015) The superiority of economists. Journal of Economic Perspectives29(1): 89–114.
34.
FuntowiczSORavetzJR (1994) The worth of a songbird: Ecological economics as a post-normal science. Ecological Economics10(3): 197–207.
GibsonCOstromEAhnTK (2000) The concept of scale and the human dimensions of global change. Ecological Economics32(2): 217–239.
37.
GowdyJEricksonJD (2005) The approach of ecological economics. Cambridge Journal of Economics29(2): 207–222.
38.
HabermasJ (1987) The Theory of Communicative Action, Volume 2: Lifeworld and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
39.
HabermasJ (1990) The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity: Twelve Lectures. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
40.
HallCLindenbergerDKümmelRet al. (2001) The need to reintegrate the natural sciences with economics. Bioscience51(8): 663–673.
41.
HamiltonCBonneuilCGemenneF (eds) (2015) The Anthropocene and the Global Environmental Crisis: Rethinking Modernity in a New Epoch. Abingdon: Routledge.
42.
HorkheimerMAdornoTW (2002) Dialectic of Enlightenment. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
43.
JacksonT (2017) Prosperity without Growth. 2nd edition.Abingdon: Routledge.
44.
KahanD (2010) Fixing the communications failure. Nature463(7279): 296–297.
45.
KallisG (2018) Degrowth. Newcastle upon Tyne: Agenda Publishing.
46.
KlinskySDowlatabadiH (2009) Conceptualizations of justice in climate policy. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science6(11): 112028.
47.
LiuJHullVBatistellaMet al. (2013) Framing sustainability in a telecoupled world. Ecology and Society2(26): 26.
48.
LiuJMooneyHHullVet al. (2015) Systems integration for global sustainability. Science347(6225): 1258832.
49.
LoAYSpashCL (2013) Deliberative monetary valuation: In search of a democratic and value plural approach to environmental policy. Journal of Economic Surveys27(4): 768–789.
50.
LyotardJ-F (1984) The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
51.
MalmAHornborgA (2014) The geology of mankind? A critique of the Anthropocene narrative. The Anthropocene Review1(1): 62–69.
52.
Martinez-AlierJMundaGO’NeillJ (1998) Weak comparability of values as a foundation for ecological economics. Ecological Economics26(3): 277–286.
53.
Max-NeefM (1995) Economic growth and quality of life: A threshold hypothesis. Ecological Economics15(2): 115–118.
54.
Max-NeefM (2005) Foundations of transdisciplinarity. Ecological Economics53(1): 5–16.
55.
M’GonigleRM (1999) Ecological economics and political ecology: Towards a necessary synthesis. Ecological Economics28(1): 11–26.
56.
MignoloWD (2007) Delinking: The rhetoric of modernity, the logic of coloniality and the grammar of de-coloniality. Cultural Studies21(2–3): 449–514.
57.
MilonakisDFineB (2009) From Political Economy to Economics: Method, the Social, and the Historical in the Evolution of Economic Theory. New York: Routledge.
58.
MooreJW (ed.) (2016) Anthropocene or Capitalocene? Nature, History, and the Crisis of Capitalism. Oakland, CA: PM Press.
59.
MundaG (2008) Social Multi-Criteria Evaluation for a Sustainable Economy. Berlin: Springer.
60.
NorgaardRB (1989) The case for methodological pluralism. Ecological Economics1(1): 37–57.
61.
OphulsW (1997) Requiem for Modern Politics: The Tragedy of the Enlightenment and the Challenge of the New Millennium. Boulder, CO: Routledge.
62.
OttK (2012) Variants of de-growth and deliberative democracy: A Habermasian proposal. Futures44(6): 571–581.
63.
PalssonGSzerszynskiBSörlinSet al. (2013) Reconceptualizing the “Anthropos” in the Anthropocene: Integrating the social sciences and humanities in global environmental change research. Environmental Science and Policy28: 3–13.
64.
PhilipsenD (2015) The Little Big Number: How GDP Came to Rule the World and What to Do about It. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
65.
PirgmaierE (2017) The neoclassical trojan horse of steady-state economics. Ecological Economics133: 52–61.
66.
PolanyiK (2001) The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. 2nd edition.Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
67.
PowerM (2004) Social provisioning as a starting point for feminist economics. Feminist Economics10(3): 3–19.
68.
RøpkeI (2004) The early history of modern ecological economics. Ecological Economics50(3–4): 293–314.
69.
RøpkeI (2005) Trends in the development of ecological economics from the late 1980s to the early 2000s. Ecological Economics55(2): 262–290.
70.
RaworthK (2017) Doughnut Economics: Seven Ways to Think Like a 21st-Century Economist. New York: Random House.
71.
SagoffM (1998) Aggregation and deliberation in valuing environmental public goods: A look beyond contingent pricing. Ecological Economics24(2–3): 213–230.
72.
ShellenbergerMNordhausT (eds) (2011) Love Your Monsters: Postenvironmentalism and the Anthropocene. Oakland, CA: Breakthrough Institute.
73.
SmartB (1990) Modernity, postmodernity, and the present. In: TurnerBS (ed.) Theories of Modernity and Postmodernity. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, pp. 14–30.
74.
SneddonCHowarthRBNorgaardRB (2006) Sustainable development in a post-Brundtland world. Ecological Economics57(2): 253–268.
75.
SöderbaumP (1999) Values, ideology and politics in ecological economics. Ecological Economics28(2): 161–170.
76.
SpashCL (2011) Social ecological economics: Understanding the past to see the future. American Journal of Economics and Sociology70(2): 340–375.
77.
SpashCL (2012) New foundations for ecological economics. Ecological Economics77: 36–47.
78.
SpashCL (2013) The shallow or the deep ecological economics movement?Ecological Economics93: 351–362.
79.
SteffenWRichardsonKRockströmJet al. (2015) Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet. Science347(6223): 1259855.
80.
SteffenWRockströmJRichardsonKet al. (2018) Trajectories of the Earth system in the Anthropocene. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America115(33): 8252–8259.
81.
TurnerKLenzenMWiedmannTet al. (2007) Examining the global environmental impact of regional consumption activities - Part 1: A technical note on combining input-output and ecological footprint analysis. Ecological Economics62(1): 37–44.
82.
Van den BeltM (2004) Mediated Modeling: A System Dynamics Approach to Environmental Consensus Building. Washington, DC: Island Press.
83.
Vargas RoncancioITemperLSterlinJet al. (2019) From the Anthropocene to mutual thriving: An agenda for higher education in the Ecozoic. Sustainability11(12): 3312.
84.
VictorP (2010) Managing without Growth. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
85.
WiedmannTLenzenMTurnerKet al. (2007) Examining the global environmental impact of regional consumption activities - Part 2: Review of input-output models for the assessment of environmental impacts embodied in trade. Ecological Economics61(1): 15–26.
86.
WiedmannTOSchandlHLenzenMet al. (2013) The material footprint of nations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences112(20): 6271–6276.
87.
WironenMBBartlettRVEricksonJD (2019) Deliberation and the promise of a deeply democratic sustainability transition. Sustainability11(4): 1023.
88.
ZalasiewiczJWatersCNSummerhayesCPet al. (2017) The working group on the Anthropocene: Summary of evidence and interim recommendations. Anthropocene19: 55–60.
